Feminist man-haters

[The_pantless_hero]

Oh bullshit. Something was done wrong in that study to make it have that result. As an anti-feminist that formerly participated heavily in the anti-feminist communities I've see firsthand the anti-feminist and feminist attitudes towards the gender issue, women, and men. The majority of feminists I've came across always had some sort of anti-male bias. Alot of them claimed to have been raped, etc.

Wow, you think that could result in an anti-male bias? I'm awfully surprised.

You bolded the wrong word. See, his point was that they CLAIMED to be raped. In other words, he thinks that they are lying about having been raped because they have an anti-male bias, rather than that any anti-male bias on their part might arise from having been violently assaulted by a man.

As soon as I read that sentence, I know the idiocy would come to here.

He can't know if they were raped. I doubt he asked for the police report or court records. Thus if they say they are raped, it is a claim. Just like people claim OJ killed some people. A criminal court didn't convict him so you can't exactly say OJ killed some people.

[Enadail]

As soon as I read that sentence, I know the idiocy would come to here.

He can't know if they were raped. I doubt he asked for the police report or court records. Thus if they say they are raped, it is a claim. Just like people claim OJ killed some people. A criminal court didn't convict him so you can't exactly say OJ killed some people.

Unless you have supporting evidence... which they never seem to have...

[Poliwanacraca]

As soon as I read that sentence, I know the idiocy would come to here.

He can't know if they were raped. I doubt he asked for the police report or court records. Thus if they say they are raped, it is a claim. Just like people claim OJ killed some people. A criminal court didn't convict him so you can't exactly say OJ killed some people.

Unless you have supporting evidence... which they never seem to have...

Yes, yes, women are all lying bitches who make up stories about having been assaulted because it's just so cool and fun. I know people are always really impressed by the crippling panic attacks that come with my PTSD, and my friends and family just loved how I couldn't even be hugged without getting scared for years. I mean, how could I resist the urge to make up a super-awesome story about getting assaulted when I get incredibly neat results like losing half my friends and not being able to date for years because being touched was too frightening?

[Saint Clair Island]

Yes, yes, women are all lying bitches who make up stories about having been assaulted because it's just so cool and fun. I know people are always really impressed by the crippling panic attacks that come with my PTSD, and my friends and family just loved how I couldn't even be hugged without getting scared for years. I mean, how could I resist the urge to make up a super-awesome story about getting assaulted when I get incredibly neat results like losing half my friends and not being able to date for years because being touched was too frightening?

Bah, you're just claiming you have PTSD to get attention. It doesn't really exist, it's all just in your head! Besides, women who get "raped" should just be glad someone's having sex with them, right?


Right?


Huh. Poli's not answering. I guess I'll just watch that woman setting up a sniper rifle on the roof opposite my apartment until she comes back to reply.

[North Suran]

Huh. Poli's not answering.

She's probably used up her allocated Internet time.

Back in the kitchen now, I presume.

[Mathematica Numerica]

Not surprised.

feminism
(n) : a social theory or political movement supporting the equality of both sexes in all aspects of public and private life; specifically, a theory or movement that argues that legal and social restrictions on females must be removed in order to bring about such equality


So anti-femenists are those who want either women to be treated better than men, or men to be treated better than women. Naturally, a woman who is part of either group is gonna be hostile towards men right? Cuz men are either "inferior" to them, or they are too intimidated by men or don't like being inferior.

Nice. However, there are people who consider themselves radical feminists, and fight against the male race itself. They seem to like equality, as well as dominance. This happens in almost all broad range issues. Difficult to be unanimus, you know.

Thus, stating that the above, and your statement, this would mean anti-feminists are just people who either defend their rights as males (according to the statement above), and/or people who radically oppose female dominance.
Secondary thoughts include that they just want a complete set of 1 race.

However, by anti-feminists, they just defend their REVOLUTIONARY RIGHTS BROUGHT UP by feminists, not female dominance, by said statement.

[Saint Clair Island]

Huh. Poli's not answering.

She's probably used up her allocated Internet time.

Back in the kitchen now, I presume.

Oh good. Well, have someone tell her I want my sandwich cut diagonally.

[Ashmoria]

Nice. However, there are people who consider themselves radical feminists, and fight against the male race itself. They seem to like equality, as well as dominance. This happens in almost all broad range issues. Difficult to be unanimus, you know.

Thus, stating that the above, and your statement, this would mean anti-feminists are just people who either defend their rights as males (according to the statement above), and/or people who radically oppose female dominance.
Secondary thoughts include that they just want a complete set of 1 race.

However, by anti-feminists, they just defend their REVOLUTIONARY RIGHTS BROUGHT UP by feminists, not female dominance, by said statement.

maybe you would like to name some names to back up this notion that there are radical male race hating feminists...

[UnhealthyTruthseeker]

Nice. However, there are people who consider themselves radical feminists, and fight against the male race itself. They seem to like equality, as well as dominance. This happens in almost all broad range issues. Difficult to be unanimus, you know.

Thus, stating that the above, and your statement, this would mean anti-feminists are just people who either defend their rights as males (according to the statement above), and/or people who radically oppose female dominance.
Secondary thoughts include that they just want a complete set of 1 race.

However, by anti-feminists, they just defend their REVOLUTIONARY RIGHTS BROUGHT UP by feminists, not female dominance, by said statement.

maybe you would like to name some names to back up this notion that there are radical male race hating feminists...

I don't think it's common at all, but:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_separatist

[Enadail]

As soon as I read that sentence, I know the idiocy would come to here.

He can't know if they were raped. I doubt he asked for the police report or court records. Thus if they say they are raped, it is a claim. Just like people claim OJ killed some people. A criminal court didn't convict him so you can't exactly say OJ killed some people.

Unless you have supporting evidence... which they never seem to have...

Yes, yes, women are all lying bitches who make up stories about having been assaulted because it's just so cool and fun. I know people are always really impressed by the crippling panic attacks that come with my PTSD, and my friends and family just loved how I couldn't even be hugged without getting scared for years. I mean, how could I resist the urge to make up a super-awesome story about getting assaulted when I get incredibly neat results like losing half my friends and not being able to date for years because being touched was too frightening?

I just wanna mean it clear... my statement was about the OJ statement, not the women-rape issue...

[Ashmoria]

Nice. However, there are people who consider themselves radical feminists, and fight against the male race itself. They seem to like equality, as well as dominance. This happens in almost all broad range issues. Difficult to be unanimus, you know.

Thus, stating that the above, and your statement, this would mean anti-feminists are just people who either defend their rights as males (according to the statement above), and/or people who radically oppose female dominance.
Secondary thoughts include that they just want a complete set of 1 race.

However, by anti-feminists, they just defend their REVOLUTIONARY RIGHTS BROUGHT UP by feminists, not female dominance, by said statement.

maybe you would like to name some names to back up this notion that there are radical male race hating feminists...

I don't think it's common at all, but:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_separatist

doesnt seem like much of a movement does it.

[Poliwanacraca]

Yes, yes, women are all lying bitches who make up stories about having been assaulted because it's just so cool and fun. I know people are always really impressed by the crippling panic attacks that come with my PTSD, and my friends and family just loved how I couldn't even be hugged without getting scared for years. I mean, how could I resist the urge to make up a super-awesome story about getting assaulted when I get incredibly neat results like losing half my friends and not being able to date for years because being touched was too frightening?

Bah, you're just claiming you have PTSD to get attention. It doesn't really exist, it's all just in your head! Besides, women who get "raped" should just be glad someone's having sex with them, right?


Right?


Huh. Poli's not answering. I guess I'll just watch that woman setting up a sniper rifle on the roof opposite my apartment until she comes back to reply.

Sorry, sorry, I just had some....things....to attend to.

By the way, that box on your doorstep? The one making the ticking noise? That's...um...a present your great-aunt sent you. It's really nice. You should have no hesitation about opening it.

[The_pantless_hero]

Yes, yes, women are all lying bitches who make up stories about having been assaulted because it's just so cool and fun. I know people are always really impressed by the crippling panic attacks that come with my PTSD, and my friends and family just loved how I couldn't even be hugged without getting scared for years. I mean, how could I resist the urge to make up a super-awesome story about getting assaulted when I get incredibly neat results like losing half my friends and not being able to date for years because being touched was too frightening?

You are neither getting the point nor helping Bottle's case.

[Heinleinites]

When people claim that all men are naturally inclined to be dirty, stupid, boorish, violent, and vicious animals, I'm the one arguing that men are human beings who are capable of rational thought and adult behavior.

I'm not naturally inclined to be dirty, although I've never objected to getting so. I'm not stupid, boorish, or vicious, either. An argument could be made, though, by people who have known me over the years, that I am naturally inclined to be violent. I've never had any trouble keeping that confined to appropriate venues and situations, though.

It's usually anti-feminists who argue that men are, at best, over-grown infants who need a woman to pick out their socks for them.

This kind of mind-set annoys me more than just about anything. It goes right along with my dis-like for the nanny state. I neither need nor want someone who thinks they need to stand in loco parentis on me. If I had to choose, I'd take the 'feminist man-hater' before I'd deal with someone who is going to(metaphorically)pat me on the head and treat me like I'm a five year old.

People who believe there is some sort of biological chasm between men and women that prevents normal interaction will be more likely to engage in pointless gender-based social rituals

It's not just people who believe that 'there is some sort of biological chasm between men and women'(by the way, that's a hell of a mental image there, thanks for that who engage in 'gender-based social rituals.' I wouldn't exactly call them 'pointless' either. Social rituals, both gender-based and not, are the grease(or considering the subject, maybe 'lube' would be more apropos)that helps the wheels of society keep turning.

I can't prove it because I don't know of any studies on the matter but I've seen it for myself so there's no convincing me otherwise. However I will argue that the study appear to be biased on the grounds that three people that have conducted the study are women (and thus more inclined than males towards the feminist cause).

See, you were already sinking, but it was this bit that went and blew you out of the water. It's generally a good idea to avoid saying that you don't know what you're talking about. There are plenty of other people who will be glad to do it for you and save you the trouble.

maybe you would like to name some names to back up this notion that there are radical male race hating feminists...

Susan Sontag, maybe, or Valerie Solanas, but they are the only ones I could think of off the top of my head that could legitimately be said to even approach that. I think they were some of those people(and every cause has them)whose association with a cause does that cause more harm than good.

[Greater Americania]

So because it contradicts your anecdotal evidence and preconceived notions, it's a flawed study?

Because it contradict my previous observations, I don't believe it. I know I'm right from what I've seen. I can't prove it, but I believe it because of what I've observed. Also, look at my argument over why it's possibly biased.

[BunnySaurus Bugsii]

I seem to have trouble concentrating when staring at Ronald Reagan.

I wouldn't mind so much if the Gaffer was at least portrayed with some fidelity. But the picture was the wrong shape for a flag and has been distorted to fit (ie widened.)

Don't understand how anyone who actually respected Reagan could tolerate that.

[BunnySaurus Bugsii]

So because it contradicts your anecdotal evidence and preconceived notions, it's a flawed study?

Because it contradict my previous observations, I don't believe it. I know I'm right from what I've seen. I can't prove it, but I believe it because of what I've observed. Also, look at my argument over why it's possibly biased.

What, the argument you lost already?

[Heinleinites]

I wouldn't mind so much if the Gaffer was at least portrayed with some fidelity. But the picture was the wrong shape for a flag and has been distorted to fit (ie widened.) Don't understand how anyone who actually respected Reagan could tolerate that.

It annoys me, I know that. I told him on the psychosomatic thread that if he was going to act in general like he had been acting on that thread, that he should change his avatar.

[Mathematica Numerica]

Nice. However, there are people who consider themselves radical feminists, and fight against the male race itself. They seem to like equality, as well as dominance. This happens in almost all broad range issues. Difficult to be unanimus, you know.

Thus, stating that the above, and your statement, this would mean anti-feminists are just people who either defend their rights as males (according to the statement above), and/or people who radically oppose female dominance.
Secondary thoughts include that they just want a complete set of 1 race.

However, by anti-feminists, they just defend their REVOLUTIONARY RIGHTS BROUGHT UP by feminists, not female dominance, by said statement.

maybe you would like to name some names to back up this notion that there are radical male race hating feminists...

I don't think it's common at all, but:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_separatist

Actually, your signature is quite easy. There's a lot of partial derivatives in that "homework" thing though. You'll need it to be a little harder, and less square/Chi distributions, as well as term variance. Statistics and gravitation.

You can't really trust Wikipedia that much. Its full of crap that users made up. Some can be trusted, like math (I proved it right), and some scientific topics.

[Greater Americania]

What, the argument you lost already?

Reasons why I think this study is false:

-It was created by three female college students which possibly shows that it is biased towards feminism.

-It goes against my personal obeservations during debates with feminists, etc.

-It was created by students of some small time university, so it's not necessarily credible.

-It was based off of a single survey, so it's not credible.

-Feminism in and of itself is an ideology that seeks to advance women in society over men. This is shown by both feminists of the past (Such as Andrea Dworkin) and by modern Feminist policies. Thus, such an ideology would begin to place a anti-male bias in the minds of feminists because they would begin to view males and their opinions as in the way of the advancement of "womens' rights".

-Anti-Feminism in and of itself is an ideology that views Feminism as anti-male and thus exists as a means of counter-combatting the anti-male feminist influence. Major anti-feminist organizations such as F4J (Fathers for Justice) seek to do a number of things via law such as reduce the amount of divorce cases in which the children go to the mother. That is what anti-feminism IS. It IS entirely biased towards the male.

So therefore, knowing all this: The study's results are a lie and likely feminist propaganda.

[Hiddenrun]

Reasons why I think this study is false:

-It was created by three female college students which possibly shows that it is biased towards feminism.

-It goes against my personal obeservations during debates with feminists, etc.

-It was created by students of some small time university, so it's not necessarily credible.

-It was based off of a single survey, so it's not credible.

-Feminism in and of itself is an ideology that seeks to advance women in society over men. This is shown by both feminists of the past (Such as Andrea Dworkin) and by modern Feminist policies. Thus, such an ideology would begin to place a anti-male bias in the minds of feminists because they would begin to view males and their opinions as in the way of the advancement of "womens' rights".

-Anti-Feminism in and of itself is an ideology that views Feminism as anti-male and thus exists as a means of counter-combatting the anti-male feminist influence. Major anti-feminist organizations such as F4J (Fathers for Justice) seek to do a number of things via law such as reduce the amount of divorce cases in which the children go to the mother. That is what anti-feminism IS. It IS entirely biased towards the male.

So therefore, knowing all this: The study's results are a lie and likely feminist propaganda.

Careful, the feminazis will have your balls for this.

[Mathematica Numerica]

Reasons why I think this study is false:

-It was created by three female college students which possibly shows that it is biased towards feminism.

-It goes against my personal obeservations during debates with feminists, etc.

-It was created by students of some small time university, so it's not necessarily credible.

-It was based off of a single survey, so it's not credible.

-Feminism in and of itself is an ideology that seeks to advance women in society over men. This is shown by both feminists of the past (Such as Andrea Dworkin) and by modern Feminist policies. Thus, such an ideology would begin to place a anti-male bias in the minds of feminists because they would begin to view males and their opinions as in the way of the advancement of "womens' rights".

-Anti-Feminism in and of itself is an ideology that views Feminism as anti-male and thus exists as a means of counter-combatting the anti-male feminist influence. Major anti-feminist organizations such as F4J (Fathers for Justice) seek to do a number of things via law such as reduce the amount of divorce cases in which the children go to the mother. That is what anti-feminism IS. It IS entirely biased towards the male.

So therefore, knowing all this: The study's results are a lie and likely feminist propaganda.

Careful, the feminazis will have your balls for this.

Yeah, if you are in MIT, they are more likely to get your balls.

[Pope Joan]

That bimbo who dreamed up "The Total Woman" was a hypocrite who ignored her family in order to capitalize on the fame and fortune she got from opposing feminism.

[Mathematica Numerica]

This is just great.

[Concurria]

What, the argument you lost already?

Reasons why I think this study is false:

-It was created by three female college students which possibly shows that it is biased towards feminism.

Um... irrational sexism much?