Serksis Federation wrote:Grenartia wrote:
While everything you say is true, and that putting a kid up for adoption is infinitely preferable to abusing said kid, I do think that if you are, for whatever reason, incapable of supporting a child who is LGBT, precisely because they are LGBT, to the extent that your options are abandoning them, abusing them, or giving them up for adoption, then you probably shouldn't be having kids in the first place. It shows a clear signal that you are not mature enough as a person to handle the responsibility of guiding a child into a reasonably well-adjusted adult.
1. If you resort to abandoning or abusing any kid for any reason you shouldn't be having children in your care and surprise, there are laws already active against this. 2. If a person would put their kid up for adoption due to changing circumstances, like finding out they are lgbt does not mean the person shouldn't have kids. A reason for them to not have kids but not that they shouldn't have kids. 3. It also has nothing to do with maturity, a part of being mature is not being accepting, and open, and positive to anything or everything.
1. Note that nothing I said goes against that in any way.
2. A reason for them to not have kids is a reason they should not have kids.
3. The underlined has nothing to do with maturity.