by Andsed » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:42 am
by Yagon » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:48 am
Genivaria wrote:Not necessarily, depends on how everyone is treated I suppose.
by Woods Is Back » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:49 am
”I’ve always been leery of the United Nations. The very concept is comically dichotomous. Nations putting their self-interests aside in the hopes of building a global community, holding hands and Kumbaya? I mean, honestly, it’s like kindergarten. Do you have rug time? I did love rug time.”
-Raymond Reddington
by The Blaatschapen » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:52 am
by Andsed » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:53 am
Woods Is Back wrote:110%. It is wrong. Change My Mind!
by The Huskar Social Union » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:54 am
by The Technocrates » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:54 am
by The Brytish Isles » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:55 am
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
| National Report | “Beautiful Albion” programme aimed at decreasing pollution, cleaning litter and renovating inhabited areas to go ahead, says Westminster correspondent. // Polish Crown Prince Konstanty announces birth of son, both mother and child “in good health.” // Prime Minister White-Patel and Austrian counterpart Leopold Mayr expected to meet in Vienna on Monday to discuss furthering Austro-Brytish ties.
by Dresderstan » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:55 am
by Heloin » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:56 am
The blAAtschApen wrote:Nothing wrong with consensual sex between one or more adult humans.
Woods Is Back wrote:110%. It is wrong. Change My Mind!
by Bezkoshtovnya » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:57 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:I think if everyone consents to it, and they all like one another enough to have that kind of relationship then i guess its fine. Not my thing though, im a one partner kind of person.
Dante Alighieri wrote:There is no greater sorrow than to recall happiness in times of misery
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
by The Democratic Nation of Unovia » Tue Mar 19, 2019 11:59 am
by Bogan Laker » Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:02 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:If you're real moderates, you'd only be moderately moderate and wouldn't actively define yourselves as such or create a thread.
Checkmate centrists.
by Vyluria-Aseko » Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:02 pm
by The South Falls » Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:04 pm
by The Krogan » Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:07 pm
by Genivaria » Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:09 pm
The Technocrates wrote:Polygamy is wrong. Two caring parents and their kids are the basic structure of any nation or civilization. Polygamy destroys the most basic and necessary structure for civilization, the nuclear family, by allow one person to have multiple partners.
by Woods Is Back » Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:09 pm
”I’ve always been leery of the United Nations. The very concept is comically dichotomous. Nations putting their self-interests aside in the hopes of building a global community, holding hands and Kumbaya? I mean, honestly, it’s like kindergarten. Do you have rug time? I did love rug time.”
-Raymond Reddington
by An Alan Smithee Nation » Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:10 pm
by Andsed » Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:11 pm
Woods Is Back wrote:Andsed wrote:Okay then let me ask a question then. If everyone involved consent, are able to consent, and no one is being harmed by the relationship how is it wrong?
I will give you three arguments from three different standpoints-
Religious- I destroys the sanctity of marriage, and promotes sin
Societal- The parents aren't in it for kids, so they neglect them, and they are a burden upon society
Scientific- If you have already had sex, and then do it again, there is a higher risk for transmitting STD's
by The New California Republic » Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:11 pm
The blAAtschApen wrote:Nothing wrong with consensual sex between one or more adult humans.
by Genivaria » Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:12 pm
Woods Is Back wrote:Andsed wrote:Okay then let me ask a question then. If everyone involved consent, are able to consent, and no one is being harmed by the relationship how is it wrong?
I will give you three arguments from three different standpoints-
Religious- I destroys the sanctity of marriage, and promotes sin
Societal- The parents aren't in it for kids, so they neglect them, and they are a burden upon society
Scientific- If you have already had sex, and then do it again, there is a higher risk for transmitting STD's
Religious- I destroys the sanctity of marriage, and promotes sin
Societal- The parents aren't in it for kids, so they neglect them, and they are a burden upon society
Scientific- If you have already had sex, and then do it again, there is a higher risk for transmitting STD's
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Camtropia, Free Land of The Free Land of Freedo, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Ifreann, Pale Dawn, Port Carverton, Tarsonis, Valyxias
Advertisement