Capitalism vs. Communism

[Jassysworth 1]

Stateless, classless, and moneyless society...

that can't work unless you want to go back to the Stone Age;^{[citation needed]} none of it is practical in the least^{[citation needed]}...

Use your common sense^{"Common sense" is the last appeal of the individual with no argument.}. What does a stateless, classless, and moneyless society lead to? The complete deconstruction of every major pillar of civilized and orderly society.^{[citation needed]} You'll get a civil war and anarchy until a new state is formed.^{[citation needed]} You'll go a full circle with everyone being worse off because of the interlude of bloodshed.^{[citation needed]}

Any evidence to support any of this?

The most advanced socities in the world are a mix of Capitalism and Communism just look at Germany and Netherlands.

This post made me want to cry.

All of history thus far strongly supports/hints at this conclusion...

[Nationalist State of Knox]

Stateless, classless, and moneyless society...

that can't work unless you want to go back to the Stone Age;^{[citation needed]} none of it is practical in the least^{[citation needed]}...

Use your common sense^{"Common sense" is the last appeal of the individual with no argument.}. What does a stateless, classless, and moneyless society lead to? The complete deconstruction of every major pillar of civilized and orderly society.^{[citation needed]} You'll get a civil war and anarchy until a new state is formed.^{[citation needed]} You'll go a full circle with everyone being worse off because of the interlude of bloodshed.^{[citation needed]}

Any evidence to support any of this?

Just butting in here.

I'd argue that a stateless society has limited practicality, due to the state's purpose as a regulating force through authority.

[Conscentia]

Any evidence to support any of this?

Just butting in here.

I'd argue that a stateless society has limited practicality, due to the state's purpose as a regulating force through authority.

Whether or not that would occur would depend on what one would regard a "state".

[Conscentia]

Any evidence to support any of this?
This post made me want to cry.

All of history thus far strongly supports/hints at this conclusion...

One sentence from you is not a citation.

[Nationalist State of Knox]

Just butting in here.

I'd argue that a stateless society has limited practicality, due to the state's purpose as a regulating force through authority.

Whether or not that would occur would depend on what one would regard a "state".

Ultimately, it's impossible to create a nation completely isolated from the effects of a "state"; a governing body will always emerge in some form unless complete anarchy is created.

[Jassysworth 1]

All of history thus far strongly supports/hints at this conclusion...

One sentence from you is not a citation.

common sense needs no citation...

[Nationalist State of Knox]

One sentence from you is not a citation.

common sense needs no citation...

That's because it isn't an argument.

[The Grey Wolf]

Not really much of a fan of either. But Capitalism is the best option because at least it rewards the more productive (with better pay, promotion, etc.) while Communism wants a utopian classless society where everyone gets equal pay regardless of their contributions.

[Conscentia]

One sentence from you is not a citation.

common sense needs no citation...

You have no argument.

It was once "common sense" that miasmas caused disease. "Common sense!!!!!11!!!1!" is not an argument.

[Conscentia]

Not really much of a fan of either. But Capitalism is the best option because at least it rewards the more productive (with better pay, promotion, etc.) while Communism wants a utopian classless society where everyone gets equal pay regardless of their contributions.

No it doesn't.

Please read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

[Nationalist State of Knox]

Not really much of a fan of either. But Capitalism is the best option because at least it rewards the more productive (with better pay, promotion, etc.) while Communism wants a utopian classless society where everyone gets equal pay regardless of their contributions.

It actually distributes wealth according to one's need, if I'm correct.

[Heavenly Peace]

Not really much of a fan of either. But Capitalism is the best option because at least it rewards the more productive (with better pay, promotion, etc.) while Communism wants a utopian classless society where everyone gets equal pay regardless of their contributions.

It actually distributes wealth according to one's need, if I'm correct.

Need? Or want?

[Nationalist State of Knox]

It actually distributes wealth according to one's need, if I'm correct.

Need? Or want?

Did I make myself unclear when I said "need"?

[The Grey Wolf]

Not really much of a fan of either. But Capitalism is the best option because at least it rewards the more productive (with better pay, promotion, etc.) while Communism wants a utopian classless society where everyone gets equal pay regardless of their contributions.

No it doesn't.

Please read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

????

[Heavenly Peace]

Need? Or want?

Did I make myself unclear when I said "need"?

No, you did not.

[The Grey Wolf]

Not really much of a fan of either. But Capitalism is the best option because at least it rewards the more productive (with better pay, promotion, etc.) while Communism wants a utopian classless society where everyone gets equal pay regardless of their contributions.

It actually distributes wealth according to one's need, if I'm correct.

Basically, it takes what you've earned, leaving only what you need?

[Nationalist State of Knox]

No it doesn't.

Please read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

????

What's so baffling about a link to Wikipedia?

[Conscentia]

No it doesn't.
Please read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

????

You seem to have forgotten to add words.

It actually distributes wealth according to one's need, if I'm correct.

Basically, it takes what you've earned, leaving only what you need?

No. Read the page I linked to. Don't glance, actually read it.

[The Grey Wolf]

????

You seem to have forgotten to add words.

Basically, it takes what you've earned, leaving only what you need?

No. Read the page I linked to. Don't glance, actually read it.

I did, I didn't get what you were referring to.
Are you Communist?

[Napkiraly]

Not really much of a fan of either. But Capitalism is the best option because at least it rewards the more productive (with better pay, promotion, etc.) while Communism wants a utopian classless society where everyone gets equal pay regardless of their contributions.

It actually distributes wealth according to one's need, if I'm correct.

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need. Basically, there is such an abundance of goods that ones needs can always be satisfied.

This follows after "to each according to his contribution".

[Conscentia]

You seem to have forgotten to add words.

No. Read the page I linked to. Don't glance, actually read it.

I did, I didn't get what you were referring to.
Are you Communist?

I was referring to the part I put in bold.

I was a communist. What difference would it make if I were?

[Royal Witch Realm]

Just keeping it on myself, I love communist, because, I am raised to be a part of a collective rather than privatize, but I do with all of my heart respect and support the capitalist allies. Thank You, and this is an awesome topic in my opinion.

[Nationalist State of Knox]

I did, I didn't get what you were referring to.

What he was referring to? By posting a link to the Wikipedia page on communism? He was actually making a statement of the feasibility of abiogenesis as a theory to suggest how life first formed from basic amino acid chains into RNA molecules.

[The Grey Wolf]

I did, I didn't get what you were referring to.
Are you Communist?

I was referring to the part I put in bold.

I was a communist. What difference would it make if I were?

Nothing, I just needed a list of ad hominems for the next time we get in a debate.

[Nationalist State of Knox]

It actually distributes wealth according to one's need, if I'm correct.

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need. Basically, there is such an abundance of goods that ones needs can always be satisfied.

This follows after "to each according to his contribution".

Of course, how one's "needs" are determined is another issue.