NATION

PASSWORD

MCU/Superhero Discussion Thread

A coffee shop for those who like to discuss art, music, books, movies, TV, each other's own works, and existential angst.

Advertisement

Remove ads

Opinion on Across the Spider-Verse

Haven’t Seen It
23
37%
0 Stars
1
2%
1 Star
1
2%
2 Stars
1
2%
3 Stars
6
10%
4 Stars
31
49%
 
Total votes : 63

User avatar
Ameriganastan
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52665
Founded: Jul 01, 2008
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Ameriganastan » Tue Feb 12, 2019 10:47 pm

Olthar wrote:
Lord Dominator wrote:Here's the Wikipedia list anyways
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor ... uperheroes

Some Marvel ones listed are Deadpool, Hercules, and Valkyrie.

...Why is Asami on a list for superheroes? I mean, I'll accept Korra since she is sort of like a superhero if you squint, but there's no way that Asami qualifies.

I mean, Batman counts as a superhero. And they're basically the same. Super rich people who fight crime with tech.
The Incompetent Critic
DENVER BRONCOS fan
Eric Lumen: Ultimate Chad
Force of nature.
The Ameri Train.
The Ameri song
Tsundere Ameri.
HulkAmeri
Ameri goes to court.
Universal Constant
Edward Richtofen wrote:Ameri's so tough that he criticized an Insane Asylum and was promptly let out

Ameri does the impossible.
Fire the Ameri.
Sinovet wrote:Ameri's like Honey badger. He don't give a fuck.

Krazakistan wrote: He is a force of negativity for the sake of negativity

Onocarcass wrote:Trying to change Ameri, is like trying to drag a 2 ton block of lead with your d**k.

Immoren wrote:When Ameri says something is shit it's good and when Ameri says some thing is good it's great. *nods*

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Wed Feb 13, 2019 12:33 am

Liriena wrote:
Olthar wrote:>20 Marvel movies with male leads
>1 Marvel movie with a female lead
>OMG ITS SJW GONE MAD HER VAGINA IS GOING TO RUIN THE FRANCHISE!!!!1!!1

At this rate Youtubers are going to carry out a mass suicide when the first LGBT+ Marvel lead comes along.

Fast track Alpha Flight!
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Ameriganastan
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52665
Founded: Jul 01, 2008
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Ameriganastan » Wed Feb 13, 2019 12:49 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Liriena wrote:At this rate Youtubers are going to carry out a mass suicide when the first LGBT+ Marvel lead comes along.

Fast track Alpha Flight!

I remember those guys. They were in an episode of the 90's X-Men cartoon. Weirdest damn super group I ever saw. Especially the cartwheeling midget in the leotard.
The Incompetent Critic
DENVER BRONCOS fan
Eric Lumen: Ultimate Chad
Force of nature.
The Ameri Train.
The Ameri song
Tsundere Ameri.
HulkAmeri
Ameri goes to court.
Universal Constant
Edward Richtofen wrote:Ameri's so tough that he criticized an Insane Asylum and was promptly let out

Ameri does the impossible.
Fire the Ameri.
Sinovet wrote:Ameri's like Honey badger. He don't give a fuck.

Krazakistan wrote: He is a force of negativity for the sake of negativity

Onocarcass wrote:Trying to change Ameri, is like trying to drag a 2 ton block of lead with your d**k.

Immoren wrote:When Ameri says something is shit it's good and when Ameri says some thing is good it's great. *nods*

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20358
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:16 am

Lord Dominator wrote:Here's the Wikipedia list anyways
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor ... uperheroes

Some Marvel ones listed are Deadpool, Hercules, and Valkyrie.

>The Ambiguously Gay Duo

Yep, that checks out.

User avatar
Tarsonis
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31124
Founded: Sep 20, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tarsonis » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:48 am

Olthar wrote:
Liriena wrote:The anti-Captain Marvel side of Youtube is absolutely breathtaking.



You can add "owning the nerds" to the list of reasons why I want to watch it.

>20 Marvel movies with male leads
>1 Marvel movie with a female lead
>OMG ITS SJW GONE MAD HER VAGINA IS GOING TO RUIN THE FRANCHISE!!!!1!!1


Maybe its an angry vagina.
NS Keyboard Warrior since 2005
Ecclesiastes 1:18 "For in much wisdom is much vexation, and those who increase knowledge increase sorrow"
Thucydides: “The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools.”
1 Corinthians 5:12 "What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside?"
Galatians 6:7 "Do not be deceived; God is not mocked, for you reap whatever you sow."
T. Stevens: "I don't hold with equality in all things, but I believe in equality under the Law."
James I of Aragon "Have you ever considered that our position is Idolatry to the Rabbi?"
Debating Christian Theology with Non-Christians pretty much anybody be like

User avatar
Hirota
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7527
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Wed Feb 13, 2019 6:11 am

Olthar wrote:
Liriena wrote:The anti-Captain Marvel side of Youtube is absolutely breathtaking.



You can add "owning the nerds" to the list of reasons why I want to watch it.

>20 Marvel movies with male leads
>1 Marvel movie with a female lead
>OMG ITS SJW GONE MAD HER VAGINA IS GOING TO RUIN THE FRANCHISE!!!!1!!1
I'm getting the distinct feeling that Hollywood types have discovered that jumping on the outrage bandwagon is a very good way to get viral marketing for free. It's all very predictable, and we've seen it played to death a few times.

1. Actor/Actress/Director will say something that they know will provoke an outraged reaction - be that about once wanting to kill a ‘black bastard’ in revenge for the rape of a loved one, or pretending everyone who dislikes their film and prefers the originals is a misogynist, or expressing how they don't want the press tour to be "too white" or whatever other bait you might think of.

2. Enter the Twittermob and Youtube ranters, stage left, to give them, their publicist, and the studio the outraged reaction they seek, only more so.

3. Enter the counter mob, replete with tumblr accounts, twitter accounts and whatever social media they decide to leverage to decide that they are going to support Actor/Actress/Director by going to watch the latest film or buy the latest product in support of Actor/Actress/Director beliefs and fuel the perpetual outrage machine.

4. Clickbait Journos and wanabee bloggers will cherrypick the most salacious parts of 2 and 3 to promote their own content whilst virtue signaling their own preferred cause or brand of politics.
I'm just a bit bored by it all, and none of it really matters what the film/TV show/product is actually about and if it's any good.

Me personally...I've already booked my seats for me and the missus, I'll probably enjoy it, and it'll make a pleasant hors d'oeuvre for the main meal in April.
Last edited by Hirota on Wed Feb 13, 2019 6:21 am, edited 6 times in total.
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22039
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Wed Feb 13, 2019 6:52 am

Lord Dominator wrote:Here's the Wikipedia list anyways
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor ... uperheroes

Some Marvel ones listed are Deadpool, Hercules, and Valkyrie.


Deadpool is only slightly more pansexual than Dumbledore is gay. Marvel literally has married LGBT superheroes (as in a same sex marriage) and Young Avengers was majority queer and somehow Deadpool gets to become this flagship character?

Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:*Although I thought the same about BP's trailers, so who knows.


Well... you were right.
Last edited by Forsher on Wed Feb 13, 2019 6:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
Platypus Bureaucracy
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1763
Founded: Jun 06, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Platypus Bureaucracy » Wed Feb 13, 2019 7:49 am

Forsher wrote:
Lord Dominator wrote:Here's the Wikipedia list anyways
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor ... uperheroes

Some Marvel ones listed are Deadpool, Hercules, and Valkyrie.


Deadpool is only slightly more pansexual than Dumbledore is gay. Marvel literally has married LGBT superheroes (as in a same sex marriage) and Young Avengers was majority queer and somehow Deadpool gets to become this flagship character?

Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:*Although I thought the same about BP's trailers, so who knows.


Well... you were right.

I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of that Best Picture nomination!
Platypus of the non-venomous, egg-laying variety
Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:I will never stop being a gay platypus.

The Huskar Social Union wrote:You glorifted ducking wanabe sea pheasant

Platapusses are not rel

Ostroeuropa wrote:"Can we just eat SOME of the rich?"

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Wed Feb 13, 2019 7:54 am

Ameriganastan wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Fast track Alpha Flight!

I remember those guys. They were in an episode of the 90's X-Men cartoon. Weirdest damn super group I ever saw. Especially the cartwheeling midget in the leotard.

Do not disparage Puck! Yeah, they named the character with dwarfism "Puck"...and that power cartwheeling is his signature move. Sasquatch was an attempt to replicate The Hulk but ended up bonding with an extra-dimensional being. His human alter ego was a scientist and former Green Bay Packer, because comics. Then there's Box...the super powered robot created by a guy who lost his legs.

Alpha Flight is supposed to be like the Canadian Avengers/X Men, but ultimately it's a weird "Island of Misfit Toys" team of superheroes. Still, kind of dug that title 'back in the day'...

Northstar was Marvel's first openly gay character and that happened in the 80s. Also first comic book character in a same sex marriage.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22039
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:37 am

Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:
Forsher wrote:
Deadpool is only slightly more pansexual than Dumbledore is gay. Marvel literally has married LGBT superheroes (as in a same sex marriage) and Young Avengers was majority queer and somehow Deadpool gets to become this flagship character?



Well... you were right.

I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of that Best Picture nomination!


Because the Oscars have such a good record at discerning good and bad films as opposed to pretentious and unwatched films...

That the MCU got an Oscar nod by making their usual movie (it's so repetitive... among other things, it's literally a rip off of Ragnarok) by doing nothing more than taking out the jokes tells you everything you need to know about the Academy and nothing about anything else.

It is, however, a better film than IW in the sense it tells a better story and fits in smoothly with the canon (i.e. the pre-existing story) much better than IW does.
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
Lord Dominator
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8900
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Right-wing Utopia

Postby Lord Dominator » Wed Feb 13, 2019 8:50 am

Forsher wrote:
Lord Dominator wrote:Here's the Wikipedia list anyways
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categor ... uperheroes

Some Marvel ones listed are Deadpool, Hercules, and Valkyrie.


Deadpool is only slightly more pansexual than Dumbledore is gay. Marvel literally has married LGBT superheroes (as in a same sex marriage) and Young Avengers was majority queer and somehow Deadpool gets to become this flagship character?

Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:*Although I thought the same about BP's trailers, so who knows.


Well... you were right.

I named DP because he's recognizable, not because he's flagship for it

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22039
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:01 am

Lord Dominator wrote:
Forsher wrote:
Deadpool is only slightly more pansexual than Dumbledore is gay. Marvel literally has married LGBT superheroes (as in a same sex marriage) and Young Avengers was majority queer and somehow Deadpool gets to become this flagship character?



Well... you were right.

I named DP because he's recognizable, not because he's flagship for it


I would say that he has become it despite having the scantest credentials.
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:02 am

Forsher wrote:
Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of that Best Picture nomination!


Because the Oscars have such a good record at discerning good and bad films as opposed to pretentious and unwatched films...

That the MCU got an Oscar nod by making their usual movie (it's so repetitive... among other things, it's literally a rip off of Ragnarok) by doing nothing more than taking out the jokes tells you everything you need to know about the Academy and nothing about anything else.

It is, however, a better film than IW in the sense it tells a better story and fits in smoothly with the canon (i.e. the pre-existing story) much better than IW does.

Alright, I'm game. How is it a rip off of Ragnarok.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22039
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Wed Feb 13, 2019 10:58 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Forsher wrote:
Because the Oscars have such a good record at discerning good and bad films as opposed to pretentious and unwatched films...

That the MCU got an Oscar nod by making their usual movie (it's so repetitive... among other things, it's literally a rip off of Ragnarok) by doing nothing more than taking out the jokes tells you everything you need to know about the Academy and nothing about anything else.

It is, however, a better film than IW in the sense it tells a better story and fits in smoothly with the canon (i.e. the pre-existing story) much better than IW does.

Alright, I'm game. How is it a rip off of Ragnarok.


BP and Ragnarok both revolve around the arrival of an unknown claimant to the throne who intends to create an Empire. Both... as is typical in MCU films... are unknown due to the secret keeping behaviour of the main character's father-kings. Both films involve the main character being presumed dead and requiring a power-up. The biggest difference is that Thor puts his team together whereas T'Challa gets put together by Nakia!

Thematically they even copy each other... both are about colonialism (although Ragnarok is much more subtle... in part because Hela is just so aggressive).
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
Platypus Bureaucracy
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1763
Founded: Jun 06, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Platypus Bureaucracy » Wed Feb 13, 2019 12:16 pm

Forsher wrote:
Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of that Best Picture nomination!


Because the Oscars have such a good record at discerning good and bad films as opposed to pretentious and unwatched films...

That the MCU got an Oscar nod by making their usual movie (it's so repetitive... among other things, it's literally a rip off of Ragnarok) by doing nothing more than taking out the jokes tells you everything you need to know about the Academy and nothing about anything else.

It is, however, a better film than IW in the sense it tells a better story and fits in smoothly with the canon (i.e. the pre-existing story) much better than IW does.

You know, when someone tells me they love a film I didn't care for, I tend to assume they've noticed something I haven't or that they value something I don't. I don't assume they're lying about liking it.

Maybe the people who like BP aren't being pretentious. That is, they're not pretending to be cleverer than you. Maybe they're just...cleverer than you.
Platypus of the non-venomous, egg-laying variety
Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:I will never stop being a gay platypus.

The Huskar Social Union wrote:You glorifted ducking wanabe sea pheasant

Platapusses are not rel

Ostroeuropa wrote:"Can we just eat SOME of the rich?"

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 45100
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Wed Feb 13, 2019 12:27 pm

Forsher wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Alright, I'm game. How is it a rip off of Ragnarok.


BP and Ragnarok both revolve around the arrival of an unknown claimant to the throne who intends to create an Empire. Both... as is typical in MCU films... are unknown due to the secret keeping behaviour of the main character's father-kings. Both films involve the main character being presumed dead and requiring a power-up. The biggest difference is that Thor puts his team together whereas T'Challa gets put together by Nakia!

Thematically they even copy each other... both are about colonialism (although Ragnarok is much more subtle... in part because Hela is just so aggressive).

Cool. That was every bit the stretch I thought it would be.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Pasong Tirad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11943
Founded: May 31, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Pasong Tirad » Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:15 pm

I have no idea how one person can think that a fantasy comedy romp film in space with superheroes is the same as an Afrofuturist political action thriller with superheroes.

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59282
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Wed Feb 13, 2019 4:30 pm

Pasong Tirad wrote:I have no idea how one person can think that a fantasy comedy romp film in space with superheroes is the same as an Afrofuturist political action thriller with superheroes.

They could still have similar plot structure but entirely different themes and variations of said plot structure.
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
The first Galactic Republic
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7436
Founded: Apr 27, 2014
Anarchy

Postby The first Galactic Republic » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:02 pm

The Huskar Social Union wrote:
Pasong Tirad wrote:I have no idea how one person can think that a fantasy comedy romp film in space with superheroes is the same as an Afrofuturist political action thriller with superheroes.

They could still have similar plot structure but entirely different themes and variations of said plot structure.

Tbh I see the point made. The scripts are very similar.

But the two movies are far too different in tone and themes. Besides, Ragnarok just pays lip service to the theme of colonialism. The countries involved are made up, and there’s no audience attachment to them. Black Panther focuses on a social message that connects to real history.
TG me about my avatars for useless trivia.

A very good link right here.

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20358
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:34 pm

The first Galactic Republic wrote:
The Huskar Social Union wrote:They could still have similar plot structure but entirely different themes and variations of said plot structure.

Tbh I see the point made. The scripts are very similar.

But the two movies are far too different in tone and themes. Besides, Ragnarok just pays lip service to the theme of colonialism. The countries involved are made up, and there’s no audience attachment to them. Black Panther focuses on a social message that connects to real history.

If you break down any story to its bare bones, there are only 7 ever told. I don't find common story elements particularly notable.

User avatar
Pasong Tirad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11943
Founded: May 31, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Pasong Tirad » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:37 pm

The Huskar Social Union wrote:
Pasong Tirad wrote:I have no idea how one person can think that a fantasy comedy romp film in space with superheroes is the same as an Afrofuturist political action thriller with superheroes.

They could still have similar plot structure but entirely different themes and variations of said plot structure.

That's true, but tbf, as other people have already said, there are a pretty limited number of kinds of stories being told, so just basing it down on a similar plot structure - or some similarities in the way the story is told - isn't really enough to say that one film is a rip off of the other (as has been claimed above).

User avatar
Lord Dominator
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8900
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Right-wing Utopia

Postby Lord Dominator » Wed Feb 13, 2019 7:05 pm

I don't even personally really see the colonialism in Ragnarok, Hela strikes me (and Asgard in general) as a person/nation who's more out to grab loot and territory than anything approximating actual governance of such. I mean, Vanaheim and Nidavallir are the only ones of the 9 Realms that actually show some form of positive relationship beyond 'Asgard is better than this place,' and only Jotunheim has that negative relationship that resembles something closer to what'd you expect if someone beat you in a bunch of wars and stole your crown jewels.

User avatar
Pasong Tirad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11943
Founded: May 31, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Pasong Tirad » Wed Feb 13, 2019 7:08 pm

Lord Dominator wrote:I don't even personally really see the colonialism in Ragnarok, Hela strikes me (and Asgard in general) as a person/nation who's more out to grab loot and territory than anything approximating actual governance of such. I mean, Vanaheim and Nidavallir are the only ones of the 9 Realms that actually show some form of positive relationship beyond 'Asgard is better than this place,' and only Jotunheim has that negative relationship that resembles something closer to what'd you expect if someone beat you in a bunch of wars and stole your crown jewels.

There was a part of the conflict wherein Hela asks something along the lines of "how do you think Asgard got so rich?" and the answer being Hela and Odin's conquests. It wasn't the main theme, but more like a column that helped support the overall arch of the story and the conflict.
Last edited by Pasong Tirad on Wed Feb 13, 2019 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lord Dominator
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8900
Founded: Dec 22, 2016
Right-wing Utopia

Postby Lord Dominator » Wed Feb 13, 2019 7:24 pm

Pasong Tirad wrote:
Lord Dominator wrote:I don't even personally really see the colonialism in Ragnarok, Hela strikes me (and Asgard in general) as a person/nation who's more out to grab loot and territory than anything approximating actual governance of such. I mean, Vanaheim and Nidavallir are the only ones of the 9 Realms that actually show some form of positive relationship beyond 'Asgard is better than this place,' and only Jotunheim has that negative relationship that resembles something closer to what'd you expect if someone beat you in a bunch of wars and stole your crown jewels.

There was a part of the conflict wherein Hela asks something along the lines of "how do you think Asgard got so rich?" and the answer being Hela and Odin's conquests. It wasn't the main theme, but more like a column that helped support the overall arch of the story and the conflict.

Sure, I just took that as something a bit closer to 'invade them and take their stuff repeatedly'

User avatar
Hirota
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7527
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Thu Feb 14, 2019 1:43 am

Lord Dominator wrote:
Pasong Tirad wrote:There was a part of the conflict wherein Hela asks something along the lines of "how do you think Asgard got so rich?" and the answer being Hela and Odin's conquests. It wasn't the main theme, but more like a column that helped support the overall arch of the story and the conflict.

Sure, I just took that as something a bit closer to 'invade them and take their stuff repeatedly'
That would be rather space viking of them.
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Arts & Fiction

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Tarsonis

Advertisement

Remove ads

cron