Rather hard to mistake /tʃ/ for /f/ imo, but eh.
Advertisement
by Pacomia » Fri Jul 19, 2019 10:41 pm
by EastKekistan » Fri Jul 19, 2019 11:20 pm
by Raider Clans » Fri Jul 19, 2019 11:29 pm
by Pacomia » Fri Jul 19, 2019 11:31 pm
Raider Clans wrote:You guys are overreacting, they're not that bad.
by Cekoviu » Fri Jul 19, 2019 11:33 pm
EastKekistan wrote:Some comments:
1. NSG folks are probably predominantly single males.
2. It is indeed a bad idea for a guy to raise kids because women do intuitively like kids a lot more than men on average.
by Geneviev » Fri Jul 19, 2019 11:34 pm
Raider Clans wrote:You guys are overreacting, they're not that bad.
by Australian rePublic » Fri Jul 19, 2019 11:39 pm
by Australian rePublic » Fri Jul 19, 2019 11:44 pm
EastKekistan wrote:Some comments:
1. NSG folks are probably predominantly single males.
2. It is indeed a bad idea for a guy to raise kids because women do intuitively like kids a lot more than men on average.
by Recidivism » Fri Jul 19, 2019 11:44 pm
by The Realm of Platinum » Fri Jul 19, 2019 11:47 pm
Australian rePublic wrote:EastKekistan wrote:Some comments:
1. NSG folks are probably predominantly single males.
2. It is indeed a bad idea for a guy to raise kids because women do intuitively like kids a lot more than men on average.
As much as I hate kids, I know a woman who hates them more than I do. She hates them to the point where her hatred of kids alone is preventing her from having any of her own. I don't hate them that much. I also know men who absolutely adore kids (in a non-paedophile way. The fact that I had to clarify that is what's wrong with society). Stupid steryotypes like this are the reason why the family court system is disgustingly bias against fathers
by EastKekistan » Sat Jul 20, 2019 12:22 am
Australian rePublic wrote:EastKekistan wrote:Some comments:
1. NSG folks are probably predominantly single males.
2. It is indeed a bad idea for a guy to raise kids because women do intuitively like kids a lot more than men on average.
As much as I hate kids, I know a woman who hates them more than I do. She hates them to the point where her hatred of kids alone is preventing her from having any of her own. I don't hate them that much. I also know men who absolutely adore kids (in a non-paedophile way. The fact that I had to clarify that is what's wrong with society). Stupid steryotypes like this are the reason why the family court system is disgustingly bias against fathers
by Australian rePublic » Sat Jul 20, 2019 12:47 am
EastKekistan wrote:Australian rePublic wrote:As much as I hate kids, I know a woman who hates them more than I do. She hates them to the point where her hatred of kids alone is preventing her from having any of her own. I don't hate them that much. I also know men who absolutely adore kids (in a non-paedophile way. The fact that I had to clarify that is what's wrong with society). Stupid steryotypes like this are the reason why the family court system is disgustingly bias against fathers
There are many feminist lies. For example division of community property in family courts during divorces is really legalized robbery no.matter what feminists say. Moreover life is really anti-male no matter what feminists say. However this one seems to be true. Unless you can argue that the average men behave drastically different from the average men here the claim stays. It is MRAs who are lying here. As usual both sides lie for self-interest maximization. I call out everyone's bullshit no matter which side they are on.
Am I suddenly the most feminist person on NSG? Lol wut?
What's particularly funny is that even some usually soc liberal guys occasionally vote with their gender identity, not their politics..which is evidence that my hypothesis of a Hobbesian world is probably correct. Ideologies are just tools for self-interest maximization while appearing altruistic. Lol.
by EastKekistan » Sat Jul 20, 2019 12:49 am
Australian rePublic wrote:EastKekistan wrote:
There are many feminist lies. For example division of community property in family courts during divorces is really legalized robbery no.matter what feminists say. Moreover life is really anti-male no matter what feminists say. However this one seems to be true. Unless you can argue that the average men behave drastically different from the average men here the claim stays. It is MRAs who are lying here. As usual both sides lie for self-interest maximization. I call out everyone's bullshit no matter which side they are on.
Am I suddenly the most feminist person on NSG? Lol wut?
What's particularly funny is that even some usually soc liberal guys occasionally vote with their gender identity, not their politics..which is evidence that my hypothesis of a Hobbesian world is probably correct. Ideologies are just tools for self-interest maximization while appearing altruistic. Lol.
Today's word of the day- "steryotype"
by Australian rePublic » Sat Jul 20, 2019 12:50 am
by Australian rePublic » Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:08 am
by The Realm of Platinum » Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:17 am
Australian rePublic wrote:EastKekistan wrote:Have you realized that you are essentially using modified SJW reasoning?
Okay fine. Here's a better argument. Many of us don't actually hate kids. We just have a lower tollerance for ill-behaved rat bags than many women. And most kids who are ill-behaved rat bags are rat bags because their mothers (in my experience, it's almost always the mum) lets them run a muck whilst doing absolutely jack shit to atop them. There are many well-behaved toddlers who I absolutely adore (once again, in a non-peadophile manner) Most men love their own children, to death, but despise the children of mothers who let their kids run wild. Who's a worse parent? The father who loves his kids but despises the kids who run a muck because their mothers let them? Now, who's a worse parent? The mother who doesn't supervise her kid? Or the father who deapises the mothers of unsupervised kids. Now, the vast, vast majority of mothers will supervise their children, and should be commended for that, but if you're comparing the (mostly) childless community of NationStates to most, or even many, fathers, anything is free gain I guess...
by Australian rePublic » Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:31 am
The Realm of Platinum wrote:Australian rePublic wrote:Okay fine. Here's a better argument. Many of us don't actually hate kids. We just have a lower tollerance for ill-behaved rat bags than many women. And most kids who are ill-behaved rat bags are rat bags because their mothers (in my experience, it's almost always the mum) lets them run a muck whilst doing absolutely jack shit to atop them. There are many well-behaved toddlers who I absolutely adore (once again, in a non-peadophile manner) Most men love their own children, to death, but despise the children of mothers who let their kids run wild. Who's a worse parent? The father who loves his kids but despises the kids who run a muck because their mothers let them? Now, who's a worse parent? The mother who doesn't supervise her kid? Or the father who deapises the mothers of unsupervised kids. Now, the vast, vast majority of mothers will supervise their children, and should be commended for that, but if you're comparing the (mostly) childless community of NationStates to most, or even many, fathers, anything is free gain I guess...
Fathers, because they don't scream "LE PHONE BAD"
by The Realm of Platinum » Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:38 am
Australian rePublic wrote:The Realm of Platinum wrote:Fathers, because they don't scream "LE PHONE BAD"
What are you bloody talking about? I've seen a kid who had been left alone in the McDonalds playground, whilst the mother, who was on the opposite side of the resturant, completely oblivious to the fact that her kid had climbed to the roof, as she was unable to see them from where she was, whilst the kid was on the roof for atleast half an hour. Those are the kinds of mothers I was talking about, but the less extreme versions
by Australian rePublic » Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:51 am
The Realm of Platinum wrote:Australian rePublic wrote:What are you bloody talking about? I've seen a kid who had been left alone in the McDonalds playground, whilst the mother, who was on the opposite side of the resturant, completely oblivious to the fact that her kid had climbed to the roof, as she was unable to see them from where she was, whilst the kid was on the roof for atleast half an hour. Those are the kinds of mothers I was talking about, but the less extreme versions
Yes.
That's why you should give custody to fathers.
by The Realm of Platinum » Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:53 am
by Australian rePublic » Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:55 am
by Risottia » Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:55 am
Ohioan Territory wrote:The sound of a crying toddler is my least favorite sound. Ever. It's not annoying, but highly disturbing. Gives me chills.
by The Realm of Platinum » Sat Jul 20, 2019 2:00 am
Australian rePublic wrote:The Realm of Platinum wrote:yes, and fathers have higher wages that would help that
Here we go with that gender wage gap bullshit. You do realise that there are more long term unemployed men and underemployed men than women, and as one of those long term unemployed men, bullshit about the gender wage bullshit isn't helping
by Australian rePublic » Sat Jul 20, 2019 2:04 am
The Realm of Platinum wrote:Australian rePublic wrote:Here we go with that gender wage gap bullshit. You do realise that there are more long term unemployed men and underemployed men than women, and as one of those long term unemployed men, bullshit about the gender wage bullshit isn't helping
It's a choice, mostly.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: A m e n r i a, Czechostan, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Lysset, Mr TM, Pale Dawn, Philjia, Platypus Bureaucracy, Port Carverton, Repreteop, The Holy Therns, The Huskar Social Union, Turenia, Vanuzgard
Advertisement