Why do cops stop armed people now? Why wouldn't they in a privatized society lol? If you don't, you get fired. You need to support your family somehow.
Advertisement

by ZombieRothbard » Sun May 01, 2011 8:21 am

by Norstal » Sun May 01, 2011 8:23 am
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Wamitoria » Sun May 01, 2011 8:23 am

by Norstal » Sun May 01, 2011 8:26 am
Wamitoria wrote:ZombieRothbard wrote:
Why do cops stop armed people now? Why wouldn't they in a privatized society lol? If you don't, you get fired. You need to support your family somehow.
Unless, you know, they make up a story as to why they ran away.
It isn't hard to assume that private companies wouldn't cut costs by training it's police less and less.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Sociobiology » Sun May 01, 2011 8:27 am

by Wamitoria » Sun May 01, 2011 8:28 am
Norstal wrote:Wamitoria wrote:Unless, you know, they make up a story as to why they ran away.
It isn't hard to assume that private companies wouldn't cut costs by training it's police less and less.
It isn't hard to assume that privatization doesn't work for everything. God, we could solve problems if we just have this in mind.

by ZombieRothbard » Sun May 01, 2011 8:28 am
Wamitoria wrote:ZombieRothbard wrote:
Why do cops stop armed people now? Why wouldn't they in a privatized society lol? If you don't, you get fired. You need to support your family somehow.
Unless, you know, they make up a story as to why they ran away.
It isn't hard to assume that private companies wouldn't cut costs by training it's police less and less.

by Keronians » Sun May 01, 2011 8:28 am
Sociobiology wrote:by what authority would a private police force be able to detain or arrest someone? And what would prevent me from say hiring people to kill off a competitors guards, if I believed my self secure enough to survive the backlash?

by ZombieRothbard » Sun May 01, 2011 8:30 am
Sociobiology wrote:by what authority would a private police force be able to detain or arrest someone? And what would prevent me from say hiring people to kill off a competitors guards, if I believed my self secure enough to survive the backlash?

by Wamitoria » Sun May 01, 2011 8:30 am
ZombieRothbard wrote:Wamitoria wrote:Unless, you know, they make up a story as to why they ran away.
It isn't hard to assume that private companies wouldn't cut costs by training it's police less and less.
So you are a private security officer. You work for Prudential Insurance, and you are assigned to a neighborhood where there are some high value clients. One happens to be a bank, who pays a hefty premium on insurance coverage, with millions upon millions of property insured. A group of bandits storm into the bank, and begin to rob it. You get a call on the radio to stop them. You show up at the scene, and notice the robbers are armed. You cower behind your cruiser, even though you have high powered assault rifles, and you cry like a little bitch. The robbers make off with millions of dollars, the insurance company Prudential only put one untrained pussy on guard to watch millions of dollars worth of property, and now the insurance company must make the bank whole again. You are fired from your job, your family eats lard sandwiches, and the insurance company goes out of business for being so fucking stupid.

by ZombieRothbard » Sun May 01, 2011 8:33 am
Wamitoria wrote:ZombieRothbard wrote:
So you are a private security officer. You work for Prudential Insurance, and you are assigned to a neighborhood where there are some high value clients. One happens to be a bank, who pays a hefty premium on insurance coverage, with millions upon millions of property insured. A group of bandits storm into the bank, and begin to rob it. You get a call on the radio to stop them. You show up at the scene, and notice the robbers are armed. You cower behind your cruiser, even though you have high powered assault rifles, and you cry like a little bitch. The robbers make off with millions of dollars, the insurance company Prudential only put one untrained pussy on guard to watch millions of dollars worth of property, and now the insurance company must make the bank whole again. You are fired from your job, your family eats lard sandwiches, and the insurance company goes out of business for being so fucking stupid.
Your hypothetical dismisses the possibility that PEOPLE LIE.

by The Parkus Empire » Sun May 01, 2011 8:33 am
ZombieRothbard wrote:Why do cops stop armed people now?
Why wouldn't they in a privatized society lol? If you don't, you get fired. You need to support your family somehow.

by Euronion » Sun May 01, 2011 8:34 am
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"

by Kleomentia » Sun May 01, 2011 8:38 am

by ZombieRothbard » Sun May 01, 2011 8:38 am
The Parkus Empire wrote:
For reasons other than shit pay and no respect.
Good luck supporting your family when you're dead.

by Sociobiology » Sun May 01, 2011 8:42 am
ZombieRothbard wrote:Sociobiology wrote:by what authority would a private police force be able to detain or arrest someone? And what would prevent me from say hiring people to kill off a competitors guards, if I believed my self secure enough to survive the backlash?
What authority? The authority that the private law grants you. And what would prevent you from killing your competition? Idk, maybe the fact that it costs money and lives to wage warfare? Why would a private company want to go rogue and burn through all their money fighting a war?

by Greater Constantium » Sun May 01, 2011 8:42 am

by ZombieRothbard » Sun May 01, 2011 8:45 am
Sociobiology wrote:ZombieRothbard wrote:
What authority? The authority that the private law grants you. And what would prevent you from killing your competition? Idk, maybe the fact that it costs money and lives to wage warfare? Why would a private company want to go rogue and burn through all their money fighting a war?
so piracy and pillaging have never been profitable, so the vikings were just f#@#ing around?
want to see how people behave look at history instead of guessing.

by Euronion » Sun May 01, 2011 8:46 am
ZombieRothbard wrote:
What would it matter if he lied about it? The point is, there wouldn't be untrained, unequipped pussies running around guarding millions of dollars worth of property.

Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"

by ZombieRothbard » Sun May 01, 2011 8:47 am

by United Districts of 1 » Sun May 01, 2011 8:47 am

by Terra Agora » Sun May 01, 2011 8:50 am

by Keronians » Sun May 01, 2011 8:51 am

by Sociobiology » Sun May 01, 2011 8:54 am
ZombieRothbard wrote:Sociobiology wrote:
so piracy and pillaging have never been profitable, so the vikings were just f#@#ing around?
want to see how people behave look at history instead of guessing.
Nobody anywhere EVER on this topic has said that piracy isn't profitable. I am starting to rage here, so I will step out to regain my composure before the insults start flying. Pirates don't usually fight other heavily armed bands on pirates. Which is why they go after easy targets, like unarmed merchant ships. So this has absolutely no relation to the discussion whatsoever.

by Sociobiology » Sun May 01, 2011 8:56 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dreria, Eahland, El Lazaro, Eternal Algerstonia, EuroStralia, Nilokeras, Port Caverton, Torisakia, Xi Jinping Thought, Yokashai Israel
Advertisement