Advertisement
by The first Galactic Republic » Fri Jul 20, 2018 3:11 pm
by The Huskar Social Union » Fri Jul 20, 2018 3:17 pm
The first Galactic Republic wrote:Some of the tweets actually go further to 2012. That’s about when they would have started on GotG.
by Olthar » Fri Jul 20, 2018 3:37 pm
The Huskar Social Union wrote:The first Galactic Republic wrote:Some of the tweets actually go further to 2012. That’s about when they would have started on GotG.
Apparently he deleted an absolute fuck ton from around that time period and before hand, i guess because he believed something like this might end up happening.
Like these were some of them:
“Expendables is so manly I f—ed the s— out of the p-ssy boy next to me,”
“The best thing about being raped is when you’re done being raped and it’s like ‘whew this feels great, not being raped!'”
“I remember my first NAMBLA meeting. It was the first time I felt ok being who I am,”
“I’m doing a big Hollywood film adaptation of The Giving Tree with a happy ending — the tree grows back and gives the kid a b—job.”
Like i laugh at some dark humour, but its honestly understandable why they would rop him, as even that stuff is a bit much for me.
more of them
by Lord Dominator » Fri Jul 20, 2018 3:39 pm
by The first Galactic Republic » Fri Jul 20, 2018 8:43 pm
by The first Galactic Republic » Sat Jul 21, 2018 4:07 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Sun Jul 22, 2018 3:02 am
by Platypus Bureaucracy » Thu Jul 26, 2018 4:14 pm
by The first Galactic Republic » Fri Jul 27, 2018 1:05 pm
Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:Hmm, so the Defenders was good. Not great, and it felt a bit too long even at eight episodes, but the characters' interactions and the action scenes carried it. Iron Fist and his girlfriend are still boring, though.
Also, I don't think anyone actually said the word "Defenders", not even as a joke.
by Forsher » Sat Jul 28, 2018 6:45 am
Lord Dominator wrote:Saw Ant-man & Wasp yesterday.
Was fairly funny, but otherwise a not-great/not-bad sort of movie
by Ameriganastan » Sat Jul 28, 2018 6:48 am
Edward Richtofen wrote:Ameri's so tough that he criticized an Insane Asylum and was promptly let out
Sinovet wrote:Ameri's like Honey badger. He don't give a fuck.
Krazakistan wrote: He is a force of negativity for the sake of negativity
Onocarcass wrote:Trying to change Ameri, is like trying to drag a 2 ton block of lead with your d**k.
Immoren wrote:When Ameri says something is shit it's good and when Ameri says some thing is good it's great. *nods*
by Forsher » Sat Jul 28, 2018 7:00 am
Ameriganastan wrote:...Better than Black Panther and Infinity War? What are you smoking and can I have some?
by The Huskar Social Union » Sat Jul 28, 2018 7:05 am
by Ameriganastan » Sat Jul 28, 2018 7:55 am
Edward Richtofen wrote:Ameri's so tough that he criticized an Insane Asylum and was promptly let out
Sinovet wrote:Ameri's like Honey badger. He don't give a fuck.
Krazakistan wrote: He is a force of negativity for the sake of negativity
Onocarcass wrote:Trying to change Ameri, is like trying to drag a 2 ton block of lead with your d**k.
Immoren wrote:When Ameri says something is shit it's good and when Ameri says some thing is good it's great. *nods*
by The Huskar Social Union » Sat Jul 28, 2018 7:56 am
by Forsher » Sat Jul 28, 2018 3:21 pm
by The Huskar Social Union » Sun Jul 29, 2018 3:49 am
by Salus Maior » Wed Aug 01, 2018 6:43 pm
by Forsher » Wed Aug 01, 2018 6:49 pm
by Salus Maior » Wed Aug 01, 2018 6:51 pm
by Forsher » Wed Aug 01, 2018 7:06 pm
by Salus Maior » Wed Aug 01, 2018 7:14 pm
by Forsher » Wed Aug 01, 2018 7:34 pm
Salus Maior wrote:
The first half was good, I'd say. But it seems like it was really rushed towards the end, as in, making characters act completely opposite to what their character is.Why would Doctor Strange give Thanos the time stone? It makes no bloody sense with everything that's been established with his character in the past. We're talking about a guy who in his original movie died multiple deaths to prevent Earth from being attacked from the Demon, a man who is clear headed and is focused on the protection of Earth and the universe....Just give Thanos the time stone, knowing exactly what he would do with it considering he JUST saw it when he was peering into the future? To save Stark, who he barely even knows and is also fighting to the death to keep Thanos in check as much as he is? And most certainly isn't guaranteed to live anyway when Thanos snaps.
It's just lazy writing, making a character do an uncharacteristic thing that ends in astronomical consequences just to let Thanos win. And the thing is, he dies anyway when Thanos snaps, so why didn't they write it so that he fought to the death to keep the stone safe? That would absolutely be within his established character.
by Salus Maior » Wed Aug 01, 2018 7:44 pm
Forsher wrote:Salus Maior wrote:
The first half was good, I'd say. But it seems like it was really rushed towards the end, as in, making characters act completely opposite to what their character is.Why would Doctor Strange give Thanos the time stone? It makes no bloody sense with everything that's been established with his character in the past. We're talking about a guy who in his original movie died multiple deaths to prevent Earth from being attacked from the Demon, a man who is clear headed and is focused on the protection of Earth and the universe....Just give Thanos the time stone, knowing exactly what he would do with it considering he JUST saw it when he was peering into the future? To save Stark, who he barely even knows and is also fighting to the death to keep Thanos in check as much as he is? And most certainly isn't guaranteed to live anyway when Thanos snaps.
It's just lazy writing, making a character do an uncharacteristic thing that ends in astronomical consequences just to let Thanos win. And the thing is, he dies anyway when Thanos snaps, so why didn't they write it so that he fought to the death to keep the stone safe? That would absolutely be within his established character.The general thinking is that had they managed to pull the Gauntlet off Thanos or Strange used a sling ring to remove it by chopping Thanos' hand off (a la Black Dwarf earlier; which is a bit probably included to remind us that they knew this was an option) the respective outcomes would be:
- Thanos wakes up and actively starts trying to kill them while they try to figure things out. It's unclear if they adapted his full powerset but comics Thanos has got eyebeams which means he can take them at range.
- Thanos is, like Black Dwarf, reasonably unharmed by being, ah, unarmed and takes them on at range with a view to kill.
So, because Doctor Strange has seen the timelines and knows this information, by giving up the stone he is choosing to die. And he does tell us earlier that he'd let Tony die to save the stone if it came to that which is not a throwaway line and is probably telling us how we're meant to interpret the end of the film. But just because I've seen explanations for this issue that doesn't mean those explanations don't raise others or resolve all of the related ones, consider:
- Thanos says Nebula wasn't that far off killing him so why don't they get her to help them kill Thanos (I mean, she might be under the impression she never came close).
- Why not sling ring Thanos' head off? (uhh...)
Thanos shouldn't have won. I agree with you. Everything stacks up just right enough to allow Thanos to win. I mean, if Thor had shown up when Scarlet Witch was still conscious, Thanos was done for. (Although to be fair to Thanos I am convinced that as far as he knew Thor died when he blew up the Asgardian ship so it's not like he didn't take measures there.) I just don't think that this ruins the movie.
I've read a lot of IW theories, incidentally, and the only one that doesn't make sense when you think about what they're saying is the "Hulk wasn't scared, he was selfish" one. The other day someone pointed out that a dead Banner doesn't mean a dead Hulk in the MCU, and I guess I can see Hulk's dialogue as petulance but the truth is that this is simply something the film tried to accomplish but failed to achieve.
by Alvecia » Thu Aug 02, 2018 1:12 am
Salus Maior wrote:Forsher wrote:The general thinking is that had they managed to pull the Gauntlet off Thanos or Strange used a sling ring to remove it by chopping Thanos' hand off (a la Black Dwarf earlier; which is a bit probably included to remind us that they knew this was an option) the respective outcomes would be:
- Thanos wakes up and actively starts trying to kill them while they try to figure things out. It's unclear if they adapted his full powerset but comics Thanos has got eyebeams which means he can take them at range.
- Thanos is, like Black Dwarf, reasonably unharmed by being, ah, unarmed and takes them on at range with a view to kill.
So, because Doctor Strange has seen the timelines and knows this information, by giving up the stone he is choosing to die. And he does tell us earlier that he'd let Tony die to save the stone if it came to that which is not a throwaway line and is probably telling us how we're meant to interpret the end of the film. But just because I've seen explanations for this issue that doesn't mean those explanations don't raise others or resolve all of the related ones, consider:
- Thanos says Nebula wasn't that far off killing him so why don't they get her to help them kill Thanos (I mean, she might be under the impression she never came close).
- Why not sling ring Thanos' head off? (uhh...)
Thanos shouldn't have won. I agree with you. Everything stacks up just right enough to allow Thanos to win. I mean, if Thor had shown up when Scarlet Witch was still conscious, Thanos was done for. (Although to be fair to Thanos I am convinced that as far as he knew Thor died when he blew up the Asgardian ship so it's not like he didn't take measures there.) I just don't think that this ruins the movie.
I've read a lot of IW theories, incidentally, and the only one that doesn't make sense when you think about what they're saying is the "Hulk wasn't scared, he was selfish" one. The other day someone pointed out that a dead Banner doesn't mean a dead Hulk in the MCU, and I guess I can see Hulk's dialogue as petulance but the truth is that this is simply something the film tried to accomplish but failed to achieve.Here's my problem with that "Strange is choosing to die" bit: Strange knows full well that giving Thanos the stone means the death of half the universe, so he knows that he wouldn't just be choosing to die for himself, but for half the universe. Which is not in his character at all.
This of course is not me saying that you shouldn't enjoy the movie. But this kind of writing did ruin it for me.
I was thinking I was going to come out of this movie, seeing the ending as sort of an inevitable defeat by heroes who did their best and fought hard but still lost. A tragic end, but the way it ended up was me saying "Gaddamn that was really stupid."
That being said, I enjoyed the movie up until about the Thanos turned that fight on Titan around. Then I think things started getting rushed.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement