Internationalist Bastard wrote:I spent some time thinking about what would be considered as art by the government
I now have the mental image of our tax money funding sonic fan art
And that would be a problem...why exactly?
Advertisement
by The New California Republic » Sat May 05, 2018 6:59 am
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I spent some time thinking about what would be considered as art by the government
I now have the mental image of our tax money funding sonic fan art
by Petrolheadia » Sat May 05, 2018 7:00 am
Conserative Morality wrote:Mike the Progressive wrote:
Implying that has been the case for all artists or works of art.
Some of the best have sought their financing through private donors and sponsors.
And some of the best have sought their financing through public donation and sponsoring.
And some of the best have been denied by private donors and sponsors.
And some of the best have died penniless and unrecognized in their lifetimes because of private donors and sponsors.
by Ifreann » Sat May 05, 2018 7:00 am
Some of the best have sought their financing through private donors and sponsors.
by Mike the Progressive » Sat May 05, 2018 7:01 am
Ifreann wrote:Mike the Progressive wrote:
Implying that has been the case for all artists or works of art.
You might be inferring that, but I was not implying anything of the sort.Some of the best have sought their financing through private donors and sponsors.
And some were commissioned by the government of the day. Sometimes the private donor effectively was the government.
by Conserative Morality » Sat May 05, 2018 7:03 am
Petrolheadia wrote:And some of them actually found a job to fund their artistic pursuits.
by Conserative Morality » Sat May 05, 2018 7:04 am
Mike the Progressive wrote:The problem is how do you determine who will be the next great artist? You can't just fund everybody because they call themselves one and their works "art."
by Ifreann » Sat May 05, 2018 7:06 am
Mike the Progressive wrote:Ifreann wrote:You might be inferring that, but I was not implying anything of the sort.
And some were commissioned by the government of the day. Sometimes the private donor effectively was the government.
The problem is how do you determine who will be the next great artist?
You can't just fund everybody because they call themselves one and their works "art."
by Internationalist Bastard » Sat May 05, 2018 7:08 am
by Mike the Progressive » Sat May 05, 2018 7:08 am
by Petrolheadia » Sat May 05, 2018 7:10 am
by Mike the Progressive » Sat May 05, 2018 7:11 am
by Internationalist Bastard » Sat May 05, 2018 7:13 am
Petrolheadia wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:Yes, I'm so glad Kafka ended up working with asbestos and dying from complications regarding his lungs, truly a worthy use of his time and talents. =^)
What about the artists who didn't get jobs that were unknown to be dangerous?
Richard Serra worked at moving. Ai Weiwei played blackjack. Keith Haring was a busboy. Jackson Pollock was a babysitter. B. B. King drove a tractor. Rod Stewart was a gravedigger.
by Petrolheadia » Sat May 05, 2018 7:15 am
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:What about the artists who didn't get jobs that were unknown to be dangerous?
Richard Serra worked at moving. Ai Weiwei played blackjack. Keith Haring was a busboy. Jackson Pollock was a babysitter. B. B. King drove a tractor. Rod Stewart was a gravedigger.
Weiwei is an artist? My husband loves him, I thought he a documentary guy
by The New California Republic » Sat May 05, 2018 7:31 am
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:What about the artists who didn't get jobs that were unknown to be dangerous?
Richard Serra worked at moving. Ai Weiwei played blackjack. Keith Haring was a busboy. Jackson Pollock was a babysitter. B. B. King drove a tractor. Rod Stewart was a gravedigger.
Weiwei is an artist? My husband loves him, I thought he a documentary guy
by Internationalist Bastard » Sat May 05, 2018 7:49 am
by Ethel mermania » Sat May 05, 2018 8:56 am
The New California Republic wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:Weiwei is an artist? My husband loves him, I thought he a documentary guy
I thought it was common knowledge and widely accepted that AI Weiwei is famous because he is an artist. Huh. It is akin to thinking Bill Clinton is famous because of his charity work...
by Kramanica » Sat May 05, 2018 8:59 am
by Ifreann » Sat May 05, 2018 9:41 am
Kramanica wrote:Lol no
If your "art" can't survive in the private sector then my tax money shouldn't be funding it. Completely useless endeavor.
by Kramanica » Sat May 05, 2018 9:57 am
by The Parkus Empire » Sat May 05, 2018 10:10 am
by Ifreann » Sat May 05, 2018 10:38 am
by The Parkus Empire » Sat May 05, 2018 10:39 am
by Kramanica » Sat May 05, 2018 10:41 am
Ifreann wrote:Kramanica wrote:Mount Rushmore was supposed to be a tourist attraction. It wasn't done for the sake of funding arts. And it technically wasn't even finished since the funding dried up anyway.
It's a giant fucking sculpture. It's art. And the gubbmint funded it.
"Completely useless endeavor." - Kramanica, 2018
by Kramanica » Sat May 05, 2018 10:42 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Google [Bot], Kaumudeen, Philjia, Post War America, United Northen States Canada
Advertisement