by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Thu Dec 28, 2017 7:40 am
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by Thermodolia » Thu Dec 28, 2017 7:44 am
by Greater Germany » Thu Dec 28, 2017 7:46 am
Thermodolia wrote:I think you are overthinking and I also think you should get a blog
by Kenmoria » Thu Dec 28, 2017 8:53 am
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:When describing crushes one recalls from one's high school years, it's easy to fall into the trap of just saying "high school crush." However, if you work with kids, this isn't a good idea, as it could get you mistaken for a pedophile.
However, if you said "classmate," you could be mistaken for a homosexual, and "female classmate" may or may not be better when it comes across as a suspiciously specific denial. Anyone have any ideas of ways to describe this that are neither gender-neutral nor age-neutral?
by Diopolis » Thu Dec 28, 2017 9:11 am
by The New California Republic » Thu Dec 28, 2017 9:15 am
by The Grim Reaper » Thu Dec 28, 2017 9:20 am
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:When describing crushes one recalls from one's high school years, it's easy to fall into the trap of just saying "high school crush." However, if you work with kids, this isn't a good idea, as it could get you mistaken for a pedophile.
However, if you said "classmate," you could be mistaken for a homosexual, and "female classmate" may or may not be better when it comes across as a suspiciously specific denial. Anyone have any ideas of ways to describe this that are neither gender-neutral nor age-neutral?
by Risottia » Thu Dec 28, 2017 9:21 am
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:When describing crushes one recalls from one's high school years, it's easy to fall into the trap of just saying "high school crush." However, if you work with kids, this isn't a good idea, as it could get you mistaken for a pedophile.
However, if you said "classmate," you could be mistaken for a homosexual, and "female classmate" may or may not be better when it comes across as a suspiciously specific denial. Anyone have any ideas of ways to describe this that are neither gender-neutral nor age-neutral?
by The Huskar Social Union » Thu Dec 28, 2017 9:27 am
by Saiwania » Thu Dec 28, 2017 10:06 am
by The Two Jerseys » Thu Dec 28, 2017 11:20 am
Diopolis wrote:When you say high school crush, everyone assumes you mean "the girl I had a crush on when I was in high school" not "the girl I have a crush on who is currently in high school".
by Free Missouri » Thu Dec 28, 2017 12:30 pm
by Luminesa » Thu Dec 28, 2017 12:33 pm
by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Dec 28, 2017 12:39 pm
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:When describing crushes one recalls from one's high school years, it's easy to fall into the trap of just saying "high school crush." However, if you work with kids, this isn't a good idea, as it could get you mistaken for a pedophile.
However, if you said "classmate," you could be mistaken for a homosexual, and "female classmate" may or may not be better when it comes across as a suspiciously specific denial. Anyone have any ideas of ways to describe this that are neither gender-neutral nor age-neutral?
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Anywhere Else But Here » Thu Dec 28, 2017 12:45 pm
Luminesa wrote:“I had a crush on a boy in high school. He was intelligent, kind, and shy. I knew him since middle school. I wanted to ask him out to prom but got tongue-tied at the last minute. I walked to Spanish class wanting to cry. I later pulled through it, and we’re friends on Steam. Need to see if he’ll play CK2 with me sometime soon.”
That’s how you describe a high school crush.
by Luminesa » Thu Dec 28, 2017 12:48 pm
Anywhere Else But Here wrote:Luminesa wrote:“I had a crush on a boy in high school. He was intelligent, kind, and shy. I knew him since middle school. I wanted to ask him out to prom but got tongue-tied at the last minute. I walked to Spanish class wanting to cry. I later pulled through it, and we’re friends on Steam. Need to see if he’ll play CK2 with me sometime soon.”
That’s how you describe a high school crush.
"We never went out, but years later I locked him up and cut off his balls in a Medieval simulator. Ah, what might have been..."
by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Thu Dec 28, 2017 3:20 pm
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:When describing crushes one recalls from one's high school years, it's easy to fall into the trap of just saying "high school crush." However, if you work with kids, this isn't a good idea, as it could get you mistaken for a pedophile.
However, if you said "classmate," you could be mistaken for a homosexual, and "female classmate" may or may not be better when it comes across as a suspiciously specific denial. Anyone have any ideas of ways to describe this that are neither gender-neutral nor age-neutral?
"This girl I had a crush on/was seeing back in high school".
Boom. Done. You owe me 5 bucks. You're welcome.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by New haven america » Thu Dec 28, 2017 3:24 pm
by Kannap » Thu Dec 28, 2017 4:10 pm
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by Xmara » Thu Dec 28, 2017 4:39 pm
by Kannap » Thu Dec 28, 2017 4:46 pm
Xmara wrote:Who makes any of those assumptions anyway? As Therm and several others said, you’re over thinking this. Like way over thinking it.
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Azurnailia, Corporate Collective Salvation, Corzerran, Erythrean Thebes, Ethel mermania, Federative Woodstockian Military Junta, Fort Viorlia, Google Adsense [Bot], Hidrandia, Kostane, Mardesurria, Nuevo Meshiko, Philjia, Red Partisan Front, Repreteop, Rusrunia, Russk, Simonia, The Apollonian Systems, The Lund, The New California Socialist Republic, Wonseon, Zetaopalatopia
Advertisement