Irrational fears

[The Romulan Republic]

I don't know about irrational, since I have a very poor sense of balance on the things, but I have a fear of going down escalators (I'm fine with going up them, though).

[Hawaii And Midway]

Yeah thats a bit odd you have a fear one one direction.


I am a firefighter and think nothing of running into a burning building where I can't see two feet in front of my face or being on a four story ladder...but I'm terrified of roller coasters...mostly just the ones that go upside down though, I don't ride any carnival rides that involve going upside down.

[Mathematica Numerica]

So, given that the extent of me, defined by, oh, say, x, is the golden ratio(i^n+1)^6n, then, that ratio between the extent and the partner extent divided by a represented by the axiom vehicle, said by f(x) is the same composition of the partner's defense extent multiplied by an differential member qualifying n as a sequence term would make a ratio of the sum between the golden ratio, thus, giving that it creates a transcendental matrix, determinant becomes a COMPLEX number. Wow. Your statement works. Thanks!

[Mathematica Numerica]

I don't know about irrational, since I have a very poor sense of balance on the things, but I have a fear of going down escalators (I'm fine with going up them, though).

Do you have fear of height, of any sort?

[Buffett and Colbert]

So, given that the extent of me, defined by, oh, say, x, is the golden ratio(i^n+1)^6n, then, that ratio between the extent and the partner extent divided by a represented by the axiom vehicle, said by f(x) is the same composition of the partner's defense extent multiplied by an differential member qualifying n as a sequence term would make a ratio of the sum between the golden ratio, thus, giving that it creates a transcendental matrix, determinant becomes a COMPLEX number. Wow. Your statement works. Thanks!

Does this actually make sense in your mind? Or are you deliberately spouting bullshit just because I wouldn't be able to call you on it?

[Mathematica Numerica]

So, given that the extent of me, defined by, oh, say, x, is the golden ratio(i^n+1)^6n, then, that ratio between the extent and the partner extent divided by a represented by the axiom vehicle, said by f(x) is the same composition of the partner's defense extent multiplied by an differential member qualifying n as a sequence term would make a ratio of the sum between the golden ratio, thus, giving that it creates a transcendental matrix, determinant becomes a COMPLEX number. Wow. Your statement works. Thanks!

Does this actually make sense in your mind? Or are you deliberately spouting bullshit just because I wouldn't be able to call you on it?

Yes, yes it does make sense in my mind. If a number is hyper-complex or transcendental, one cannot produce a radian effect, thus, if the unknown sum qualified as 'n' is between the golden ratio, then, the exponent must be hyper-complex. Proven that it is hyper-complex, the matrix must be transcendental, again. This creates the determinant of several vectors that must be imaginary, otherwise it would divide by zero. But now I need to spend money on contacts, too much money...

[Buffett and Colbert]

Yes, yes it does make sense in my mind. If a number is hyper-complex or transcendental, one cannot produce a radian effect, thus, if the unknown sum qualified as 'n' is between the golden ratio, then, the exponent must be hyper-complex. Proven that it is hyper-complex, the matrix must be transcendental, again. This creates the determinant of several vectors that must be imaginary, otherwise it would divide by zero. But now I need to spend money on contacts, too much money...

I'll take your word for it.

[Mathematica Numerica]

Yes, yes it does make sense in my mind. If a number is hyper-complex or transcendental, one cannot produce a radian effect, thus, if the unknown sum qualified as 'n' is between the golden ratio, then, the exponent must be hyper-complex. Proven that it is hyper-complex, the matrix must be transcendental, again. This creates the determinant of several vectors that must be imaginary, otherwise it would divide by zero. But now I need to spend money on contacts, too much money...

I'll take your word for it.

I'm very sorry. But do you know where I can get cheap, yet effective contacts?

[Buffett and Colbert]

Yes, yes it does make sense in my mind. If a number is hyper-complex or transcendental, one cannot produce a radian effect, thus, if the unknown sum qualified as 'n' is between the golden ratio, then, the exponent must be hyper-complex. Proven that it is hyper-complex, the matrix must be transcendental, again. This creates the determinant of several vectors that must be imaginary, otherwise it would divide by zero. But now I need to spend money on contacts, too much money...

I'll take your word for it.

I'm very sorry. But do you know where I can get cheap, yet effective contacts?

Nope. Search online or pay attention to those contacts commercials.