People shouldn't be allowed to make themselves look attractive?
Advertisement
by Ethel mermania » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:06 pm
by Des-Bal » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:06 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:You sell aluminum siding?
Bear Stearns wrote:Wait - isn't that what seduction is? Trying to trigger physiological reactions in someone to heighten their attraction and arousal?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Liriena » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:06 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Galloism » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:07 pm
by Bear Stearns » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:08 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Bear Stearns wrote:Wait - isn't that what seduction is? Trying to trigger physiological reactions in someone to heighten their attraction and arousal?
It's about how you think about tit. That's why seduction isn't gross but "trying to trigger physiological reactions in someone to heighten their attraction and arousal" is.
by Galloism » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:08 pm
Des-Bal wrote:I sell a specific viewpoint of the truth.
by Liriena » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:08 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Ethel mermania » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:08 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:You sell aluminum siding?
I sell a specific viewpoint of the truth.Bear Stearns wrote:Wait - isn't that what seduction is? Trying to trigger physiological reactions in someone to heighten their attraction and arousal?
It's about how you think about tit. That's why seduction isn't gross but "trying to trigger physiological reactions in someone to heighten their attraction and arousal" is.
by Liriena » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:09 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Des-Bal » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:09 pm
Galloism wrote:I mean, intent of makeup is pretty clear.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Bear Stearns » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:09 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
I sell a specific viewpoint of the truth.
It's about how you think about tit. That's why seduction isn't gross but "trying to trigger physiological reactions in someone to heighten their attraction and arousal" is.
So candlelit dinners with wine and a chocolate dessert are out?
by Neder Brum » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:09 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Neder Brum wrote:How so? Everybody manipulates everybody.
I am literally a professional manipulator, being successful in my field means knowing how to psychologically control people's decision making with neatly defined terms and parameters. If I brought that arsenal into my social life I would be a monster.
by Harkback Union » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:09 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
I sell a specific viewpoint of the truth.
It's about how you think about tit. That's why seduction isn't gross but "trying to trigger physiological reactions in someone to heighten their attraction and arousal" is.
So candlelit dinners with wine and a chocolate dessert are out?
by Liriena » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:10 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Ethel mermania » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:11 pm
by Galloism » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:11 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Galloism wrote:I mean, intent of makeup is pretty clear.
Not really.
"I look good like this." Do you wear that makeup.
"This color is scientifically proven to create a sensation of arousal." Push this person out of a car, do not stop the car, persist in your flight until you can no longer see them.
As with eyes, Russell found that women have darker mouths than men of the same skin tone. Manipulating lips to be darker than the rest of a woman's face makes it appear more feminine and attractive. But it turns out that the color of the lipstick matters, too. When women are ovulating, the relative concentration of the hormone estrogen rises in comparison to progesterone. This hormonal shift enhances vascular blood flow under the skin's surface, which has a number of side effects. Women near ovulation (when they're most fertile) report that they're more easily turned on and have more interest in sex. They also tend to have redder lips! By putting on reddening lipstick, women are accentuating a natural signal of fertility. On top of that, blood flow also increases during arousal, so those red lips are not only saying that she's young and healthy - they're specifically giving the illusion that she's interested in YOU, which of course is bound to draw attention. That increased blood flow also pinkens the cheeks, so blush, too, adds to this effect.
But it's not just bold colors that make a difference. Foundation and cover-up also play a large role in making a woman look more attractive. That's because we are naturally drawn to even skin tones. As our skin ages, it tends to get discolorations, whether they be from the sun, scars, or other kinds of damage. So it's not surprising that an even skin tone, no matter what the topology of the face is, strikes us as younger and thus more attractive. One study found that eye makeup and foundation were most important in explaining why makeup makes women appear more attractive and younger. Again, it's about producing offspring - youth in and of itself isn't all that useful except in the context of sex, fecundity, and fertility.
...
When you look at the science, it's no wonder that more than $40 billion dollars a year is spent on cosmetics. Makeup works, and it does so because our bodies are programmed to perceive sexual signals from the coloration of our faces. Makeup tricks our brains just enough for it to be worth the time and effort if you want to look hotter. Of course, modern media and the way women are portrayed certainly helps boost sales. But makeup has been used for centuries in disparate and diverse cultures in strikingly similar ways for a reason. In the end, we are drawn to makeup is that it taps into our primal urge to find a young, healthy mate who will produce lots of kids so that we can pass on our genes. As Theodosius Dobzhansky might have predicted, even makeup only makes sense in the light of evolution.
by The South Falls » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:12 pm
by Des-Bal » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:12 pm
Galloism wrote:You're a Jedi Master?
Ethel mermania wrote:So candlelit dinners with wine and a chocolate dessert are out?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Bear Stearns » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:14 pm
by Neder Brum » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:14 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Galloism wrote:You're a Jedi Master?
I'm a lawyer, so it depends on how you look at it.Ethel mermania wrote:So candlelit dinners with wine and a chocolate dessert are out?
Are you hoping they'll like the chocolate dessert or that the serotonin will make them more malleable? One's fine one's creepy.
by Galloism » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:14 pm
by Ethel mermania » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:16 pm
by Galloism » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:16 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Galloism wrote:I was actually drawing an unironic comparison between the wedding ring thing and the makeup thing. They're basically the same thing.
FWIW, I do know women, especially those who travel for a living, who preferred married men for one night stands or short flings, as those men are most likely not looking for something long term.
Tbh, I am missing the comparison.
by Bear Stearns » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:18 pm
Galloism wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:FWIW, I do know women, especially those who travel for a living, who preferred married men for one night stands or short flings, as those men are most likely not looking for something long term.
Tbh, I am missing the comparison.
Basically, the wedding ring is a false signal to boost the chances of someone finding you attractive, which leads eventually to sex.
So is makeup, for the record.
by Galloism » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:19 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Dutch Socialist States, Duvniask, Elejamie, Ifreann, Luziyca, Nu Elysium, Page, Pale Dawn, Platypus Bureaucracy, Post War America, Rusozak, Tarsonis, Theodorable, Uiiop, Vassenor
Advertisement