Advertisement

by Georgetpwn » Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:06 am

by Kantria » Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:08 am

by Kantria » Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:08 am
Georgetpwn wrote:the only reason why the liberal media swings at him for his beer choice is because they're afraid to actually critize him on his policies, because liberal media belives Obama is God.

by Fartsniffage » Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:28 am
Georgetpwn wrote:the only reason why the liberal media swings at him for his beer choice is because they're afraid to actually critize him on his policies, because liberal media belives Obama is God.

by Pacifisia » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:23 am

by No Names Left Damn It » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:25 am
Pacifisia wrote:When did you last hear of a politician getting angry in public?

by Wanderjar » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:26 am
Hairless Kitten II wrote:Surprise surprise, me, Hairless Kitten created a posting about Obama.
The reason why I wrote it is about the amusing news that some American media is mad because lately Obama drunk a beer with that black professor and that white policeman.
The reason why the media is mad? Well, the beer is 'Belgian'.
If the media is complaining about such things, if this is Obama his worst sin then he's doing pretty well.
After all, what's next? He can't eat no Chinese food anymore? And what about Champagne? French Fries? Spaghetti?
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/07/29 ... 6417.shtml
http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/lager- ... ted-voice/

by Pacifisia » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:26 am
No Names Left Damn It wrote:Pacifisia wrote:When did you last hear of a politician getting angry in public?
The Czech Prime Minister's a bit of a nutcase, he ends up whacking people quite a lot. And then there was John Prescott laying into that protester dick a couple of years ago.

by No Names Left Damn It » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:26 am
Wanderjar wrote:I felt that was a good call on Obama's part, and is the only thing he's done right in his entire presidency.

by No Names Left Damn It » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:27 am
Pacifisia wrote:A serious politician, I mean.

by Wanderjar » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:29 am
No Names Left Damn It wrote:Wanderjar wrote:I felt that was a good call on Obama's part, and is the only thing he's done right in his entire presidency.
Oh come on, he's done a few other good things.

by Nineteen Halves » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:38 am
Wanderjar wrote:No Names Left Damn It wrote:Wanderjar wrote:I felt that was a good call on Obama's part, and is the only thing he's done right in his entire presidency.
Oh come on, he's done a few other good things.
You're right, using an executive order to end torture usage was a good call. Touche. I'm not a fan of his economic policies though. I don't entirely blame him though, gotta blame congress too. Oh and I detest socialised medicare.

by No Names Left Damn It » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:38 am
Wanderjar wrote:Oh and I detest socialised medicare.

by Wanderjar » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:40 am
No Names Left Damn It wrote:Wanderjar wrote:Oh and I detest socialised medicare.
That's one of the few points where I actually agree with Obama. Socialised healthcare is a good thing.

by No Names Left Damn It » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:45 am
Wanderjar wrote:No. It isn't. Socialised anything is never a good thing. Government interference in anything is never a good thing.

by Wanderjar » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:49 am
No Names Left Damn It wrote:Wanderjar wrote:No. It isn't. Socialised anything is never a good thing. Government interference in anything is never a good thing.
Yeah, that's why the NHS has lasted over 60 years and even Margaret Thatcher said she wouldn't change anything about it.

by SaintB » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:50 am
Wanderjar wrote:No Names Left Damn It wrote:Wanderjar wrote:Oh and I detest socialised medicare.
That's one of the few points where I actually agree with Obama. Socialised healthcare is a good thing.
No. It isn't. Socialised anything is never a good thing. Government interference in anything is never a good thing.

by Kantria » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:52 am
Wanderjar wrote:No Names Left Damn It wrote:Wanderjar wrote:Oh and I detest socialised medicare.
That's one of the few points where I actually agree with Obama. Socialised healthcare is a good thing.
No. It isn't. Socialised anything is never a good thing. Government interference in anything is never a good thing.
All except for the Postal Service, and urban water supplies, and sewer removal and treatment, and garbage management, and road repair and construction, and....In short that argument is made of a cup of fail and tablespoon of totally wrong.

by Pedoka » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:53 am

by Sdaeriji » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:53 am
Wanderjar wrote:No Names Left Damn It wrote:Wanderjar wrote:Oh and I detest socialised medicare.
That's one of the few points where I actually agree with Obama. Socialised healthcare is a good thing.
No. It isn't. Socialised anything is never a good thing. Government interference in anything is never a good thing.

by Wanderjar » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:57 am
SaintB wrote:Wanderjar wrote:Wanderjar wrote:Oh and I detest socialised medicare.
No. It isn't. Socialised anything is never a good thing. Government interference in anything is never a good thing.
All except for the Postal Service, and urban water supplies, and sewer removal and treatment, and garbage management, and road repair and construction, and....
In short that argument is made of a cup of fail and tablespoon of totally wrong.

by SaintB » Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:59 am
Wanderjar wrote:SaintB wrote:All except for the Postal Service, and urban water supplies, and sewer removal and treatment, and garbage management, and road repair and construction, and....
In short that argument is made of a cup of fail and tablespoon of totally wrong.
Well actually I'm not in favour of the government controlling any of that. And the postal service is among the most inefficient, most wasteful organizations ever devised.

by Wanderjar » Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:01 am
SaintB wrote:Wanderjar wrote:SaintB wrote:All except for the Postal Service, and urban water supplies, and sewer removal and treatment, and garbage management, and road repair and construction, and....
In short that argument is made of a cup of fail and tablespoon of totally wrong.
Well actually I'm not in favour of the government controlling any of that. And the postal service is among the most inefficient, most wasteful organizations ever devised.
Well than you unlike most are at least ocnsistent.


by Hawaii And Midway » Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:04 am

by Wanderjar » Sun Aug 02, 2009 9:05 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arval Va, Celritannia, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, EuroStralia, Greater Siamese State, Habsburg Mexico, Haganham, Kubra, Lezviya, Majestic-12 [Bot], Necroghastia, Norse Inuit Union, Pizza Friday Forever91, Southland, The Jamesian Republic, The Pirateariat, Vrbo
Advertisement