NATION

PASSWORD

A short story

A coffee shop for those who like to discuss art, music, books, movies, TV, each other's own works, and existential angst.
User avatar
Onekawa-Nukanor
Senator
 
Posts: 3518
Founded: Sep 24, 2009
New York Times Democracy

A short story

Postby Onekawa-Nukanor » Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:21 am

Well, this is something that I have written and I would like to get some FB about it.


Memoirs of an Unknown Soldier.

I never told anyone of the atrocities I saw, and the ones I committed, they still haunt me. I do not think anyone should experience the horrifying things I saw, from the pain of seeing your best mates face smiling uneasily at you, then there face etched in fear as they realize that they are going to die moments later after being shot, and you telling them that they are going to be all right when you both know that you are lying and that he is too far gone, to seeing an captured enemy soldier pleading for mercy, begging for his life to be spared and tears rolling down his cheeks, and then you pulling the trigger, there blood spraying all over your shirt, and your innocence travelling with the soul of the man you just executed, never to be seen again.

It was always cold on those battlefields; however there was one place I could find warmth, it was in the memories of her, a girl’s name who has disappeared down the mist of time yet whose face shall never be forgotten, our times walking down the pebble-strewn beach, the waves whirling around our ankles, but there it was not water whirling around my ankles, but blood, the blood of the innocent victims of that horrid war. everything I ever cared for has gone, all I am is an empty shell of a once vibrant and living being, the soul that once inhabited it is no longer, it was corrupted by the horrors of warfare, and irreversibly changed to something I would not call human.

We were told that we were fighting for all that is good in the world, yet I now know that it was a lie, for there is no good on a battlefield, just the constant reminders that the only things that existed there was death and decay, and that the only thing that could be won was not victory, but to be allowed to live another day, another day closer to going home, another day to cherish a thing that these days is taken for granted, a thing called life.

We were led to believe that the enemy was a heartless monster, something that could only think about the destruction of all we held dear, of all the things that makes us happy and help the world be a better place, but they were not the heartless machine we were told, just simple normal men who have sweethearts, children, wives and mothers just like us, men who were just as desperate to leave this god-forsaken place and return to the simple pleasures of their former lives, to rejoice in the ability to appreciate silence, and to be able to fall asleep without the constant pounding of cannon echoing in the distance.

I remember the first man I killed, the first person whose life was snubbed out by my hand, this was also the day I died, not wholly but just a little, this was the day the nightmares started to occur. The look of his face, little older than I was showed not pain or anger, but sadness when the light finally left his eyes, as if he had hoped to maybe been able to say goodbye to those he had loved and cherished, maybe one last time to play with a much loved child, just one last time to do these things that must have been so dear to his heart. And it was by my hand that these things were not accomplished.

Before that man died, he handed me something, just a small locket, I opened and saw that there was a picture of a women inside, and a small note that read Ich liebe Sie immer, und ich bin immer mit Ihnen which is German for I will always love you, and I will always be with you. I still own this locket, I always keep it in my pocket, I have tried to track down who this women was but to no avail, I felt sad for her, she would have received the news by some monotonous letter telling her how valiant her man was, and how the rest of the nation grieved for him also. I feel so much sorrow, because this maybe all that is left of this man that she loved, and it is owned by the man who denied her the joy of seeing him again.

I hope that the future generations will learn from the mistakes made by us, to make a better future for them, yet I feel that this is not how the course of history will proceed, I think this new generation has forgotten the lesson we have tried to teach. But I am at peace now, for the guns and cannon have finally fallen silent, the boom of cannon has been replaced by the laughter of children and the rattle of gunfire is now the sound of birdsong. The blood that I and so many others spilt just hope that our sacrifice isn’t forgotten.
A NEW ZEALANDER

ALL BLACKS SUPPORTER


When refering to me ICly, please use the proper term Ngāti Onekawa-Nukanor, not Ngāti of Onekawa-Nukanor. Thank you.

User avatar
Onekawa-Nukanor
Senator
 
Posts: 3518
Founded: Sep 24, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Onekawa-Nukanor » Sat Nov 06, 2010 5:53 am

Bump
A NEW ZEALANDER

ALL BLACKS SUPPORTER


When refering to me ICly, please use the proper term Ngāti Onekawa-Nukanor, not Ngāti of Onekawa-Nukanor. Thank you.

User avatar
Stuffed Taxidermists
Diplomat
 
Posts: 997
Founded: Oct 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Stuffed Taxidermists » Sat Nov 06, 2010 5:57 am

I think this story is great. It kinda made me sad.
Cartfartium wrote:Winwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwinwcakewinwinwinwinwinwin.

Lyndiana wrote:No! NO!! BAD Vanilla Ice! You spit that thing out RIGHT NOW!
Clicky
Slavbada (Leader):N/A
Vichy Slavbada: N/A
Wiki
National Factbook
Embassy Program
Defcon: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
RP Population: 950,000,000

User avatar
Onekawa-Nukanor
Senator
 
Posts: 3518
Founded: Sep 24, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Onekawa-Nukanor » Sat Nov 06, 2010 6:00 am

Stuffed Taxidermists wrote:I think this story is great. It kinda made me sad.


Thank you :)
A NEW ZEALANDER

ALL BLACKS SUPPORTER


When refering to me ICly, please use the proper term Ngāti Onekawa-Nukanor, not Ngāti of Onekawa-Nukanor. Thank you.

User avatar
Conoga
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6054
Founded: Nov 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Conoga » Sat Nov 06, 2010 7:00 am

I liked it. It made me somewhat sad, as well.

User avatar
Onekawa-Nukanor
Senator
 
Posts: 3518
Founded: Sep 24, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Onekawa-Nukanor » Sat Nov 06, 2010 7:15 am

Conoga wrote:I liked it. It made me somewhat sad, as well.


Thank you :)
A NEW ZEALANDER

ALL BLACKS SUPPORTER


When refering to me ICly, please use the proper term Ngāti Onekawa-Nukanor, not Ngāti of Onekawa-Nukanor. Thank you.

User avatar
Glorious Homeland
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1973
Founded: Apr 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Homeland » Sat Nov 06, 2010 8:27 am

Okay, I didn't get beyond the first paragraph because I didn't find it easy to read... structurally, not emotionally, heh. I'm going to try a dissect it for you, to give you a bit of serious criticism. I hope it can help you to improve the quality of your writing. Bear in mind this is all my opinion, so if you don't find a specific thing relevant, then feel free to ignore the criticism.

Bold means I'm pointing something out.
Underlining means I have added something.
Strikethrough is a suggested removal.

I have never told anyone of the atrocities I saw, and the ones I committed, they still haunt me.

Okay, I'd suggest you make the second comma a full stop for more dramatic pause. It flows too quickly otherwise, I think.

I do not think anyone should experience the horrifying things I saw,

He doesn't need to say "horrifying" if he's admitted that what he took part in was an atrocity. Be watchful of adjectives that are surplus to requirement and try to keep the use of language simple, concise.
Now I've pointed out the major issue I find in the style you are using. "Saw" doesn't read well for a good reason. "Have seen" would be a better consider that you've lengthened "I don't" to "I do not". Now presuming your voice (narrator) is middle-upper class he's going to use proper language consistently, in which case it's more likely they'll say "I do not.... I have seen." rather than a more working class "I don't... saw." if you understand my criticism. But because there's that inconsistency I'm confused and it comes across more like bad writing than style. If you are using a first person narration you'll probably need to edit your writings to be consistent with how you want your character to be or come across, otherwise you'll confuse the reader.

from the pain of seeing your best mates face smiling uneasily at you, then there face etched in fear as they realize that they are going to die moments later after being shot, and you telling them that they are going to be all right when you both know that you are lying and that he is too far gone, to seeing an captured enemy soldier pleading for mercy, begging for his life to be spared and tears rolling down his cheeks, and then you pulling the trigger, there blood spraying all over your shirt, and your innocence travelling with the soul of the man you just executed, never to be seen again.

First criticism, a paragraph is not a sentence. You'll need to break this up a lot into multiple sentences. Long sentences are fine, on occasion and given context... but you should practice reading your story out aloud. Every time you need to take a breath, a full stop is a good idea.
The first sentence (I'll just say "sentence" where you use a comma) is confusing. The pain of seeing your mates face smiling at you? Your use of a comma implies more is to come, but the fact that you've used "then" tells us that what is to come next is different from what has been. So the idea we get is that the character felt pain at seeing their friend smile. But that's obviously not what you want us to read. So this needs restructured.

Let's say.... "It's painful to watch a friend bleed to death, at that moment you both know that words of comfort are bare faced lies. They were smiling a only few moments earlier, before they were shot." That's far from perfect, but it's a fair bit more concise and less confusing (I hope!).

The second bit is a similar case, it's exceedingly lengthy for what it is and needs rewritten. Perhaps... "You think killing one of them would be easier. It's different from how you imagine or when they're shooting at you across a field. When they are unarmed, even crying, pleading for their life. That makes it very different. Each time you kill someone like that, you lose a little bit of what makes you human. Your soul some may say, it sure felt like I was losing my soul by killing people like that. When the man you are killing has a face it makes you think about him as a person, the human implications. His family won't see him again. I hate that I only started thinking about things like that after I pulled the trigger."
if you wanted to integrate survivor's guilt into it, you might add... "After a while I wished it was me that was dead. At least, then I'd be easy to stop."

I'd suggest you go through your short story and do a serious edit. Please don't copy what I've suggested word for word, but use it as a guide of how you can improve. You may also want to do some research into the kind of thing your character is thinking, the psychologies of war criminals, and soldiers having killed or survived war, etc. Unless you're speaking from experience. Also do read it out loud, it is a very useful tool to help correcting flow and sentence structure.
I'd be happy to read the whole thing if you edit it. :) and hope my response has been useful for you, as a writer. Don't take it personally, that loads of things need edited doesn't mean you're a bad writer or that I'm saying you're crap. Far from it. If you want me to review your edit once its done then I can do that too.
Last edited by Glorious Homeland on Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:47 pm, edited 6 times in total.

User avatar
SUPERFISHPIE
Diplomat
 
Posts: 549
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby SUPERFISHPIE » Sat Nov 06, 2010 12:54 pm

After the Glorious Homeland's dissection, I doubt I need to say much. Indeed, there were a few sentence structures which didn't particularly help the flow or impression, as well as the typical idea you have used of a guilty soldier, which isn't all that original, but that doesn't matter, that's just me.
It was rather well done anyway-the ideas were clear, the descriptions mostly induced good imagery and what not, and I found it easy to read (as in I wasn't put off by it, not that it was very simple). Still, too many commas :)
Zikatere zikatere, tiyeni tilowe m'bwalo!
In no particular order of importance:
The Environmentalist
The Freedom Legislator
The Accountant
The One Who Plays Strategic War Simulations In Lieu Of Actual Warring
The Social Contract-er
The Listener
The Teacher
The Transporter
The Bureaucrat
The Doctor
The Support
and The Jack of All Trades (who acts as a speaker for the council)


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Arts & Fiction

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]

Advertisement

Remove ads