Page 9 of 20

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:05 pm
by Drachmar
greed and death wrote:Look as the Governor has said countless time he is only weakening the unions because they have become so violent. And like his hand picked justices on the Wisconsin Supreme court have said any recall vote would be unconstitutional because it is motivated by violence.


But...but...but...

Wisconsin judges are elected officials!!! :p

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:06 pm
by Greed and Death
Drachmar wrote:
greed and death wrote:Look as the Governor has said countless time he is only weakening the unions because they have become so violent. And like his hand picked justices on the Wisconsin Supreme court have said any recall vote would be unconstitutional because it is motivated by violence.


But...but...but...

Wisconsin judges are elected officials!!! :p

The union protest created a state of emergency and they were all replaced by appointed ones for the interim.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:07 pm
by Wamitoria
greed and death wrote:
Drachmar wrote:
But...but...but...

Wisconsin judges are elected officials!!! :p

The union protest created a state of emergency and they were all replaced by appointed ones for the interim.

How the hell is that constitutional?

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:11 pm
by Luciratus
Wamitoria wrote:
greed and death wrote:The union protest created a state of emergency and they were all replaced by appointed ones for the interim.

How the hell is that constitutional?

...is it contained in Wisconsin's constitution? :unsure:

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:12 pm
by Greed and Death
Wamitoria wrote:
greed and death wrote:The union protest created a state of emergency and they were all replaced by appointed ones for the interim.

How the hell is that constitutional?

Its a state of emergency.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:13 pm
by Wamitoria
greed and death wrote:
Wamitoria wrote:How the hell is that constitutional?

Its a state of emergency.

So, he's fearmongering in an attempt to remain in power even if he is voted out of office. Right.

How the hell is that constitutional?

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:14 pm
by Gauthier
Wamitoria wrote:
greed and death wrote:Its a state of emergency.

So, he's fearmongering in an attempt to remain in power even if he is voted out of office. Right.

How the hell is that constitutional?


G&D likes to make comments like that. It's not real.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:14 pm
by Greed and Death
Wamitoria wrote:
greed and death wrote:Its a state of emergency.

So, he's fearmongering in an attempt to remain in power even if he is voted out of office. Right.

How the hell is that constitutional?

Only when the strikers go back to work, and renounce their citizenship so they can not vote will the crisis be over.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:15 pm
by Gauthier
greed and death wrote:
Wamitoria wrote:So, he's fearmongering in an attempt to remain in power even if he is voted out of office. Right.

How the hell is that constitutional?

Only when the strikers go back to work, and renounce their citizenship so they can not vote will the crisis be over.


But then that means Walker would have employed illegal immigrant labor and the Tea Party would eat him alive.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:16 pm
by Greed and Death
Gauthier wrote:
Wamitoria wrote:So, he's fearmongering in an attempt to remain in power even if he is voted out of office. Right.

How the hell is that constitutional?


G&D likes to make comments like that. It's not real.

Don't ruin my fun.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:17 pm
by Greed and Death
Gauthier wrote:
greed and death wrote:Only when the strikers go back to work, and renounce their citizenship so they can not vote will the crisis be over.


But then that means Walker would have employed illegal immigrant labor and the Tea Party would eat him alive.

Its not employing illegals when a Republican does it.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:18 pm
by Luciratus
greed and death wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
G&D likes to make comments like that. It's not real.

Don't ruin my fun.

Indeed. Please, do not deny me greed and death humor.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:19 pm
by Luciratus
greed and death wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
But then that means Walker would have employed illegal immigrant labor and the Tea Party would eat him alive.

Its not employing illegals when a Republican does it.

It is- dealing with NAFTA! Damn Democrats Communists, you'll never understand. :palm:

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:24 pm
by Drachmar
greed and death wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
But then that means Walker would have employed illegal immigrant labor and the Tea Party would eat him alive.

Its not employing illegals when a Republican does it.

In recent news, work visa applications to the State Department surge.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:34 pm
by Luciratus
Drachmar wrote:
greed and death wrote:Its not employing illegals when a Republican does it.

In recent news, work visa applications to the State Department surge,

-as does the immigrant vote for the Republican Party.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:36 pm
by Drachmar
Luciratus wrote:
Drachmar wrote:In recent news, work visa applications to the State Department surge,

-as does the immigrant vote for the Republican Party.


As the Tea Party fumes...

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:29 pm
by Greed and Death
Drachmar wrote:
Luciratus wrote:-as does the immigrant vote for the Republican Party.


As the Tea Party fumes...

Wait a minute, I think i can make both the immigrants and the tea party happy, I will simply need a lot of make up artist and skin whitener.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:50 pm
by The Black Forrest
Instead of civility would it be more polite to suggest the wearing of body armor?

*quickly erases the target sight on the state of Wisconsin*

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 10:59 pm
by Gauthier
greed and death wrote:
Drachmar wrote:
As the Tea Party fumes...

Wait a minute, I think i can make both the immigrants and the tea party happy, I will simply need a lot of make up artist and skin whitener.


An army of Michael Jacksons? No thanks.

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 11:05 pm
by Soviet Grazeland
I guess it's true what they say: "An Eye for an Eye."

Politically crippling the majority is just as deserving as being only one man being hunted down from said people.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 11:02 am
by Luciratus
Gauthier wrote:
greed and death wrote:Wait a minute, I think i can make both the immigrants and the tea party happy, I will simply need a lot of make up artist and skin whitener.


An army of Michael Jacksons? No thanks.

*I cough.* Racist! *I cough.* :lol:

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 11:04 am
by Gauthier
Luciratus wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
An army of Michael Jacksons? No thanks.

*I cough.* Racist! *I cough.* :lol:


I'm sorry, the only time I feel comfortable with an army of plastic mannequins moving is when I'm watching an episode of Doctor Who .

:p

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 11:15 am
by Luciratus
Gauthier wrote:
Luciratus wrote:*I cough.* Racist! *I cough.* :lol:


I'm sorry, the only time I feel comfortable with an army of plastic mannequins moving is when I'm watching an episode of Doctor Who .

:p

Star Wars?

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:56 pm
by Daistallia 2104
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Frankly, after all the lies and dirty tricks the WI GOP has pulled, I'm calling complete bullshit on this.


From what I can tell, there's been no substantiation of these threats since I called BS on them.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 2:21 pm
by Los Cabreddes
Gauthier wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
What exactly are you taking from his statement?


That the death threats (which could well be fabricated by the Republicans, not too different from Walker thinking about Mubaraking the protestors) are a sign that the Democrats, liberals and union workers have conceded.

In other words, more partisan gloating and sneering from Yu-Gi-Owe.


Not that they have conceded, just that they should and are only screaming "No" out of stubbornness! :lol: