Assume someone complained they were offensive.
Advertisement
by Lunas Legion » Sat Jun 01, 2019 4:54 am
by Licana » Sat Jun 01, 2019 1:06 pm
Puzikas wrote:Gulf War One was like Slapstick: The War. Except, you know, up to 40,000 people died.
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Never in all my years have I seen someone actually quote the dictionary and still get the definition wrong.
Senestrum wrote:How are KEPs cowardly? Surely the "real man" would in fact be the one firing giant rods of nuclear waste at speeds best described as "hilarious".
by Wallenburg » Sat Jun 01, 2019 1:13 pm
by Purpelia » Sun Jun 02, 2019 3:11 am
by Impaled Nazarene » Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:07 am
Purpelia wrote:Wallenburg wrote:This, but unironically. The fucking gall of my vassals to dislike a tall, kind, charitable, brawny, brilliant strategist whose realm is twice as strong as any neighbors.
Well of course they do. He is the one who steals their well earned money and calls it tax. Tax. Taxes are for peasants! Worse yet you drag their armies away from their vitally important dealings to waste on petty squabbles with other kings. And what do THEY get out of it? Nothing I tell you! And than you have the gall to try and push through reforms to make the realm even more centralized so as to further your banditry.
A good king is a weak king, a passive king, a stupid king, preferably underaged as well. At least as far as the nobility is concerned.
Kiaculta wrote:Oh, Kar, you silly sack of shit.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Bickering ist krieg.
Infected Mushroom wrote:isn't this a bit extreme?
Finland SSR wrote:"Many dictatorships are oligarchies.
Many democracies are oligarchies.
Therefore, many dictatorships are democracies."
-said no one ever. I made these words up.
Genivaria wrote:"WHY!? Why do this!? Thousands of planets and trillions of innocent lives gone! For what!?"
"It seemed like fun at the time."
by Serrus » Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:26 am
Purpelia wrote:Wallenburg wrote:This, but unironically. The fucking gall of my vassals to dislike a tall, kind, charitable, brawny, brilliant strategist whose realm is twice as strong as any neighbors.
Well of course they do. He is the one who steals their well earned money and calls it tax. Tax. Taxes are for peasants! Worse yet you drag their armies away from their vitally important dealings to waste on petty squabbles with other kings. And what do THEY get out of it? Nothing I tell you! And than you have the gall to try and push through reforms to make the realm even more centralized so as to further your banditry.
A good king is a weak king, a passive king, a stupid king, preferably underaged as well. At least as far as the nobility is concerned.
Eastern Raarothorgren wrote:News websites are good and reasonable soruces of information or they would not be on the internet if they were saying things that were incorrect.
Keshiland wrote:I am yes arguing that the 1st 4 are not binding to the states and yes I know that in most Republican states they would ban the freedom of religion and the freedom of essembally but I don't live there and I hate guns!
by The Imperial Reach » Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:56 am
Serrus wrote:Purpelia wrote:Well of course they do. He is the one who steals their well earned money and calls it tax. Tax. Taxes are for peasants! Worse yet you drag their armies away from their vitally important dealings to waste on petty squabbles with other kings. And what do THEY get out of it? Nothing I tell you! And than you have the gall to try and push through reforms to make the realm even more centralized so as to further your banditry.
A good king is a weak king, a passive king, a stupid king, preferably underaged as well. At least as far as the nobility is concerned.
My nobles usually like me, even though I get warmongery sometimes. That might be because I bribe them with gold and clean borders (i.e. if I'm the king of Eire, I put Mumu, Connachta, and whatever the other duke is as separate vassals of unrelated dynasties, whilst keeping Ulaidh as my own land out of paranoia.
by Ism » Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:26 am
The Imperial Reach wrote:Serrus wrote:My nobles usually like me, even though I get warmongery sometimes. That might be because I bribe them with gold and clean borders (i.e. if I'm the king of Eire, I put Mumu, Connachta, and whatever the other duke is as separate vassals of unrelated dynasties, whilst keeping Ulaidh as my own land out of paranoia.
Never let your vassals try to expand on their own. All they end up doing is either losing and fucking up your moral authority or winning and growing stronger, taking specific provinces you needed/wanted, destroying your tributaries/allies/other vassals, etc.
Honestly there is nothing good about vassal wars.
by The Imperial Reach » Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:39 am
Ism wrote:The Imperial Reach wrote:
Never let your vassals try to expand on their own. All they end up doing is either losing and fucking up your moral authority or winning and growing stronger, taking specific provinces you needed/wanted, destroying your tributaries/allies/other vassals, etc.
Honestly there is nothing good about vassal wars.
Gotta disagree. While it’s not all good stuff, letting vassals expand can make life easy. For instance, back in my Israel game, my vassals conquered half the Middle East for me. And I don’t think I had a single revolt that entire game.
by Ithalian Empire » Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:00 am
The Imperial Reach wrote:Serrus wrote:My nobles usually like me, even though I get warmongery sometimes. That might be because I bribe them with gold and clean borders (i.e. if I'm the king of Eire, I put Mumu, Connachta, and whatever the other duke is as separate vassals of unrelated dynasties, whilst keeping Ulaidh as my own land out of paranoia.
Never let your vassals try to expand on their own. All they end up doing is either losing and fucking up your moral authority or winning and growing stronger, taking specific provinces you needed/wanted, destroying your tributaries/allies/other vassals, etc.
Honestly there is nothing good about vassal wars.
by Ism » Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:05 am
The Imperial Reach wrote:Ism wrote:
Gotta disagree. While it’s not all good stuff, letting vassals expand can make life easy. For instance, back in my Israel game, my vassals conquered half the Middle East for me. And I don’t think I had a single revolt that entire game.
Vassals will always be your biggest threat. You just got lucky.
by Wallenburg » Sun Jun 02, 2019 11:29 am
The Imperial Reach wrote:Serrus wrote:My nobles usually like me, even though I get warmongery sometimes. That might be because I bribe them with gold and clean borders (i.e. if I'm the king of Eire, I put Mumu, Connachta, and whatever the other duke is as separate vassals of unrelated dynasties, whilst keeping Ulaidh as my own land out of paranoia.
Never let your vassals try to expand on their own. All they end up doing is either losing and fucking up your moral authority or winning and growing stronger, taking specific provinces you needed/wanted, destroying your tributaries/allies/other vassals, etc.
Honestly there is nothing good about vassal wars.
by The Imperial Reach » Sun Jun 02, 2019 1:54 pm
by Wallenburg » Sun Jun 02, 2019 3:12 pm
by The Imperial Reach » Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:35 pm
Wallenburg wrote:
That horrible sinking feeling when he immediately enters a matrilineal marriage and gets usurped within a decade.
by Ithalian Empire » Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:39 pm
The Imperial Reach wrote:Wallenburg wrote:That horrible sinking feeling when he immediately enters a matrilineal marriage and gets usurped within a decade.
He was already married and had a son when he became Basileus. He has two now, and is starting to convert his vassals to Catholicism by force after I help him fuck them up in constant civil wars.
RIP Orthodoxy
by The Imperial Reach » Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:53 pm
by Wallenburg » Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:01 am
by Lunas Legion » Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:47 am
Wallenburg wrote:I loaded this absurdity up just for giggles, and now that I've seen the full Lovecraftian horror of it all, I must play it. Wolfe, give me those extra 32 bits of address space. I'm gonna need all of them, I think.
by Bralia » Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:07 am
Wallenburg wrote:I loaded this absurdity up just for giggles, and now that I've seen the full Lovecraftian horror of it all, I must play it. Wolfe, give me those extra 32 bits of address space. I'm gonna need all of them, I think.
by Wallenburg » Mon Jun 03, 2019 9:08 am
Lunas Legion wrote:Wallenburg wrote:I loaded this absurdity up just for giggles, and now that I've seen the full Lovecraftian horror of it all, I must play it. Wolfe, give me those extra 32 bits of address space. I'm gonna need all of them, I think.
How many stars is that?
Bralia wrote:Wallenburg wrote:I loaded this absurdity up just for giggles, and now that I've seen the full Lovecraftian horror of it all, I must play it. Wolfe, give me those extra 32 bits of address space. I'm gonna need all of them, I think.
Now fill this galaxy with triple the existing amount of races and you've got a fun time. As it is now, you'd never meet another race for over 50 years, if you didn't know exactly where they were.
by The Vekta-Helghast Empire » Mon Jun 03, 2019 11:32 am
by The Huskar Social Union » Mon Jun 03, 2019 11:55 am
The Vekta-Helghast Empire wrote:Man, we really need more fear mechanics in CK2. Like, sure - having everyone love you is nice and all, but if I can't get them to love me, I might as well make them fear me with the threat of burning them alive, or beheading them.
by Impaled Nazarene » Mon Jun 03, 2019 12:03 pm
Kiaculta wrote:Oh, Kar, you silly sack of shit.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Bickering ist krieg.
Infected Mushroom wrote:isn't this a bit extreme?
Finland SSR wrote:"Many dictatorships are oligarchies.
Many democracies are oligarchies.
Therefore, many dictatorships are democracies."
-said no one ever. I made these words up.
Genivaria wrote:"WHY!? Why do this!? Thousands of planets and trillions of innocent lives gone! For what!?"
"It seemed like fun at the time."
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement