The New California Republic wrote:Hanafuridake wrote:There is much debate over whether the Buddha can be considered God, I think that it would be best to say that the Buddhas are their own class of religious being which overlaps in some areas with the Western notion of Godhood, but differs in others. A major difference between the Buddha and the Christian God (and why the two religions are incompatible) is that the Buddha is not a Creator God and specifically rejects the concept of a being creating this universe. Another major difference is that in Christian theology, God
exists, while notions such as exists, doesn't exist, neither exists nor doesn't exist, don't apply to the Tathāgata.
Having attained
nirvāṇa and before he ultimately attained
parinirvāṇa, Buddha refers to himself as
Tathāgata as you said, so
"beyond the transitory"; but what that exactly means in relation to whether he continues to exist after
parinirvāṇa, and the precise "form" of that existence, is unclear.
The state of Nirvana excludes both states of being and non-being, the implication being that the Buddha has gone beyond them.
Nibbana Sutta wrote:There is that dimension where there is neither earth, nor water, nor fire, nor wind; neither dimension of the infinitude of space, nor dimension of the infinitude of consciousness, nor dimension of nothingness, nor dimension of neither perception nor non-perception; neither this world, nor the next world, nor sun, nor moon. And there, I say, there is neither coming, nor going, nor stasis; neither passing away nor arising: without stance, without foundation, without support [mental object]. This, just this, is the end of stress.