Standard are different for Republicans.
Advertisement
by Bombadil » Thu Sep 24, 2020 9:32 pm
by San Lumen » Thu Sep 24, 2020 9:33 pm
by The Black Forrest » Thu Sep 24, 2020 9:34 pm
Bombadil wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Silly man. You expected the republicans to follow their own stances?
I rarely expect any politician to these days, certainly not in the money-fuelled politics of the US. It's too expensive to afford principles. However Lindsay Graham has really reached a new bar lately, I hope he didn't crick his neck with that enormous about face of his.
McConnell I expect it.
by Telconi » Thu Sep 24, 2020 9:39 pm
by Lamoni » Thu Sep 24, 2020 9:57 pm
Eirinnland wrote:How stupid are the people who think a dementia addled old man like Biden can beat Trump lol, he's ruthless and Biden will be literally bullied.
Licana on the M-21A2 MBT: "Well, it is one of the most badass tanks on NS."
Vortiaganica: Lamoni I understand fully, of course. The two (Lamoni & Lyras) are more inseparable than the Clinton family and politics.
Triplebaconation: Lamoni commands a quiet respect that carries its own authority. He is the Mandela of NS.
by Greater Miami Shores » Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:11 pm
by Rusozak » Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:14 pm
Greater Miami Shores wrote:San Lumen wrote:
Standard are different for Republicans.
The Democrats want to pack the court or whatever anyone calls it, they want to add more Democrats to the court, even RBG was against doing this.
"Standard are different for Republicans." What about the Different standards of those Democrats"
by Post War America » Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:16 pm
Greater Miami Shores wrote:San Lumen wrote:
Standard are different for Republicans.
The Democrats want to pack the court or whatever anyone calls it, they want to add more Democrats to the court, even RBG was against doing this.
"Standard are different for Republicans." What about the Different standards of those Democrats"
Gravlen wrote:The famous Bowling Green Massacre is yesterday's news. Today it's all about the Cricket Blue Carnage. Tomorrow it'll be about the Curling Yellow Annihilation.
by Greater Miami Shores » Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:30 pm
Rusozak wrote:Greater Miami Shores wrote:The Democrats want to pack the court or whatever anyone calls it, they want to add more Democrats to the court, even RBG was against doing this.
"Standard are different for Republicans." What about the Different standards of those Democrats"
Is "The democrats do it too" your only defense? Is there absolutely nothing you can contribute to either condemn or logically defend the Republicans in this case? I implore you to find a defense that doesn't say anything about Democrats, the left, or any opposition to the Republicans or conservatism.
by Bombadil » Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:31 pm
Greater Miami Shores wrote:Rusozak wrote:
Is "The democrats do it too" your only defense? Is there absolutely nothing you can contribute to either condemn or logically defend the Republicans in this case? I implore you to find a defense that doesn't say anything about Democrats, the left, or any opposition to the Republicans or conservatism.
lol, I have made many good arguments on my posts why President Trump or any President like say a Hillary President has the right under the US constitution to name and try to confirm a highly qualified US Supreme Court Justice of their choice anytime during their elected term.
by The Black Forrest » Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:32 pm
Greater Miami Shores wrote:Rusozak wrote:
Is "The democrats do it too" your only defense? Is there absolutely nothing you can contribute to either condemn or logically defend the Republicans in this case? I implore you to find a defense that doesn't say anything about Democrats, the left, or any opposition to the Republicans or conservatism.
lol, I have made many good arguments on my posts why President Trump or any President like say a Hillary President has the right under the US constitution to name and try to confirm a highly qualified US Supreme Court Justice of their choice anytime during their elected term.
by Greater Miami Shores » Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:41 pm
Bombadil wrote:Greater Miami Shores wrote:lol, I have made many good arguments on my posts why President Trump or any President like say a Hillary President has the right under the US constitution to name and try to confirm a highly qualified US Supreme Court Justice of their choice anytime during their elected term.
So you disagree with the Republican actions in 2016?
by Bombadil » Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:46 pm
Greater Miami Shores wrote:Bombadil wrote:
So you disagree with the Republican actions in 2016?
Yes I do disagree but many, a few or some of the fair, unbiased Democrat Political saints of today, right now, want to pack the US Supreme Court with extra Leftist Liberal Democrats, instead of allowing Republican President Trump to nominate and try to confirm a highly qualified US Supreme Court Justice nominee of his choice anytime during his elected term, lol. as the democratic US constitution allows. Those certain many, a few or some Leftist Liberal Democrats who want to Pack the US Supreme Court with extra Leftist Liberal Democrat Justices are wrong. I was being sarcastic, as in lol,
by Greater Miami Shores » Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:48 pm
Bombadil wrote:Greater Miami Shores wrote:Yes I do disagree but many, a few or some of the fair, unbiased Democrat Political saints of today, right now, want to pack the US Supreme Court with extra Leftist Liberal Democrats, instead of allowing Republican President Trump to nominate and try to confirm a highly qualified US Supreme Court Justice nominee of his choice anytime during his elected term, lol. as the democratic US constitution allows. Those certain many, a few or some Leftist Liberal Democrats who want to Pack the US Supreme Court with extra Leftist Liberal Democrat Justices are wrong. I was being sarcastic, as in lol,
Right, good, so they were wrong to block Merrick Garland without even a hearing.
Therefore they were wrong to state that there was now a precedent that no SC would be appointed in an election year.
Thus they're dishonourable for instantly breaking that precedent the first chance they got
Glad we agree, because I also believe a president should be able to nominate an SC during an election year but neither I nor the Democrats set any precedent to the opposite.
Having broken these things, not keeping their word, Republicans have provided license for the Democrats to do whatever the fuck they like.
by Rusozak » Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:50 pm
Greater Miami Shores wrote:Bombadil wrote:
Right, good, so they were wrong to block Merrick Garland without even a hearing.
Therefore they were wrong to state that there was now a precedent that no SC would be appointed in an election year.
Thus they're dishonourable for instantly breaking that precedent the first chance they got
Glad we agree, because I also believe a president should be able to nominate an SC during an election year but neither I nor the Democrats set any precedent to the opposite.
Having broken these things, not keeping their word, Republicans have provided license for the Democrats to do whatever the fuck they like.
Wrong all I said was they should have let Obama choose a nominee, just like the Democrats of right now today, should let President Trump choose a nominee, end of story, end of post,
by Bombadil » Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:52 pm
Greater Miami Shores wrote:Bombadil wrote:
Right, good, so they were wrong to block Merrick Garland without even a hearing.
Therefore they were wrong to state that there was now a precedent that no SC would be appointed in an election year.
Thus they're dishonourable for instantly breaking that precedent the first chance they got
Glad we agree, because I also believe a president should be able to nominate an SC during an election year but neither I nor the Democrats set any precedent to the opposite.
Having broken these things, not keeping their word, Republicans have provided license for the Democrats to do whatever the fuck they like.
Wrong all I said was they should have let Obama choose a nominee, just like the Democrats of right now today, should let President Trump choose a nominee, end of story, end of post, lol.
by Greater Miami Shores » Thu Sep 24, 2020 10:55 pm
by Bombadil » Thu Sep 24, 2020 11:01 pm
Greater Miami Shores wrote:I think the Republicans are playing politics to their base, and I think the Democrats are playing politics to their base, lets all admit it. lol.
For the Record:
lol, and lol attacks are my favorite expressions, not always necessarily an actual lol or a lol attack, and usually not so.
by Greater Miami Shores » Thu Sep 24, 2020 11:04 pm
Bombadil wrote:Greater Miami Shores wrote:I think the Republicans are playing politics to their base, and I think the Democrats are playing politics to their base, lets all admit it. lol.
For the Record:
lol, and lol attacks are my favorite expressions, not always necessarily an actual lol or a lol attack, and usually not so.
It's ok, we're used to those on the right not meaning what they say, Lindsay Graham for example..
by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Sep 24, 2020 11:25 pm
Greater Miami Shores wrote:Bombadil wrote:
It's ok, we're used to those on the right not meaning what they say, Lindsay Graham for example..
lol, it's ok were used to those on the left not meaning what they say, Democrat Nancy Pelosi, Democrat Adam Schiff, Democrat, Chuck Schumer, Democrat Hillary Clinton, Democrat President Obama, Democrat Vice President Joe Biden, and many, many more, lol again.
by Greater Miami Shores » Thu Sep 24, 2020 11:44 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Greater Miami Shores wrote:lol, it's ok were used to those on the left not meaning what they say, Democrat Nancy Pelosi, Democrat Adam Schiff, Democrat, Chuck Schumer, Democrat Hillary Clinton, Democrat President Obama, Democrat Vice President Joe Biden, and many, many more, lol again.
It's rather telling that you didn't provide any quotes for these people. Almost like it's not a rebuttal.
by Vassenor » Fri Sep 25, 2020 12:59 am
by The Huskar Social Union » Fri Sep 25, 2020 4:12 am
Corrian wrote:On a random note, you know shits gotten bad when, after the RBG news, my far leftist friend said it might be time to buy a gun.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Almonaster Nuevo, Clatian Order, Eahland, El Lazaro, United Calanworie, Vanuzgard
Advertisement