New thoughts on Sexuality (in humans)

[Blahem]

Um, not exactly. Polygamy can be female-based as well, it just has shown itself as male-based in the past. All polygamy is is one person having multipal spousis.

Please site an example of female based polygamy in history. I will wait for it.

http://www.lemondrop.com/2009/06/24/fem ... jail-time/

This is more modern.

[Roman Cilicia]

At what point do you consider puberty finished? Recent research suggests it continues up into the late teens (18, 19)

God, you're being difficult. Let's just say 16 and leave it at that. If you're mature enough to drive, you're mature enough for sexy tiems.

So a noticeable change happens when a 15.999 year old gains a day? That they're now magically able or mature enough to have sex and drive? :facepalm:

[Conserative Morality]

So a noticeable change happens when a 15.999 year old gains a day? That they're now magically able or mature enough to have sex and drive? :facepalm:

It's known as a 'Blanket law'.

[Takaram]

God, you're being difficult. Let's just say 16 and leave it at that. If you're mature enough to drive, you're mature enough for sexy tiems.

So a noticeable change happens when a 15.999 year old gains a day? That they're now magically able or mature enough to have sex and drive? :facepalm:

Yep. The stars align and you get this awesome epiphany that tells you all these things.

[Meryuma]

As someone who is completely comfortable with his non-heterosexuality, I advise you keep your Orwellian nightmare state far, far from my genitals.

There are so many problems with this: the conflation of violent crimes with harmless sexual desires, the chance of false arrests, the immense amount of taxpayer money needed for such a policy and the complete horror of castrating people for victimless crimes including possibly thoughtcrimes, the millions of victims who would've been leading happy, peaceful lives until this fucking horror of a policy came into place, possibly resulting in mass suicide in the streets.

Hopefully in your "utopia" I can obtain the necessary equipment to shoot the bastards who try to implement this the day they try to get their filthy hands anywhere near me.

Well, you've heard right. Have you also heard that many governments are threatening to cut all trade with Uganda if they pass it?

Seriously? Is homosex really that important to our politicians? lol

Genocide leaves a bad taste in most people's mouth.

[Vyan]

Um, not exactly. Polygamy can be female-based as well, it just has shown itself as male-based in the past. All polygamy is is one person having multipal spousis.

Please site an example of female based polygamy in history. I will wait for it.

Please read this extraction from my post

-...it just has shown itself as male-based in the past...-

I never said it has happened as of yet, simply that it can be done. If Polygamy laws where inacted, woman could go out and marry multipal men just as men could marry multipal woman.

[UCUMAY]

Please site an example of female based polygamy in history. I will wait for it.

The ancient Britons, I believe, as well as Southern Arabia at one point.

http://books.google.com/books?id=HWAbAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA154&lpg=PA154&dq=#v=onepage&q&f=false

Your source even says it's not reliable... I'm not impressed.

[Meryuma]

So a noticeable change happens when a 15.999 year old gains a day? That they're now magically able or mature enough to have sex and drive? :facepalm:

It's known as a 'Blanket law'.

And it forcibly stops voluntary action in the name of protecting some perceived majority against their will. It's also completely arbitrary, with no rational justification.

[Roman Cilicia]

... this fucking horror of a policy came into place, possibly resulting in mass suicide in the streets ...


Genocide leaves a bad taste in most people's mouth.

Yes I'm sure many people would commit suicide to show their solidarity with the gays /sarcasm

And Gays are not a "gens" - a race or род, so your argument is ill-founded.

[UCUMAY]

Please site an example of female based polygamy in history. I will wait for it.

http://www.lemondrop.com/2009/06/24/fem ... jail-time/

This is more modern.

Fair enough... But do we base a behavior on the majority or the minority?

[Conserative Morality]

Your source even says it's not reliable... I'm not impressed.

Go wild.

[Blahem]

... this fucking horror of a policy came into place, possibly resulting in mass suicide in the streets ...


Genocide leaves a bad taste in most people's mouth.

Yes I'm sure many people would commit suicide to show their solidarity with the gays /sarcasm

And Gays are not a "gens" - a race or род, so your argument is ill-founded.

We're not asking people to commit suicide to show solidarity. And gays are a population, duh. Just like African Americans, Jews, Christians, etc. THANK GOD your bigoted, hateful ideas are slowly dying in every new generation. You're part of a dying race, my friend.

[Conserative Morality]

And it forcibly stops voluntary action in the name of protecting some perceived majority against their will. It's also completely arbitrary, with no rational justification.

Actually, there is a rational justification. It's a matter of probability and an inability to reliable measure mental and physical maturity.

[Blahem]

http://www.lemondrop.com/2009/06/24/fem ... jail-time/

This is more modern.

Fair enough... But do we base a behavior on the majority or the minority?

You asked for an example. I provided one.

[UCUMAY]

Fair enough... But do we base a behavior on the majority or the minority?

You asked for an example. I provided one.

You provided a example, but please don't avoid the question.

[Motuka]

Is the OP for real?

The poll options are straight out of an inferior Hammurab knock-off.

lolol I said "straight"

[Blahem]

You asked for an example. I provided one.

You provided a example, but please don't avoid the question.

The majority of people aren't polygamous, so it's a minority for both men and women.

[Meryuma]

... this fucking horror of a policy came into place, possibly resulting in mass suicide in the streets ...


Genocide leaves a bad taste in most people's mouth.

Yes I'm sure many people would commit suicide to show their solidarity with the gays /sarcasm

And Gays are not a "gens" - a race or род, so your argument is ill-founded.

I meant mass suicide by the gays who had their genitals removed by the state for expressing their natural desires.

Also, gays are a distinct population group with their own culture and everything. A people doesn't have to be an ethnicity.

And it forcibly stops voluntary action in the name of protecting some perceived majority against their will. It's also completely arbitrary, with no rational justification.

Actually, there is a rational justification. It's a matter of probability and an inability to reliable measure mental and physical maturity.

1. One can't reliably measure maturity.
2. Therefore, one should measure maturity by age.

Logical contradiction.

Also, why must one be fully mature to consent to sex? IMO if you want to have sex, you're not being forced to have sex, you're not being tricked into having sex, and you know what sex is, you've consented.

[UCUMAY]

You provided a example, but please don't avoid the question.

The majority of people aren't polygamous, so it's a minority for both men and women.

Judge it based on its behavior. Of those who are polygamous the majority is 1 man and multiple wives not the other way around.

[Blahem]

The majority of people aren't polygamous, so it's a minority for both men and women.

Judge it based on its behavior. Of those who are polygamous the majority is 1 man and multiple wives not the other way around.

Proof?

[Sociobiology]

1/6 is not the norm. Don't be silly.

You can say that it's racial deviance to be white, since only 8% of people are white, but of course or superiority shows.

Ever think gays might be superior? After all, the Silver Band kicked ass.

gays do have more children statistically than exclusive heterosexuals.

[Dread Lady Nathicana]

The Nathi is disappoint.

When we see a troll, we do not feed it. We report it. Whereupon the Moderators will deal with it handily. As it stands, the lot of you have done nothing but encourage it and give it face time on the forums, for far, far longer than you should have.

Bad. Naughty.


*whappitywhappitywhapwhapwhap*

Now to go review the other thread wherein someone is accused of trollery. At which point we shall see if this is worth more than a note in file for now.

*whap*