
by The Truth and Light » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:08 am

by Lackadaisical2 » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:14 am

The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Bongoongoland » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:15 am
The Truth and Light wrote:I was debating this with my friends yesterday. They are both scientific theories, thus completely observable and mostly supported by evidence, except global warming does not seem as likely an idea as global climate change.
During the early part of the year, blizzards covered the US. Now, going by a strict, definition of global warming, this is countered to the theory. What I think is more likely, is not that the temperature is slowly rising over the whole earth, but rather the climate is shifting. Rainy areas are becoming droughty, beaches are flooding, precipitation is occuring in commonly dry spots, as well as the slow melting of the ice-caps. I think that, under global warming, our seasons should not be so polar. But what do you think NS? Which is the better theory?


by Motuka » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:22 am

by Drenetharada » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:22 am

by Roman Cilicia » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:24 am
Kylarosa wrote:
The romans were destroyed by tribes like the mongols

by Lackadaisical2 » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:27 am
Drenetharada wrote:I don't care, we can't sit around we still need to do something we can't continue living like how we do. This is something we can not take any risks about if we do it could be too late to change our way of life.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Bongoongoland » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:28 am
Roman Cilicia wrote:Both are outright false.

by Roman Cilicia » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:30 am

Kylarosa wrote:
The romans were destroyed by tribes like the mongols

by Norstal » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:31 am
Roman Cilicia wrote:Thank you for calling me a child, I really appreciate it
The climate changes periodically as it has throughout the sum of human history. We've simply entered a warmer epoch of the world's history.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Norstal » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:32 am
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Unchecked Expansion » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:33 am

by Chumblywumbly » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:35 am
Free Soviets wrote:um, those aren't different things...

by Free Soviets » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:36 am
Roman Cilicia wrote:The climate changes periodically as it has throughout the sum of human history. We've simply entered a warmer epoch of the world's history.

by Motuka » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:37 am
Roman Cilicia wrote:The climate changes periodically as it has throughout the sum of human history. We've simply entered a warmer epoch of the world's history.
Zarvarza wrote:time to wake up from your brainwashing, this was disproven a LONG time ago

by Norstal » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:41 am
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Roman Cilicia » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:42 am
Kylarosa wrote:
The romans were destroyed by tribes like the mongols

by Motuka » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:43 am

by Arkinesia » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:44 am
Bongoongoland wrote:The Truth and Light wrote:I was debating this with my friends yesterday. They are both scientific theories, thus completely observable and mostly supported by evidence, except global warming does not seem as likely an idea as global climate change.
During the early part of the year, blizzards covered the US. Now, going by a strict, definition of global warming, this is countered to the theory. What I think is more likely, is not that the temperature is slowly rising over the whole earth, but rather the climate is shifting. Rainy areas are becoming droughty, beaches are flooding, precipitation is occuring in commonly dry spots, as well as the slow melting of the ice-caps. I think that, under global warming, our seasons should not be so polar. But what do you think NS? Which is the better theory?
Oh my god you realized what the scientist were saying for thirty years
give yourself a fucking pat on the back
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.

by Sociobiology » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:52 am

by The Truth and Light » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:52 am
Roman Cilicia wrote:The current theory is false.
The climate of course changes over long periods of time.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Applebania, Berkowia, Bradfordville, Duvniask, El Lazaro, Greater Miami Shores 3, Ifreann, Karnata, Lotha Demokratische-Republique, Pizza Friday Forever91, Port Caverton, Republica de Sierra Nevada, Riviere Renard, Ryemarch, Shrillland, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, The Two Jerseys, Valyxias
Advertisement