Advertisement
by Cavirfi » Sun Feb 05, 2023 11:11 pm
CAVIRFI ONE: Lambda League heading in 2024 Crabaiaian general election opinion polls with 85% of respondents declaring their intention to vote for them; Asia-Pacific political analysts worried about potential Cold War between Crabaiaia and the West and China over Southeast Asia should Lambda win with supermajority; election to be held in rest of Crabaiaia on May 28 | Rally racing fans consider establishing rally championship in Cavirfi | Biologists in Ostry begin research on novel viruses that could potentially affect human population as urbanisation increases likelihood of contact | Average Temperature: 16℃
by True Europa State » Sun Feb 05, 2023 11:17 pm
by USS Monitor » Sun Feb 05, 2023 11:47 pm
Orostan wrote:USS Monitor wrote:
Problem is we don't have any treatments that can correct someone's "mental gender" to match their body.
The gap between how someone actually looks and how they want to look is going to be different for each person. If it's not that big of a gap, then you might be able to get comfortable by just changing your attitude and/or your clothes. But if there's a wide gap between how they look and how they feel, then transitioning might be the best option they have.
We do actually. I would bet money on the idea that a lot of transgender people are suffering from some type of hormone disorder before they transition, especially if they’re young. For others it might just be a phase or an entirely social issue where they don’t “feel like their gender” because they aren’t good at matching the role.
IMO the most invasive option to treat a condition should be the last. Transitioning is incredibly invasive and as such should be absolutely the last thing someone considers after trying everything else. I don’t see how any other course of action could be moral because if the person makes a mistake and takes an invasive treatment which will not help them, it’s done forever and cannot be undone.
by Laka Strolistandiler » Mon Feb 06, 2023 2:45 am
Orostan wrote:Rakhalia wrote:Depression as a condition has a whole host of causes, and sometimes just occurs.
I don't believe that. Nothing ever "just happens", there is always a reason. Regardless, I don't see why 'transmaxxing' isn't an attempt by incels to get "gender euphoria" by abandoning the male gender role. Would that not make their claim to the transgender identity as valid as anyone else's?
It is seeming more to me that a lot of transgenderism is caused by a fundamental disconnect between what expectations people think society has of them in a certain role and what expectations they think they can meet. Consistently failing to meet expectations a person has of themselves or that society has of them is a reason depression can occur.
I reserve the right to /stillme any one-liners if my post is at least two lines long
by Ifreann » Mon Feb 06, 2023 7:18 am
Christian Confederation wrote:The simple fact is there's more men than Weman in the dating market
by Loeje » Mon Feb 06, 2023 7:59 am
by Dayganistan » Mon Feb 06, 2023 8:51 am
by Christian Confederation » Mon Feb 06, 2023 8:56 am
by Dayganistan » Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:16 am
by Krasny-Volny » Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:42 am
by Christian Confederation » Mon Feb 06, 2023 9:55 am
Dayganistan wrote:Christian Confederation wrote:Simple supply and demand problem.
Exactly, so incels have two options:
Work to improve themselves by becoming more attractive and/or getting a better job (increase their market demand)
Move to a larger city and/or be open to a long distance/international relationship (increasing the supply of women available to them)
Both are valid options, and they're easier, less expensive solutions than gender transition. It costs nothing other than your free time to get volunteer experience to pad out your resume and help find a better job. It costs $50 a month to get a gym membership. It costs $1000 or less to get a plane ticket to go meet a girl you met online that lives in another country. It costs thousands of dollars over many years to get gender transition treatment.
by Ifreann » Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:03 am
by New-Minneapolis » Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:05 am
by Holy Patagonia » Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:14 am
Saiwania wrote:Are you an unsuccessful man? Tired of having to initiate every social interaction/courtship and getting shot down/rejected at every turn? There are some solutions out there, one of the most radical of which is: why not try becoming a woman? Become what you previously wanted but always fail to get.
As of late, I've been fascinated by this "transmaxxing" phenomenon that is allegedly going on. Which is more or less, not becoming MtF because of identifying as trans, but specifically as a bid for personal gain and to trade a bad life for what they think will become a better one as the opposite sex. There is a small Reddit of 3,000+ unsuccessful men who're taking it upon themselves to get a sex change, in the belief that they'll find more personal gain/success as a woman than they currently do as a man, if they were born biologically male. They've essentially given up on trying to "man up" and conclude that women have it better and want to be one of them instead.
There is a 73+ page manifesto outlining the reasons for why being a woman in today's society is far superior than remaining as a man if they've failed to "measure up" to societal expectations or aren't otherwise a "Chad" in their worldview, their term for a truly masculine, dominant, assertive, and successful male who has success with women and in most other domains of life.
To keep it as PG-13 as possible, their reasons for transitioning to MtF being beneficial is as follows:
1. More beautiful to have a feminine body.
2. Access to the trans/lesbian dating pool.
3. More intense stimulus from physical touch.
4. More intense and wider range of emotions and happier on Estrogen.
5. Being able to attract cisgender lesbians (if attractive enough).
6. Being able to attract cisgender men for physical intimacy (if attractive enough).
7. Softer skin and less/no acne.
8. Live longer.
9. Being able to maybe extract money/resources from men.
10. No longer driven to do stupid/dangerous things due to testosterone.
11. Stop and reverse hair loss.
12. People will treat you better if they believe you're a woman.
13. Less likely to get killed.
14. Access to female only spaces.
15. Cheaper car insurance.
The transmaxxing manifesto has some testimonials of men who've successfully became women and have never looked back in terms of being happier than they were in their old life with before and after photos. They contend that the male gender role is broken and obsolete.
Their quote: "Let's face it, if you present as male, there's exactly one personality that will earn you social approval:Chad. Assertive, dominant, successful. Nobody will be impressed by a male that is meek, submissive and struggling. Such males are not considered gender trailblazers; they're just derided as incel NEETs. Nobody is offering an actual solution to this. Tradcons tell you to just man up. TERFs tell you to just abolish gender. Liberals deny this reality altogether. By embracing girl mode, you actually become free to be your authentic self without shame. Society at large requires men to keep grinding and struggling to keep the lights on, so obviously no serious and respectable person will encourage you to just drop down the pink vortex, but it's possibly the only thing that will actually help you if you're stuck being a shitty male with no prospects."
In addition, they discourage FtM transition because their conjecture is that this harms fertility and reproduction for our species and makes the world less beautiful, and that the end result is more beneficial if there are more MtF people but fewer FtM people out there.
Given the emergence of this recent rabbit hole, what do you make of it? Do you know anyone who's doing this online or in real life? Do you expect it to remain niche or become a bigger trend in the coming years? If it is a cry for help, what could possibly be done to keep men from giving up on being men? Are some or all of the reasons they give for it being more advantageous as a woman, valid or not?
I'm very much against sex changes in general, but do concede that it seems more viable to do MtF than FtM with our current medical technology/practices. I can't imagine going for something that is too permanent in that there is "no going back" after a certain point once it has been done. I'm very dissatisfied with what is expected of men from women and larger society, but I'm the sort to never give up my body for the world. What is your experience in terms of it being more positive or negative to be the sex/gender that you are?
https://www.piratewires.com/p/transmaxxing
-Article explaining transmaxxing more in depth (Safe for Work, so far as I can tell).
by Dayganistan » Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:28 am
by Christian Confederation » Mon Feb 06, 2023 11:01 am
Dayganistan wrote:Ifreann wrote:So is Christian Confederation's claim based on demographics or on the vibes on Tinder?
Both honestly. Most countries do have a surplus of males in younger generations, even countries that are known for having an overall gender ratio imbalance in favor of women. Plus there are a lot of women that straight up dislike Tinder or don't seriously use it to find a partner which makes Tinder an exacerbated version of real world demographics. Not that incels should purely blame the male surplus in younger generations for being alone because it doesn't stop most guys from dating.
by Ifreann » Mon Feb 06, 2023 11:05 am
Dayganistan wrote:Ifreann wrote:So is Christian Confederation's claim based on demographics or on the vibes on Tinder?
Both honestly. Most countries do have a surplus of males in younger generations, even countries that are known for having an overall gender ratio imbalance in favor of women. Plus there are a lot of women that straight up dislike Tinder or don't seriously use it to find a partner which makes Tinder an exacerbated version of real world demographics. Not that incels should purely blame the male surplus in younger generations for being alone because it doesn't stop most guys from dating.
by Dayganistan » Mon Feb 06, 2023 11:11 am
Ifreann wrote:Dayganistan wrote:Both honestly. Most countries do have a surplus of males in younger generations, even countries that are known for having an overall gender ratio imbalance in favor of women. Plus there are a lot of women that straight up dislike Tinder or don't seriously use it to find a partner which makes Tinder an exacerbated version of real world demographics. Not that incels should purely blame the male surplus in younger generations for being alone because it doesn't stop most guys from dating.
Are you two the same person or something?
by Christian Confederation » Mon Feb 06, 2023 1:23 pm
by USS Monitor » Mon Feb 06, 2023 5:37 pm
Loeje wrote:Ifreann wrote:Why would there be more men than women in the dating market when there are more women than men in society?
I think they're specifically talking about dating apps, and I wouldn't be surprised if there's more men than women on dating apps just because most women don't feel like those apps are safe.
by Laka Strolistandiler » Mon Feb 06, 2023 11:51 pm
Christian Confederation wrote:Those who don't improve themselves are destined to die out and not continue their bloodline. It's sad but a large number of men today are the end of their family line.
I reserve the right to /stillme any one-liners if my post is at least two lines long
by Rakhalia » Tue Feb 07, 2023 1:36 am
by Christian Confederation » Tue Feb 07, 2023 6:42 am
Laka Strolistandiler wrote:Christian Confederation wrote:Those who don't improve themselves are destined to die out and not continue their bloodline. It's sad but a large number of men today are the end of their family line.
What’s bad about it? My family lineage will with 80% probability include genetic illnesses including but not limited to shizotypal disorder, heart attack risks and other shit. For the best of the world and the people that I might bring into it it’d be better for me not to have children. I hate to sound ableistic but it’s simply wrong for people with genetically transferred diseases, especially psychiatric ones to have children.
That would require people noticing you. Not easy for Joe Smoe to get noticed. Online Dating has it's merits but the current execution is all wrong.Rakhalia wrote:USS Monitor wrote:
Even if you don't end up in a dangerous situation, dating apps are exhausting.
While ultimately algorithmically-networked romance was, and remains, an inevitability, I can't help but find something grotesque about electronically streamlining your love life into a series of predetermined interactions, rather than organic interaction with people you just, well, meet.
by Saiwania » Wed Feb 08, 2023 10:37 pm
The Snazzylands wrote:"Ugh being a guy is so hard these days. I mean at this rate I should just become a girl instead haha. I mean just think about it for a second it makes perfect sense. And who wouldn't want to have a more feminine body? They're just more beautiful right?"
Rakhalia wrote:While ultimately algorithmically-networked romance was, and remains, an inevitability, I can't help but find something grotesque about electronically streamlining your love life into a series of predetermined interactions, rather than organic interaction with people you just, well, meet.
Christian Confederation wrote:It's the ones that don't that concerns me. Demoralized men are easily radicalized. Just look at what happened with Andrew Tate, he gained a following of millions Just by taping into the incels he got them thinking awful things about weman but the next Andrew Tate could be far more dangerous with millions of demoralized young men.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ariddia, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Liberal Malaysia, Pasong Tirad, Risottia, The Archregimancy, The Huskar Social Union, The Notorious Mad Jack, Tungstan
Advertisement