Advertisement
by Emergent Quality » Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:23 am
by Sibirsky » Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:32 am
M07H3R wrote:
Why? He doesn't have it now. The only way this is possible is through Anarchy, which could not be sustained without significant changes to Human nature.
by Sibirsky » Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:33 am
Lelouche wrote:M07H3R wrote:Lelouche wrote:M07H3R wrote:
Try telling your average Somalian that you would rather have freedom over security, and see where that gets you.Ben Franklin wrote:Those who would chose Security over Liberty, deserve neither Security nor Liberty
What Somalia thinks is irrelevant to me, because Somalia has never proven to be capable of self government, and as such has no credibility
in short, they deserve everything that is wrong with themThomas Jefferson wrote:The People get the Government they deserve
They didn't get much of a chance, since they were raped and pillaged by money/power hungry imperialists.
ah the very Euro-Centric view that we are responsible for all the worlds ills, even to this day
Tell me, is eating albino's for their "magical powers" a western belief?
Cause in Zimbabwe it's the hippest trend man, and relatively new.
by Emergent Quality » Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:33 am
Sibirsky wrote:You need to learn before you post. You have a very warped view of the world.
by Emergent Quality » Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:35 am
M07H3R wrote:They can't 'ask' for them, the're busy fighting amongst each other for their warlords. We must show them how to help themselves, or it will only get worse there.
by Sibirsky » Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:35 am
M07H3R wrote:Lelouche wrote:M07H3R wrote:Lelouche wrote:M07H3R wrote:
Try telling your average Somalian that you would rather have freedom over security, and see where that gets you.Ben Franklin wrote:Those who would chose Security over Liberty, deserve neither Security nor Liberty
What Somalia thinks is irrelevant to me, because Somalia has never proven to be capable of self government, and as such has no credibility
in short, they deserve everything that is wrong with themThomas Jefferson wrote:The People get the Government they deserve
They didn't get much of a chance, since they were raped and pillaged by money/power hungry imperialists.
ah the very Euro-Centric view that we are responsible for all the worlds ills, even to this day
Tell me, is eating albino's for their "magical powers" a western belief?
Cause in Zimbabwe it's the hippest trend man, and relatively new.
No, we're not responsible for many of their cultural problems (apart from those that came about by forcibly combining tribes in the 'scramble for Africa' of course). A world government, with its improvements in education could rid them of such nonsensical beliefs, however.
But many of the 1st and 2nd world nations did (and many still do) have a part to play in the troubles in Africa and other 3rd world nations.
by Sibirsky » Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:37 am
Lelouche wrote:
I understand your concern
and in the context of this conversation, we are dealing with modern cultures
However, this is just a placeholder, the real issue for me. is that I don't need some far off place, telling me what I should and should not value. I value Liberty above Security, and till the end of my days I shall strive to live in a place which shares my values
and if none exist, then I am willing to fight to make one that does. Surely I am not alone in that struggle.
by Sibirsky » Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:38 am
M07H3R wrote:They can't 'ask' for them, the're busy fighting amongst each other for their warlords. We must show them how to help themselves, or it will only get worse there.
by Emergent Quality » Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:38 am
Sibirsky wrote:How would this education system get rid of cultural beliefs?
by Zot109land » Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:47 am
by Emergent Quality » Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:56 am
Zot109land wrote:see to copenhagen its a catastrophe why would we be ruled as 1 people as we cant get something about climate
by Sibirsky » Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:02 am
Emergent Quality wrote:Zot109land wrote:see to copenhagen its a catastrophe why would we be ruled as 1 people as we cant get something about climate
The people can't even plan the economy to their own benefit, let alone to save themselves if it were necessary. This isn't the time for climate change talks.
Don't be silly. Hitler was already crazy. Hitler was not corrupted by power.
The UN would not become corrupt if it ran the world. The UN is already corrupt.
by Zot109land » Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:03 am
Emergent Quality wrote:Zot109land wrote:see to copenhagen its a catastrophe why would we be ruled as 1 people as we cant get something about climate
The people can't even plan the economy to their own benefit, let alone to save themselves if it were necessary. This isn't the time for climate change talks.
Don't be silly. Hitler was always crazy.
by Emergent Quality » Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:04 am
Sibirsky wrote:The economy is not supposed to be planned. That's why socialism fails.
by Sibirsky » Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:15 am
Emergent Quality wrote:Sibirsky wrote:The economy is not supposed to be planned. That's why socialism fails.
You're absolutely right. Planning things never does any good. Only planlessness, randomness, chaos can bring prosperity. I don't know what came over me. Blindfold yourselves and run aimlessly at the enemy, my warriors!
Capitain, Romulans at the rear. What are your orders? PLANLESSNESS.
by Emergent Quality » Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:22 am
Sibirsky wrote:The economy is too complex and sophisticated for people to plan it. That does not mean randomness and chaos.
Sibirsky wrote:That's why the Soviet economy collapsed. That's why Cuba is poor. That's why North Korea is poor.
Sibirsky wrote:The government is extremely inept at allocating resources (planning the economy), while the market uses price signals to allocate resources more efficiently.
by Sibirsky » Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:27 am
Emergent Quality wrote:Sibirsky wrote:The economy is too complex and sophisticated for people to plan it. That does not mean randomness and chaos.
My lord, the war is too complex and sophisticated to plan. Let our drafted, individual soldiers take their own initiative at the front. That doesn't mean randomness and chaos.Sibirsky wrote:That's why the Soviet economy collapsed. That's why Cuba is poor. That's why North Korea is poor.
The Soviet Economy collapses because the people who ran it were incompetent. And Cuba/NK are a bit lacking in trade and resources.Sibirsky wrote:The government is extremely inept at allocating resources (planning the economy), while the market uses price signals to allocate resources more efficiently.
No, I'd have to say you're inept. If the government is running the economy then it's a monopoly. It's got a good deal.
by Emergent Quality » Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:31 am
Sibirsky wrote:Which is common in the big government crowd.
Sibirsky wrote:Nobody is capable of planning an economy.
Sibirsky wrote:That is why planned economies are all poorer than free economies.
by Sibirsky » Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:40 am
Emergent Quality wrote:Sibirsky wrote:Which is common in the big government crowd.
I'm not in favour of big government.Sibirsky wrote:Nobody is capable of planning an economy.
No one is capable of running the war, my lord! That's why we have generals.
Sibirsky wrote:That is why planned economies are all poorer than free economies.
No... it's because they were incompetent. Incompetent people running the government also shows that you're incompetent. Blame yourself. You talk about free market. Pressure deciding who runs the economy? It is impossible that you can choose who can run the economy better than pressure? Choose the people who run the economy. Run it yourself. Remain silent. sssshhh... don't talk. You'll distract them. Soviet Union is better than you. Incompetent bureaucracy of fools running economy still better than competent person not running the economy. They are great. You are small.
by Emergent Quality » Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:43 am
Sibirsky wrote:You favor a planned economy. Planned economy=big government.
by M07H3R » Sat Dec 26, 2009 8:05 am
Sibirsky wrote:You need to provide sources for your claims that a world government would improve education. How would this education system be funded? How would this education system get rid of cultural beliefs. How would this government prevent war?
by Urgolon » Sat Dec 26, 2009 8:27 am
by Buffett and Colbert » Sat Dec 26, 2009 8:46 am
You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Britain-, Fractalnavel, Sodor and Seljaryssk, The Huskar Social Union, Thermodolia
Advertisement