NATION

PASSWORD

Would you vote for independence?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should America be independent?

YES! Give me Liberty, or give me Death!
141
59%
NO! God save the King
97
41%
 
Total votes : 238

User avatar
Bienenhalde
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6472
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Bienenhalde » Fri Jul 06, 2018 9:32 am

Gharrow wrote:Given Britain's current pathetic state, and the fact that the U.S is fine...

I think I'll go with independence


What the heck are you even talking about? I would take the strong and stable leadership of the Queen Elizabeth and Theresa May over Trump's fudged up rubbish any day.

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Fri Jul 06, 2018 9:47 am

Bienenhalde wrote:
Gharrow wrote:Given Britain's current pathetic state, and the fact that the U.S is fine...

I think I'll go with independence


What the heck are you even talking about? I would take the strong and stable leadership of the Queen Elizabeth and Theresa May over Trump's fudged up rubbish any day.


The American Revolution not happening would fuck so much shit up that May and the Queen probably wouldn't have even been born.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Tobleste
Minister
 
Posts: 2713
Founded: Dec 27, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Tobleste » Fri Jul 06, 2018 11:19 am

LiberNovusAmericae wrote:
Tobleste wrote:In practice, I imagine the only difference for America would be the correct use of vowels and a more successful football team.

If we would have stayed with Britain, we would be "enjoying" Europe's lack of free speech and lack of cultural identity. I think I like the current timeline the way it is.


Wrt free speech, Europe is no different. Wrt cultural identity, America is currently divided into 2 camps that despise each other. I think you don't understand your own timeline.
Social Democrat
Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -4.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.26

User avatar
Sarzonia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8554
Founded: Mar 22, 2004
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Sarzonia » Fri Jul 06, 2018 11:21 am

If I had the opportunity to be able to provide warnings to the framers of the Constitution, I would definitely warn them about Citizens United and modern weaponry so that they could do things like specify that the Second Amendment only pertains to organised militia and prevent the idea that mega corporations could steal elections with dollars.
First WCC Grand Slam Champion
NSWC Hall of Fame Inductee (post-World Cup 25)
Former WLC President. He/him/his.

Our trophy case and other honours; Our hosting history

User avatar
Firaxin
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1324
Founded: Sep 28, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Firaxin » Fri Jul 06, 2018 11:34 am

Sarzonia wrote:If I had the opportunity to be able to provide warnings to the framers of the Constitution, I would definitely warn them about Citizens United and modern weaponry so that they could do things like specify that the Second Amendment only pertains to organised militia and prevent the idea that mega corporations could steal elections with dollars.

And make sure that multiple parties are allowed, right?

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54813
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Fri Jul 06, 2018 11:37 am

Sarzonia wrote:If I had the opportunity to be able to provide warnings to the framers of the Constitution, I would definitely warn them about Citizens United and modern weaponry so that they could do things like specify that the Second Amendment only pertains to organised militia and prevent the idea that mega corporations could steal elections with dollars.


The Second Amendment wasn't meant to only apply to organized militias though. Like, we can read the Federalist Papers and see that.

Likewise Citizens United was very much the right choice constitutionally speaking.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
The Serbian Empire
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58107
Founded: Apr 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Serbian Empire » Fri Jul 06, 2018 11:50 am

I would have been against independence with my knowledge of today.

Tobleste wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:If we would have stayed with Britain, we would be "enjoying" Europe's lack of free speech and lack of cultural identity. I think I like the current timeline the way it is.


Wrt free speech, Europe is no different. Wrt cultural identity, America is currently divided into 2 camps that despise each other. I think you don't understand your own timeline.

Richard Spencer would be doing hard time in Europe for his promotion of Neo-Nazism. There's a reason he's not allowed in the Schengen Zone or UK.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~ WOMAN
Level 12 Myrmidon, Level ⑨ Tsundere, Level ✿ Hold My Flower
Bad Idea Purveyor
8 Values: https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=56.1&d=70.2&g=86.5&s=91.9
Political Compass: Economic -10.00 Authoritarian: -9.13
TG for Facebook if you want to friend me
Marissa, Goddess of Stratospheric Reach
preferred pronouns: Female ones
Primarily lesbian, but pansexual in nature

User avatar
Nucego
Attaché
 
Posts: 93
Founded: Jul 06, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Nucego » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:22 pm

I would say nothing, start gunsmithing and arm all sides of all the wars that follow. Since the triumphant party of wars is Death, why not be Death yourself?
You're unique. Have a nuke, I insist. <[☢]Σ I am the Nuclear Stirner, wet nightmare of mutually assured NAP violation.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78513
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:30 pm

Bienenhalde wrote:
Gharrow wrote:Given Britain's current pathetic state, and the fact that the U.S is fine...

I think I'll go with independence


What the heck are you even talking about? I would take the strong and stable leadership of the Queen Elizabeth and Theresa May over Trump's fudged up rubbish any day.

Hahahah. May ain’t strong and stable
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Nucego
Attaché
 
Posts: 93
Founded: Jul 06, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Nucego » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:32 pm

Bienenhalde wrote:
Gharrow wrote:Given Britain's current pathetic state, and the fact that the U.S is fine...

I think I'll go with independence


What the heck are you even talking about? I would take the strong and stable leadership of the Queen Elizabeth and Theresa May over Trump's fudged up rubbish any day.

Two people with equally reactionary opinions on the matter competing with one another? :lol2:

Is it my birthday or what?
You're unique. Have a nuke, I insist. <[☢]Σ I am the Nuclear Stirner, wet nightmare of mutually assured NAP violation.

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tahar Joblis » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:36 pm

I'm not sure, at the end of the day, what the alternative looks like if the vote goes the other way.

Let's take it slowly.

In 1776, the thirteen colonies as a collective vote against independence. There's already an armed revolt underway. Let's suppose that the colonists vote to send another olive branch petition to King George III, Lord Dartmouth actually presents it to the king, the king has a sane day decides it's a good idea, and George Washington surrenders the Continental Army.

There is no natural experiment of trade with a politically independent America to show up the mercantilists and bring Adam Smith's novel ideas in Wealth of Nations to the fore. The British continue their lead-footed work attempting to extract the mercantilist best that they can out of the rebellious colonies and quarter a bunch of troops on top of them to suppress the scattered revolts. They don't have massive wartime expenditure, but they do have a mounting long-term expense keeping order in the colonies and putting out brushfires, and governance of Canada becomes heavier-handed as a result. The colonies are less profitable than trade with the independent United States would have been.

Benjamin Franklin and other leaders either move to Paris or are hung as traitors. Many less-prominent rebels and other dissatisfied and move west into the Louisiana territory, to become nominally subjects of Charles IV, who could care less (but only if he tried very hard at caring less).

The French Revolution may or may not happen. France does not spend another seven years trying to buy Britain's military defeat via colonial proxies, and there's no fresh inspiring example of a successful anti-monarchist rebellion close at hand. Since the French are less bankrupt, they are almost certainly happy to buy back Louisiana from the Spanish as they did in the original timeline.

Now, we're on schedule for the Napoleonic Wars to happen, but Napoleon probably isn't Emperor. If the French Revolution happened at all, it happened on a different schedule with different key leaders in different key places. France and England are probably still due for another war, but the staging is very different.

The British haven't had their reputation - or overconfidence - punctured by losing the war against the colonists. Neither they nor the French have spent their treasuries dry on that war. There may have been no reason for the Germans, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese, and Dutch to all team up together in panic with the British to try to stop the French Republic and Napoleon from upending the old order of Europe - the French Revolution having likely taken a different form, if it happened at all.

So now we're ready for a second major tipping point, because having rescheduled the French Revolution, Britain and France are due for a major show-down with the alignment of the other European powers being uncertain (instead of having the scheduled "Napoleon fights everybody!" prizefight). With Britain still being the 'scary kid on the block' instead of Napoleon, most of the other major powers are probably more worried about the ascendant British (who didn't just get embarrassed by a successful colonial revolt). OTOH, Britain now fights this war able to call on the resources of these (not quite as large and prosperous) colonies on the other side of the Atlantic.

Some other things... without an anti-imperialist "new" power looking to slowly shove European colonial masters out of the picture, the New World probably remains a colonial battleground to fight proxy wars in with other European powers. Slavery is probably abolished in the South earlier (1830s) but gets replaced with a lasting apartheid system ala South Africa.

Those rebel-and-settler infused lands governed briefly by Charles IV, subsequently by Louis XVI and maybe XVII, maybe briefly by Emperor Maximilian - who knows? - probably develop a distinct identity from the eastern colonies. Mexico stays huge. If he still gets French backing and Louisiana is French, Emperor Max probably succeeds in staking his claim and keeping it, which would probably align Mexico with Austria-Hungary in an eventual global conflict...

... lots of exciting possibilities, but the entire world changes in ways that are hard to predict. The British might not decolonize so gracefully.

User avatar
Rusozak
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7037
Founded: Jun 14, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Rusozak » Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:58 pm

I mean, I would WANT independence, but I'm cowardly and afraid to fight for it...

I'd probably feign loyalty to the crown and covertly help the revolutionaries.
NOTE: This nation's government style, policies, and opinions in roleplay or forum 7 does not represent my true beliefs. It is purely for the enjoyment of the game.

User avatar
Tobleste
Minister
 
Posts: 2713
Founded: Dec 27, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Tobleste » Fri Jul 06, 2018 3:17 pm

The Serbian Empire wrote:I would have been against independence with my knowledge of today.

Tobleste wrote:
Wrt free speech, Europe is no different. Wrt cultural identity, America is currently divided into 2 camps that despise each other. I think you don't understand your own timeline.

Richard Spencer would be doing hard time in Europe for his promotion of Neo-Nazism. There's a reason he's not allowed in the Schengen Zone or UK.


Possibly but there are neo Nazis in Europe. I think if America's definition of free speech is considered better because their neo Nazis are safer, I think Europe's approach is actually better.

Anyway the idea that Europe is some dictatorship seems a hard one to shift among American right wingers (though most of their minds are as easily changed as concrete in general). I once talked to someone on this site who genuinely believed the UK is as free Saudi Arabia. There's no response to that.
Social Democrat
Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -4.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.26

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Fri Jul 06, 2018 3:42 pm

In 2018 we could still stand to be more independent of Britain. They pull strings all over the globe, like a shadow empire.
Opium Wars.
Classism.
Black Hole of calcutta.
Misadventures in Crimea
Disastrous remapping of the Middle East after the fall of the Ottoman Empire.
WMD debacle
They bought up my bank and turned it into crap
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15697
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Major-Tom » Fri Jul 06, 2018 4:05 pm

You may take our lives but you may nev....wait wrong independence movement. But, y'know, go USA.

User avatar
Nucego
Attaché
 
Posts: 93
Founded: Jul 06, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Nucego » Fri Jul 06, 2018 5:12 pm

Pope Joan wrote:In 2018 we could still stand to be more independent of Britain. They pull strings all over the globe, like a shadow empire.
Opium Wars.
Classism.
Black Hole of calcutta.
Misadventures in Crimea
Disastrous remapping of the Middle East after the fall of the Ottoman Empire.
WMD debacle
They bought up my bank and turned it into crap

It's why I'd decide to make the most of what I can in that situation. I don't really see either the British Empire or the United States being better than the other. A warmongering slave empire vs. another at the time and a warmongering reactionary hybrid regime vs. another nowadays with most of their colonies lost to independence and liberation movements. Fortunately, might I add.
You're unique. Have a nuke, I insist. <[☢]Σ I am the Nuclear Stirner, wet nightmare of mutually assured NAP violation.

User avatar
Tobleste
Minister
 
Posts: 2713
Founded: Dec 27, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Tobleste » Fri Jul 06, 2018 6:18 pm

Pope Joan wrote:In 2018 we could still stand to be more independent of Britain. They pull strings all over the globe, like a shadow empire.
Opium Wars.
Classism.
Black Hole of calcutta.
Misadventures in Crimea
Disastrous remapping of the Middle East after the fall of the Ottoman Empire.
WMD debacle
They bought up my bank and turned it into crap


I think a few of those are more yesterday's problem. You're on your own with the bank thing as well. :p
Social Democrat
Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -4.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.26

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Fri Jul 06, 2018 8:01 pm

Yes.
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
Socialist Communist States
Envoy
 
Posts: 257
Founded: Apr 03, 2017
Corporate Police State

Postby Socialist Communist States » Fri Jul 06, 2018 8:05 pm

Nope. God Save the King. All the way with his majesty, King George III. Crush the rebel scum! Crush all those who don't like tea! Especially the ones who find Earl Grey to taste horrible! (even though it hasn't been invented/discovered yet).

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Fri Jul 06, 2018 8:06 pm

Socialist Communist States wrote:Nope. God Save the King. All the way with his majesty, King George III. Crush the rebel scum! Crush all those who don't like tea! Especially the ones who find Earl Grey to taste horrible! (even though it hasn't been invented/discovered yet).

>Damn commie
>Damn redcoat

I see the connection now.../s
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78513
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Fri Jul 06, 2018 8:19 pm

Socialist Communist States wrote:Nope. God Save the King. All the way with his majesty, King George III. Crush the rebel scum! Crush all those who don't like tea! Especially the ones who find Earl Grey to taste horrible! (even though it hasn't been invented/discovered yet).

Nah. Down with the monarchy free Scotland!!
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Fri Jul 06, 2018 8:23 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Socialist Communist States wrote:Nope. God Save the King. All the way with his majesty, King George III. Crush the rebel scum! Crush all those who don't like tea! Especially the ones who find Earl Grey to taste horrible! (even though it hasn't been invented/discovered yet).

Nah. Down with the monarchy free Scotland!!

Eh. I’m all for toppling monarchies but I’d rather conserve the Union, be it American or British.
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
Bienenhalde
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6472
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Bienenhalde » Fri Jul 06, 2018 8:56 pm

Sovaal wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Nah. Down with the monarchy free Scotland!!

Eh. I’m all for toppling monarchies but I’d rather conserve the Union, be it American or British.


What about making Scotland and England separate Commonwealth realms, with both retaining the monarchy?

User avatar
Elwher
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9380
Founded: May 24, 2012
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Elwher » Fri Jul 06, 2018 9:23 pm

Socialist Communist States wrote:Nope. God Save the King. All the way with his majesty, King George III. Crush the rebel scum! Crush all those who don't like tea! Especially the ones who find Earl Grey to taste horrible! (even though it hasn't been invented/discovered yet).


Up the Rebels! Éirinn go Brách! And Earl Grey is an abomination unto the Lord! True tea lovers much prefer Lapsang souchong.
CYNIC, n. A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. Hence the custom among the Scythians of plucking out a cynic's eyes to improve his vision.
Ambrose Bierce

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Aggicificicerous, Chocolate territory, Cinnaa, Eahland, Enormous Gentiles, Existential Cats, Great United States, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Kaumudeen, Lothria, Mr TM, Nordengrund, Pathonia, Platypus Bureaucracy, Rivogna, Rusozak, Statesburg, Stratonesia, The Holy Therns, ThE VoOrIaPeN DiScOrD

Advertisement

Remove ads