NATION

PASSWORD

ASoIAF/Game of Thrones general Discussion Thread

A coffee shop for those who like to discuss art, music, books, movies, TV, each other's own works, and existential angst.

Advertisement

Remove ads

Thoughts on HOTD Episode Ten: "The Black Queen"

5 Stars
8
67%
4 Stars
1
8%
3 Stars
0
No votes
2 Stars
0
No votes
1 Star
2
17%
Not seen it yet
1
8%
 
Total votes : 12

User avatar
Zentrut
Diplomat
 
Posts: 798
Founded: Jan 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Zentrut » Fri May 23, 2014 1:29 pm

Charellia wrote:
Mormak wrote:
Yeah we did this dance before, and if you recall trying to claim i lack comprehensions of the subject doesn't work. I am clearly well invested with the Lore.

But if you are done trying to hurt my internet feelings we can do this little debate again.

No, He sounds quite like a Hypocrite. His Mother did the Karstarks near the same dishonor and it was brushed off with a word, He broke faith with the Freys and it was all forgiven because he was appointed "King" But the same code of Honor applies to him as well, he was a self deluded teenager, not a man of honor that people portray him as.

A.He failed utterly at keeping the North together, even got a title for it. "The King who lost the North" His war went into the gutter because he failed to disclose his battle plans with his commanders, in the very instance he NEEDED to tell them, exactly what to do because his overly complicated plan ended up costing him the war. His lack of tact and faith, cost him one of his largest supporters and, Further weakened his dying cause and executing the Karstark was the blow that cast the final nail into his coffin. He failed at keeping the North Together, if he had kept it together through tact, diplomacy and wit he would have done so, instead his lack of all three cost his cause. The Greyjoys picked their moment and picked it well and struck hard, but it wasn't they who defeated the North, it was robb. He picked some battles well, and even had adequate strategy but he failed, because he ultimately didn't do what you claim him of doing here.
B.See above.
C. His Mother did that actually as you well know, She struck the terms, robb merely gave his consent. And ironically enough? Since we are disusing Honor here, it seems rather humorous to mention that, he broke faith here, he didn't honor his contract. The Freys who pledged swords and bled and die for him, were betrayed by him.
D. Actually wielding a sword is more about depth perception and coordination, rather then any show of mental aptitude or ineptitude, you do not need to be a scholar to wield a metal stick as our own history has shown.

Oh!Hooray, shared interests! I did a bit of studying on Psychology myself and i found him quite fitting for a Narcissistic personality disorder. Mostly ironically enough because of his claims to honor, that his own behavior didn't live up to, hence me beliving that he viewed himself as above it, Add in his lack of empathy and all you really need is the obsessive preoccupation of the self.

Trying to diagnose fictional characters with mental illness is almost never a good idea. Even trying to diagnose clearly mentally ill characters like Joffrey would be inadvisable. For a character like Robb Stark trying to do a diagnosis is just ridiculous. You could look at the actions of any fictional character and find symptoms of mental illness. Unless other characters observe signs of mental illness you should not fall into the trap of trying to diagnose.

It is true that Robb's behaviour didn't live up to his claims of honour, but it is not true that he considered himself above it. Robb found himself in a conflict of honour, between his obligation to marry a Frey and a perceived obligation to marry Jeyne Westerling. He did not have an honourable way out of this conflict. Furthermore after his betrayal of the Freys he tried to put things right, but was too late because Lord Walder had already gone over to the Lannisters. Robb tried and failed to maintain his honour, but he never abandoned it or held himself above it. Thus you cannot claim that he was dishonourable. You can claim quite rightly that he lacked foresight or prudence, but those things do not make him dishonourble.


I would like an example of Robb's lack of empathy.

Can we at least diagnose Aerys II with pyromania and pyrophelia.

User avatar
Mormak
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1981
Founded: Apr 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Mormak » Fri May 23, 2014 1:30 pm

Zentrut wrote:
Charellia wrote:Trying to diagnose fictional characters with mental illness is almost never a good idea. Even trying to diagnose clearly mentally ill characters like Joffrey would be inadvisable. For a character like Robb Stark trying to do a diagnosis is just ridiculous. You could look at the actions of any fictional character and find symptoms of mental illness. Unless other characters observe signs of mental illness you should not fall into the trap of trying to diagnose.

It is true that Robb's behaviour didn't live up to his claims of honour, but it is not true that he considered himself above it. Robb found himself in a conflict of honour, between his obligation to marry a Frey and a perceived obligation to marry Jeyne Westerling. He did not have an honourable way out of this conflict. Furthermore after his betrayal of the Freys he tried to put things right, but was too late because Lord Walder had already gone over to the Lannisters. Robb tried and failed to maintain his honour, but he never abandoned it or held himself above it. Thus you cannot claim that he was dishonourable. You can claim quite rightly that he lacked foresight or prudence, but those things do not make him dishonourble.


I would like an example of Robb's lack of empathy.

Can we at least diagnose Aerys II with pyromania and pyrophelia.


I would say its safe to label him with some form of Psychosis at the very least.

User avatar
The Treorai
Senator
 
Posts: 3706
Founded: Jul 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Treorai » Fri May 23, 2014 1:52 pm

Mormak wrote:
The Treorai wrote:Honor:
Adherence to what is right or to a conventional standard of conduct.
"I must as a matter of honor avoid any taint of dishonesty."

Sounds exactly like executing a man for killing defensless prisoners. He is upholding the moral, or honorable way of doing something.

Incompetence:
Inability to do something successfully; ineptitude.
"Allegations of professional incompetence"

If he were incompetent, he would have done one of the following:
A. Failed at keeping the north together, especially the Greatjon.
B. Not been a highly successful military leader.
C. Not have successfully struck a deal with the Freys of the Crossing.
D. Missed Lord Karstark's head on the block.
Same goes for stupidity. Perhaps you could make an argument for shortsightedness, but otherwise your are completely off base.

As to your allegations of mental illness, I am somewhat familiar with the subject (I took college course on, and currently own a dictionary of Psychology), and nothing in Robb Stark's character suggests any symptoms of mental illness. So, yeah. You might be reaching a little far with your lack of reading comprehension.


Yeah we did this dance before, and if you recall trying to claim i lack comprehensions of the subject doesn't work. I am clearly well invested with the Lore.

But if you are done trying to hurt my internet feelings we can do this little debate again.

No, He sounds quite like a Hypocrite. His Mother did the Karstarks near the same dishonor and it was brushed off with a word, He broke faith with the Freys and it was all forgiven because he was appointed "King" But the same code of Honor applies to him as well, he was a self deluded teenager, not a man of honor that people portray him as.

A.He failed utterly at keeping the North together, even got a title for it. "The King who lost the North" His war went into the gutter because he failed to disclose his battle plans with his commanders, in the very instance he NEEDED to tell them, exactly what to do because his overly complicated plan ended up costing him the war. His lack of tact and faith, cost him one of his largest supporters and, Further weakened his dying cause and executing the Karstark was the blow that cast the final nail into his coffin. He failed at keeping the North Together, if he had kept it together through tact, diplomacy and wit he would have done so, instead his lack of all three cost his cause. The Greyjoys picked their moment and picked it well and struck hard, but it wasn't they who defeated the North, it was robb. He picked some battles well, and even had adequate strategy but he failed, because he ultimately didn't do what you claim him of doing here.
B.See above.
C. His Mother did that actually as you well know, She struck the terms, robb merely gave his consent. And ironically enough? Since we are disusing Honor here, it seems rather humorous to mention that, he broke faith here, he didn't honor his contract. The Freys who pledged swords and bled and die for him, were betrayed by him.
D. Actually wielding a sword is more about depth perception and coordination, rather then any show of mental aptitude or ineptitude, you do not need to be a scholar to wield a metal stick as our own history has shown.

Oh!Hooray, shared interests! I did a bit of studying on Psychology myself and i found him quite fitting for a Narcissistic personality disorder. Mostly ironically enough because of his claims to honor, that his own behavior didn't live up to, hence me beliving that he viewed himself as above it, Add in his lack of empathy and all you really need is the obsessive preoccupation of the self.

Yeah, not even going to respond to you anymore, as it is quite clear you have no clue what you are talking about, and are ready to completley ignore facts to support your own opinions.
GOD-KING OF ABRASIVENESS

Dumb Ideologies wrote:It's a situation intrinsic to the committed ideologue. Whenever one makes a counter-argument the goalposts seem not only to move in two dimensions but also float several hundred thousand miles above the pitch whilst wearing cast-iron earplugs.

Rainbows and Rivers wrote:Dictators blaming America for all their problems? That's new.

Caninope wrote:If I think in my mind that the book sitting in front of me is Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows when it is in fact Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised, 11th Edition, then it doesn't make me any more objectively correct.

User avatar
Islamic republiq of Julundar
Envoy
 
Posts: 314
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Islamic republiq of Julundar » Fri May 23, 2014 1:53 pm

A. Failed at keeping the north together, especially the Greatjon.
B. Not been a highly successful military leader.
C. Not have successfully struck a deal with the Freys of the Crossing.
D. Missed Lord Karstark's head on the block.

A. I agree with Mormak, but spoiler that stuff
B. Robb was a successful military leader, but incompetent at politics.
C. Cat haggled the deal. Robb sent a competent diplomat to do the haggling.
Rob's incompetence was busting the deal for no reason whatsoever. It is common in Westeros for high-borns to have concubines and marry for politics.
D. Robb is a competent Lord high Executioner. He is too honourable to be a competent politician. He should have followed Cat's wise counsel.

Incompetence ain't insanity. Honour even unto Death (HeD) is a moral dogma; it is not insanity.

BUT Honour even unto Death (HeD) would be a reasonable dogma in an uncaring universe like Real Life. Robb lives in a story by GRR Martin, he has been taught 9,000 years of Westerosi history. He knows that the Honourable are always the first to die and then everyone else dies.

Some Peasant in the Brotherhood without Banners who does not know 9k years of Westerosi history might be excused for being honourable. So from genre-savvy POV, Robb's honour = insanity. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GenreSavvy

User avatar
Mormak
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1981
Founded: Apr 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Mormak » Fri May 23, 2014 1:58 pm

The Treorai wrote:
Mormak wrote:
Yeah we did this dance before, and if you recall trying to claim i lack comprehensions of the subject doesn't work. I am clearly well invested with the Lore.

But if you are done trying to hurt my internet feelings we can do this little debate again.

No, He sounds quite like a Hypocrite. His Mother did the Karstarks near the same dishonor and it was brushed off with a word, He broke faith with the Freys and it was all forgiven because he was appointed "King" But the same code of Honor applies to him as well, he was a self deluded teenager, not a man of honor that people portray him as.

A.He failed utterly at keeping the North together, even got a title for it. "The King who lost the North" His war went into the gutter because he failed to disclose his battle plans with his commanders, in the very instance he NEEDED to tell them, exactly what to do because his overly complicated plan ended up costing him the war. His lack of tact and faith, cost him one of his largest supporters and, Further weakened his dying cause and executing the Karstark was the blow that cast the final nail into his coffin. He failed at keeping the North Together, if he had kept it together through tact, diplomacy and wit he would have done so, instead his lack of all three cost his cause. The Greyjoys picked their moment and picked it well and struck hard, but it wasn't they who defeated the North, it was robb. He picked some battles well, and even had adequate strategy but he failed, because he ultimately didn't do what you claim him of doing here.
B.See above.
C. His Mother did that actually as you well know, She struck the terms, robb merely gave his consent. And ironically enough? Since we are disusing Honor here, it seems rather humorous to mention that, he broke faith here, he didn't honor his contract. The Freys who pledged swords and bled and die for him, were betrayed by him.
D. Actually wielding a sword is more about depth perception and coordination, rather then any show of mental aptitude or ineptitude, you do not need to be a scholar to wield a metal stick as our own history has shown.

Oh!Hooray, shared interests! I did a bit of studying on Psychology myself and i found him quite fitting for a Narcissistic personality disorder. Mostly ironically enough because of his claims to honor, that his own behavior didn't live up to, hence me beliving that he viewed himself as above it, Add in his lack of empathy and all you really need is the obsessive preoccupation of the self.

Yeah, not even going to respond to you anymore, as it is quite clear you have no clue what you are talking about, and are ready to completley ignore facts to support your own opinions.


But everything that i mentioned, besides my own conjecture on his mental state, actually comes from the Lore.

How is it, that cited Lore can be wrong i wonder.

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Fri May 23, 2014 2:06 pm

Islamic republiq of Julundar wrote: It is common in Westeros for high-borns to have concubines and marry for politics.


Just like when Robert banged Edric's noble mother. He recognized him as his son (not heir of course), gave him education and a good life amongst nobility at Storm's End, which is fair treatment, I think.
Last edited by Socialist Czechia on Fri May 23, 2014 2:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
Charellia
Minister
 
Posts: 3172
Founded: Jul 24, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charellia » Fri May 23, 2014 2:27 pm

Socialist Czechia wrote:
Islamic republiq of Julundar wrote: It is common in Westeros for high-borns to have concubines and marry for politics.


Just like when Robert banged Edric's noble mother. He recognized him as his son (not heir of course), gave him education and a good life amongst nobility at Storm's End, which is fair treatment, I think.

Robert was the king and could do whatever he wanted. It didn't mean that his adultery was honourable, or even would have been tolerated if he and Edric's mother had been of equal station in the hierarchy of Westeros. Robb likely found the idea of having a high-born concubine unacceptable to his honour (or to hers) and felt obliged to marry her.

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Fri May 23, 2014 2:31 pm

Charellia wrote:
Socialist Czechia wrote:
Just like when Robert banged Edric's noble mother. He recognized him as his son (not heir of course), gave him education and a good life amongst nobility at Storm's End, which is fair treatment, I think.

Robert was the king and could do whatever he wanted. It didn't mean that his adultery was honourable, or even would have been tolerated if he and Edric's mother had been of equal station in the hierarchy of Westeros. Robb likely found the idea of having a high-born concubine unacceptable to his honour (or to hers) and felt obliged to marry her.


honestly, perhaps I would do the same thing, but then I would be sure that Freys must be eliminated or hostages to ensure their loyalty despite this thing. they were known as treacherous ferrets already.
honorable king is kinda oxymoron, indeed. every king must be a butcher. it's a simple fact.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
Corrian
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73686
Founded: Mar 19, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Corrian » Fri May 23, 2014 2:33 pm

A lot of you aren't good at following the clear as daylight rules that say put spoilers into your posts, are you? Don't know how many times I've seen people needing to be told to spoiler things, despite the fact it was VERY CLEARLY MENTIONED you're supposed to... :palm:
My Last.FM and RYM

RP's hosted by me: The Last of Us RP's

Look on the bright side, one day you'll be dead~Street Sects

User avatar
Zentrut
Diplomat
 
Posts: 798
Founded: Jan 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Zentrut » Fri May 23, 2014 2:49 pm

Charellia wrote:
Socialist Czechia wrote:
Just like when Robert banged Edric's noble mother. He recognized him as his son (not heir of course), gave him education and a good life amongst nobility at Storm's End, which is fair treatment, I think.

Robert was the king and could do whatever he wanted. It didn't mean that his adultery was honourable, or even would have been tolerated if he and Edric's mother had been of equal station in the hierarchy of Westeros. Robb likely found the idea of having a high-born concubine unacceptable to his honour (or to hers) and felt obliged to marry her.

It would've been tolerated, considering the Baratheons have a long history of it. And if he weren't king, he'd be dead and we'd have Lord Paramount Stannis Baratheon, King Rhaegar I/Viserys III and no War of the Five Kings.

User avatar
Mormak
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1981
Founded: Apr 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Mormak » Fri May 23, 2014 2:54 pm

Zentrut wrote:
Charellia wrote:Robert was the king and could do whatever he wanted. It didn't mean that his adultery was honourable, or even would have been tolerated if he and Edric's mother had been of equal station in the hierarchy of Westeros. Robb likely found the idea of having a high-born concubine unacceptable to his honour (or to hers) and felt obliged to marry her.

It would've been tolerated, considering the Baratheons have a long history of it. And if he weren't king, he'd be dead and we'd have Lord Paramount Stannis Baratheon, King Rhaegar I/Viserys III and no War of the Five Kings.


He went to war for his Brother, against his King because he picked family over his personal "Honor". He stated as much to Davos in Clash of King's, it was a hard choice for him but he made it and never looked back.

I'd say Stannis would have gone down swinging along with Robert.

Realm would be lesser for it too, Driven men of character and integrity like Stannis are a rarity in Westeros that much is certain.

User avatar
Charellia
Minister
 
Posts: 3172
Founded: Jul 24, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charellia » Fri May 23, 2014 3:10 pm

Zentrut wrote:
Charellia wrote:Robert was the king and could do whatever he wanted. It didn't mean that his adultery was honourable, or even would have been tolerated if he and Edric's mother had been of equal station in the hierarchy of Westeros. Robb likely found the idea of having a high-born concubine unacceptable to his honour (or to hers) and felt obliged to marry her.

It would've been tolerated, considering the Baratheons have a long history of it. And if he weren't king, he'd be dead and we'd have Lord Paramount Stannis Baratheon, King Rhaegar I/Viserys III and no War of the Five Kings.

That Robert's behaviour was tolerated because he is a Baratheon is part of my point.If he never became kind he would still be sufficiently above Edric's mother that his actions would be without consequence. But if they were equals he would have faced consequences. That is the point I was trying to make. Speculating about what else would have happened if he were not king has nothing to do with the issue about whether or not affairs with high-born women are considered acceptable or honourable in Westeros.

User avatar
Mormak
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1981
Founded: Apr 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Mormak » Fri May 23, 2014 3:17 pm

Charellia wrote:
Zentrut wrote:It would've been tolerated, considering the Baratheons have a long history of it. And if he weren't king, he'd be dead and we'd have Lord Paramount Stannis Baratheon, King Rhaegar I/Viserys III and no War of the Five Kings.

That Robert's behaviour was tolerated because he is a Baratheon is part of my point.If he never became kind he would still be sufficiently above Edric's mother that his actions would be without consequence. But if they were equals he would have faced consequences. That is the point I was trying to make. Speculating about what else would have happened if he were not king has nothing to do with the issue about whether or not affairs with high-born women are considered acceptable or honourable in Westeros.


True, Dalliances with people of high birth isn't something to do lightly and it isn't something to be caught at, Commoners are frowned upon there isn't much done about it besides social stigma, Highborns are a different story. But still, even in Westeros things are better then across the narrow sea.

Least in Westeros you won't be "Killed" for "raping with your eyes".

Honestly, why Danny ever thought she could change them folk is beyond me.

It's about like trying to get Africa out of a collection of Rogue States, Civil Wars and Puppet States for Oil interests, Into an actually united and independent government.

User avatar
Charellia
Minister
 
Posts: 3172
Founded: Jul 24, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charellia » Fri May 23, 2014 4:01 pm

Mormak wrote:
Charellia wrote:That Robert's behaviour was tolerated because he is a Baratheon is part of my point.If he never became kind he would still be sufficiently above Edric's mother that his actions would be without consequence. But if they were equals he would have faced consequences. That is the point I was trying to make. Speculating about what else would have happened if he were not king has nothing to do with the issue about whether or not affairs with high-born women are considered acceptable or honourable in Westeros.


True, Dalliances with people of high birth isn't something to do lightly and it isn't something to be caught at, Commoners are frowned upon there isn't much done about it besides social stigma, Highborns are a different story. But still, even in Westeros things are better then across the narrow sea.

Least in Westeros you won't be "Killed" for "raping with your eyes".

Honestly, why Danny ever thought she could change them folk is beyond me.

It's about like trying to get Africa out of a collection of Rogue States, Civil Wars and Puppet States for Oil interests, Into an actually united and independent government.

Well nobody ever said that Dany was the brightest. She is certainly idealistic and inexperienced.
I think the reason that she thought she could change Slaver's Bay was that the slaves were the most numerous and most physically powerful group in the region. Since the system oppresses them, she thought that they would back her. If she had had the military power and foresight to occupy all three cities she would have encountered significantly less resistance.
But she has shown ability to learn from mistakes, so perhaps she may still be able to salvage the situation, or at least do better in Westeros.

User avatar
Bralia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31250
Founded: Mar 07, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bralia » Sat May 24, 2014 7:43 pm

Today is a good day. I have witnessed the other wedding in Storm of Swords. I am so, so very pleased!
Romantic slut. Self-deprecating egotist. Benevolent communist.

User avatar
Zentrut
Diplomat
 
Posts: 798
Founded: Jan 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Zentrut » Sat May 24, 2014 7:45 pm

Bralia wrote:
Today is a good day. I have witnessed the other wedding in Storm of Swords. I am so, so very pleased!

Spoiler this.

User avatar
Bralia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31250
Founded: Mar 07, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bralia » Sat May 24, 2014 7:48 pm

Zentrut wrote:
Bralia wrote:
Today is a good day. I have witnessed the other wedding in Storm of Swords. I am so, so very pleased!

Spoiler this.

Why? My post doesn't say anything substantial at all.
Romantic slut. Self-deprecating egotist. Benevolent communist.

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Sat May 24, 2014 7:49 pm

Zentrut wrote:
Bralia wrote:
Today is a good day. I have witnessed the other wedding in Storm of Swords. I am so, so very pleased!

Spoiler this.


definitely. The Others on any wedding are not only spoilerous but hilarious. even Night's King would share a story or two, I suppose.

just wights can ruin all the interspecies fun around i suppose.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
Mormak
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1981
Founded: Apr 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Mormak » Sat May 24, 2014 7:50 pm

Bralia wrote:
Zentrut wrote:Spoiler this.

Why? My post doesn't say anything substantial at all.


It mentions a book title! Ja Cuse! Seriously though, i don't think it needs to be spoiler tagged, but folks around here jump to spoiler everything.

Its like an Autobody shop or something.

User avatar
Bralia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31250
Founded: Mar 07, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bralia » Sat May 24, 2014 7:59 pm

Socialist Czechia wrote:
Zentrut wrote:Spoiler this.


definitely. The Others on any wedding are not only spoilerous but hilarious. even Night's King would share a story or two, I suppose.

just wights can ruin all the interspecies fun around i suppose.

I hear that a wedding is planned for Winds of Winter. Between Jon Snow and his new lover, the Ice Queen (aka White Walker #34 in the show). The two of them seize control of the North and rape and pillage everything south of the North. Winter is coming, southron lords, like no winter you've ever seen before!

Mormak wrote:
Bralia wrote:Why? My post doesn't say anything substantial at all.


It mentions a book title! Ja Cuse! Seriously though, i don't think it needs to be spoiler tagged, but folks around here jump to spoiler everything.

Its like an Autobody shop or something.

I'm all for trigger-happy spoiler tags everywhere, but the only way my post would warrant a spoiler tag is if the person already knew what was going to happen. I really couldn't possibly make my post less informative than I'd already made it.
Last edited by Bralia on Sat May 24, 2014 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Romantic slut. Self-deprecating egotist. Benevolent communist.

User avatar
Charellia
Minister
 
Posts: 3172
Founded: Jul 24, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charellia » Sat May 24, 2014 8:07 pm

Bralia wrote:
Socialist Czechia wrote:
definitely. The Others on any wedding are not only spoilerous but hilarious. even Night's King would share a story or two, I suppose.

just wights can ruin all the interspecies fun around i suppose.

I hear that a wedding is planned for Winds of Winter. Between Jon Snow and his new lover, the Ice Queen (aka White Walker #34 in the show). The two of them seize control of the North and rape and pillage everything south of the North. Winter is coming, southron lords, like no winter you've ever seen before!

Mormak wrote:
It mentions a book title! Ja Cuse! Seriously though, i don't think it needs to be spoiler tagged, but folks around here jump to spoiler everything.

Its like an Autobody shop or something.

I'm all for trigger-happy spoiler tags everywhere, but the only way my post would warrant a spoiler tag is if the person already knew what was going to happen. I really couldn't possibly make my post less informative than I'd already made it.

There are definitely a lot of posts that should be spoilered and aren't, but in this case there is no need. There is nothing in there that could give anything away. That there are weddings in Storm of Swords is apparent from the two previous books.

User avatar
Socialist Czechia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6183
Founded: Apr 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Czechia » Sat May 24, 2014 8:10 pm

Bralia wrote:
I hear that a wedding is planned for Winds of Winter. Between Jon Snow and his new lover, the Ice Queen (aka White Walker #34 in the show). The two of them seize control of the North and rape and pillage everything south of the North. Winter is coming, southron lords, like no winter you've ever seen before!


nah. i think you speaks about that prequel about Bran the Builder, who bedded only hot ice girls, but his clumsy actions after not so cold breakups lead to their hate towards humanity, so the Wall was only way to stop their icy fury.
"Those who reached my boundary, their seed is not; their hearts and their souls are finished forever and ever. As for those who had assembled before them on the sea, the full flame was their front before the harbour mouths, and a wall of metal upon the shore surrounded them. They were dragged, overturned, and laid low upon the beach; slain and made heaps from stern to bow of their galleys, while all their things were cast upon the water." - Ramesses III., Battle of the Delta

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58281
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Sun May 25, 2014 3:14 am

Zentrut wrote:
Bralia wrote:
Today is a good day. I have witnessed the other wedding in Storm of Swords. I am so, so very pleased!

Spoiler this.

There is no need to. his post mentions no names, clues or anything else to suggest who was involved or where it took place or what happened at the wedding, so its not a spoiler.
Last edited by The Huskar Social Union on Sun May 25, 2014 3:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Mormak
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1981
Founded: Apr 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Mormak » Mon May 26, 2014 4:26 pm

I got told a funny ASIAF joke last night at my buddies house.

It involved blind wolves and midget lions.

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58281
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Tue May 27, 2014 2:17 am

Mormak wrote:I got told a funny ASIAF joke last night at my buddies house.

It involved blind wolves and midget lions.

I really dont want to...

But can you tell it? or would it be a tad too offensive?
Last edited by The Huskar Social Union on Tue May 27, 2014 2:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Arts & Fiction

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Raskana

Advertisement

Remove ads