Texas: Put Creationism In Every Textbook!!!

[The Holy NeoSpanish Empire]

they believe in a false faith. only catholic faith is the true, the one predicated by the aphostols

Prove it. The bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or whatever religious text Hindus subscribe to. (Apologies for my ignorance)

In fact, it has just as much evidence for it as the Enuma Elish. Or the Odyssey. Or any text claiming that magic people in the sky are real.

jesus prevented us from the fake muslim lier in the byble

[Benuty]

they believe in a false faith. only catholic faith is the true, the one predicated by the aphostols

Prove it. The bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or whatever religious text Hindus subscribe to. (Apologies for my ignorance)

In fact, it has just as much evidence for it as the Enuma Elish. Or the Odyssey. Or any text claiming that magic people in the sky are real.

Can not tell if serious...

[Blasveck]

Prove it. The bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or whatever religious text Hindus subscribe to. (Apologies for my ignorance)

In fact, it has just as much evidence for it as the Enuma Elish. Or the Odyssey. Or any text claiming that magic people in the sky are real.

jesus prevented us from the fake muslim lier in the byble

Satire.

I knew it.

[Pandeeria]

Prove it. The bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or whatever religious text Hindus subscribe to. (Apologies for my ignorance)

In fact, it has just as much evidence for it as the Enuma Elish. Or the Odyssey. Or any text claiming that magic people in the sky are real.

jesus prevented us from the fake muslim lier in the byble

[Citation Needed]

[Pavlostani]

Prove it. The bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or whatever religious text Hindus subscribe to. (Apologies for my ignorance)

In fact, it has just as much evidence for it as the Enuma Elish. Or the Odyssey. Or any text claiming that magic people in the sky are real.

jesus prevented us from the fake muslim lier in the byble

Thank you for removing the bold and underline. As a result, the merciful Pavlo shall not tear this post to shreds.

[Aeken]

Prove it. The bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or whatever religious text Hindus subscribe to. (Apologies for my ignorance)

In fact, it has just as much evidence for it as the Enuma Elish. Or the Odyssey. Or any text claiming that magic people in the sky are real.

jesus prevented us from the fake muslim lier in the byble

Calling people liars and and making claims isn't helping your case.

[Utceforp]

Prove it. The bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or whatever religious text Hindus subscribe to. (Apologies for my ignorance)

In fact, it has just as much evidence for it as the Enuma Elish. Or the Odyssey. Or any text claiming that magic people in the sky are real.

jesus prevented us from the fake muslim lier in the byble

Prove it. The Bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or...

You know what, I'm not repeating myself. I've already posted why the bible isn't correct, you can read it again if you must.

[The Parkus Empire]

Prove it. The bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or whatever religious text Hindus subscribe to. (Apologies for my ignorance)

In fact, it has just as much evidence for it as the Enuma Elish. Or the Odyssey. Or any text claiming that magic people in the sky are real.

jesus prevented us from the fake muslim lier in the byble

You are poor at this game. You wouldn't even pass muster on /b/

[Lost heros]

Prove it. The bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or whatever religious text Hindus subscribe to. (Apologies for my ignorance)

In fact, it has just as much evidence for it as the Enuma Elish. Or the Odyssey. Or any text claiming that magic people in the sky are real.

jesus prevented us from the fake muslim lier in the byble

Mohammad prevented us from the fake christian lier in the Quran.
Moses prevented us from the fake christian lier in the Torah.

See anyone can do it!

[Christian Union]

Because to assume that the variables being measured are the same 100 million years ago as they are now, or that the values of those variables can be estimated, is not empirical science.

I don't understand, so you need to be more specific. Which variable? What makes you think this assumption was taken? Was it valid or invalid to have that assumption taken for that very particular variable? Give me an example of scientists taking such a measurement (example as in it has actually happened), because obviously, different ways of measuring time depend on different principles.

The variable would be carbon, or whatever medium was used to date any given object. To assume that the volume of carbon present in the atmosphere 100 million years ago is either A.) the same then as it is now, or B.) can somehow be estimated even though we weren't there, is the faulty assumption. Many "scientists" use such dating methods to "prove" that certain fossil samples are millions of years old, despite the inconsistencies of the dating (one test might say 50,000 years, the other might say 1 million, for example), and despite the obvious problem of making assumptions.

[The Parkus Empire]

jesus prevented us from the fake muslim lier in the byble

Satire.

I knew it.

No, satire is supposed to make readers laugh, not make them angry (except perhaps in the sense of compelling them to action).

[The Holy NeoSpanish Empire]

jesus prevented us from the fake muslim lier in the byble

Prove it. The Bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or...

You know what, I'm not repeating myself. I've already posted why the bible isn't correct, you can read it again if you must.

if you say bible is not infalible youre not a cristian , youre an heretic

[Priory Academy USSR]

You could put it under 'Reasons why you really need to concentrate in biology class'.

Anyway, wasn't the Scopes Trial last century?

[Edlichbury]

I don't understand, so you need to be more specific. Which variable? What makes you think this assumption was taken? Was it valid or invalid to have that assumption taken for that very particular variable? Give me an example of scientists taking such a measurement (example as in it has actually happened), because obviously, different ways of measuring time depend on different principles.

The variable would be carbon, or whatever medium was used to date any given object. To assume that the volume of carbon present in the atmosphere 100 million years ago is either A.) the same then as it is now, or B.) can somehow be estimated even though we weren't there, is the faulty assumption. Many "scientists" use such dating methods to "prove" that certain fossil samples are millions of years old, despite the inconsistencies of the dating (one test might say 50,000 years, the other might say 1 million, for example), and despite the obvious problem of making assumptions.

So you have no fucking idea what carbon dating does?
Cute.

[Czechanada]

And thus begins the intellectual decline of America, where science is made up and the facts don't matter.

[Furious Grandmothers]

Prove it. The bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or whatever religious text Hindus subscribe to. (Apologies for my ignorance)

In fact, it has just as much evidence for it as the Enuma Elish. Or the Odyssey. Or any text claiming that magic people in the sky are real.

jesus prevented us from the fake muslim lier in the byble

Calm down. This thread isn't about that. This thread is about Creationism and other topics relevant to it, just as abiogenesis (and to a smaller extent, evolution). Come back on topic.

[Blasveck]

Satire.

I knew it.

No, satire is supposed to make readers laugh, not make them angry (except perhaps in the sense of compelling them to action).

He could be a pretty shitty satirist.

[Utceforp]

Prove it. The bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or whatever religious text Hindus subscribe to. (Apologies for my ignorance)

In fact, it has just as much evidence for it as the Enuma Elish. Or the Odyssey. Or any text claiming that magic people in the sky are real.

Can not tell if serious...

Serious. The Bible says that there are magic people in the sky. The Odyssey (among other ancient greek texts) claims that there are magic people on Mount Olympus (In the sky). The Sumerians claimed there is a god called Anu, who is a magic person in the sky.

[New Chalcedon]

*** Warned for flaming ***

And the pro-evolution NS mods arrive, warning those who have been condescended and defend themselves, while letting their offending buddies get by without a single word.

Point to the personal attack Divair made. You claimed "no evidence" for evolution, he supplied a list of links to evidence and told you to refute them or stop arguing that point. Your response was to call him a "rude little shit" and obliquely threaten him with violence.

Guess what? There's no rule against a certain level of abrasiveness on NationStates. When it gets to the point of calling the person you're replying to a "little shit", then you've crossed the line.

And your response appears to be - instead of actually learning something - to turn around and flame the Mod who warned you.

You mustn't be too attached to your nation, I somehow think.

And the pro-evolution NS mods arrive, warning those who have been condescended and defend themselves, while letting their offending buddies get by without a single word.

You broke the rules!

Ah, but you forget: his ideological purity is supposed to protect him from the rules. That's how it rolls at places like Conservapedia and Redstate, after all. The attitude doesn't survive contact with reality, but then I've yet to cross the zealot's attitude that does.

[Pavlostani]

Prove it. The Bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or...

You know what, I'm not repeating myself. I've already posted why the bible isn't correct, you can read it again if you must.

if you say bible is not infalible youre not a cristian , youre an heretic

It's like the angrier you get, the worse your spelling gets. And guess what. Not many of us people bashing you are Christians.

[Tatooene]

Didn't post what I wanted it to, sorry.

[Utceforp]

Prove it. The Bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or...

You know what, I'm not repeating myself. I've already posted why the bible isn't correct, you can read it again if you must.

if you say bible is not infalible youre not a cristian , youre an heretic

I'm not a Christian, I thought that much was obvious at this point. Therefore I am wrong?

[Edlichbury]

if you say bible is not infalible youre not a cristian , youre an heretic

I'm not a Christian, I thought that much was obvious at this point.

See? Heretic!

[Benuty]

Prove it. The Bible has just as much evidence for it as the Quran or...

You know what, I'm not repeating myself. I've already posted why the bible isn't correct, you can read it again if you must.

if you say bible is not infallible then you're not a christian , you're a heretic

Fixed.

[Pavlostani]

if you say bible is not infallible then you're not a christian , you're a heretic

Fixed.

Thank you Benuty. The spelling was starting to bother me.