NationStates

The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:

Community Values wrote:
I see. And we know that he wants this based on what sources?

Did he say it in the press conference?

I think it was C-span or fox news.

The Black Forrest wrote:

The Portland Territory wrote:I know it was in the blog section, written by different people, but I still find it funny that it was on the same site, of course it being Huffington

I am failing to see the problem. The blog is basically an opinion page. Now if it was the same guy? That would be a good argument.

The Grene Knyght wrote:

Patridam wrote:
I am getting really sick of that eternally half-a**ed argument.Firstly, the will of the people is also represented by a Republican majority in both houses of congress.

Secondly, the popular vote in the presidential election is a goddamn meaningless statistic, because both candidates campaigned to win the electoral college vote, not the popular vote. If the campaigns had been run for the popular vote, Trump wouldn't have had eleven million rallies in Pennsylvania and would have had some in California.

If y'all Democrats hate the popular vote so much and find it so misrepresentative of the people, why did you try to get it changed when it was helping you? It's just something for you to whine about to help feed your victim complexes and patriarchy/white conspiracy theories.

Out of curiosity, when did the electoral college vote help the Dems?

Community Values wrote:

The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:I think it was C-span or fox news.

You? Watching Fox? Must be because Hannity is such a unbiased reporter, I'm sure.

Patridam wrote:

The Black Forrest wrote:
I am failing to see the problem. The blog is basically an opinion page. Now if it was the same guy? That would be a good argument.

Huffington post is one big SJW op-ed.

The Black Forrest wrote:

Patridam wrote:
Huffington post puts its op ed "blog" posts in all of its emails and lists it among all of its supposedly news articles with no distinguishing separators. The HuffPost and its twin sister, BuzzFeed, are the most abhorrent excuses for journalism that the world has ever seen.

But of course Fox News or the average con blog is the light of truth.

The Black Forrest wrote:

Patridam wrote:
Huffington post puts its op ed "blog" posts in all of its emails and lists it among all of its supposedly news articles with no distinguishing separators. The HuffPost and its twin sister, BuzzFeed, are the most abhorrent excuses for journalism that the world has ever seen.

But of course Fox News or the average con blog is the light of truth.

Community Values wrote:

The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:I think it was C-span or fox news.

You? Watching Fox? Must be because Hannity is such a unbiased reporter, I'm sure.

The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster wrote:

The Black Forrest wrote:
But of course Fox News or the average con blog is the light of truth.

Don't forget Breitbart, the soon-to-be Official State Media©.

The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster wrote:

The Black Forrest wrote:
But of course Fox News or the average con blog is the light of truth.

Don't forget Breitbart, the soon-to-be Official State Media©.

Patridam wrote:

Community Values wrote:
You? Watching Fox? Must be because Hannity is such a unbiased reporter, I'm sure.

A progressive accusing Fox of being biased against Trump?

wat

Patridam wrote:

Community Values wrote:
You? Watching Fox? Must be because Hannity is such a unbiased reporter, I'm sure.

A progressive accusing Fox of being bias against Trump?

wat

The Portland Territory wrote:

The Black Forrest wrote:
But of course Fox News or the average con blog is the light of truth.

Fox News is alright, but this is where blogging is at

Gauthier wrote:

Patridam wrote:
A progressive accusing Fox of being biased against Trump?

wat

They were railing against him early in the campaign especially when he implied Megyn Kelly was gushing blood like the elevator in The Shining. Then he won and FOXNews being FOXNews pivoted 180 like most Republicans and started sucking his dick.

Community Values wrote:

Patridam wrote:
A progressive accusing Fox of being bias against Trump?

wat

I don't get it, are you calling me a progressive, or Herp? I was just watching Hannity an hour ago for the first time in a few months, and noticed how biased he was. Found it kinda applicable to the post.

Anyways, I don't think many hard line conservatives watching late-night Fox would disagree with deporting immigrants based on the suspicion of crime, if anyone said such a thing.

The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster wrote:

The Portland Territory wrote:Fox News is alright, but this is where blogging is at

Oh dear god in heaven...wait, scratch that. That blog proves there is no god.

The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster wrote:

The Portland Territory wrote:Fox News is alright, but this is where blogging is at

Oh dear god in heaven...wait, scratch that. That blog proves there is no god.

Patridam wrote:

Wallenburg wrote:Someone didn't check the popular vote.

I am getting really sick of that eternally half-a**ed argument.Firstly, the will of the people is also represented by a Republican majority in both houses of congress.

Secondly, the popular vote in the presidential election is a goddamn meaningless statistic, because both candidates campaigned to win the electoral college vote, not the popular vote.

If the campaigns had been run for the popular vote, Trump wouldn't have had eleven million rallies in Pennsylvania and would have had some in California.

If y'all Democrats hate the popular vote so much and find it so misrepresentative of the people,

why did you try to get it changed when it was helping you?

It's just something for you to whine about to help feed your victim complexes and patriarchy/white conspiracy theories.

The Portland Territory wrote:

Gauthier wrote:They were railing against him early in the campaign especially when he implied Megyn Kelly was gushing blood like the elevator in The Shining. Then he won and FOXNews being FOXNews pivoted 180 like most Republicans and started sucking his dick.

Hey, you forgot about Bernie sucking Hillary's dick after losing.

wait, how does that work?

Community Values wrote:

The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster wrote:Oh dear god in heaven...wait, scratch that. That blog proves there is no god.

You haven't seen anything yet.

Patridam wrote:

The Portland Territory wrote:As far as the whole thing with the EC helping the Dems more, I think it is true. They only need to win a handful of states to win the presidency, and most of which always go solid blue. It's hard for a Republican to win the presidency nowadays.

Now, even after Trump's victory because of the Electoral College, I still believe it should be replaced with a two-round system, the first round being purely popular vote and second being a proportional version of the EC

Never mind the fact that Democratic news agencies were defending the electoral college when their candidate won but denigrating it as a racist relic of slavery when the other guy won.

Gauthier wrote:

The Portland Territory wrote:Hey, you forgot about Bernie sucking Hillary's dick after losing.

wait, how does that work?

Hillary is out of the picture. Stop clucking an excuse for Trump.

The Black Forrest wrote:

Community Values wrote:You haven't seen anything yet.

For a second I did think they can't be serious then I saw the comment about reduced fertility.

An Ugly African Woman Has Somehow Managed To Win Miss Helsinki
Finland is officially cucked

The Black Forrest wrote:

Community Values wrote:You haven't seen anything yet.

For a second I did think they can't be serious then I saw the comment about reduced fertility.

Gauthier wrote:

The Portland Territory wrote:Hey, you forgot about Bernie sucking Hillary's dick after losing.

wait, how does that work?

Hillary is out of the picture. Stop clucking an excuse for Trump.