San Lumen wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
He should but the House did not issue him a subpoena so he's under no obligation to do so. Democrats have sufficient evidence and as much as they would like his testimony, the underlining argument has been proven: Trump used his position of power to solicit a foreign government to investigate a political opponent. Of course, I think the Democrats are playing the long game when it comes to Bolton: they know a court will uphold the inquiry for Bolton and Kupperman's case, they're just hoping it's done quickly because if it is and it's in the House's favor, then Bolton will come.
Then just issue him a subpoena and be done with it.
Your fellow Democrats in the House have decided against it. Take it up with them for why they didn't.