The Armed Republic of Dutch Coolness wrote:The Huskar Social Union wrote:I think people have mellowed about a bit over the age of sigmar thing.
I should hope!
It's great, IMO. Easy to get into, some really great new designs (Nighthaunt, Idoneth Deepkin, etc), and it's revitalized the scene for Fantasy.
I think the Deepkin in particular were such an out there idea that it just worked.
Baltenstein wrote:Some old veterans continue to bitch about Age of Sigmar but the truth is that its sales go really well whereas 9th Age is rapidly declining. People may not like it but the numbers are on GW's side.
On the plus side, GW seems to have somewhat reacted to fan pressure in that they are sloooowly bringing the "classic" fantasy races back into the setting. Battletomes Orruk Warclans (aka Orcs) and Cities of Sigmar (aka Empire) have been announced yesterday:
https://www.warhammer-community.com/201 ... ge-post-1/
It's also expected that we'll see Battletome Slaves to Darkness (aka Warriors of Chaos) before the end of the year.
The absolute irony would be if GW should at some point decide to bring 40k's "3 scales" format (Kill Team for small skirmishes, 40k for medium sized games, Apocalypse for massive horde battles) to AoS (they've already covered two out of three with AoS and now Warcry) and essentially bring back Rank & File movement trays.
We are Sigmar's heirs!
About time