[Insert soap opera "Nooo...!" scene]
Battlefront III needs to be made, because they will rake in bunches of cash.
Advertisement

by Indeos » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:20 pm

by Old Vester » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:27 pm

by Indeos » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:29 pm

by United Dependencies » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:30 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.

by Old Vester » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:31 pm
Indeos wrote:Old Vester wrote:Duh. And don't forget how epic it will be when we have huge maps with alot more action going on as the newest consoles will be able to handle it all.
PC can handle even bigger, more epic battles. Especially if they decide to ignore most next-gen graphics in favor of lulzy huge numbers and effects on screen.

by United Dependencies » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:32 pm

Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.

by Indeos » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:34 pm

by Northwest Slobovia » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:35 pm

by Greenland and Russia » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:35 pm

by Old Vester » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:37 pm
Indeos wrote:Old Vester wrote:Obviously, but some people want a huge cake and want it to taste good too.
TBH anything beyond decent graphics becomes showing off while adding nothing to gameplay pretty quickly. I'd rather it look like a PS2 game and addict me like the PS2 ones did than look like whatever realistic-looking shooter is popular ATM and lack addiction. Seriously, Battlefront II is the only game I've ever bought twice, and I've owned two copies of both games.

by Ottomark » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:38 pm

by Swkoll » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:40 pm

by Segmentia » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:41 pm
Ottomark wrote:When i had a ps2 the battlefront games were by far my favorite. If they made a 3 ten i would play non-stop.
My vote though would would be for a Warhammer 40,000 rpg or shooter. If any one know anyting about 40k then you know it would be the most violent video game ever! muahahahahahah!

by Indeos » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:41 pm
Old Vester wrote:Indeos wrote:
TBH anything beyond decent graphics becomes showing off while adding nothing to gameplay pretty quickly. I'd rather it look like a PS2 game and addict me like the PS2 ones did than look like whatever realistic-looking shooter is popular ATM and lack addiction. Seriously, Battlefront II is the only game I've ever bought twice, and I've owned two copies of both games.
I'm just saying that some people want a good looking game. I am not one of those people. I had so much fun with Battlefront when I rented and then bought. The only thing that kinda broke the game for me was
1: Retarded AI
2: Removing space ships from ground battles
3:Only a total of 16 players.
If 3 ever came out and 2 was still in there then I could work with it. But if 1 and 3 were still in there then there's no way I getting it.

by Minoriteeburg » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:41 pm
Segmentia wrote:Ottomark wrote:When i had a ps2 the battlefront games were by far my favorite. If they made a 3 ten i would play non-stop.
My vote though would would be for a Warhammer 40,000 rpg or shooter. If any one know anyting about 40k then you know it would be the most violent video game ever! muahahahahahah!
Isnt there a 40K game coming out?

by Unicario » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:42 pm

by Indeos » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:42 pm
Segmentia wrote:Ottomark wrote:When i had a ps2 the battlefront games were by far my favorite. If they made a 3 ten i would play non-stop.
My vote though would would be for a Warhammer 40,000 rpg or shooter. If any one know anyting about 40k then you know it would be the most violent video game ever! muahahahahahah!
Isnt there a 40K game coming out?

by Minoriteeburg » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:43 pm

by Wiztopia » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:43 pm
Old Vester wrote:Indeos wrote:
TBH anything beyond decent graphics becomes showing off while adding nothing to gameplay pretty quickly. I'd rather it look like a PS2 game and addict me like the PS2 ones did than look like whatever realistic-looking shooter is popular ATM and lack addiction. Seriously, Battlefront II is the only game I've ever bought twice, and I've owned two copies of both games.
I'm just saying that some people want a good looking game. I am not one of those people. I had so much fun with Battlefront when I rented and then bought. The only thing that kinda broke the game for me was
1: Retarded AI
2: Removing space ships from ground battles
3:Only a total of 16 players.
If 3 ever came out and 2 was still in there then I could work with it. But if 1 and 3 were still in there then there's no way I getting it.

by Old Vester » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:43 pm
Indeos wrote:Old Vester wrote:I'm just saying that some people want a good looking game. I am not one of those people. I had so much fun with Battlefront when I rented and then bought. The only thing that kinda broke the game for me was
1: Retarded AI
2: Removing space ships from ground battles
3:Only a total of 16 players.
If 3 ever came out and 2 was still in there then I could work with it. But if 1 and 3 were still in there then there's no way I getting it.
1. I'll give you that one, but it was largely map-dependent. Sometimes the AI fighting me was a fucking mastermind, and they destroyed both me and my friend.
2. Kinda tough to balance, and I kinda liked the ground-only battles. But transports would be nice.
3. I think they couldn't support any higher numbers, but that would definitely change.

by Indeos » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:47 pm
Old Vester wrote:Indeos wrote:
1. I'll give you that one, but it was largely map-dependent. Sometimes the AI fighting me was a fucking mastermind, and they destroyed both me and my friend.
2. Kinda tough to balance, and I kinda liked the ground-only battles. But transports would be nice.
3. I think they couldn't support any higher numbers, but that would definitely change.
1: I never got a mastermind AI so pretty much everygame was a complete slaughter for me.
2: Maybe make it so more classes have some sort of defence against ships?
3:Probably will change now that the consoles and PCs nowadays can handle a ton of stuff.

by Idealismania » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:49 pm

by Old Vester » Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:49 pm
Indeos wrote:Old Vester wrote:1: I never got a mastermind AI so pretty much everygame was a complete slaughter for me.
2: Maybe make it so more classes have some sort of defence against ships?
3:Probably will change now that the consoles and PCs nowadays can handle a ton of stuff.
1. Yeah, it's kinda random.
2. Well, the missile troops could -possibly- pull that off, but I don't think you need anything other than transports. Most ships weren't designed to pull double-duty as starfighters and atmo fighters, and the battles generally didn't involve air support. Now, a linked land-space battle system would be awesome.
3. Yep.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Cachard Calia, Cyclopiaru, Emotional Support Crocodile, EuroStralia, Filonian State, Floofybit, Ifreann, Neu California, The Great Nevada Overlord, Violetist Britannia
Advertisement