North Suran wrote:You just have to spin it out for them.
If they don't like what they hear, they had better not get cheeky either!
Advertisement

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:23 am
North Suran wrote:You just have to spin it out for them.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by North Suran » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:25 am
Buffett and Colbert wrote:North Suran wrote:You just have to spin it out for them.
If they don't like what they hear, they had better not get cheeky either!
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:28 am
North Suran wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:North Suran wrote:You just have to spin it out for them.
If they don't like what they hear, they had better not get cheeky either!
Or lippy, too.
Although sugar-coating the facts does take the sting out of it.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Leviticus Isles » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:28 am

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:29 am
Leviticus Isles wrote:People, I'm afraid of interacting with people... I only have a few friends... I am freaked by people...
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by North Suran » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:31 am
Buffett and Colbert wrote:North Suran wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:If they don't like what they hear, they had better not get cheeky either!
Or lippy, too.
Although sugar-coating the facts does take the sting out of it.
I think this whole conversation has turned tongue in cheek now.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas

by Vichy-Corsica » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:31 am

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:33 am
North Suran wrote:We have weaved quite a web.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Saint Clair Island » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:34 am
Khadgar wrote:As for me I have an irrational dislike of looking at people's eyes. When I was a kid I was afraid people would be able to read my thoughts if they looked at my eyes.

by Saint Clair Island » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:37 am
Buffett and Colbert wrote:North Suran wrote:We have weaved quite a web.
(Boo!)
You have used that one already! Time to call... DADDY LONGLEGS!

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:38 am
Saint Clair Island wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:North Suran wrote:We have weaved quite a web.
(Boo!)
You have used that one already! Time to call... DADDY LONGLEGS!
I knew I could count on you guys for wrapping the thread in silly puns.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by North Suran » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:39 am
Buffett and Colbert wrote:North Suran wrote:We have weaved quite a web.
(Boo!)
You have used that one already! Time to call... DADDY LONGLEGS!
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Well if you don't like it, we'll just have to punt you out of the thread.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:40 am
North Suran wrote:Seems a fair punishment.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Cubians » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:43 am

by North Suran » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:44 am
Buffett and Colbert wrote:North Suran wrote:Seems a fair punishment.
It's not punitive?
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:47 am
North Suran wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:North Suran wrote:Seems a fair punishment.
It's not punitive?
I feel that your punctuation was off in that post.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:48 am
Cubians wrote:Bees and public speaking.
I've never actually fainted while presenting anything, but I wouldn't be too surprised if it happened. I stutter and I shake all over.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Mad hatters in jeans » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:49 am
Buffett and Colbert wrote:
Umm... how?
I usually punderstand the basics of spelling...
I'm getting desperate.

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:50 am
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:
Umm... how?
I usually punderstand the basics of spelling...
I'm getting desperate.
always pays to be punctual when attending the punctuation party, but try not to over do it on the punch eh?
(how do you like them puns)
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by North Suran » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:51 am
Buffett and Colbert wrote:North Suran wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:It's not punitive?
I feel that your punctuation was off in that post.
Umm... how?
I usually punderstand the basics of spelling...
I'm getting desperate.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas

by Mad hatters in jeans » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:51 am
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:
Umm... how?
I usually punderstand the basics of spelling...
I'm getting desperate.
always pays to be punctual when attending the punctuation party, but try not to over do it on the punch eh?
(how do you like them puns)
You've got to be joking.


by North Suran » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:51 am
Buffett and Colbert wrote:Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Buffett and Colbert wrote:
Umm... how?
I usually punderstand the basics of spelling...
I'm getting desperate.
always pays to be punctual when attending the punctuation party, but try not to over do it on the punch eh?
(how do you like them puns)
You've got to be joking.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:52 am
North Suran wrote:Ouch.
The desperation was like a punch to the face.
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:53 am
North Suran wrote:It seems we have turned this thread into a punch bag.
Talk about a crushing blow!You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by North Suran » Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:53 am
Buffett and Colbert wrote:North Suran wrote:Ouch.
The desperation was like a punch to the face.
Once again, already used. Tsk. Tsk.
Truth be told, however, I am socking at this.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.
Geniasis wrote:The War on Christmas
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dakran, Elejamie, Fartsniffage, New haven america, Old Tyrannia, The order of the suicidal donkeys, Union Hispanica de Naciones, Valyxias
Advertisement