Page 148 of 244

PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 2:57 am
by Petrolheadia
Yesterday I saw Yesterday.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 3:53 am
by An Alan Smithee Nation
Petrolheadia wrote:Yesterday I saw Yesterday.


The day after tomorrow are you going to watch The Day After Tomorrow?

PostPosted: Fri Aug 30, 2019 11:50 pm
by Snow Bird-Worldism Crash
the lobster (2015)

PostPosted: Sat Aug 31, 2019 3:45 pm
by Cannot think of a name
Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:Whiplash. I'm not sure I've ever found watching a movie so damn stressful. I had to keep pausing to take breaks.

I watched it in the theaters. And I majored in jazz performance at one point.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 02, 2019 10:23 am
by An Alan Smithee Nation
Life of Crime enjoyed it. Great cast. Never read an Elmore Leonard book, but they do seem to make great films.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 03, 2019 10:57 am
by HC Eredivisie
Once upon a time in Hollywood.

PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2019 3:13 am
by Abercontin-Jereaux
Angry Birds 2
Forced to watch this by my stupid annoying cousin brother(younger obviously) but it wasn't that bad.

PostPosted: Thu Sep 05, 2019 3:19 am
by Free China
IT: Chapter 2. Thought it was good, few parts were funny.

PostPosted: Fri Sep 06, 2019 11:49 pm
by Snow Bird-Worldism Crash
nosferatu: phantom der nacht (1979)

PostPosted: Thu Sep 12, 2019 2:38 am
by Abarri
"Split"

PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2019 11:55 pm
by An Alan Smithee Nation
Keeping up with the Joneses not very good, but not terrible.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:10 am
by Cannot think of a name
Rambo Last Blood is the Gremlins 2 of the Rambo franchise. But not on purpose.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:46 pm
by Nyte
Rambo: Last Blood. I thoroughly enjoyed it too.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 6:49 pm
by Valehart
Ad Astra. Gorgeously filmed, great acting, so-so plot. Honestly, the main quips I had while watching wasn't even due to the movie, but having more to do with the movie theatre.

PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2019 2:10 am
by Snow Bird-Worldism Crash
transmorphers (2007) dir. leigh scott

PostPosted: Wed Sep 25, 2019 8:10 am
by An Alan Smithee Nation
The Driftless Area, too quirky for me.

PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 11:12 am
by Guelder
It was almost a month ago I watch a movie on Netflix, but I watched Sex Education as the last movie

PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 2:08 pm
by Hurdergaryp
The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert

PostPosted: Thu Sep 26, 2019 2:45 pm
by Nanatsu no Tsuki
FAG- Todrick Hall

PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 12:07 am
by An Alan Smithee Nation
The Hitman's Bodyguard I rather enjoyed it, kind of reminded me of a Roger Moore era Bond film, banter and long action sequences.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:14 am
by The Eternal October
Valehart wrote:Ad Astra. Gorgeously filmed, great acting, so-so plot. Honestly, the main quips I had while watching wasn't even due to the movie, but having more to do with the movie theatre.

Here, too, it was Ad Astra.

To continue, it was a so-so plot (seemed lifted from the whole "hero's journey" schtick, you could make many a direct comparison to the various travels taken in Middle Earth), but it was laughably problematic as far as scientific accuracy. Even assuming near-future 'advances'.

There was improbably hyperprofficient orbital aiming skills (e.g. Mars, through the belt, and then the final "boosted" trip) where we might well have had automated or HUD-augmented opportunities to add to this super-astronaut's instinctual skill (and, remember, he had some years of warzone experience to eat into his time at becoming that uber-astronaut?) to allow the necessary lateral thruster corrections to any of these journeys, though I don't believe he had much scope for that for the example when he just had his suit and the deck-plate. You can add similar plot-armour for the little ballistic trip on the Moon, too, with nothing other than luck allowing him a safe landing.

Gravitational effects was another huge bugbear, for me. No apparent effort made to make the Moonbase people lope under 0.166g (looked like the whole old "there's an Earth atmosphere, there's an Earth gravity" thing was just used without thinking too much about it). Mars, ditto, at 0.376ish. Numerous cases where zero-g scenes just had too much clues (clothing, and tears from an eye at one point) that they weren't. I wonder if that was the excuse, though, for the bit where Mars gravity plus acceleration seemed to be no trouble at all? (It was soon after, though, that a separate phase of acceleration was made a plot-point problem!)

Loads of other little niggles. Including a quick (flashback) bit where I'm sure that someone shown with strong wind atmospherically blowing through their air was standing in front of forest of wind turbines that were not spinning. Maybe they were just shut/feathered down (their load not required, or even protecting against overspin from the gale) but it jarred.

As did the "you're going to try to destroy <censored> with a <censored> and that's going to make the unstable <censored#1> safe???" plan. Apparently it did, and stopped the thing that we are told near the start somehow increases with power as it gets further from the source. (Focussed? Apparently not, if it's not deliberate. Maybe something akin to flavour-flipping neutrinos? But still apparently aimed at Earth, with Mars chancing to be in/near the path.) Largely a Mcguffin Threat, though, in many ways.

That said, I liked much of the ship design. Plausible, give or take wriggleroom for future developments. (Not including the "let's just arbitrarily stop off half way" thing. No, just no. Not even because it's a Rule Of Spacefaring that you do. It was a silly stop at a silly reason to have a place to stop at. Unless they had a rather compulsive backstory to that which they then had to cut.)

The thing I liked a lot was the Siri-esque psych-evaluation process. Feasible (if, it seems, normally easily satisfied by a hard-nose astronaut with good pulse control) to have applied machine-learning to the process of automating the process that doubtless every space-goer (of note, but there being many of them in this universe!) has to go through, and creating a level playing field.


So, mostly a Space Comedy, for me. But with an added dose of personal poignancy, when it reminded me of my own last few days with my father, though of course in nothing like the same situation.


And I got a bit of vertigo. The trailer in the screening was of the upcoming historically-inspired film regarding high-altitude balloon flight (taking me back to the time me and my parents had a balloon trip, not my thing at all - and this film dialling things up and the trailer giving 'cliff-hanging' moments made me unnecessarily uneasy in my cinema seat). That done with, we then had the start of Ad Astra and the intro concerning the ISA (no great errors with gravity there, obviously, though it did look strange until it became obvious to me what would be revealed) which gave me a little more of the same.

Until he was loose, and then (culminating in admirable stuntwork, the last bit with the 'ripped fabric' effect, though surely fairly safe to perform) I was Ok. As I was with all other bits in space. It's just not the same without ground and all-too-fallible things to fall off of. Either alone seems to be not as much a problem.


Is it worth seeing? Well, shove quite a lot of your disbelief into microgravity for the duration. Visually stunning. Like Gravity.

And, like Gravity:
...I'm convinced that after some inderterminate point (one of many such potential points), everything that happens to our hero is actually a fast-paced hypoxic death-dream they fall into due to not successfully getting through one or other critical situation.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:16 am
by Thepeopl
In the Shadow of the moon

PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:17 am
by South Central South-Park
Gay N-words from outer space

PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:20 am
by Syeadeshistania
I rewatched Full Metal Jacket recently, still a great movie

PostPosted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 2:29 pm
by The Two Jerseys
Rockys II thru IV