There's no way Bran as King can ever work in any narrative.
Also, Tyrion needed to die.
I still cannot believe that Jon Snow would just assassinate the Dragon Queen. It's... too much... I have no faith that that can be made to work at all.
Advertisement
by Infected Mushroom » Tue Aug 13, 2019 10:39 am
by Otira » Tue Aug 13, 2019 7:12 pm
Infected Mushroom wrote:There's no way Bran as King can ever work in any narrative.
Also, Tyrion needed to die.
I still cannot believe that Jon Snow would just assassinate the Dragon Queen. It's... too much... I have no faith that that can be made to work at all.
by Valrifell » Tue Aug 13, 2019 7:27 pm
Arcadian Union wrote:
I can actually imagine that, there would be independence movements in the North, Iron Islands and possibly Dorne, the Lannisters would definitely own a mining company, Essos would probably be divided into nation-states engaged in multiple civil conflicts along with causing refugees to flee into Westeros. This could actually make quite an interesting show, shame we'll never get it along with a Robert's Rebellion prequel but at least we can dream.
by Infected Mushroom » Fri Aug 16, 2019 11:23 pm
by -Ocelot- » Sat Aug 17, 2019 10:21 am
Infected Mushroom wrote:Fedel wrote:
Pretty much describes the entire second half of the show.
There's no way Bran as King can ever work in any narrative.
Also, Tyrion needed to die.
I still cannot believe that Jon Snow would just assassinate the Dragon Queen. It's... too much... I have no faith that that can be made to work at all.
by The Huskar Social Union » Sat Aug 17, 2019 2:31 pm
by Auristania » Sat Aug 17, 2019 3:33 pm
-Ocelot- wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:
There's no way Bran as King can ever work in any narrative.
Also, Tyrion needed to die.
I still cannot believe that Jon Snow would just assassinate the Dragon Queen. It's... too much... I have no faith that that can be made to work at all.
Season 8 is absolute crap. The writers wanted to move on, so they wrapped up the rest of the story into a super short mini-season in the worst way imaginable. They didn't care about GoT's legacy because, to them, it was hampering their future projects. Rationalizing their decisions is meaningless because even they didn't care, so why should we? The writers even kind of forgot the Azor Ahai and Valonqar prophecies.
We'll have to wait for Winds of Winter and A Dream of Spring to find out how the story is supposed to continue.
by The Huskar Social Union » Sat Aug 17, 2019 3:39 pm
by Ifreann » Sat Aug 17, 2019 4:53 pm
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Watched the first part when it came out, ill get around to the second part some time tomorrow.
Her stuff is crackin, loved her Hobbit videos.
by New haven america » Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:22 pm
by Valrifell » Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:37 pm
New haven america wrote:
Already seen and enjoyed the videos, but I'm gonna have to disagree with her on the planned out ending being the problem.
Plenty of great series have planned out stories: Avatar TLA, Babylon 5, The Expanse, One Piece, etc... The writers and directors knew what they wanted to do from the get go and had the support to do so, which lead to great stories and tons of foreshadowing, Easter eggs, and blink and you miss it tiny details that only make sense in the long run. Meanwhile, you have related shows that aren't planned out(Like LoK, Babylon 5 season 5, BattleStar Galactica 2003, Naruto/Bleach, etc...), that, while they still can be good, have a lot of problems with build up and where to actually take the story.
Still great videos, but that explanation has been annoying me for a while now.
by New haven america » Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:51 pm
Valrifell wrote:New haven america wrote:Already seen and enjoyed the videos, but I'm gonna have to disagree with her on the planned out ending being the problem.
Plenty of great series have planned out stories: Avatar TLA, Babylon 5, The Expanse, One Piece, etc... The writers and directors knew what they wanted to do from the get go and had the support to do so, which lead to great stories and tons of foreshadowing, Easter eggs, and blink and you miss it tiny details that only make sense in the long run. Meanwhile, you have related shows that aren't planned out(Like LoK, Babylon 5 season 5, BattleStar Galactica 2003, Naruto/Bleach, etc...), that, while they still can be good, have a lot of problems with build up and where to actually take the story.
Still great videos, but that explanation has been annoying me for a while now.
I may have to rewatch some parts, but I think her point could be more accurately summed up as: they fucked up the planned ending by pointlessly trying to outsmart the audience instead of trying to make a cohesive narrative and ran out of time and fucks to give to make things like character motivations make sense. I don't think she was dragging on the concept of planned endings altogether, but how they handled it was a travesty.
So the problem wasn't that they wanted a planned ending, it was that they forced their planned ending without doing any of the work that makes those things enjoyable.
by Platypus Bureaucracy » Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:56 pm
Valrifell wrote:New haven america wrote:Already seen and enjoyed the videos, but I'm gonna have to disagree with her on the planned out ending being the problem.
Plenty of great series have planned out stories: Avatar TLA, Babylon 5, The Expanse, One Piece, etc... The writers and directors knew what they wanted to do from the get go and had the support to do so, which lead to great stories and tons of foreshadowing, Easter eggs, and blink and you miss it tiny details that only make sense in the long run. Meanwhile, you have related shows that aren't planned out(Like LoK, Babylon 5 season 5, BattleStar Galactica 2003, Naruto/Bleach, etc...), that, while they still can be good, have a lot of problems with build up and where to actually take the story.
Still great videos, but that explanation has been annoying me for a while now.
I may have to rewatch some parts, but I think her point could be more accurately summed up as: they fucked up the planned ending by pointlessly trying to outsmart the audience instead of trying to make a cohesive narrative and ran out of time and fucks to give to make things like character motivations make sense. I don't think she was dragging on the concept of planned endings altogether, but how they handled it was a travesty.
So the problem wasn't that they wanted a planned ending, it was that they forced their planned ending without doing any of the work that makes those things enjoyable.
by Hanafuridake » Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:57 pm
Suriyanakhon's alt, finally found my old account's password李贽 wrote:There is nothing difficult about becoming a sage, and nothing false about transcending the world of appearances.
by Infected Mushroom » Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:57 pm
Auristania wrote:-Ocelot- wrote:
Season 8 is absolute crap. The writers wanted to move on, so they wrapped up the rest of the story into a super short mini-season in the worst way imaginable. They didn't care about GoT's legacy because, to them, it was hampering their future projects. Rationalizing their decisions is meaningless because even they didn't care, so why should we? The writers even kind of forgot the Azor Ahai and Valonqar prophecies.
We'll have to wait for Winds of Winter and A Dream of Spring to find out how the story is supposed to continue.
DnD used GrrM's Cliff notes because he did NOT write like the wind.
We know how the story is supposed to continue:
Danny goes mad Queen, BUT In the Book it makes sense.
Jon goes mad Bastard, BUT In the Book it makes sense.
Jaime goes mad Valonqar, BUT In the Book it makes sense.
Fan theory: Aegon raped Countess Tywin and spawned Tyrion. BUT what if Tyrion is true-born while Jaimie and Cersei are the Targaryen rape babies? Blonde incestuous, spawning Tyrants. Then Danny is the younger sister who killed them all.
by New haven america » Sat Aug 17, 2019 6:00 pm
Hanafuridake wrote:If Jon Snow's father is Rhaegar in the book as well as the show, then I'm sort of confused why he never had Targaryen characteristics like platinum blonde hair and violet eyes, especially since his brother Aegon (who's mother was Elia) has to dye his hair blue to keep from being recognized. I don't see how a Targaryen married a Dornish woman with dark features and had a typical Targaryen son, but married a pasty Northern woman and had a son with no trace of those features, especially how George's understanding of genetics in the series seems to be “sons inherit their father's hair color.”
by The Huskar Social Union » Sun Aug 18, 2019 2:54 am
by Platypus Bureaucracy » Sun Aug 18, 2019 5:20 am
by Starblaydia » Sun Aug 18, 2019 6:25 am
Hanafuridake wrote:If Jon Snow's father is Rhaegar in the book as well as the show, then I'm sort of confused why he never had Targaryen characteristics like platinum blonde hair and violet eyes, especially since his brother Aegon (who's mother was Elia) has to dye his hair blue to keep from being recognized. I don't see how a Targaryen married a Dornish woman with dark features and had a typical Targaryen son, but married a pasty Northern woman and had a son with no trace of those features, especially how George's understanding of genetics in the series seems to be “sons inherit their father's hair color.”
Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:Infected Mushroom wrote:There's no way Bran as King can ever work in any narrative.
Course it can. So you take the whole "stories bring us together" point, but you give Bran an actual personality. And then, during the whole White Walker thing, you have him set various inter-house squabbles to rest by talking about their family histories, how they've fought side-by-side in the past etc.
Then, once he's king, you make the point that he's going to do the same sort of thing with the people as a whole, smallfolk and lords. Maybe have him be the one to write the Song of Ice and Fire.
This is pretty similar to how nationalism was born historically, with people imagining a shared history.
by Ifreann » Sun Aug 18, 2019 6:33 am
Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:
Course it can. So you take the whole "stories bring us together" point, but you give Bran an actual personality. And then, during the whole White Walker thing, you have him set various inter-house squabbles to rest by talking about their family histories, how they've fought side-by-side in the past etc.
Then, once he's king, you make the point that he's going to do the same sort of thing with the people as a whole, smallfolk and lords. Maybe have him be the one to write the Song of Ice and Fire.
This is pretty similar to how nationalism was born historically, with people imagining a shared history.
by Tarsonis » Sun Aug 18, 2019 12:18 pm
by Ethel mermania » Sun Aug 18, 2019 4:04 pm
Ifreann wrote:Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:Course it can. So you take the whole "stories bring us together" point, but you give Bran an actual personality. And then, during the whole White Walker thing, you have him set various inter-house squabbles to rest by talking about their family histories, how they've fought side-by-side in the past etc.
Then, once he's king, you make the point that he's going to do the same sort of thing with the people as a whole, smallfolk and lords. Maybe have him be the one to write the Song of Ice and Fire.
This is pretty similar to how nationalism was born historically, with people imagining a shared history.
This sounds a lot better than robo-Bran psychically watching his sister get raped.
by Ifreann » Sun Aug 18, 2019 4:12 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement