New haven america wrote:Maybe because he was a Sith Lord and they knew that he would never give up his power...
Being a Sith Lord is not illegal, and it is not the Jedi's place to decide who does or does not get to be Supreme Chancellor. The Jedi had zero proof that Palpatine had engineered the Clone Wars, only that he was a Sith; if so, then they are arresting him on purely religious reasons. Again, it is not the Jedi's place to decide who gets to be Supreme Chancellor, that's the Senate's responsibility. Palpatine's declaration that he "[is] the Senate" echoes this; arresting the Chancellor with no valid reason to do so equates to overthrowing the Senate. The only reason the Jedi have to arrest the Chancellor is because he is a Sith; neither the Jedi Order, the Separatist leadership, nor the galaxy as a whole knew that Palpatine was actually Sidious (Dooku being the only exception, and he's dead by the time the Jedi attempt their coup). If the Jedi could actually prove that Palpatine was the one behind everything, then they could be rid of him legally, but they don't have a single shred of evidence.
Had the Jedi managed to arrest or kill the Chancellor, it would have looked like a military coup to the average Citizen and Senator. And right near the end of the Clone Wars, to boot! Either that would have resulted in more worlds joining the Separatists (enough to maybe overthrow the new Jedi junta), or a galaxy-wide purging of the Jedi at the hands of the Grand Army (ultimately loyal to the Republic itself, not the Jedi). Alive or dead, Sidious wins.
The Jedi presumed to act in "the name of the Galactic Senate of the Republic" despite not having the powers or authorization to do so. Neither the Senate nor the Security Council approved of removing the Chancellor from office ('Order 65'), so the Jedi's actions were unilateral and without legal basis. The Jedi pulled killing weapons on the Supreme Chancellor, and he defended himself accordingly. Mace Windu then fought Palps, disarmed him, and had him at his mercy. The Jedi Master would have killed the disarmed, practically defenceless Chancellor had Vader not intervened - and considering the Jedi's track record in dealing with Sith, it's unlikely the Chancellor would have made it to court even if he did surrender. Windu realized, quite rightly, that the Senate would not go along with the Jedi's planned removal of the Chancellor, although he put it in terms of the Chancellor "having control of the Senate and the courts" rather than the illegality of his actions.
This is what police do in real life. Unless you want to go full libertarian and suggest the law be nothing more than people on their front porches with shotguns, they didn’t do anything wrong.
Which is ironically what you're advocating here. The Jedi are not the Republic's police force*, although they regularly assisted the proper legal authorities in investigations. The Jedi were ultimately peacekeepers, solving disputes between rival systems and factions within the Republic at the behest of the Chancellor and Senate, and then as Generals within the Grand Army of the Republic (again at the behest of the Chancellor and Senate). To argue that the Jedi were acting within the law when they attempted to overthrow the Chancellor is nothing but pure folly.
*="The Jedi can't get involved. This is a job for the local police." (Anakin Skywalker, The Clone Wars S3E4)






