A pretty big stretch to equate interest in a movie to an increased likelihood for perfect scores.
Dismissing the outliers is hardly a new concept.
Advertisement

by The first Galactic Republic » Wed Mar 06, 2019 12:23 pm

by Forsher » Wed Mar 06, 2019 1:03 pm
The first Galactic Republic wrote:Forsher wrote:
Absurd. Movies are watched pretty much exclusively by people who think they'll enjoy them. Throw out all the 1's... the 10's are what theory would predict.
A pretty big stretch to equate interest in a movie to an increased likelihood for perfect scores.
Dismissing the outliers is hardly a new concept.

by The Huskar Social Union » Wed Mar 06, 2019 1:13 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Mar 06, 2019 2:16 pm
Forsher wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:Now watch as you practically quote Barthes directly...
I repeat, if you want to see this as trying to represent Barthes' views and, therefore, of abusing them, then that's on you.Yes.
Don't dismiss what you're clearly interested in as "boring". If you find my particular take, i.e. the ability of film elements to predict audience reception and calling films which predict positive receptions good, boring then just don't reply to me and instead engage with any of the other people talking about this.It's really not. It's part of why we come up with so many different terms to describe them.
We have lots of different words for penis too. I could call a hairdo a hair style or a look and probably other things, e.g. most people will accept hair cut. The existence of synonyms and near synonyms doesn't imply an actual purpose and certainly doesn't describe a non-arbitrary motivation for the purpose. Is it vomit or a technicolour snake?“I think I'm about to have a technicolour snake!' he added, and threw up. °ere, mistah?'someone shouted back. 'Yes?' “That was a chunder!' “Right! No worries!
Is this distinction, in anyway, non-arbitrary? No it's not.So what.
This is a kind of non-arbitrary distinction between what we can loosely term emotional states that, in particular, would be condensed into one category for most non-technical purposes.It is.
Yeah, well, whatever.I loved The First Avenger. Ultron suffered from the tug of war between Whedon and the studio, making it uneven. Iron Man 3 was a wuss out, they were afraid that The Mandarin's ten rings would be too hard a sell in the MCU as it was at the time but they were working their way towards the Infinity Gauntlet and Doctor Strange, they should have just gone for it. Plus we'd tangentially get Fin Fang Foom.
Of course I'm still rooting for them to try and pull off M.O.D.O.K.
Fin Fang Foom is so much more omnipresent than the Mandarin.

by Liriena » Wed Mar 06, 2019 2:26 pm
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Chris Stuckmann Review of Captain Marvel
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Forsher » Wed Mar 06, 2019 2:27 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Fuck, dude. We get it, you want to quote Barthes but don't think doing that has anything to do with him and you want a completely robotic binary on pleasure. You're wrong, but I don't really need to run the fucking MCU thread into the ground with it. Let it go. Talk about comic book movies or make a thread about how we're pleasure robots.
EDIT: And your Fing Fang Foom comment completely missed the point. You can't even on topic right.
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Mar 06, 2019 2:36 pm
Forsher wrote:If your point is that Iron Man 3 lacked the guts to go full comics, my point is that the Mandarin is a trivial character whose importance is grossly overstated whereas Fing Fang Foom (whether spelt incorrectly or not) isn't.
Forsher wrote:Wait... do I seriously have to call that the best you've done? Yep. That's sad, man.

by Liriena » Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:09 pm
Liriena wrote:The Huskar Social Union wrote:Chris Stuckmann Review of Captain Marvel
Lukewarm. Dampens my expectations a bit, although it's definitely adding to the mixed signals I'm getting from all the reviews.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Andsed » Wed Mar 06, 2019 4:45 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Mar 06, 2019 6:34 pm

by Liriena » Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:15 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Andsed wrote:You know what would be really nice? If we could judge movies off their quality not politics. Seriously I honestly hate how hard it is to have discussions about movies without someone throwing in some political bullshit.
I mean, if you stay off youtube and reddit and just watch the movie you don't really have to answer to anyone's agenda.
When it comes down to it, I couldn't tell you what the various review aggregate scores were for the movies I liked last year, even the ones with overt messages like Sorry to Bother You or Blackkklansman or Blindspotting. The tantrum children have tricked us into giving a shit about the score...I mean...imagine this, we're fusing over the reviews of a genre superhero movie. What in the world are we doing? When has critical reviews ever mattered for shit like that? What world are we living in that we're judging a superhero movie on what AO Scott thinks? I go into every superhero movie hoping I'll enjoy it. Hell I go into every movie hoping I'll enjoy it. It doesn't always happen but there's good news, there are 30 screens in walking distance from my house and I get to see three a week for a flat fee. I'll fucking get over it.
Honestly the film being 'okay' would be fucking great. Because people flipping their shit over a movie that's perfectly fine will look at their maximum ridiculous. No hipster claims of 'overrated' will land and the hysteria will just seem like what it is, unhinged. Like someone raging at Zootopia or something.
Fuck. There probably are people raging about Zootopia. But no one cares, because who cares about your passionate weird opinion about Zootopia? Let's relegate the whiners and saberrattlers to the level of people with passionate opinions about Zootopia and just not give a shit.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Tarsonis » Thu Mar 07, 2019 5:49 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:Andsed wrote:You know what would be really nice? If we could judge movies off their quality not politics. Seriously I honestly hate how hard it is to have discussions about movies without someone throwing in some political bullshit.
I mean, if you stay off youtube and reddit and just watch the movie you don't really have to answer to anyone's agenda.
When it comes down to it, I couldn't tell you what the various review aggregate scores were for the movies I liked last year, even the ones with overt messages like Sorry to Bother You or Blackkklansman or Blindspotting. The tantrum children have tricked us into giving a shit about the score...I mean...imagine this, we're fusing over the reviews of a genre superhero movie. What in the world are we doing? When has critical reviews ever mattered for shit like that? What world are we living in that we're judging a superhero movie on what AO Scott thinks? I go into every superhero movie hoping I'll enjoy it. Hell I go into every movie hoping I'll enjoy it. It doesn't always happen but there's good news, there are 30 screens in walking distance from my house and I get to see three a week for a flat fee. I'll fucking get over it.
Honestly the film being 'okay' would be fucking great. Because people flipping their shit over a movie that's perfectly fine will look at their maximum ridiculous. No hipster claims of 'overrated' will land and the hysteria will just seem like what it is, unhinged. Like someone raging at Zootopia or something.
Fuck. There probably are people raging about Zootopia. But no one cares, because who cares about your passionate weird opinion about Zootopia? Let's relegate the whiners and saberrattlers to the level of people with passionate opinions about Zootopia and just not give a shit.

by The Huskar Social Union » Thu Mar 07, 2019 5:50 am
Tarsonis wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:I mean, if you stay off youtube and reddit and just watch the movie you don't really have to answer to anyone's agenda.
When it comes down to it, I couldn't tell you what the various review aggregate scores were for the movies I liked last year, even the ones with overt messages like Sorry to Bother You or Blackkklansman or Blindspotting. The tantrum children have tricked us into giving a shit about the score...I mean...imagine this, we're fusing over the reviews of a genre superhero movie. What in the world are we doing? When has critical reviews ever mattered for shit like that? What world are we living in that we're judging a superhero movie on what AO Scott thinks? I go into every superhero movie hoping I'll enjoy it. Hell I go into every movie hoping I'll enjoy it. It doesn't always happen but there's good news, there are 30 screens in walking distance from my house and I get to see three a week for a flat fee. I'll fucking get over it.
Honestly the film being 'okay' would be fucking great. Because people flipping their shit over a movie that's perfectly fine will look at their maximum ridiculous. No hipster claims of 'overrated' will land and the hysteria will just seem like what it is, unhinged. Like someone raging at Zootopia or something.
Fuck. There probably are people raging about Zootopia. But no one cares, because who cares about your passionate weird opinion about Zootopia? Let's relegate the whiners and saberrattlers to the level of people with passionate opinions about Zootopia and just not give a shit.
What do the carnivores actually eat? Zootopia is bullshit

by Tarsonis » Thu Mar 07, 2019 5:52 am
by Cannot think of a name » Thu Mar 07, 2019 5:55 am

by The Blaatschapen » Thu Mar 07, 2019 6:05 am

by Pasong Tirad » Thu Mar 07, 2019 6:47 am

by Lord Dominator » Thu Mar 07, 2019 6:48 am
Tarsonis wrote:snip

by Tarsonis » Thu Mar 07, 2019 7:04 am
by Cannot think of a name » Thu Mar 07, 2019 8:42 am

by Tarsonis » Thu Mar 07, 2019 9:15 am
I fucking knew I shouldn't have picked Zootopia, I was trying to think of a movie people liked 'just fine'...

by Liriena » Thu Mar 07, 2019 9:17 am

| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Liriena » Thu Mar 07, 2019 9:19 am
Pasong Tirad wrote:Bought my tickets for tomorrow! I'm excited for it. Crappy or not, it's probably going to be fun to watch.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Platypus Bureaucracy » Thu Mar 07, 2019 9:21 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aeritai, Candesia, Cerespasia, Champlania, Lackadaisia, Pilipinas and Malaya, Sarolandia, Union Hispanica de Naciones, Yokron pro-government partisans
Advertisement