
by Kalasparata » Fri Dec 10, 2010 5:01 am

by Ramsetia » Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:35 pm

by Meryuma » Fri Dec 10, 2010 3:41 pm
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

by Ceannairceach » Fri Dec 10, 2010 5:14 pm
by Inchland » Fri Dec 10, 2010 5:35 pm

by Tsa-la-gi Nation » Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:16 pm


by Hegstoria » Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:44 pm

by Hegstoria » Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:48 pm

by Latin Hispania » Mon Dec 13, 2010 5:18 pm
Meryuma wrote:I am the Walrus is actually a pretty normal song, discounting the lyrics. This is weird:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvJiyOPmsJs

by The REAL Glasers » Mon Dec 13, 2010 5:21 pm
Hegstoria wrote:
I hate that "song" so much, though I get why they did it. It's one of the tracks I truly hate from the White Album.

by Hassett » Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:26 pm

by Grenartia » Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:57 pm
Tsa-la-gi Nation wrote:
Yeah, I agree that #9 is the most out there song by the Beatles
Have you seen Wiliam Shatner doing Lucy in the Sky w/ Diamond?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-yy2URAYqU
It's so terrible!

by Hegstoria » Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:00 pm
The REAL Glasers wrote:Hegstoria wrote:I hate that "song" so much, though I get why they did it. It's one of the tracks I truly hate from the White Album.
How pretentious.
I really find Revolution 9 to be one of The Beatles' better songs, it's definitely innovative for a band of their style and it's fairly light as far as most Avant-Garde compositions go.

by Ceannairceach » Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:02 pm
Hegstoria wrote:The REAL Glasers wrote:
How pretentious.
I really find Revolution 9 to be one of The Beatles' better songs, it's definitely innovative for a band of their style and it's fairly light as far as most Avant-Garde compositions go.
Ugh... IT'S NOT MUSIC! It's just sound bytes all clumped together. There's no beat. No tempo. No lyrics. No instruments. It's just sound! Gah!

by Hegstoria » Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:11 pm
Get off my lawn while you're at it!
by The REAL Glasers » Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:15 pm
Hegstoria wrote:The REAL Glasers wrote:
How pretentious.
I really find Revolution 9 to be one of The Beatles' better songs, it's definitely innovative for a band of their style and it's fairly light as far as most Avant-Garde compositions go.
Ugh... IT'S NOT MUSIC! It's just sound bytes all clumped together. There's no beat. No tempo. No lyrics. No instruments. It's just sound! Gah!

by Hegstoria » Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:16 pm
The REAL Glasers wrote:Hegstoria wrote:Ugh... IT'S NOT MUSIC! It's just sound bytes all clumped together. There's no beat. No tempo. No lyrics. No instruments. It's just sound! Gah!
Except there's clearly a drumbeat going on within the song. And there are instruments, everything can be an instrument. Also, lyrics are not a characteristic of music.
Organized sound is music, and Revolution 9 is sound that is organized and composed, I'm sorry, but you're 100% wrong.

by Ceannairceach » Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:17 pm
Hegstoria wrote:The REAL Glasers wrote:
Except there's clearly a drumbeat going on within the song. And there are instruments, everything can be an instrument. Also, lyrics are not a characteristic of music.
Organized sound is music, and Revolution 9 is sound that is organized and composed, I'm sorry, but you're 100% wrong.
Somebodies taking this a little too seriously.
We're all entitled to our opinions on music.

by Hegstoria » Tue Dec 14, 2010 5:20 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement