Seangoli wrote:If sending death threats tonkids is bad, then sending death threats to kids is bad. It doesn't fucking matter how it came about in these situations.
Who is saying sending death threats to kids is good?
Advertisement
by Des-Bal » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:14 am
Seangoli wrote:If sending death threats tonkids is bad, then sending death threats to kids is bad. It doesn't fucking matter how it came about in these situations.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Xmara » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:16 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Vassenor wrote:When did your "feminism is evil" screed become relevant to this thread?
Virtually nothing you've posted over the last few pages has been relevant. With the source material entirely discredited as a partial and misleading version of events, the thread seemingly now exists only as a venue for you to post so many drink-worthy attempts at denial, deflection and diversion that our livers have all surely surrendered to their inevitable pickling.
by Des-Bal » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:17 am
Xmara wrote:This is NSG. If someone posted that the sky is blue then there’d be at least one person argue that it’s not and cause the thread to escalate into 50 pages of arguing over the sky’s color.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by The Dalatian Republic » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:19 am
by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:19 am
by Vassenor » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:20 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Vassenor wrote:When did your "feminism is evil" screed become relevant to this thread?
Virtually nothing you've posted over the last few pages has been relevant. With the source material entirely discredited as a partial and misleading version of events, the thread seemingly now exists only as a venue for you to post so many drink-worthy attempts at denial, deflection and diversion that our livers have all surely surrendered to their inevitable pickling.
by Des-Bal » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:24 am
Vassenor wrote:
But drive-by gotcha-ing is perfectly OK? Because clearly you haven't actually read anything I posted.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Seangoli » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:24 am
by ShakaZuli » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:26 am
Vassenor wrote:Meanwhile SHS is trying to pretend that Trayvon Martin, the Parkland Survivors and the Central Park 5 don't exist.
Or she actually thinks it's OK to do large scale character assassination if you're doing it for conservative reasons.
by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:29 am
Seangoli wrote:Des-Bal wrote:
Who is saying sending death threats to kids is good?
I didn't say that. I have, however, noticed a remarkable ability for people to brush off death threats sent by their own side as kot a big issue or try to excuse it. In this very thread, we have both you and Osto trying to argue against equivalencies because reasons.
Do I think you think Death Threats are good? No, no I do not. But you have been very willing to find any excuse as to why it isn't as bad in this one case.
My point isn't that the Right supports Death Threats against the left. My point is they don't care if they do happen. And vice versa. I have never once in my entire damn life seen a person for the right say "death threats are bad" when they happen to leftists. I have seen jt happen from them *only* whem it comes from the right to the left.
And the flip side.
My point is, nobody actually gives two flying shits what happened in the situation or about the kids and what happened to them. It's outrage theater through amd through.
by Vassenor » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:29 am
ShakaZuli wrote:Vassenor wrote:Meanwhile SHS is trying to pretend that Trayvon Martin, the Parkland Survivors and the Central Park 5 don't exist.
Or she actually thinks it's OK to do large scale character assassination if you're doing it for conservative reasons.
What is the point of Trayvon Martin? He unprovokedely attacked Zimmerman which retaliated in selfdefence. It has nothing to do with racism.
by Woodfiredpizzas » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:32 am
Vassenor wrote:Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Virtually nothing you've posted over the last few pages has been relevant. With the source material entirely discredited as a partial and misleading version of events, the thread seemingly now exists only as a venue for you to post so many drink-worthy attempts at denial, deflection and diversion that our livers have all surely surrendered to their inevitable pickling.
But drive-by gotcha-ing is perfectly OK? Because clearly you haven't actually read anything I posted.
by Des-Bal » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:34 am
Seangoli wrote:
I didn't say that. I have, however, noticed a remarkable ability for people to brush off death threats sent by their own side as kot a big issue or try to excuse it. In this very thread, we have both you and Osto trying to argue against equivalencies because reasons.
Do I think you think Death Threats are good? No, no I do not. But you have been very willing to find any excuse as to why it isn't as bad in this one case.
My point isn't that the Right supports Death Threats against the left. My point is they don't care if they do happen. And vice versa. I have never once in my entire damn life seen a person for the right say "death threats are bad" when they happen to leftists. I have seen jt happen from them *only* whem it comes from the right to the left.
And the flip side.
My point is, nobody actually gives two flying shits what happened in the situation or about the kids and what happened to them. It's outrage theater through amd through.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Vassenor » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:34 am
by ShakaZuli » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:34 am
Potthan wrote:Oldenfranck wrote:https://www.google.com/amp/s/newsmaven.io/indiancountrytoday/api/amp/indiancountrytoday/news/outrage-as-non-native-youth-wearing-maga-hats-taunt-and-disrespect-native-elder-jy7UVwdg8kK2uvT0L-JOig/
It made me want to throw up, but hey, do anything to #triggerthelibs or #triggerthecons. We are stooping so low, it is wanton. God bless Nathan Phillips, an American vet, he’s done more to make America great as it is now than any of those people for this country, and he stood there proudly, not batting an eyelash, knowing full well that he was in a very dangerous situation. What’s even more so awe-inspiring is he began to sing a prayer of healing for the terribly-behaved around him, wishing them well and that one day they may be cured of their troubles. Thomas Massie needs to comdemn this, I hope he will, I think he is better than this.
Do you think that they should be expelled or suspended? Should Trump call this conduct out and condemn it? What would you have done if you were there?
Update 1: Self edited OP to be less hostile and more constructive. I'll apologize and fix my OP since it proved offensive, but this is a good thread for discussion, and as long as everything goes smoothly from here, it's a good conversation.
He's not a vet. He supposedly fought in a war that meant anything. Besides, according to his birth date he would've been 18 in 1972, one year after the last marine pulled out of Vietnam. Additionally he has been an actor in an old Skrillex music video so his legitimacy is held to question. All in all, he is a fraud and nothing more.
by Vassenor » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:34 am
Woodfiredpizzas wrote:Vassenor wrote:
But drive-by gotcha-ing is perfectly OK? Because clearly you haven't actually read anything I posted.
Ok so I’ve been hitting my pain killer button instead of drinking and I’m really fucking high right now.And even I can see you haven’t posted anything relevant or engaged honestly anywhere in this thread. I need to ask is your inability to make it okay to hate white People really worth all this effort? Cause that nurse is crying and I’m going to give her a hug.
by Xmara » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:37 am
Woodfiredpizzas wrote:Vassenor wrote:
But drive-by gotcha-ing is perfectly OK? Because clearly you haven't actually read anything I posted.
Ok so I’ve been hitting my pain killer button instead of drinking and I’m really fucking high right now.And even I can see you haven’t posted anything relevant or engaged honestly anywhere in this thread. I need to ask is your inability to make it okay to hate white People really worth all this effort? Cause that nurse is crying and I’m going to give her a hug.
by Seangoli » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:37 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Seangoli wrote:
I didn't say that. I have, however, noticed a remarkable ability for people to brush off death threats sent by their own side as kot a big issue or try to excuse it. In this very thread, we have both you and Osto trying to argue against equivalencies because reasons.
Do I think you think Death Threats are good? No, no I do not. But you have been very willing to find any excuse as to why it isn't as bad in this one case.
My point isn't that the Right supports Death Threats against the left. My point is they don't care if they do happen. And vice versa. I have never once in my entire damn life seen a person for the right say "death threats are bad" when they happen to leftists. I have seen jt happen from them *only* whem it comes from the right to the left.
And the flip side.
My point is, nobody actually gives two flying shits what happened in the situation or about the kids and what happened to them. It's outrage theater through amd through.
How often do you see right wing pundits saying things like "Kill <race> people"?
https://external-preview.redd.it/HLLcDo ... e12c1637f1
https://external-preview.redd.it/2-SRb2 ... 673878705b
https://external-preview.redd.it/pAVPeX ... a7c1a65745
Let's not pretend the progressives don't support threats of violence. They very often do. The difference is they pretend those threats don't matter because of ideological reasons.
The right doesn't care because often its individual actors and not endorsed or excused by official ideological statements. How many times have we seen "Punch a nazi" and so on?
There is a qualitative difference between a political movement containing angry members who send death threats, and a political movement absolutely inundated with violence rhetoric and threats which has explicitly baked into its core tenets ideological reasons for why that behavior doesn't matter.
Which elements of conservative philosophy can you point to that excuse this behavior?
by ShakaZuli » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:37 am
by Xmara » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:38 am
ShakaZuli wrote:Potthan wrote:
He's not a vet. He supposedly fought in a war that meant anything. Besides, according to his birth date he would've been 18 in 1972, one year after the last marine pulled out of Vietnam. Additionally he has been an actor in an old Skrillex music video so his legitimacy is held to question. All in all, he is a fraud and nothing more.
The whole case looks like it was planned. It is strange how CNN interviewed the Indian guy in the moment when the other kids still were around him as if the journalist were there the whole time
by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:39 am
Seangoli wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
How often do you see right wing pundits saying things like "Kill <race> people"?
https://external-preview.redd.it/HLLcDo ... e12c1637f1
https://external-preview.redd.it/2-SRb2 ... 673878705b
https://external-preview.redd.it/pAVPeX ... a7c1a65745
Let's not pretend the progressives don't support threats of violence. They very often do. The difference is they pretend those threats don't matter because of ideological reasons.
The right doesn't care because often its individual actors and not endorsed or excused by official ideological statements. How many times have we seen "Punch a nazi" and so on?
There is a qualitative difference between a political movement containing angry members who send death threats, and a political movement absolutely inundated with violence rhetoric and threats which has explicitly baked into its core tenets ideological reasons for why that behavior doesn't matter.
Which elements of conservative philosophy can you point to that excuse this behavior?
Proving my entire point. You excuse one side while demonizing the other.
And fortunately, I don't pretend one side is better than the other. I have seen plenty of "Pinochet did nothing wrong", and plenty of calls for violence against Commies, even in the modern day.
I don't particularly care about the reasonings. They ultimately don't matter. What does matter is how things play out in reality. And in reality, the sides pull the same bullshit. The reasons why they do it, and why THEY are better than the other, are contrivances meant to excuse behavior.
If one set of behavior against one group is bad, then it is bad against every group regardless of contrived excusatory bullshit.
by Des-Bal » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:40 am
Xmara wrote:
CNN also reported that the whole thing was taken out of context and that it all started with the Black Hebrew Israelites. So it’s not them who’s pushing the narrative here.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Vassenor » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:41 am
ShakaZuli wrote:Vassenor wrote:
I'm still waiting for proof that they're specifically anti-white.
The mainstream media lied about the events. What motivated them to do so? It is the fact that the teen was a Catholic white male while he oponent was an Indian. Had the roles be reversed the media would shill for young teen.
Also anti-white racist send death treats to the young boys and his family. What do you want more?
by Ostroeuropa » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:42 am
Vassenor wrote:ShakaZuli wrote:The mainstream media lied about the events. What motivated them to do so? It is the fact that the teen was a Catholic white male while he oponent was an Indian. Had the roles be reversed the media would shill for young teen.
Also anti-white racist send death treats to the young boys and his family. What do you want more?
That's not proof that they're specifically anti-white. Do you have hard evidence they wouldn't be doing this if it was a group of African- or Asian-Americans?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Corporate Collective Salvation, Dumb Ideologies, Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Pale Dawn, Philjia, Rhaf, The Astral Mandate, Tungstan, Turenia, Valrifall, Valyxias
Advertisement