Soviet Haaregrad wrote:What's your take on multiple unreliable narrators and a resulting story that's never an objective telling but always through viewed through the lens of whichever character's PoV it's being shown from? Too confusing to make it work, or it's fine to leave 'what really happened' ambiguous and let the reader decide who's telling the truth and to what extent?
I love stories like that. Nothing wrong with it if you can pull it off.





