Frozen Thread

by **Russian Socialist Soviet States** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:44 pm

How did Kaiser Wilhelm II react when Arendelle cut of trade with Weselton?

by **The Kingdom of Glitter** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:45 pm

Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:How did Kaiser Wilhelm II react when Arendelle cut of trade with Weselton?

He didn't because he is not in the movie because he is real and Arendelle is not.

by **Russian Socialist Soviet States** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:51 pm

The Kingdom of Glitter wrote:
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:How did Kaiser Wilhelm II react when Arendelle cut of trade with Weselton?

He didn't because he is not in the movie because he is real and Arendelle is not.

He was the emperor of Weselton. The Duke of Weselton was probably second in command.

by **The Kingdom of Glitter** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:51 pm

Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:He was the emperor of Weselton. The Duke of Weselton was probably second in command.

No he was not. Where on earth did you get that information from? How is a real man emperor of a fake kingdom without being mentioned at all in the movie?

by **Russian Socialist Soviet States** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:53 pm

The Kingdom of Glitter wrote:
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:He was the emperor of Weselton. The Duke of Weselton was probably second in command.

No he was not. Where on earth did you get that information from? How is a real man emperor of a fake kingdom without being mentioned at all in the movie?

I got my information through logic.

by **Arabic Spain** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:55 pm

Oh god,This has become off-topic while being on-topic.

by **The Kingdom of Glitter** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:55 pm

[quote="Russian Socialist Soviet States";p="20616756"]

How is it logical that a real man is emperor of a fictional fairy tale kingdom/empire/principality/we don't actually know without ever being mentioned or seen in the movie?

by **Russian Socialist Soviet States** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:57 pm

The Kingdom of Glitter wrote:
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:
How is it logical that a real man is emperor of a fictional fairy tale kingdom/empire/principality/we don't actually know without ever being mentioned or seen in the movie?

Frozen takes place in 1889. Weselton is supposed to be Germany. Kaiser Wilhelm II was the leader of Germany in 1889.

by **The Kingdom of Glitter** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 4:57 pm

Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Frozen takes place in 1889. Weselton is supposed to be Germany. Kaiser Wilhelm II was the leader of Germany in 1889.

No it is supposed to be Weselton. Also, how do you know Frozen takes place in 1889 and not say 1666?

by **Russian Socialist Soviet States** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:00 pm

The Kingdom of Glitter wrote:
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Frozen takes place in 1889. Weselton is supposed to be Germany. Kaiser Wilhelm II was the leader of Germany in 1889.

No it is supposed to be Weselton. Also, how do you know Frozen takes place in 1889 and not say 1666?

1889 is my guess due to the fact it was 100 years after the French Revolution.

by **The Kingdom of Glitter** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:02 pm

Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:1889 is my guess due to the fact it was 100 years after the French Revolution.

And what does the French Revolution have to do with the movie?

Anyways, since we discuss this all the time and nothing else but your bullshit theories.

Has anyone heard about the plans to turn Frozen into a Broadway show?

by **Arabic Spain** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:02 pm

The Kingdom of Glitter wrote:
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:1889 is my guess due to the fact it was 100 years after the French Revolution.

And what does the French Revolution have to do with the movie?

Anyways, since we discuss this all the time and nothing else but your bullshit theories.

Has anyone heard about the plans to turn Frozen into a Broadway show?

I have not.

by **Giovenith** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:02 pm

Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:How did Kaiser Wilhelm II react when Arendelle cut of trade with Weselton?

He asks when he finds he can't answer a previous question.

by **Russian Socialist Soviet States** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:03 pm

The Kingdom of Glitter wrote:
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:1889 is my guess due to the fact it was 100 years after the French Revolution.

And what does the French Revolution have to do with the movie?

Anyways, since we discuss this all the time and nothing else but your bullshit theories.

Has anyone heard about the plans to turn Frozen into a Broadway show?

The citizens feared Queen Elsa. I have heard of the plans to bring Frozen to Broadway.

by **The Kingdom of Glitter** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:04 pm

Arabic Spain wrote:I have not.

Here's an article on it.

The idea seems interesting. I wonder how they will manage all the snow and magical snow bits

by **Arabic Spain** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:04 pm

Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:
The Kingdom of Glitter wrote:
And what does the French Revolution have to do with the movie?

Anyways, since we discuss this all the time and nothing else but your bullshit theories.

Has anyone heard about the plans to turn Frozen into a Broadway show?

The citizens feared Queen Elsa.

Still does not prove your point.

by **Russian Socialist Soviet States** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:05 pm

Arabic Spain wrote:
The Kingdom of Glitter wrote:
And what does the French Revolution have to do with the movie?

Anyways, since we discuss this all the time and nothing else but your bullshit theories.

Has anyone heard about the plans to turn Frozen into a Broadway show?

I have not.

Do you like Frozen?

by **Russian Socialist Soviet States** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:06 pm

Arabic Spain wrote:
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:The citizens feared Queen Elsa.

Still does not prove your point.

The citizens should have rose up against Queen Elsa.

by **Arabic Spain** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:06 pm

Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:
Arabic Spain wrote:I have not.

Do you like Frozen?

Not much.

by **The Kingdom of Glitter** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:06 pm

Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:The citizens feared Queen Elsa.

The citizens also likely feared Satan. I don't see your point? It doesn't matter because French Revolution was not about "fear" it was about democracy and overthrowing a monarchy. Not out of "fear" but out of liberty and all that jazz.

by **The Kingdom of Glitter** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:07 pm

Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:The citizens should have rose up against Queen Elsa.

They also should have put on a winter jacket. They live in Norway, according to you, and by that logic winter should not be a surprise to them, it is Norway.

by **Russian Socialist Soviet States** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:07 pm

Arabic Spain wrote:
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Do you like Frozen?

Not much.

Do you think it is Satanic?

by **The Kingdom of Glitter** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:08 pm

Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Do you think it is Satanic?

WHAT EVEN

by **Russian Socialist Soviet States** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:11 pm

The Kingdom of Glitter wrote:
Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:Do you think it is Satanic?

WHAT EVEN

I was talking to a devout Muslim.

by **The Kingdom of Glitter** » Sat Jun 21, 2014 5:15 pm

Russian Socialist Soviet States wrote:I was talking to a devout Muslim.

Plot twist, Satan is a Christian figure and therefore why would a devout Muslim know/care if something is Satanic?

Frozen Thread

Who is online