NATION

PASSWORD

ASoIAF/Game of Thrones general Discussion Thread

A coffee shop for those who like to discuss art, music, books, movies, TV, each other's own works, and existential angst.

Advertisement

Remove ads

Thoughts on HOTD Episode Ten: "The Black Queen"

5 Stars
8
67%
4 Stars
1
8%
3 Stars
0
No votes
2 Stars
0
No votes
1 Star
2
17%
Not seen it yet
1
8%
 
Total votes : 12

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39283
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Tue Aug 13, 2019 10:39 am

Fedel wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:

They could have executed it better but the concept was good.


Pretty much describes the entire second half of the show.


There's no way Bran as King can ever work in any narrative.

Also, Tyrion needed to die.

I still cannot believe that Jon Snow would just assassinate the Dragon Queen. It's... too much... I have no faith that that can be made to work at all.

User avatar
Otira
Envoy
 
Posts: 344
Founded: Jun 25, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Otira » Tue Aug 13, 2019 7:12 pm

Infected Mushroom wrote:There's no way Bran as King can ever work in any narrative.

Also, Tyrion needed to die.

These.

I still cannot believe that Jon Snow would just assassinate the Dragon Queen. It's... too much... I have no faith that that can be made to work at all.

This I could actually see. Definitely book Jon Snow.

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Tue Aug 13, 2019 7:27 pm

Arcadian Union wrote:
Cerinda wrote:I wish this was actually a real trailer and not a joke. It would have been cool to see GOT set in the modern day.

I can actually imagine that, there would be independence movements in the North, Iron Islands and possibly Dorne, the Lannisters would definitely own a mining company, Essos would probably be divided into nation-states engaged in multiple civil conflicts along with causing refugees to flee into Westeros. This could actually make quite an interesting show, shame we'll never get it along with a Robert's Rebellion prequel but at least we can dream.


Modern-day worldbuilding is exceedingly uncommon, I actually don't know if there's any popular piece of media that is a completely fictional modern-tech world.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39283
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Fri Aug 16, 2019 11:23 pm

I’m re sketching all the Game of Thrones characters (Stannis, Tywin included)

This is going to take some time

I think it’s a way of getting some closure

User avatar
-Ocelot-
Minister
 
Posts: 2260
Founded: Jun 14, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby -Ocelot- » Sat Aug 17, 2019 10:21 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Fedel wrote:
Pretty much describes the entire second half of the show.


There's no way Bran as King can ever work in any narrative.

Also, Tyrion needed to die.

I still cannot believe that Jon Snow would just assassinate the Dragon Queen. It's... too much... I have no faith that that can be made to work at all.


Season 8 is absolute crap. The writers wanted to move on, so they wrapped up the rest of the story into a super short mini-season in the worst way imaginable. They didn't care about GoT's legacy because, to them, it was hampering their future projects. Rationalizing their decisions is meaningless because even they didn't care, so why should we? The writers even kind of forgot the Azor Ahai and Valonqar prophecies.

We'll have to wait for Winds of Winter and A Dream of Spring to find out how the story is supposed to continue.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163844
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sat Aug 17, 2019 10:35 am

Do you have two hours to spare? Enjoy Lindsay Ellis' two parter on Game of Thrones.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Ism
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6152
Founded: Oct 14, 2011
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ism » Sat Aug 17, 2019 12:04 pm

Ifreann wrote:Do you have two hours to spare? Enjoy Lindsay Ellis' two parter on Game of Thrones.


Just saw the second part yesterday. Good stuff.

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59282
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Sat Aug 17, 2019 2:31 pm

Watched the first part when it came out, ill get around to the second part some time tomorrow.

Her stuff is crackin, loved her Hobbit videos.
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Auristania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1122
Founded: Aug 12, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Auristania » Sat Aug 17, 2019 3:33 pm

-Ocelot- wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
There's no way Bran as King can ever work in any narrative.

Also, Tyrion needed to die.

I still cannot believe that Jon Snow would just assassinate the Dragon Queen. It's... too much... I have no faith that that can be made to work at all.


Season 8 is absolute crap. The writers wanted to move on, so they wrapped up the rest of the story into a super short mini-season in the worst way imaginable. They didn't care about GoT's legacy because, to them, it was hampering their future projects. Rationalizing their decisions is meaningless because even they didn't care, so why should we? The writers even kind of forgot the Azor Ahai and Valonqar prophecies.

We'll have to wait for Winds of Winter and A Dream of Spring to find out how the story is supposed to continue.

DnD used GrrM's Cliff notes because he did NOT write like the wind.
We know how the story is supposed to continue:

Danny goes mad Queen, BUT In the Book it makes sense.
Jon goes mad Bastard, BUT In the Book it makes sense.
Jaime goes mad Valonqar, BUT In the Book it makes sense.

Fan theory: Aegon raped Countess Tywin and spawned Tyrion. BUT what if Tyrion is true-born while Jaimie and Cersei are the Targaryen rape babies? Blonde incestuous, spawning Tyrants. Then Danny is the younger sister who killed them all.
Last edited by Auristania on Sat Aug 17, 2019 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59282
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Sat Aug 17, 2019 3:39 pm

I really really really dont want Tyrion to be a secret targaryen in the books.

Or Jaime or Cersei for that matter.

Had enough secret targs.
Last edited by The Huskar Social Union on Sat Aug 17, 2019 3:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163844
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sat Aug 17, 2019 4:53 pm

The Huskar Social Union wrote:Watched the first part when it came out, ill get around to the second part some time tomorrow.

Her stuff is crackin, loved her Hobbit videos.

She's in Dublin tonight, up for a Hugo Award for those videos.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44080
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:22 pm

Ifreann wrote:Do you have two hours to spare? Enjoy Lindsay Ellis' two parter on Game of Thrones.

Already seen and enjoyed the videos, but I'm gonna have to disagree with her on the planned out ending being the problem.

Plenty of great series have planned out stories: Avatar TLA, Babylon 5, The Expanse, One Piece, etc... The writers and directors knew what they wanted to do from the get go and had the support to do so, which lead to great stories and tons of foreshadowing, Easter eggs, and blink and you miss it tiny details that only make sense in the long run. Meanwhile, you have related shows that aren't planned out(Like LoK, Babylon 5 season 5, BattleStar Galactica 2003, Naruto/Bleach, etc...), that, while they still can be good, have a lot of problems with build up and where to actually take the story.

Still great videos, but that explanation has been annoying me for a while now.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:37 pm

New haven america wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Do you have two hours to spare? Enjoy Lindsay Ellis' two parter on Game of Thrones.

Already seen and enjoyed the videos, but I'm gonna have to disagree with her on the planned out ending being the problem.

Plenty of great series have planned out stories: Avatar TLA, Babylon 5, The Expanse, One Piece, etc... The writers and directors knew what they wanted to do from the get go and had the support to do so, which lead to great stories and tons of foreshadowing, Easter eggs, and blink and you miss it tiny details that only make sense in the long run. Meanwhile, you have related shows that aren't planned out(Like LoK, Babylon 5 season 5, BattleStar Galactica 2003, Naruto/Bleach, etc...), that, while they still can be good, have a lot of problems with build up and where to actually take the story.

Still great videos, but that explanation has been annoying me for a while now.


I may have to rewatch some parts, but I think her point could be more accurately summed up as: they fucked up the planned ending by pointlessly trying to outsmart the audience instead of trying to make a cohesive narrative and ran out of time and fucks to give to make things like character motivations make sense. I don't think she was dragging on the concept of planned endings altogether, but how they handled it was a travesty.

So the problem wasn't that they wanted a planned ending, it was that they forced their planned ending without doing any of the work that makes those things enjoyable.
Last edited by Valrifell on Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44080
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:51 pm

Valrifell wrote:
New haven america wrote:Already seen and enjoyed the videos, but I'm gonna have to disagree with her on the planned out ending being the problem.

Plenty of great series have planned out stories: Avatar TLA, Babylon 5, The Expanse, One Piece, etc... The writers and directors knew what they wanted to do from the get go and had the support to do so, which lead to great stories and tons of foreshadowing, Easter eggs, and blink and you miss it tiny details that only make sense in the long run. Meanwhile, you have related shows that aren't planned out(Like LoK, Babylon 5 season 5, BattleStar Galactica 2003, Naruto/Bleach, etc...), that, while they still can be good, have a lot of problems with build up and where to actually take the story.

Still great videos, but that explanation has been annoying me for a while now.


I may have to rewatch some parts, but I think her point could be more accurately summed up as: they fucked up the planned ending by pointlessly trying to outsmart the audience instead of trying to make a cohesive narrative and ran out of time and fucks to give to make things like character motivations make sense. I don't think she was dragging on the concept of planned endings altogether, but how they handled it was a travesty.

So the problem wasn't that they wanted a planned ending, it was that they forced their planned ending without doing any of the work that makes those things enjoyable.

Her point was that planned out endings don't work out in the long run because it doesn't allow for natural chemistry from actors/characters or organic storytelling to take place, which means you can't change things on the fly or edit how the series is going to go because you already have a set series of events and destinations to get too and "Check off."

She admits that planned out endings can be good, but that you need to keep the space in-between points A and B as loose or open as possible to allow for the natural changes with characters or events to take place, which again, isn't entirely true as I've just listed 4 series above that didn't keep their planned out stories fast and loose but still ended up being great.
Last edited by New haven america on Sat Aug 17, 2019 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Platypus Bureaucracy
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1763
Founded: Jun 06, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Platypus Bureaucracy » Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:56 pm

Valrifell wrote:
New haven america wrote:Already seen and enjoyed the videos, but I'm gonna have to disagree with her on the planned out ending being the problem.

Plenty of great series have planned out stories: Avatar TLA, Babylon 5, The Expanse, One Piece, etc... The writers and directors knew what they wanted to do from the get go and had the support to do so, which lead to great stories and tons of foreshadowing, Easter eggs, and blink and you miss it tiny details that only make sense in the long run. Meanwhile, you have related shows that aren't planned out(Like LoK, Babylon 5 season 5, BattleStar Galactica 2003, Naruto/Bleach, etc...), that, while they still can be good, have a lot of problems with build up and where to actually take the story.

Still great videos, but that explanation has been annoying me for a while now.


I may have to rewatch some parts, but I think her point could be more accurately summed up as: they fucked up the planned ending by pointlessly trying to outsmart the audience instead of trying to make a cohesive narrative and ran out of time and fucks to give to make things like character motivations make sense. I don't think she was dragging on the concept of planned endings altogether, but how they handled it was a travesty.

So the problem wasn't that they wanted a planned ending, it was that they forced their planned ending without doing any of the work that makes those things enjoyable.

Right. Actually planning a story is knowing who your characters are, all the major choices they'll be faced with along the way, and what decisions they'll make and why. And if you find you can't or don't want to hit any of those character beats, you need to be willing to re-evaluate what your story is about and revise your ending accordingly. It would appear D&D tried to have their cake and eat it; let the characters go wherever they wanted, then force them into the original ending regardless.

Although, frankly, the original ending is fundamentally shitty and if it's what GRRM's really planning then I suspect I'll dislike it even more than I disliked the last two books.
Platypus of the non-venomous, egg-laying variety
Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:I will never stop being a gay platypus.

The Huskar Social Union wrote:You glorifted ducking wanabe sea pheasant

Platapusses are not rel

Ostroeuropa wrote:"Can we just eat SOME of the rich?"

User avatar
Hanafuridake
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5532
Founded: Sep 09, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hanafuridake » Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:57 pm

If Jon Snow's father is Rhaegar in the book as well as the show, then I'm sort of confused why he never had Targaryen characteristics like platinum blonde hair and violet eyes, especially since his brother Aegon (who's mother was Elia) has to dye his hair blue to keep from being recognized. I don't see how a Targaryen married a Dornish woman with dark features and had a typical Targaryen son, but married a pasty Northern woman and had a son with no trace of those features, especially how George's understanding of genetics in the series seems to be “sons inherit their father's hair color.”
Nation name in proper language: 花降岳|पुष्पद्वीप
Theravada Buddhist
李贽 wrote:There is nothing difficult about becoming a sage, and nothing false about transcending the world of appearances.
Suriyanakhon's alt, finally found my old account's password

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39283
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:57 pm

Auristania wrote:
-Ocelot- wrote:
Season 8 is absolute crap. The writers wanted to move on, so they wrapped up the rest of the story into a super short mini-season in the worst way imaginable. They didn't care about GoT's legacy because, to them, it was hampering their future projects. Rationalizing their decisions is meaningless because even they didn't care, so why should we? The writers even kind of forgot the Azor Ahai and Valonqar prophecies.

We'll have to wait for Winds of Winter and A Dream of Spring to find out how the story is supposed to continue.

DnD used GrrM's Cliff notes because he did NOT write like the wind.
We know how the story is supposed to continue:

Danny goes mad Queen, BUT In the Book it makes sense.
Jon goes mad Bastard, BUT In the Book it makes sense.
Jaime goes mad Valonqar, BUT In the Book it makes sense.

Fan theory: Aegon raped Countess Tywin and spawned Tyrion. BUT what if Tyrion is true-born while Jaimie and Cersei are the Targaryen rape babies? Blonde incestuous, spawning Tyrants. Then Danny is the younger sister who killed them all.


I’m pretty sure they are all 100 percent Lannisters

It would take too much of who they are away (for any one of the main Lannister syblings) if they turned out to be Targ

Also, what would this twist add to the story?

Their entire character arcs have been about “dealing” with being Lannisters and what that means

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44080
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sat Aug 17, 2019 6:00 pm

Hanafuridake wrote:If Jon Snow's father is Rhaegar in the book as well as the show, then I'm sort of confused why he never had Targaryen characteristics like platinum blonde hair and violet eyes, especially since his brother Aegon (who's mother was Elia) has to dye his hair blue to keep from being recognized. I don't see how a Targaryen married a Dornish woman with dark features and had a typical Targaryen son, but married a pasty Northern woman and had a son with no trace of those features, especially how George's understanding of genetics in the series seems to be “sons inherit their father's hair color.”

Rhaenys (Rhaegar's 1st daughter) took more after her Dornish mom though...
Last edited by New haven america on Sat Aug 17, 2019 6:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59282
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Sun Aug 18, 2019 2:54 am

Ifreann wrote:
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Watched the first part when it came out, ill get around to the second part some time tomorrow.

Her stuff is crackin, loved her Hobbit videos.

She's in Dublin tonight, up for a Hugo Award for those videos.

Cool.
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Platypus Bureaucracy
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1763
Founded: Jun 06, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Platypus Bureaucracy » Sun Aug 18, 2019 5:20 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Fedel wrote:
Pretty much describes the entire second half of the show.


There's no way Bran as King can ever work in any narrative.

Course it can. So you take the whole "stories bring us together" point, but you give Bran an actual personality. And then, during the whole White Walker thing, you have him set various inter-house squabbles to rest by talking about their family histories, how they've fought side-by-side in the past etc.

Then, once he's king, you make the point that he's going to do the same sort of thing with the people as a whole, smallfolk and lords. Maybe have him be the one to write the Song of Ice and Fire.

This is pretty similar to how nationalism was born historically, with people imagining a shared history.
Platypus of the non-venomous, egg-laying variety
Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:I will never stop being a gay platypus.

The Huskar Social Union wrote:You glorifted ducking wanabe sea pheasant

Platapusses are not rel

Ostroeuropa wrote:"Can we just eat SOME of the rich?"

User avatar
Starblaydia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 4691
Founded: Apr 05, 2004
Father Knows Best State

Postby Starblaydia » Sun Aug 18, 2019 6:25 am

Hanafuridake wrote:If Jon Snow's father is Rhaegar in the book as well as the show, then I'm sort of confused why he never had Targaryen characteristics like platinum blonde hair and violet eyes, especially since his brother Aegon (who's mother was Elia) has to dye his hair blue to keep from being recognized. I don't see how a Targaryen married a Dornish woman with dark features and had a typical Targaryen son, but married a pasty Northern woman and had a son with no trace of those features, especially how George's understanding of genetics in the series seems to be “sons inherit their father's hair color.”

Robb and Sansa were both described as looking very Tully-like, while Arya and Jon got the Stark genes, so it's not as cut-and-dried as that even in the books.

Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:There's no way Bran as King can ever work in any narrative.

Course it can. So you take the whole "stories bring us together" point, but you give Bran an actual personality. And then, during the whole White Walker thing, you have him set various inter-house squabbles to rest by talking about their family histories, how they've fought side-by-side in the past etc.

Then, once he's king, you make the point that he's going to do the same sort of thing with the people as a whole, smallfolk and lords. Maybe have him be the one to write the Song of Ice and Fire.

This is pretty similar to how nationalism was born historically, with people imagining a shared history.

This kind of plot would actually make sense and is along the lines of how I assume GRRM will do it in the last two books. In fact, this would be the same with all the terrible no-precedent actions in the final season (Jaime, Dany, Sansa, Sandor, etc), in that they'd actually (hopefully) have some grounding as to why those characters took those decisions.
Six-Time World Cup Committee President (WCs 25-33, 46-51 & 82*)
Co-host of World Cups 20, 40 & 80 • Di Bradini Cup Organiser
World Cups 30, 63 & 83 Runner-Up • World Cup 27 Third Place • 25th Baptism of Fire Runner-Up
Seven-Time AOCAF Cup Champions • Two-time U21, One-Time U18 WC Champions • Men's Football Olympic Champions, Ashford Games
Five-Time Cherry Cup Champions • 1st Quidditch World Cup Champions • WGPC8 Drivers' Champion
The Protectorate of Starblaydia
Commended by WA Security Council Resolution #40
Five-Time NS World Cup Champions (WCs 25, 28, 41, 44 & 47)

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163844
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Aug 18, 2019 6:33 am

Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
There's no way Bran as King can ever work in any narrative.

Course it can. So you take the whole "stories bring us together" point, but you give Bran an actual personality. And then, during the whole White Walker thing, you have him set various inter-house squabbles to rest by talking about their family histories, how they've fought side-by-side in the past etc.

Then, once he's king, you make the point that he's going to do the same sort of thing with the people as a whole, smallfolk and lords. Maybe have him be the one to write the Song of Ice and Fire.

This is pretty similar to how nationalism was born historically, with people imagining a shared history.

This sounds a lot better than robo-Bran psychically watching his sister get raped.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Tarsonis
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31119
Founded: Sep 20, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tarsonis » Sun Aug 18, 2019 12:18 pm

Ifreann wrote:
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Watched the first part when it came out, ill get around to the second part some time tomorrow.

Her stuff is crackin, loved her Hobbit videos.

She's in Dublin tonight, up for a Hugo Award for those videos.


Nostalgia Chick making it to the big leagues
NS Keyboard Warrior since 2005
Ecclesiastes 1:18 "For in much wisdom is much vexation, and those who increase knowledge increase sorrow"
Thucydides: “The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting by fools.”
1 Corinthians 5:12 "What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside?"
Galatians 6:7 "Do not be deceived; God is not mocked, for you reap whatever you sow."
T. Stevens: "I don't hold with equality in all things, but I believe in equality under the Law."
James I of Aragon "Have you ever considered that our position is Idolatry to the Rabbi?"
Debating Christian Theology with Non-Christians pretty much anybody be like

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129504
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Sun Aug 18, 2019 4:04 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Platypus Bureaucracy wrote:Course it can. So you take the whole "stories bring us together" point, but you give Bran an actual personality. And then, during the whole White Walker thing, you have him set various inter-house squabbles to rest by talking about their family histories, how they've fought side-by-side in the past etc.

Then, once he's king, you make the point that he's going to do the same sort of thing with the people as a whole, smallfolk and lords. Maybe have him be the one to write the Song of Ice and Fire.

This is pretty similar to how nationalism was born historically, with people imagining a shared history.

This sounds a lot better than robo-Bran psychically watching his sister get raped.

No wonder she wants no part of his kingdom.
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163844
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Aug 18, 2019 4:12 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:This sounds a lot better than robo-Bran psychically watching his sister get raped.

No wonder she wants no part of his kingdom.

"We're all agreed, your weirdo creep brother is going to be our king"
"Cool, I'm suddenly overcome with secessionist sentiment"
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Arts & Fiction

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads