NATION

PASSWORD

Feminist man-haters

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Saint Clair Island
Minister
 
Posts: 3233
Founded: Feb 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Saint Clair Island » Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:31 am

Bottle wrote:
Wanderjar wrote:These studies are performed by people with far too much time on their hands and not enough work to do. lol

He said, posting on an internet forum.

Making a few posts on an internet forum doesn't mean you have too much free time, if it's a reasonable number.

Making 534 posts on an internet forum, on the other hand...
Signatures are for losers.

User avatar
Loya386
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 14
Founded: Jun 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Loya386 » Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:51 am

Completely agree with Bottle and Poliwanacraca, as well as all the other posters in the past few pages who've pointed out the obvious: People who believe there is some sort of biological chasm between men and women that prevents normal interaction will be more likely to engage in pointless gender-based social rituals, and will be more likely to see women and men as two "sides" engaged in constant warfare.

This is yet more evidence that gender roles are detrimental to everyone.

User avatar
Smunkeeville
Minister
 
Posts: 2775
Founded: Aug 09, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Smunkeeville » Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:54 am

Loya386 wrote:Completely agree with Bottle and Poliwanacraca, as well as all the other posters in the past few pages who've pointed out the obvious: People who believe there is some sort of biological chasm between men and women that prevents normal interaction will be more likely to engage in pointless gender-based social rituals, and will be more likely to see women and men as two "sides" engaged in constant warfare.

This is yet more evidence that gender roles are detrimental to everyone.

:blink: You should post more.
"I like vacuuming, I find it cathartic. It's like I imagine all the people who tick me off being little pieces of lint and I'm sucking them up a tube into a vortex of terror, it's a healthy way to deal with my frustrations." - Smunkling, aged 8

User avatar
Poliwanacraca
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1807
Founded: Jun 08, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Poliwanacraca » Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:58 am

Smunkeeville wrote:
Loya386 wrote:Completely agree with Bottle and Poliwanacraca, as well as all the other posters in the past few pages who've pointed out the obvious: People who believe there is some sort of biological chasm between men and women that prevents normal interaction will be more likely to engage in pointless gender-based social rituals, and will be more likely to see women and men as two "sides" engaged in constant warfare.

This is yet more evidence that gender roles are detrimental to everyone.

:blink: You should post more.


Indeed! It's cool to see a n00bling who uses complete, grammatically correct sentences to make rational, thoughtful points. We need more of those. (And I promise I'm not just saying that because one of those points was to completely agree with me. ;) )
"You know...I've just realized that "Poliwanacraca" is, when rendered in Arabic, an anagram for "Bom-chica-wohw-waaaow", the famous "sexy riff" that was born in the 70's and will live forever..." - Hammurab
----
"Extortion is such a nasty word.
I much prefer 'magnolia'. 'Magnolia' is a much nicer word." - Saint Clair Island

----
"Go forth my snarky diaper babies, and CONQUER!" - Neo Art

User avatar
Saint Clair Island
Minister
 
Posts: 3233
Founded: Feb 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Saint Clair Island » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:00 am

Poliwanacraca wrote:
Smunkeeville wrote:
Loya386 wrote:Completely agree with Bottle and Poliwanacraca, as well as all the other posters in the past few pages who've pointed out the obvious: People who believe there is some sort of biological chasm between men and women that prevents normal interaction will be more likely to engage in pointless gender-based social rituals, and will be more likely to see women and men as two "sides" engaged in constant warfare.

This is yet more evidence that gender roles are detrimental to everyone.

:blink: You should post more.


Indeed! It's cool to see a n00bling who uses complete, grammatically correct sentences to make rational, thoughtful points. We need more of those. (And I promise I'm not just saying that because one of those points was to completely agree with me. ;) )

Considering that the usual fare around here tends to be along the lines of "I think abortion is a pretty cool guy, eh kills babies and doesn't afraid of anything", thirded. But I think you should have agreed with me; way too many people agree with Bottle and Poli already.
Signatures are for losers.

User avatar
Iron Chariots
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1414
Founded: Jun 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Iron Chariots » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:00 am

Bottle wrote:
Unreliable Narrator wrote:Since when is disagreement considered a come-on?

Well actually, around here it probably is.

"That's right baby, debate the merits of the capital gains tax at me! Oooh yeah, debate it hard. Now tell me about your thoughts on socialized medicine. Oh god, I think my paradigm is about to shift..."


Oh god, that was so hot. You clearly know how to please a man. :D

But yeah, as for the OP, it's not surprising. Of all the feminists I know (including myself, a heterosexual white male feminist antihomophobe antiracist and generally anti-bigot), not a single one is a "man-hater." Indeed, a large portion of them enjoy nothing more than having sex with men. But I suppose that's just more of my feminist man-hating, claiming that wimminz enjoy sex too!
Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -5.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.13

User avatar
North Suran
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9974
Founded: Jul 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby North Suran » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:02 am

Saint Clair Island wrote:
Bottle wrote:
Wanderjar wrote:These studies are performed by people with far too much time on their hands and not enough work to do. lol

He said, posting on an internet forum.

Making a few posts on an internet forum doesn't mean you have too much free time, if it's a reasonable number.

Making 534 posts on an internet forum, on the other hand...

So 1929 posts would be...?

Jokes, I love you really, don't smite me with your Hammer of Thor
Last edited by North Suran on Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
Neu Mitanni wrote:As for NS, his latest statement is grounded in ignorance and contrary to fact, much to the surprise of all NSGers.


User avatar
Minnas
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1705
Founded: Jun 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Minnas » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:03 am

Iron Chariots wrote:
Bottle wrote:
Unreliable Narrator wrote:Since when is disagreement considered a come-on?

Well actually, around here it probably is.

"That's right baby, debate the merits of the capital gains tax at me! Oooh yeah, debate it hard. Now tell me about your thoughts on socialized medicine. Oh god, I think my paradigm is about to shift..."


Oh god, that was so hot. You clearly know how to please a man. :D


That's Bottle alright. Hot and fucking scary.

Whiz kid, I bet you can construct that artificial brain in your spare time.
Take your time to trust in me,
and you will find
Infinity...

User avatar
Enadail
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5799
Founded: Jun 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Enadail » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:06 am

Iron Chariots wrote:But yeah, as for the OP, it's not surprising. Of all the feminists I know (including myself, a heterosexual white male feminist antihomophobe antiracist and generally anti-bigot), not a single one is a "man-hater." Indeed, a large portion of them enjoy nothing more than having sex with men. But I suppose that's just more of my feminist man-hating, claiming that wimminz enjoy sex too!


That's interesting, because I have the opposite, albeit small, experience. Back in college, when I was a Junior, the college was undergoing some merging, part of which was that the all-female Douglass College was gonna be absorbed into the University at large while remaining a separate program (note that it wasn't the only college being merged in, thus was not being specially picked on). Douglass girls rallied against the merger like no matter, regardless of how many concessions were made. They wanted the rest of the University to merge while remaining its own separate college. I saw some merit to their early arguments, and so I actually went to one rally to side with them. As soon as I got off the bus, I was heckled, called a number of sexist names I can't post here, and instantly decided I couldn't care less to support their cause.

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Bottle » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:08 am

Loya386 wrote:Completely agree with Bottle and Poliwanacraca, as well as all the other posters in the past few pages who've pointed out the obvious: People who believe there is some sort of biological chasm between men and women that prevents normal interaction will be more likely to engage in pointless gender-based social rituals, and will be more likely to see women and men as two "sides" engaged in constant warfare.

This is yet more evidence that gender roles are detrimental to everyone.

Oy, yes. Traditional anti-feminist gender roles are all about pitting men against women and women against men. I don't personally believe it is possible to have a meaningful relationship of any kind, if you perceive your partner as both alien and enemy.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72259
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Galloism » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:10 am

Bottle wrote:
Loya386 wrote:Completely agree with Bottle and Poliwanacraca, as well as all the other posters in the past few pages who've pointed out the obvious: People who believe there is some sort of biological chasm between men and women that prevents normal interaction will be more likely to engage in pointless gender-based social rituals, and will be more likely to see women and men as two "sides" engaged in constant warfare.

This is yet more evidence that gender roles are detrimental to everyone.

Oy, yes. Traditional anti-feminist gender roles are all about pitting men against women and women against men. I don't personally believe it is possible to have a meaningful relationship of any kind, if you perceive your partner as both alien and enemy.


Sounds like my first relationship.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Bottle » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:10 am

Enadail wrote:
Iron Chariots wrote:But yeah, as for the OP, it's not surprising. Of all the feminists I know (including myself, a heterosexual white male feminist antihomophobe antiracist and generally anti-bigot), not a single one is a "man-hater." Indeed, a large portion of them enjoy nothing more than having sex with men. But I suppose that's just more of my feminist man-hating, claiming that wimminz enjoy sex too!


That's interesting, because I have the opposite, albeit small, experience. Back in college, when I was a Junior, the college was undergoing some merging, part of which was that the all-female Douglass College was gonna be absorbed into the University at large while remaining a separate program (note that it wasn't the only college being merged in, thus was not being specially picked on). Douglass girls rallied against the merger like no matter, regardless of how many concessions were made. They wanted the rest of the University to merge while remaining its own separate college. I saw some merit to their early arguments, and so I actually went to one rally to side with them. As soon as I got off the bus, I was heckled, called a number of sexist names I can't post here, and instantly decided I couldn't care less to support their cause.

And yet again we see someone confusing "female" with "feminist" and vice versa.
Last edited by Bottle on Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Eofaerwic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1079
Founded: Nov 16, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Eofaerwic » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:10 am

Saint Clair Island wrote:Considering that the usual fare around here tends to be along the lines of "I think abortion is a pretty cool guy, eh kills babies and doesn't afraid of anything", thirded. But I think you should have agreed with me; way too many people agree with Bottle and Poli already.


I know, damn them for being right so often!
Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.38
Grave_n_idle: That's much better, that's not creepy at all. Nothing creepy about dropping a hook in someone's brain soup.
Mad hatters in jeans:Why is there a whirlpool inside your head?

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Bottle » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:13 am

Saint Clair Island wrote:Considering that the usual fare around here tends to be along the lines of "I think abortion is a pretty cool guy, eh kills babies and doesn't afraid of anything", thirded. But I think you should have agreed with me; way too many people agree with Bottle and Poli already.

I find it's generally pretty easy to get people to agree with me, when I'm arguing for increased personal freedoms, better jobs at better pay, and an increase in the amount of enthusiastic sex being had by the population at large. :P
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Iniika
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1075
Founded: May 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Iniika » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:17 am

I love gender studies myself, though I do think its somewhat unfairly tilted towards women. Don't get me wrong, I understand why this is and I do consider myself a feminist, but its seems that while women have been allowed great leaps of freedom within their gender with the feminist movement, men still seem more or less trapped within their gender expectations. That is to say that while women have been allowed social access to the whole range of gender perspectives, men seem to still be narrowly confined in the 'masculine' region. I find this fascinating. Maybe I'll study it one day, if I find a large sum of money to put to no greater use than an extra arm on my University career.
"Sir, I admit your general rule, / That every poet is a fool; / But you yourself may serve to show it, / That every fool is not a poet."
— Alexander Pope
“He who knows one, knows none.”
- Max Muller
"The English language has rules for a reason. Abusing them doesn't make you a special snowflake; it makes you an idiot."
- Unknown

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Bottle » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:21 am

Iniika wrote:I love gender studies myself, though I do think its somewhat unfairly tilted towards women. Don't get me wrong, I understand why this is and I do consider myself a feminist, but its seems that while women have been allowed great leaps of freedom within their gender with the feminist movement, men still seem more or less trapped within their gender expectations. That is to say that while women have been allowed social access to the whole range of gender perspectives, men seem to still be narrowly confined in the 'masculine' region. I find this fascinating. Maybe I'll study it one day, if I find a large sum of money to put to no greater use than an extra arm on my University career.

It's actually pretty simple:

Maleness/masculinity is perceived as stronger, smarter, more rational, and generally superior.
Femaleness/femininity is likewise weaker, dumber, more foolish, and generally inferior.

Thus, if a woman aspires to "masculine" roles, or takes on "masculine" characteristics, this makes sense because she is trying to rise above her lowly female status.

However, if a male seeks out "feminine" roles or takes on "feminine" characteristics, he is a freak because he is inexplicably choosing to become less worthy and less valued.

You are correct in that this is an example of how Patriarchy Hurts Men Too. But you are incorrect in thinking that this has anything to do with things being unfairly tilted in favor of women. Rather, it is a phenomenon caused by the fact that females, femaleness, and anything considered "feminine" are regarded as inferior.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Iron Chariots
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1414
Founded: Jun 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Iron Chariots » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:23 am

Iniika wrote:I love gender studies myself, though I do think its somewhat unfairly tilted towards women. Don't get me wrong, I understand why this is and I do consider myself a feminist, but its seems that while women have been allowed great leaps of freedom within their gender with the feminist movement, men still seem more or less trapped within their gender expectations. That is to say that while women have been allowed social access to the whole range of gender perspectives, men seem to still be narrowly confined in the 'masculine' region. I find this fascinating. Maybe I'll study it one day, if I find a large sum of money to put to no greater use than an extra arm on my University career.


I would suspect that it's because "masculine" things are considered superior to "feminine" things. So women wanting to be allowed to do the things that men traditionally do is praiseworthy-- they're trying to reach up and take equality. But men who accept "feminine" roles are "lowering" themselves to the level of a woman.
Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -5.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.13

User avatar
Saint Clair Island
Minister
 
Posts: 3233
Founded: Feb 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Saint Clair Island » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:24 am

North Suran wrote:
Saint Clair Island wrote:
Bottle wrote:He said, posting on an internet forum.

Making a few posts on an internet forum doesn't mean you have too much free time, if it's a reasonable number.

Making 534 posts on an internet forum, on the other hand...

So 1929 posts would be...?

Jokes, I love you really, don't smite me with your Hammer of Thor

I dunno, but 1,935 posts is "pure awesome". *nods*

Bottle wrote:
Saint Clair Island wrote:Considering that the usual fare around here tends to be along the lines of "I think abortion is a pretty cool guy, eh kills babies and doesn't afraid of anything", thirded. But I think you should have agreed with me; way too many people agree with Bottle and Poli already.

I find it's generally pretty easy to get people to agree with me, when I'm arguing for increased personal freedoms, better jobs at better pay, and an increase in the amount of enthusiastic sex being had by the population at large. :P

Yeah, I sometimes wonder about that. Why on earth do people want more freedom, more money, and more sex? It seems so irrational compared to my ideals of less personal freedom, worse jobs with lower pay, and banning all forms of sexual pleasure.
Signatures are for losers.

User avatar
Iron Chariots
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1414
Founded: Jun 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Iron Chariots » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:25 am

Bottle wrote:
Iniika wrote:I love gender studies myself, though I do think its somewhat unfairly tilted towards women. Don't get me wrong, I understand why this is and I do consider myself a feminist, but its seems that while women have been allowed great leaps of freedom within their gender with the feminist movement, men still seem more or less trapped within their gender expectations. That is to say that while women have been allowed social access to the whole range of gender perspectives, men seem to still be narrowly confined in the 'masculine' region. I find this fascinating. Maybe I'll study it one day, if I find a large sum of money to put to no greater use than an extra arm on my University career.

It's actually pretty simple:

Maleness/masculinity is perceived as stronger, smarter, more rational, and generally superior.
Femaleness/femininity is likewise weaker, dumber, more foolish, and generally inferior.

Thus, if a woman aspires to "masculine" roles, or takes on "masculine" characteristics, this makes sense because she is trying to rise above her lowly female status.

However, if a male seeks out "feminine" roles or takes on "feminine" characteristics, he is a freak because he is inexplicably choosing to become less worthy and less valued.

You are correct in that this is an example of how Patriarchy Hurts Men Too. But you are incorrect in thinking that this has anything to do with things being unfairly tilted in favor of women. Rather, it is a phenomenon caused by the fact that females, femaleness, and anything considered "feminine" are regarded as inferior.

Damnit. Beat me to it AND phrased it much better than I ever could have. Stop being so smart! >:(
Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -5.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.13

User avatar
Enadail
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5799
Founded: Jun 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Enadail » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:25 am

Bottle wrote:And yet again we see someone confusing "female" with "feminist" and vice versa.


Errrr... when someone labels themselves as feminists, who am I to argue? The rally was described as a "pro-feminism" rally, that merging the campus was an attack on female independence.

User avatar
Greater Americania
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6313
Founded: Sep 02, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Greater Americania » Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:59 am

Oh bullshit. Something was done wrong in that study to make it have that result. As an anti-feminist that formerly participated heavily in the anti-feminist communities I've see firsthand the anti-feminist and feminist attitudes towards the gender issue, women, and men. The majority of feminists I've came across always had some sort of anti-male bias. Alot of them claimed to have been raped, etc.

Anti-feminist groups on the contrary tend to bias towards pro-male policies while Feminist groups to the opposite. For example, F4J or Fathers for Justice is one of the major anti-feminist groups in America and it advocates changing the court system's method of handing over children to the mother in divorces to instead hand them over to the fathers.

I can't prove it because I don't know of any studies on the matter but I've seen it for myself so there's no convincing me otherwise. However I will argue that the study appear to be biased on the grounds that three people that have conducted the study are women (and thus more inclined than males towards the feminist cause).
Federal Republic of Greater Americania: “Liberty, Soveriegnty, Freedom!”
Original Founder of the Nationalist Union
Member of the Santiago Anti-Communist Treaty Organization

Nationalist Republic, governed by the National Republican Party
Economic Left/Right: 2.0, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 6.21
President: Austin Farley
Vice President: John Raimark
Secretary of State: Jason Lee
Secretary of Defense: Shane Tomlinson
Secretary of Federal Security: Ross Ferrell
-Chief of Interior Security Forces: General James Calley
Secretary of Territorial Administration: Brandon Terry
-Governor of Tlozuk: Jarod Harris
-Governor of Comaack: John Fargo
*Territories are foreign nations which have been annexed by the Federal Republic

User avatar
Saint Clair Island
Minister
 
Posts: 3233
Founded: Feb 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Saint Clair Island » Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:01 pm

Greater Americania wrote:Oh bullshit. Something was done wrong in that study to make it have that result. As an anti-feminist that formerly participated heavily in the anti-feminist communities I've see firsthand the anti-feminist and feminist attitudes towards the gender issue, women, and men. The majority of feminists I've came across always had some sort of anti-male bias. Alot of them claimed to have been raped, etc.

Wow, you think that could result in an anti-male bias? I'm awfully surprised.
Signatures are for losers.

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:01 pm

Greater Americania wrote:Oh bullshit. Something was done wrong in that study to make it have that result. As an anti-feminist that formerly participated heavily in the anti-feminist communities I've see firsthand the anti-feminist and feminist attitudes towards the gender issue, women, and men. The majority of feminists I've came across always had some sort of anti-male bias. Alot of them claimed to have been raped, etc.

Anti-feminist groups on the contrary tend to bias towards pro-male policies while Feminist groups to the opposite. For example, F4J or Fathers for Justice is one of the major anti-feminist groups in America and it advocates changing the court system's method of handing over children to the mother in divorces to instead hand them over to the fathers.

I can't prove it because I don't know of any studies on the matter but I've seen it for myself so there's no convincing me otherwise. However I will argue that the study appear to be biased on the grounds that three people that have conducted the study are women (and thus more inclined than males towards the feminist cause).


So because it contradicts your anecdotal evidence and preconceived notions, it's a flawed study? :rofl:
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Bottle » Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:02 pm

Greater Americania wrote:Oh bullshit. Something was done wrong in that study to make it have that result. As an anti-feminist that formerly participated heavily in the anti-feminist communities I've see firsthand the anti-feminist and feminist attitudes towards the gender issue, women, and men. The majority of feminists I've came across always had some sort of anti-male bias.

Feel free to provide a study of your own to support your claim.

Greater Americania wrote:Alot of them claimed to have been raped, etc.

Given that between a third and one half of women have been raped, depending on where you live, is that remotely surprising?

Greater Americania wrote:Anti-feminist groups on the contrary tend to bias towards pro-male policies while Feminist groups to the opposite. For example, F4J or Fathers for Justice is one of the major anti-feminist groups in America and it advocates changing the court system's method of handing over children to the mother in divorces to instead hand them over to the fathers.

Oh this is going to get fun real fast...

Greater Americania wrote:I can't prove it because I don't know of any studies on the matter but I've seen it for myself so there's no convincing me otherwise.

Well, at least we got that up front, so nobody will mistake you for a rational or informed person who is interested in having meaningful discussion on this topic.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

User avatar
Bottle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14985
Founded: Dec 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Feminist man-haters

Postby Bottle » Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:03 pm

Saint Clair Island wrote:
Greater Americania wrote:Oh bullshit. Something was done wrong in that study to make it have that result. As an anti-feminist that formerly participated heavily in the anti-feminist communities I've see firsthand the anti-feminist and feminist attitudes towards the gender issue, women, and men. The majority of feminists I've came across always had some sort of anti-male bias. Alot of them claimed to have been raped, etc.

Wow, you think that could result in an anti-male bias? I'm awfully surprised.

You bolded the wrong word. See, his point was that they CLAIMED to be raped. In other words, he thinks that they are lying about having been raped because they have an anti-male bias, rather than that any anti-male bias on their part might arise from having been violently assaulted by a man.
"Until evolution happens like in pokemon I'll never accept your 'evidence'!" -Ifreann
"Well, excuuuuuuse me, feminist." -Ende

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Breizh-Veur, Celritannia, Dimetrodon Empire, Enormous Gentiles, Ethel mermania, Fahran, Forsher, Grinning Dragon, Hdisar, Ifreann, Ithania, Mother Asia, Northern Seleucia, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Tse-Tung, Western Theram

Advertisement

Remove ads