Amen to that. After revisiting Renly's character recently, I've grown quite fond of him.
Advertisement

by New Frenco Empire » Thu Jul 24, 2014 2:13 am

by The Jonathanian States » Thu Jul 24, 2014 5:15 am
Newcrest ColdSilver wrote:the "good guys" (not that there really are any)

by New Aerios » Thu Jul 24, 2014 6:15 am
The Jonathanian States wrote:Newcrest ColdSilver wrote:the "good guys" (not that there really are any)
May I introduce you to the honorable Lord Eddard of House Stark? Can anybody legitimately say that he was a bad guy?
To the heiress(?) to the Sapphire Island, Lady Brienne of Tarth? Depending on your opinion possibly also his Grace Robb of House Stark, King in the North, King of the Trident?
Also,his Grace Tommen of House Baratheon-Lannister, King on the Iron Throne, isn't a particularly bad person.
"No matter how worthy the cause, it is robbery, theft, and injustice to confiscate the property of one person and give it to another to whom it does not belong"------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Prior to capitalism, the way people amassed great wealth was by looting, plundering and enslaving their fellow man. Capitalism made it possible to become wealthy by serving your fellow man."

by Point Breeze » Thu Jul 24, 2014 7:27 am
Thane of WA Affairs for Wintreath

by Bralia » Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:44 am
The Jonathanian States wrote:Newcrest ColdSilver wrote:the "good guys" (not that there really are any)
May I introduce you to the honorable Lord Eddard of House Stark? Can anybody legitimately say that he was a bad guy?
To the heiress(?) to the Sapphire Island, Lady Brienne of Tarth? Depending on your opinion possibly also his Grace Robb of House Stark, King in the North, King of the Trident?
Also,his Grace Tommen of House Baratheon-Lannister, King on the Iron Throne, isn't a particularly bad person.


by The Huskar Social Union » Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:45 am
Bralia wrote:The Jonathanian States wrote:May I introduce you to the honorable Lord Eddard of House Stark? Can anybody legitimately say that he was a bad guy?
To the heiress(?) to the Sapphire Island, Lady Brienne of Tarth? Depending on your opinion possibly also his Grace Robb of House Stark, King in the North, King of the Trident?
Also,his Grace Tommen of House Baratheon-Lannister, King on the Iron Throne, isn't a particularly bad person.
Cersei Lannister.

by New Aerios » Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:55 am
"No matter how worthy the cause, it is robbery, theft, and injustice to confiscate the property of one person and give it to another to whom it does not belong"------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Prior to capitalism, the way people amassed great wealth was by looting, plundering and enslaving their fellow man. Capitalism made it possible to become wealthy by serving your fellow man."

by The Huskar Social Union » Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:55 am

by Goldsaver » Thu Jul 24, 2014 9:04 am
New Aerios wrote:The Jonathanian States wrote:May I introduce you to the honorable Lord Eddard of House Stark? Can anybody legitimately say that he was a bad guy?
To the heiress(?) to the Sapphire Island, Lady Brienne of Tarth? Depending on your opinion possibly also his Grace Robb of House Stark, King in the North, King of the Trident?
Also,his Grace Tommen of House Baratheon-Lannister, King on the Iron Throne, isn't a particularly bad person.
The Starks may not have been bad, but they were incredibly fucking stupid and deserved to die for their total incompetence. Tommen is just a little kid really, he's fine so far but he might grow up to become another Joffrey. I'll agree with you that Brienne was a good person (again rather stupid, though. Yes, she swore an oath to Catelyn, but tois nothing short of idiocy).return the Starks most valuable prisoner to the Lannisters for no benefit whatsoever

by New Aerios » Thu Jul 24, 2014 9:19 am
Goldsaver wrote:New Aerios wrote:
The Starks may not have been bad, but they were incredibly fucking stupid and deserved to die for their total incompetence. Tommen is just a little kid really, he's fine so far but he might grow up to become another Joffrey. I'll agree with you that Brienne was a good person (again rather stupid, though. Yes, she swore an oath to Catelyn, but tois nothing short of idiocy).return the Starks most valuable prisoner to the Lannisters for no benefit whatsoever
The Starks were not really all that stupid or at all incompetent; they are simply honorable (in Ned's case I'd say moral) to a fault.Ned served as a decent hand-of-the-king (not as good as Tywinn obviously).Ned's main mistake was trusting Littlefinger, who in the books atleast had helped Ned ALOT and gave Ned little reason to distrust him. Ned was operating under the assumption Baleish was just doing whatever was best for Catelyn out of his infatuation with her.
Goldsaver wrote:New Aerios wrote:
The Starks may not have been bad, but they were incredibly fucking stupid and deserved to die for their total incompetence. Tommen is just a little kid really, he's fine so far but he might grow up to become another Joffrey. I'll agree with you that Brienne was a good person (again rather stupid, though. Yes, she swore an oath to Catelyn, but tois nothing short of idiocy).return the Starks most valuable prisoner to the Lannisters for no benefit whatsoeverRobb really couldn't of predicted Walder was just going to shit all over guest right. There is also a slight implication that his infatuation with Jeyne Westerling and subsequent quick marriage to her was not a decision he made with a clear mind; a throw-away line mentions the Westerlings are known for brewing, among other things, fertility potions, abortive potions, and love (!) potions. It is also very strongly implied that the Westerlings planned for Robb to fall in love with/marry Jeyne as part of Twyin's plan to turn Lord Walder to his side.
Forget the whole marriage thing, Robb wouldn't have even needed to [spoiler]see Walder Frey and try to forge an alliance if he hadn't been stupid enough to execute Rickard Karstark and lose half his fucking bannermen with a single swing of his sword. He was an idiot, and he paid the price for his idiocy.
"No matter how worthy the cause, it is robbery, theft, and injustice to confiscate the property of one person and give it to another to whom it does not belong"------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Prior to capitalism, the way people amassed great wealth was by looting, plundering and enslaving their fellow man. Capitalism made it possible to become wealthy by serving your fellow man."

by Point Breeze » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:15 am
Goldsaver wrote:New Aerios wrote:
The Starks may not have been bad, but they were incredibly fucking stupid and deserved to die for their total incompetence. Tommen is just a little kid really, he's fine so far but he might grow up to become another Joffrey. I'll agree with you that Brienne was a good person (again rather stupid, though. Yes, she swore an oath to Catelyn, but tois nothing short of idiocy).return the Starks most valuable prisoner to the Lannisters for no benefit whatsoever
Joffery wasTommen is not showing even the barest hint of the cruelty that Joffery demonstrated at a young age.cutting open cats to see unborn kittens at Tommen's age.
Brienne was a sworn sword, just following orders. It was Catelyn's decision and Catelyn's mistake.
The Starks were not really all that stupid or at all incompetent; they are simply honorable (in Ned's case I'd say moral) to a fault.Ned served as a decent hand-of-the-king (not as good as Tywinn obviously).Ned's main mistake was trusting Littlefinger, who in the books atleast had helped Ned ALOT and gave Ned little reason to distrust him. Ned was operating under the assumption Baleish was just doing whatever was best for Catelyn out of his infatuation with her.Robb really couldn't of predicted Walder was just going to shit all over guest right. There is also a slight implication that his infatuation with Jeyne Westerling and subsequent quick marriage to her was not a decision he made with a clear mind; a throw-away line mentions the Westerlings are known for brewing, among other things, fertility potions, abortive potions, and love (!) potions. It is also very strongly implied that the Westerlings planned for Robb to fall in love with/marry Jeyne as part of Twyin's plan to turn Lord Walder to his side.
Granted this point is irrelevant in the show since Jeyne is replaced by a completely different character.
Also, people are talking about good guys, and not mentioning Davos Seaworth? He's probably the most straight-up moral person in the series.
Thane of WA Affairs for Wintreath

by Charellia » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:20 am
New Aerios wrote:Goldsaver wrote:
The Starks were not really all that stupid or at all incompetent; they are simply honorable (in Ned's case I'd say moral) to a fault.Ned served as a decent hand-of-the-king (not as good as Tywinn obviously).Ned's main mistake was trusting Littlefinger, who in the books atleast had helped Ned ALOT and gave Ned little reason to distrust him. Ned was operating under the assumption Baleish was just doing whatever was best for Catelyn out of his infatuation with her.
No, Ned's main mistake wastelling Little Miss Murderous Bitch that he knew she was fucking her brother and that none of her kids had a legitimate claim to the Iron Throne. He knew what Cersei was like. He knew what the Lannisters in general were like. He was an idiot, and paid the price for his idiocy.Goldsaver wrote:Robb really couldn't of predicted Walder was just going to shit all over guest right. There is also a slight implication that his infatuation with Jeyne Westerling and subsequent quick marriage to her was not a decision he made with a clear mind; a throw-away line mentions the Westerlings are known for brewing, among other things, fertility potions, abortive potions, and love (!) potions. It is also very strongly implied that the Westerlings planned for Robb to fall in love with/marry Jeyne as part of Twyin's plan to turn Lord Walder to his side.
Forget the whole marriage thing, Robb wouldn't have even needed to [spoiler]see Walder Frey and try to forge an alliance if he hadn't been stupid enough to execute Rickard Karstark and lose half his fucking bannermen with a single swing of his sword. He was an idiot, and he paid the price for his idiocy.

by New Aerios » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:28 am
Charellia wrote:New Aerios wrote:
No, Ned's main mistake wastelling Little Miss Murderous Bitch that he knew she was fucking her brother and that none of her kids had a legitimate claim to the Iron Throne. He knew what Cersei was like. He knew what the Lannisters in general were like. He was an idiot, and paid the price for his idiocy.
Forget the whole marriage thing, Robb wouldn't have even needed tosee Walder Frey and try to forge an alliance if he hadn't been stupid enough to execute Rickard Karstark and lose half his fucking bannermen with a single swing of his sword. He was an idiot, and he paid the price for his idiocy.If Robb hadn't executed Rickard Karstark he would have ended any chance for peace with the Lannisters. He still hoped to end the war diplomatically.
"No matter how worthy the cause, it is robbery, theft, and injustice to confiscate the property of one person and give it to another to whom it does not belong"------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Prior to capitalism, the way people amassed great wealth was by looting, plundering and enslaving their fellow man. Capitalism made it possible to become wealthy by serving your fellow man."

by Goldsaver » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:35 am
New Aerios wrote:Charellia wrote:If Robb hadn't executed Rickard Karstark he would have ended any chance for peace with the Lannisters. He still hoped to end the war diplomatically.If Robb had half a brain cell, he would have realised that a diplomatic victory over the people who killed his father and held his sister prisoner, and were willing to let an insane sadistic illegitimate incestuous bastard sit on the Iron Throne, was impossible. He knew even before he executed Rickard that he would lose half his army for doing so. Any half decent leader would not throw away half their army for a slim chance at diplomacy with the most determined and unforgiving family of cunts in the war.

by Charellia » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:44 am
New Aerios wrote:Charellia wrote:If Robb hadn't executed Rickard Karstark he would have ended any chance for peace with the Lannisters. He still hoped to end the war diplomatically.If Robb had half a brain cell, he would have realised that a diplomatic victory over the people who killed his father and held his sister prisoner, and were willing to let an insane sadistic illegitimate incestuous bastard sit on the Iron Throne, was impossible. He knew even before he executed Rickard that he would lose half his army for doing so. Any half decent leader would not throw away half their army for a slim chance at diplomacy with the most determined and unforgiving family of cunts in the war.

by New Aerios » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:47 am
Goldsaver wrote:New Aerios wrote:If Robb had half a brain cell, he would have realised that a diplomatic victory over the people who killed his father and held his sister prisoner, and were willing to let an insane sadistic illegitimate incestuous bastard sit on the Iron Throne, was impossible. He knew even before he executed Rickard that he would lose half his army for doing so. Any half decent leader would not throw away half their army for a slim chance at diplomacy with the most determined and unforgiving family of cunts in the war.
I don't know what Robb was doing in the TV show, butin the books, he was on his way back to the North, going to the /only/ way North, only stopping to attend Edmure's wedding to try and rebuild his bridge with Walder Frey. Were it not for Roose/Walder/Tywin's plan to kill Robb and raise up Roose, the Karstarks would of had basically no choice but to remain loyal to Robb, or else see their homes taken and burned by the Ironborn without the King in the North to support them.
"No matter how worthy the cause, it is robbery, theft, and injustice to confiscate the property of one person and give it to another to whom it does not belong"------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Prior to capitalism, the way people amassed great wealth was by looting, plundering and enslaving their fellow man. Capitalism made it possible to become wealthy by serving your fellow man."

by New Aerios » Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:56 am
Charellia wrote:New Aerios wrote:If Robb had half a brain cell, he would have realised that a diplomatic victory over the people who killed his father and held his sister prisoner, and were willing to let an insane sadistic illegitimate incestuous bastard sit on the Iron Throne, was impossible. He knew even before he executed Rickard that he would lose half his army for doing so. Any half decent leader would not throw away half their army for a slim chance at diplomacy with the most determined and unforgiving family of cunts in the war.A diplomatic resolution was the only possible way for Robb to win and certainly the only way to free Sansa. If he hadn't killed Rickard Karstark the Lannisters might have started executing their own hostages.
"No matter how worthy the cause, it is robbery, theft, and injustice to confiscate the property of one person and give it to another to whom it does not belong"------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Prior to capitalism, the way people amassed great wealth was by looting, plundering and enslaving their fellow man. Capitalism made it possible to become wealthy by serving your fellow man."

by Charellia » Thu Jul 24, 2014 11:26 am
New Aerios wrote:Charellia wrote:A diplomatic resolution was the only possible way for Robb to win and certainly the only way to free Sansa. If he hadn't killed Rickard Karstark the Lannisters might have started executing their own hostages.No, a diplomatic resolution was impossible. Karstark killed a couple of very minor Lannisters. Tywin's lot aren't going to execute a hostage as valuable as Sansa for that. If he hadn't killed Karstark, he would have been able to take Casterly Rock with his much larger army, defend against Lannister reinforcements from King's Landing, and pretty much beat the Lannisters right there in a defensive war fought from their capital. That was the only possible way for Robb to win. To hell with the ginger bitch, better one Stark dies than all of them.

by Raurosia » Thu Jul 24, 2014 5:02 pm

by Persivis » Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:07 pm
New Frenco Empire wrote:I don't see the appeal in him. He has the likability and character development of a cardboard box, imho.

by Infected Mushroom » Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:11 pm

by United Marxist Nations » Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:25 pm
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Charellia » Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:40 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:ASoIAF should be required classroom reading.
I've learned more from it about life and how things work than the Bible, the Illiad and all the works of classical literature combined.
Its also quite the philosophical treatise. Definitely a few notches above Hobbes,Locke, Rousseau etc...

by New Frenco Empire » Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:44 pm
And he is one of the few kings that would not suck.
How, precisely, has Danearys developed?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Continental Free States, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, The Huskar Social Union
Advertisement