CDT is merely the club which RWDT grasps--why strike the hand rather than the body?
Advertisement
by Taihei Tengoku » Mon Jul 09, 2018 7:57 am
by The Parkus Empire » Mon Jul 09, 2018 7:57 am
Bienenhalde wrote:Fahran wrote:Restoring the family unit might prove a sound cultural trend as well if your intention is to restore religion as a focal point of public, albeit not necessarily political, life. Oddly enough, certain racial and ethnic minorities who presently vote Democrat would be quite grateful to see such policies implemented given that Democratic partisans tend to be more atheistic and secular than their rank-and-file voters.
Very good point. And considering current demographic trends, it is very important that the Republican party should make more of an effort to reach out to socially conservative minority voters.
by Bienenhalde » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:05 am
by The Parkus Empire » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:06 am
by Washington Resistance Army » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:10 am
Bienenhalde wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:Through what sort of policies?
More funding for anti-bias training for police, elimination of overly lenient treatment for white criminals, pushing the police to arrest more white people who commit drug crimes, more social services for poor mothers and children, more focus on reducing the abortion rate, zero-tolerance attitude towards hate crimes and incitement of racial tension, and opposition to confederate monuments on government property.
by The Parkus Empire » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:13 am
Bienenhalde wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:Through what sort of policies?
More funding for anti-bias training for police, elimination of overly lenient treatment for white criminals, pushing the police to arrest more white people who commit drug crimes, more social services for poor mothers and children, more focus on reducing the abortion rate, zero-tolerance attitude towards hate crimes and incitement of racial tension, and opposition to confederate monuments on government property.
by Hakons » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:19 am
by The Parkus Empire » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:20 am
by The Parkus Empire » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:21 am
by Fahran » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:23 am
The Parkus Empire wrote:I also don't think I inciting racial "tension" is a crime.
by The Parkus Empire » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:25 am
by Fahran » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:28 am
The Parkus Empire wrote:That's incitement to violence, not "tension"
by Canadensia » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:28 am
by The Parkus Empire » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:31 am
by Canadensia » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:51 am
The Parkus Empire wrote:Canadensia wrote:
I dunno, the leadership of the KKK as well as several other hate groups probably belong in jail.
One doesn't need to directly advocate violence in order to be a major contributor to it.
You have to charge someone with a crime. Incitement to "tension" gives ridiculous latitude to prosecutors
by The East Marches II » Mon Jul 09, 2018 8:52 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Bienenhalde wrote:
More funding for anti-bias training for police, elimination of overly lenient treatment for white criminals, pushing the police to arrest more white people who commit drug crimes, more social services for poor mothers and children, more focus on reducing the abortion rate, zero-tolerance attitude towards hate crimes and incitement of racial tension, and opposition to confederate monuments on government property.
The last thing we should be doing is arresting more people for drug crimes.
by The Parkus Empire » Mon Jul 09, 2018 9:00 am
Canadensia wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:You have to charge someone with a crime. Incitement to "tension" gives ridiculous latitude to prosecutors
Which, frankly, is why Common Law isn't a particularly good legal system. It gives far too much authority to legal precedence, and far too little to a judge's own discretion.
by United Muscovite Nations » Mon Jul 09, 2018 9:39 am
by Herskerstad » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:33 am
by The East Marches II » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:37 am
by Aellex » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:38 am
The Parkus Empire wrote:Lol why do I give a fuck about a judge's personal value judgements? They're judges, not priests
by Herskerstad » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:39 am
The Parkus Empire wrote:Canadensia wrote:
Which, frankly, is why Common Law isn't a particularly good legal system. It gives far too much authority to legal precedence, and far too little to a judge's own discretion.
Lol why do I give a fuck about a judge's personal value judgements? They're judges, not priests
by Genivaria » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:40 am
by Herskerstad » Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:40 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Cinnaa, Corporate Collective Salvation, Dresderstan, Floofybit, Hidrandia, Kostane, Likhinia, Mr TM, Rosartemis, Rusozak, Statesburg, The New California Socialist Republic, Tiami
Advertisement