Page 12 of 15

PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:47 am
by United Muscovite Nations
Jack Thomas Lang wrote:
Grenartia wrote:1. You specifically denied knowing who the people in the picture were, which is not an issue anyone raised until you said so. People do not specifically deny knowledge about things unprovoked unless they are trying to deflect from something.
2. You specifically said Necro didn't know who those people were, as if you did in fact know who they were, and somehow had proof that Necro couldn't possibly know who they were.

Given these facts, it is more than reasonable to think you were lying about not knowing who they were. And, given your well-known, hardcore traditional Catholic stance on...everything, you have every motivation to be too ashamed to openly admit to knowing who two porn actors (especially transgender ones) are.

I'm not even reaching that hard, you put the cookie jar on the floor, left the lid off, and then said "I didn't eat the cookies!". Nobody's parents fell for it when they were kids, and I won't fall for it now.

It's not reasonable. I don't know about other people, but it still looks like you're reaching to accuse another poster of watching or knowing something about transgender porn to shame them.

Which is fucking sad tbqh.

^This, I can't say that's what you were trying to do, but that's exactly what it looked like to me.

PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:47 am
by Communist Zombie Horde
why can't homeless shelters have freedom to choose? It's not a bad thing if they get to decide.

PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:53 am
by Vassenor
Communist Zombie Horde wrote:why can't homeless shelters have freedom to choose? It's not a bad thing if they get to decide.


There you have it. Active discrimination is just "freedom to choose" and "not a bad thing".

PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:55 am
by Salus Maior
Vassenor wrote:
Communist Zombie Horde wrote:why can't homeless shelters have freedom to choose? It's not a bad thing if they get to decide.


There you have it. Active discrimination is just "freedom to choose" and "not a bad thing".


So women's shelters are bad?

PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:57 am
by Vassenor
Salus Maior wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
There you have it. Active discrimination is just "freedom to choose" and "not a bad thing".


So women's shelters are bad?


#falseequivalence

PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:59 am
by Salus Maior
Vassenor wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:
So women's shelters are bad?


#falseequivalence


Women's shelters actively discriminate against men for their biological sex.

If they can do that to them, then single-sex shelters can discriminate against transgenders for their biological sex.

PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:59 am
by Vassenor
Salus Maior wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
#falseequivalence


Women's shelters actively discriminate against men for their biological sex.

If they can do that to them, then single-sex shelters can discriminate against transgenders for their biological sex.


So yes false equivalence to try and NO U the argument.

PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2019 11:01 am
by United Muscovite Nations
Vassenor wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:
Women's shelters actively discriminate against men for their biological sex.

If they can do that to them, then single-sex shelters can discriminate against transgenders for their biological sex.


So yes false equivalence to try and NO U the argument.

I'm not even for the discrimination, but that's not a false equivalence at all.

PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2019 11:01 am
by Cappuccina
Communist Zombie Horde wrote:why can't homeless shelters have freedom to choose? It's not a bad thing if they get to decide.

Choice isn't always the best thing in every situation. Nitpicking between which homeless person to take based on things irrelevant to the fact they're homeless isn't something that should be permitted.

PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2019 11:02 am
by Salus Maior
United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
So yes false equivalence to try and NO U the argument.

I'm not even for the discrimination, but that's not a false equivalence at all.


It's not even a "NO U".

PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2019 11:05 am
by Cappuccina
United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
So yes false equivalence to try and NO U the argument.

I'm not even for the discrimination, but that's not a false equivalence at all.

I agree with you on this, there should be transgender shelters, it'd eliminate the issue. Transphobes can be happy that no "icky" transpeople are around them, and trans homeless people can be safe, fed, and have a roof over their heads.

PostPosted: Mon May 27, 2019 11:08 am
by Salus Maior
Grenartia wrote:
As has been previously pointed out, most homeless shelters are run by religious organizations with proven and recent anti-LGBT+ biases. Secular shelters are extremely few and far in between, especially in areas that aren't Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Seattle, DC, or New York. Ones that are actually competent at dealing with the LGBT+ community in a non-shitty way are likely even rarer.


There's nothing suggesting that shelters in general will be allowed to ban any particular people. Only single-sex shelters have been mentioned in the OP, and they already discriminate based on biological sex.

PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 4:06 am
by The Xenopolis Confederation
Cappuccina wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:I'm not even for the discrimination, but that's not a false equivalence at all.

I agree with you on this, there should be transgender shelters, it'd eliminate the issue. Transphobes can be happy that no "icky" transpeople are around them, and trans homeless people can be safe, fed, and have a roof over their heads.

How about we don't have women's shelters or men's shelters or trans shelters, we just have shelters. Segregation is bad folks, I thought we established that.

PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 7:12 am
by Salus Maior
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:
Cappuccina wrote:I agree with you on this, there should be transgender shelters, it'd eliminate the issue. Transphobes can be happy that no "icky" transpeople are around them, and trans homeless people can be safe, fed, and have a roof over their heads.

How about we don't have women's shelters or men's shelters or trans shelters, we just have shelters. Segregation is bad folks, I thought we established that.


If you want to pick a fight with Feminists go right ahead. It'll be fun.

PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 7:14 am
by Gormwood
Salus Maior wrote:
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:How about we don't have women's shelters or men's shelters or trans shelters, we just have shelters. Segregation is bad folks, I thought we established that.


If you want to pick a fight with Feminists go right ahead. It'll be fun.

It's just a matter of time before someone in this forum tries to organize a literal feminist hunt.

PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 8:39 am
by The Xenopolis Confederation
Salus Maior wrote:
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:How about we don't have women's shelters or men's shelters or trans shelters, we just have shelters. Segregation is bad folks, I thought we established that.


If you want to pick a fight with Feminists go right ahead. It'll be fun.

I'll oppose segregationists of all ideologies.

PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 8:40 am
by The Xenopolis Confederation
Gormwood wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:
If you want to pick a fight with Feminists go right ahead. It'll be fun.

It's just a matter of time before someone in this forum tries to organize a literal feminist hunt.

Bro, you just posted cringe. You are going to lose subscriber.

PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 8:52 am
by Cappuccina
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:
Cappuccina wrote:I agree with you on this, there should be transgender shelters, it'd eliminate the issue. Transphobes can be happy that no "icky" transpeople are around them, and trans homeless people can be safe, fed, and have a roof over their heads.

How about we don't have women's shelters or men's shelters or trans shelters, we just have shelters. Segregation is bad folks, I thought we established that.

Separation is the pragmatic solution here. All the arguing about who should be allowed where and with who, is wasting time and effort that could be used to help people get out of the streets. Make separate fucking shelters for everyone so all the idpol idiots on all sides can shut the hell up and stop slowing down aid to homeless people.

PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 10:15 am
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp
United Muscovite Nations wrote:

I just think it's ridiculous that we're wording an issue about people being forced into the streets by economics as if it's socially conservative values that are the main enemy and not the system that makes homeless shelters necessary in the first place. If people are being thrown out of their homes for being trans, we can tackle that too, certainly, but we need to do better than just a social safety net for a system that requires large numbers of people to fail.

Hell yeah. I'm 100% for ending all homelessness.

Cappuccina wrote:
The Xenopolis Confederation wrote:How about we don't have women's shelters or men's shelters or trans shelters, we just have shelters. Segregation is bad folks, I thought we established that.

Separation is the pragmatic solution here. All the arguing about who should be allowed where and with who, is wasting time and effort that could be used to help people get out of the streets. Make separate fucking shelters for everyone so all the idpol idiots on all sides can shut the hell up and stop slowing down aid to homeless people.


Makes sense to me.

PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 10:19 am
by Nakena
Gormwood wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:
If you want to pick a fight with Feminists go right ahead. It'll be fun.

It's just a matter of time before someone in this forum tries to organize a literal feminist hunt.


If you think NSG is bad, check reddit.

PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 10:21 am
by Cappuccina
Nakena wrote:
Gormwood wrote:It's just a matter of time before someone in this forum tries to organize a literal feminist hunt.


If you think NSG is bad, check reddit.

Reddit is a hotbed for idiocy.

PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 12:26 pm
by Grenartia
Eternal Lotharia wrote:This is disgusting. Any republican that claims to be moral yet supports the policy or the president or who anyone else who supports it cannot claim to be moral and have sold their soul to the devil. Whether you think Transgenderism is a illness or not this is inexcusable.

How many more shitty stuff does the Trump Admin. have to do before you all realize it's pure evil and Anti-Christian?


If you've signed a deal with the devil (as the religious right has), why would you suddenly start caring about something being evil and anti-Christian?

PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 12:29 pm
by Galloism
Grenartia wrote:
Eternal Lotharia wrote:This is disgusting. Any republican that claims to be moral yet supports the policy or the president or who anyone else who supports it cannot claim to be moral and have sold their soul to the devil. Whether you think Transgenderism is a illness or not this is inexcusable.

How many more shitty stuff does the Trump Admin. have to do before you all realize it's pure evil and Anti-Christian?


If you've signed a deal with the devil (as the religious right has), why would you suddenly start caring about something being evil and anti-Christian?

I don't know what you're talking about. Trump is so pro-family, he has three of them.

PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 12:50 pm
by Threlizdun
Salus Maior wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
#falseequivalence


Women's shelters actively discriminate against men for their biological sex.

If they can do that to them, then single-sex shelters can discriminate against transgenders for their biological sex.

Women's shelters do not discriminate based on gender. They are established for the specific purpose of combating violence against women, and specialize in genered violence and women's services. Trans women undergo gendered violence at rates similar to or above those of cis women. It makes sense having trans women in women's shelters because they're women and experience violence in ways similar to cis women.

PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 12:53 pm
by Galloism
Threlizdun wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:
Women's shelters actively discriminate against men for their biological sex.

If they can do that to them, then single-sex shelters can discriminate against transgenders for their biological sex.

Women's shelters do not discriminate based on gender. They are established for the specific purpose of combating violence against women, and specialize in genered violence and women's services. Trans women undergo gendered violence at rates similar to or above those of cis women. It makes sense having trans women in women's shelters because they're women and experience violence in ways similar to cis women.

So men who are victims of gendered violence are permitted in women's shelters? Source?