Jack didn't die though (
Advertisement

by Tokuopolis » Sun Mar 20, 2016 1:42 am

by United Kingdom of Poland » Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:06 am
and he died in order to balance the changes to the timeline the 10th doctor made

by The Romulan Republic » Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:16 am
United Kingdom of Poland wrote:Tokuopolis wrote:Jack didn't die though (). Miracle day came out and was set after series 5 (I think). What, do you mean replace John Barrowman with another actor?he became immortal in the 2005 series finale
ok I thought you meant Jack died at the end of Tennants run when you said this:and he died in order to balance the changes to the timeline the 10th doctor made
DW who continuity is a pain in the rear end.

by Tokuopolis » Sun Mar 20, 2016 11:30 am
United Kingdom of Poland wrote:Tokuopolis wrote:Jack didn't die though (). Miracle day came out and was set after series 5 (I think). What, do you mean replace John Barrowman with another actor?he became immortal in the 2005 series finale
ok I thought you meant Jack died at the end of Tennants run when you said this:and he died in order to balance the changes to the timeline the 10th doctor made
DW who continuity is a pain in the rear end.
It is impossible for a show about a dimension-hopping time traveller to have a canon

by Tokuopolis » Thu Mar 24, 2016 2:45 pm

by Osnil » Thu Mar 24, 2016 2:57 pm
Tokuopolis wrote:Is it just me or does doctor who seem at it's best and most appealing when we have a light doctor against a dark universe?
When you've got a dark doctor against light, campy villains and stories (like Eccleston's run), fans of the darker and edgier style feel the actor's talents are wasted, but when you've got a dark doctor and dark, serious villains and stories, the darkness puts off younger and casual fans.
That's why I think Tennant's and Smith's doctors are more popular, as a light doctor in a dark universe has the most appeal, pleasing fans of both the dark and light styles.

by Conscentia » Thu Mar 24, 2016 3:01 pm
Osnil wrote:Tokuopolis wrote:Is it just me or does doctor who seem at it's best and most appealing when we have a light doctor against a dark universe?
When you've got a dark doctor against light, campy villains and stories (like Eccleston's run), fans of the darker and edgier style feel the actor's talents are wasted, but when you've got a dark doctor and dark, serious villains and stories, the darkness puts off younger and casual fans.
That's why I think Tennant's and Smith's doctors are more popular, as a light doctor in a dark universe has the most appeal, pleasing fans of both the dark and light styles.
I've always wondered why nobody liked Eccleston. . .
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Conscentia » Thu Mar 24, 2016 3:05 pm
Tokuopolis wrote:Is it just me or does doctor who seem at it's best and most appealing when we have a light doctor against a dark universe?
When you've got a dark doctor against light, campy villains and stories (like Eccleston's run),[...]
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Astrolinium » Thu Mar 24, 2016 3:10 pm

by Conscentia » Thu Mar 24, 2016 3:59 pm
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Aqizithiuda » Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:05 pm
Conscentia wrote:Osnil wrote:Let's see. . . ghosts, Earth Blowing up, and Killer TV Shows vs vampires, Slendermen, and Weeping Angels
I gotta go with 11 as darker.
Weeping Angels in 11's run were a parody of themselves, and the "vampires" were just ugly fish-people.
11 was silly more often than dark.Astrolinium wrote:That's... not what darkness is. Darkness is about the emotional content. That said, both runs got very dark at times.
When did 11 get "very dark"?
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...

by The Romulan Republic » Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:09 pm

by Conscentia » Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:15 pm
Aqizithiuda wrote:"See them shine? See how valuable they are? And they're all yours. Enjoy your bounty."
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Aqizithiuda » Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:25 pm
Nationstatelandsville wrote:I liked the prostitute - never quote me on that.
Puzikas wrote:This is beyond condom on toes. This is full on Bra-on-balls.
Puzikas wrote:Im not cheep-You can quote me on that.
Hellraiser-Army wrote:and clearly I am surrounded by idiots who never looked at a blueprint before...

by Conscentia » Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:30 pm
Aqizithiuda wrote:Conscentia wrote:Wasn't that dark, unless you had sympathy for Solomon for some reason.
The Doctor was killing someone in cold blood with what could be considered satisfaction, someone who pretty much said they were going to rape Nefertiti until her spirit broke.
Are you not seeing the darkness inherent in this scenario?
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by The Romulan Republic » Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:37 pm

by Conscentia » Thu Mar 24, 2016 5:52 pm
The Romulan Republic wrote:And frankly, I have a problem with your implication that anyone who disapproves of sadistic murder of criminals therefore sympathizes with those criminals.
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Nation of Quebec » Thu Mar 24, 2016 6:01 pm
Osnil wrote:Tokuopolis wrote:Is it just me or does doctor who seem at it's best and most appealing when we have a light doctor against a dark universe?
When you've got a dark doctor against light, campy villains and stories (like Eccleston's run), fans of the darker and edgier style feel the actor's talents are wasted, but when you've got a dark doctor and dark, serious villains and stories, the darkness puts off younger and casual fans.
That's why I think Tennant's and Smith's doctors are more popular, as a light doctor in a dark universe has the most appeal, pleasing fans of both the dark and light styles.
I've always wondered why nobody liked Eccleston. . .

by The Romulan Republic » Thu Mar 24, 2016 6:13 pm
Conscentia wrote:The Romulan Republic wrote:Its the hero murdering someone in cold blood. A bastard sure, but its still murder in cold blood. And taunting him while he does.
I didn't say it wasn't dark, I said it wasn't that dark. By the standards of Doctor Who, the Doctor's actions here aren't especially dark.
He killed Solomon after telling him "get off this ship while you still can". Solomon was given the opportunity to leave and abandon the dinosaurs before the Doctor killed him.
As 10 said after murdering the Sycorax leader with a piece of fruit...
"No second chances, I'm that sort of a man".The Romulan Republic wrote:And frankly, I have a problem with your implication that anyone who disapproves of sadistic murder of criminals therefore sympathizes with those criminals.
If one didn't have sympathy for them, then one would only be left with apathy. It is why most are not upset when insects are killed. They have no sympathy for the insects.

by East Gondwana » Thu Mar 24, 2016 11:40 pm

by Tokuopolis » Fri Mar 25, 2016 12:13 am
Osnil wrote:Tokuopolis wrote:Is it just me or does doctor who seem at it's best and most appealing when we have a light doctor against a dark universe?
When you've got a dark doctor against light, campy villains and stories (like Eccleston's run), fans of the darker and edgier style feel the actor's talents are wasted, but when you've got a dark doctor and dark, serious villains and stories, the darkness puts off younger and casual fans.
That's why I think Tennant's and Smith's doctors are more popular, as a light doctor in a dark universe has the most appeal, pleasing fans of both the dark and light styles.
I've always wondered why nobody liked Eccleston. . .

by Tokuopolis » Sat Apr 02, 2016 11:44 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement