NationStates

Blitzkrenia wrote:

Capitalistliberals wrote:

Dumb Ideologies wrote:

Blitzkrenia wrote:

Sypian wrote:I believe only nice nudity should be allowed without showing men in the same photo.

Then is multiple women okay?

So long as they are wearing enough clothes so that you can only see a maximum of two half-boobs. The limit is reduced to one if you can also see their ankles. Vaginas must be blurred out, since it might be triggering if seen by youngsters who have only relatively recently come out of one.

How about two guys

Probably only half their torsos.

Which half?

Karsol wrote:

Blitzkrenia wrote:

Capitalistliberals wrote:

Dumb Ideologies wrote:

Blitzkrenia wrote:

Sypian wrote:I believe only nice nudity should be allowed without showing men in the same photo.

Then is multiple women okay?

So long as they are wearing enough clothes so that you can only see a maximum of two half-boobs. The limit is reduced to one if you can also see their ankles. Vaginas must be blurred out, since it might be triggering if seen by youngsters who have only relatively recently come out of one.

How about two guys

Probably only half their torsos.

Which half?

The one you prefer?

Blitzkrenia wrote:

Karsol wrote:

Blitzkrenia wrote:

Capitalistliberals wrote:

Dumb Ideologies wrote:

Blitzkrenia wrote:

Sypian wrote:I believe only nice nudity should be allowed without showing men in the same photo.

Then is multiple women okay?

So long as they are wearing enough clothes so that you can only see a maximum of two half-boobs. The limit is reduced to one if you can also see their ankles. Vaginas must be blurred out, since it might be triggering if seen by youngsters who have only relatively recently come out of one.

How about two guys

Probably only half their torsos.

Which half?

The one you prefer?

Do you have to ask?

Karsol wrote:

Blitzkrenia wrote:

Karsol wrote:

Blitzkrenia wrote:

Capitalistliberals wrote:

Dumb Ideologies wrote:

Blitzkrenia wrote:

Sypian wrote:I believe only nice nudity should be allowed without showing men in the same photo.

Then is multiple women okay?

So long as they are wearing enough clothes so that you can only see a maximum of two half-boobs. The limit is reduced to one if you can also see their ankles. Vaginas must be blurred out, since it might be triggering if seen by youngsters who have only relatively recently come out of one.

How about two guys

Probably only half their torsos.

Which half?

The one you prefer?

Do you have to ask?

He said torso, how you gonna rate half of a torso? on a side note the top half of guys is far more sexy than the bottom half

Capitalistliberals wrote:

Karsol wrote:

Blitzkrenia wrote:

Karsol wrote:

Blitzkrenia wrote:

Capitalistliberals wrote:

Dumb Ideologies wrote:

Blitzkrenia wrote:

Sypian wrote:I believe only nice nudity should be allowed without showing men in the same photo.

Then is multiple women okay?

So long as they are wearing enough clothes so that you can only see a maximum of two half-boobs. The limit is reduced to one if you can also see their ankles. Vaginas must be blurred out, since it might be triggering if seen by youngsters who have only relatively recently come out of one.

How about two guys

Probably only half their torsos.

Which half?

The one you prefer?

Do you have to ask?

He said torso, how you gonna rate half of a torso? on a side note the top half of guys is far more sexy than the bottom half

Huh just wiki'ed torso and seems I had a misconception that it didn't consider the nether regions still point stands guys top half is better than bottom half.

Sypian wrote:I believe only nice nudity should be allowed without showing men in the same photo.

I agree on the nice nudity. Only nice pictures of people fucking, please, no silicone boobs and horse cocks. Just plain and natural for me.
But men - at least to me - are essential in the picture, sorry.

Cabra West wrote:

Sypian wrote:I believe only nice nudity should be allowed without showing men in the same photo.

I agree on the nice nudity. Only nice pictures of people fucking, please, no silicone boobs and horse cocks. Just plain and natural for me.
But men - at least to me - are essential in the picture, sorry.

Cabra why pretend to be a woman player i don't think woman play NS just because you have that silly pic doesn't fool me a bit but it's a good attention getter i bet

Sypian wrote:Cabra why pretend to be a woman player i don't think woman play NS just because you have that silly pic doesn't fool me a bit but it's a good attention getter i bet

Why should pornography be limited to shots of women only?

Fartsniffage wrote:

Sypian wrote:Cabra why pretend to be a woman player i don't think woman play NS just because you have that silly pic doesn't fool me a bit but it's a good attention getter i bet

Why should pornography be limited to shots of women only?

Cuz Lukin at Men make u gai an Gainez iz teh ebils!

Sypian wrote:

Cabra West wrote:

Sypian wrote:I believe only nice nudity should be allowed without showing men in the same photo.

I agree on the nice nudity. Only nice pictures of people fucking, please, no silicone boobs and horse cocks. Just plain and natural for me.
But men - at least to me - are essential in the picture, sorry.

Cabra why pretend to be a woman player i don't think woman play NS just because you have that silly pic doesn't fool me a bit but it's a good attention getter i bet

You fail on so many levels my brain is failing to compute.

citation needed wrote: Japan use to have rape eroge games and they have one of the lowest rape statistics in the world.

last I checked, Japan had a pretty high rape statistic which was blamed on a growing public acceptance of rape, even a condoning of it



and before you ask, yes your off the ignore list, your 4 day ban is up.

Lelouche wrote:

citation needed wrote: Japan use to have rape eroge games and they have one of the lowest rape statistics in the world.

last I checked, Japan had a pretty high rape statistic which was blamed on a growing public acceptance of rape, even a condoning of it



and before you ask, yes your off the ignore list, your 4 day ban is up.

You must have checked some feminist site with bullshit claims then. Also lol at the picture. That isn't rape nor should a motivational poster be used to try to prove something. Especially considering it's fictional therefore isn't real and doesn't mean anything.

boils down

you made a claim of Japan having "low rape stats" which you connected to increased porn and "Ero Rape Games"

I'm asking you to source your claim, as all information I've seen to date says otherwise.

All pornography is bad.

The only difference that I've been able to come up with between societies with an acceptance of porn and ones without, is that:

a. The ones without have higher levels of guilt and thus stress and thus stress induced illness.

b. The rapes committed in the less "porn friendly" is less likely to be reported in a timely fasion in the above countries due to the aformentioned guilt felt by the victims for having had their bodies used in any way sexual; however once all rapes committed in either case are either reported or discovered, the number is not statistically less in any significant amount in either case.

That said, modern pornography does tend to dehumanize its subjects, but then again so does modern society, so of the two options (with or without) we seem to be better off with.