Hawaii has legalized same sex marriage

[Pink Panther]

Call the union of same sex couples whatever you want to but not marriage!

[Shershah]

Stop trying to evade the questions.

It is not evading the question. More like answering them. No one said that it would be the answer you are looking for or are contend with.

[Domenic and friends]

Call the union of same sex couples whatever you want to but not marriage!

Indeed!

[Othelos]

Stop trying to evade the questions.

It is not evading the question. More like answering them. No one said that it would be the answer you are looking for or are contend with.

So you believe you have the right to define other people's personal relationships?

[Tekania]

Call the union of same sex couples whatever you want to but not marriage!

Why?

[Othelos]

Call the union of same sex couples whatever you want to but not marriage!

Indeed!

LGBT people aren't second class citizens.

[Shershah]

It is not evading the question. More like answering them. No one said that it would be the answer you are looking for or are contend with.

So you believe you have the right to define other people's personal relationships?

That has been replied to previously. The answer and the "why" aspect to it. Considering how long the entire argument was, i have no intention of going through it again, just for the sake of doing so.

[Domenic and friends]

Indeed!

LGBT people aren't second class citizens.

Not saying they are they can be together but it should not be classified as marriage. Marriage is meant for a female and male

[OddLawnIstan]

LGBT people aren't second class citizens.

Not saying they are they can be together but it should not be classified as marriage. Marriage is meant for a female and male

According to whom?

[Othelos]

So you believe you have the right to define other people's personal relationships?

That has been replied to previously. The answer and the "why" aspect to it. Considering how long the entire argument was, i have no intention of going through it again, just for the sake of doing so.

I'm asking you to answer "yes" or "no". I'm not asking for an explanation.

[Shershah]

That has been replied to previously. The answer and the "why" aspect to it. Considering how long the entire argument was, i have no intention of going through it again, just for the sake of doing so.

I'm asking you to answer "yes" or "no". I'm not asking for an explanation.

In that case, yes, in this context.

[Domenic and friends]

Not saying they are they can be together but it should not be classified as marriage. Marriage is meant for a female and male

According to whom?

Only a man and a woman can have a child its just the way it is. Hence is why marriage is here for company, love and the raising of children. Theres a reason why two guys or two woman cannot not naturally have a child

[Blasveck]

According to whom?

Only a man and a woman can have a child its just the way it is. Hence is why marriage is here for company, love and the raising of children. Theres a reason why two guys or two woman cannot not naturally have a child

Appeal to nature, for one.

Also, marriage is not primarily for the purposes of easing a child as there are no legal requirements to do so when seeking legal marriage. Marriage, historically, was not just between one man and one woman, but a man and his harem, as well as gay marriage, believe it or not.

[OddLawnIstan]

According to whom?

Only a man and a woman can have a child its just the way it is. Hence is why marriage is here for company, love and the raising of children. Theres a reason why two guys or two woman cannot not naturally have a child

Marriage exists for company, love, and raising children. There are plenty of children that need adoption. I sense a win win.

[Domenic and friends]

Only a man and a woman can have a child its just the way it is. Hence is why marriage is here for company, love and the raising of children. Theres a reason why two guys or two woman cannot not naturally have a child

Marriage exists for company, love, and raising children. There are plenty of children that need adoption. I sense a win win.

Children should be adopted by Couples that the woman cannot not have a child due to some medical reason.

[Tekania]

LGBT people aren't second class citizens.

Not saying they are they can be together but it should not be classified as marriage. Marriage is meant for a female and male

Marriage is meant for whatever it comes to mean by common usage. Usage of marriage to apply to same sex persons has become common enough that it has been included in supporting dictionaries.... As such you're simply wrong. Primarily because you fail to grasp language. Language is not some static thing... it's something which ever evolves with those who use it.

[British Prussia]

According to whom?

Only a man and a woman can have a child its just the way it is. Hence is why marriage is here for company, love and the raising of children. Theres a reason why two guys or two woman cannot not naturally have a child

Yes. But the problem is, LGBT's want this. And you'd need an overarching Act, or in America's case, some sort of Federal Law, that states Civil Unions = Marriage. Otherwise a partner would be considered a friend or a stranger to the other partner... Much easier just to call them married.

[Arumdaum]

Call the union of same sex couples whatever you want to but not marriage!

why

[OddLawnIstan]

Marriage exists for company, love, and raising children. There are plenty of children that need adoption. I sense a win win.

Children should be adopted by Couples that the woman cannot not have a child due to some medical reason.

What makes a same sex couples less qualified to bring up children?

[Regnum Dominae]

Call the union of same sex couples whatever you want to but not marriage!

Why?

[Regnum Dominae]

According to whom?

Only a man and a woman can have a child its just the way it is. Hence is why marriage is here for company, love and the raising of children. Theres a reason why two guys or two woman cannot not naturally have a child

1) Appeal to nature. (and also homosexuality is natural: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_animals)
2) Marriage is not just about having children.
3) There are many other ways of having children. (surrogacy, adoption, IVF, etc, etc)

[Arumdaum]

According to whom?

Only a man and a woman can have a child its just the way it is. Hence is why marriage is here for company, love and the raising of children. Theres a reason why two guys or two woman cannot not naturally have a child

So sterile people shouldn't marry?

[Domenic and friends]

Only a man and a woman can have a child its just the way it is. Hence is why marriage is here for company, love and the raising of children. Theres a reason why two guys or two woman cannot not naturally have a child

So sterile people shouldn't marry?

They can but thats what adoptions for.

[British Prussia]

So sterile people shouldn't marry?

They can but thats what adoptions for.

Gay couples can adopt too...

[Domenic and friends]

They can but thats what adoptions for.

Gay couples can adopt too...

I understand that but adoption should be for sterile Straight couples or for a couple that just wants to adopt for some reason.