The force is tight with Asian stereotypes that I could have sworn disappeared in the 90's though.
Advertisement

by The first Galactic Republic » Sat May 13, 2017 12:07 pm

by Zanera » Sat May 13, 2017 12:08 pm

by Salus Maior » Sat May 13, 2017 12:16 pm
The first Galactic Republic wrote:Real machine guns aren't so bright though. In Star Wars it's like a big sign that says don't walk here, but they'll be damned if they don't walk there.

by The first Galactic Republic » Sat May 13, 2017 12:17 pm
Salus Maior wrote:The first Galactic Republic wrote:Real machine guns aren't so bright though. In Star Wars it's like a big sign that says don't walk here, but they'll be damned if they don't walk there.
Most people don't have the reflexes to dodge light-speed projectiles. Remember, the visible bolt isn't what kills you.
At least, that's how it was in the old canon.

by Salus Maior » Sat May 13, 2017 12:21 pm
The first Galactic Republic wrote:Salus Maior wrote:
Most people don't have the reflexes to dodge light-speed projectiles. Remember, the visible bolt isn't what kills you.
At least, that's how it was in the old canon.
I don't care what universe you're from, that's gotta hurt.
(Is there a source for that?)

by The Greater Aryan Race » Sat May 13, 2017 12:21 pm
The first Galactic Republic wrote:These are valid criticisms. People complain that Episode II had too much politics in it but the movie failed to really explain a lot of its politics. That being said I do think we're given enough information to understand the gist of the Separatists.
The movie doesn't at all introduce us to most of the Separatist Council. We just see a bunch of aliens who want to sign Count Dooku's treaty. However I do think the movie gives us enough information to really understand their role in the story. Episode I introduced us to Nute Gunray and we do get to see his character and motivations. He's greedy and self serving, but also being manipulated by Palpatine. Episode II pretty much implies that the Separatist council is a council of Gunrays. They're greedy and largely doing what they do for their own benefit, but they're also fundamentally pawns of Dooku and Sidious. The movie gives you enough information to understand their role in the story. We don't get to see all the politics involved no but remember that any legitimate grievances the Separatists had are irrelevant to their true purpose, which is simply to start the Clone Wars.
The first Galactic Republic wrote:I don't think you really understand Padme though. She doesn't have a problem with violence in general. I mean she does carry a pistol. She just saw the Clone army for what it was. Violence was fine to liberate Naboo because the Trade Federation acted illegally, but that doesn't mean she wanted the Clone Army to repress the galaxy. She wanted to talk to the Separatists, and when the Clone Army was revealed she realized that someone was interested in making sure peace wasn't an option. As the Clone Wars went on she realized that was Palpatine. There are deleted scenes from III where she meets with the future leaders of the rebel alliance and basically starts the rebellion.
Imperium Sidhicum wrote:So, uh... Is this another one of those threads where everyone is supposed to feel outraged and circle-jerk in agreement of how injust and terrible the described incident is?
Because if it is, I'm probably going to say something mean and contrary just to contradict the majority.

by The first Galactic Republic » Sat May 13, 2017 2:42 pm
The Greater Aryan Race wrote:The first Galactic Republic wrote:These are valid criticisms. People complain that Episode II had too much politics in it but the movie failed to really explain a lot of its politics. That being said I do think we're given enough information to understand the gist of the Separatists.
The movie doesn't at all introduce us to most of the Separatist Council. We just see a bunch of aliens who want to sign Count Dooku's treaty. However I do think the movie gives us enough information to really understand their role in the story. Episode I introduced us to Nute Gunray and we do get to see his character and motivations. He's greedy and self serving, but also being manipulated by Palpatine. Episode II pretty much implies that the Separatist council is a council of Gunrays. They're greedy and largely doing what they do for their own benefit, but they're also fundamentally pawns of Dooku and Sidious. The movie gives you enough information to understand their role in the story. We don't get to see all the politics involved no but remember that any legitimate grievances the Separatists had are irrelevant to their true purpose, which is simply to start the Clone Wars.
Actually to my understanding, it was Dooku's and Sidious's master plan to start the Clone Wars. The Separatists went along with secession because they either (1) were genuinely fed up with the corruption of the Republic or (2) always fancied going their own way at independence. In fact, it was clear from the reactions of the Separatist leaders on Geonosis that none of them expected the Republic to suddenly field a well-trained clone army out of the blue since their understanding was that the Republic possessed no standing military at that time. Ergo, as I mentioned previously, Episode II fails to explain the deep-seated motivations (and how they varied between (1) and (2)) of the Separatists. All we see are the leaders making talk of building droid armies and intimidating the Republic into doing...I dunno...whatever the Separatists demanded which was again only very briefly alluded to.The first Galactic Republic wrote:I don't think you really understand Padme though. She doesn't have a problem with violence in general. I mean she does carry a pistol. She just saw the Clone army for what it was. Violence was fine to liberate Naboo because the Trade Federation acted illegally, but that doesn't mean she wanted the Clone Army to repress the galaxy. She wanted to talk to the Separatists, and when the Clone Army was revealed she realized that someone was interested in making sure peace wasn't an option. As the Clone Wars went on she realized that was Palpatine. There are deleted scenes from III where she meets with the future leaders of the rebel alliance and basically starts the rebellion.
Except that the whole point of the clone army and the Military Creation Bill (at least based the official reasons given by Palpatine in Episode II) was to prevent a repeat of similar situations like that of Naboo and to pre-empt the dissolution of the Republic through illegal secession. In Episode II, no one, and not even Padme, saw the true role of the clone army as Palpatine's means of promulgating civil war and seizing political power. It simply makes no sense, as I stated previously, that a Senator who was the victim of said illegal aggression would suddenly become a pacifist and oppose the creation of a Republican military.

by The first Galactic Republic » Sun May 14, 2017 5:38 pm

by Romic » Mon May 15, 2017 12:08 am
Salus Maior wrote:The first Galactic Republic wrote:Real machine guns aren't so bright though. In Star Wars it's like a big sign that says don't walk here, but they'll be damned if they don't walk there.
Most people don't have the reflexes to dodge light-speed projectiles. Remember, the visible bolt isn't what kills you.
At least, that's how it was in the old canon.

by Uinted Communist of Africa » Mon May 15, 2017 7:04 am

by Laughing Peninsula » Mon May 15, 2017 7:46 am

by Alvecia » Mon May 15, 2017 8:08 am

by Laughing Peninsula » Mon May 15, 2017 8:23 am
Alvecia wrote:There's a Star Wars thread in A&F this probably would have been bettter in.
IIRC didn't he send Anakin to go destroy the Droid control center (or something) on Mustafar with the Separatist leaders.
The destruction of the Separatists was still important for his public image in the senate and amongst the populace. It isn't until Episode 4 that the senate dissolved and his power became absolute.

by Alvecia » Mon May 15, 2017 8:29 am

by The Huskar Social Union » Mon May 15, 2017 8:48 am
Uinted Communist of Africa wrote:POWER....UN-LIM-I-TED PPPPPPPPPPPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!
*shocks everything even himself*

by Socialist Nordia » Mon May 15, 2017 8:50 am

by Uinted Communist of Africa » Mon May 15, 2017 8:55 am

by Salus Maior » Mon May 15, 2017 9:06 am


by The Huskar Social Union » Mon May 15, 2017 9:07 am

by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon May 15, 2017 9:26 am
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

by The first Galactic Republic » Mon May 15, 2017 10:08 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:What would people like to see in future star wars stand alone movies? I think i mentioned it before, but i would like to see something similar to Rogue one except with a unit of stormtroopers, just a straight up war movie from their perspective. Or about clone troopers.

by Zanera » Mon May 15, 2017 10:11 am
The first Galactic Republic wrote:The Huskar Social Union wrote:What would people like to see in future star wars stand alone movies? I think i mentioned it before, but i would like to see something similar to Rogue one except with a unit of stormtroopers, just a straight up war movie from their perspective. Or about clone troopers.
FN-2199's Loyal Adventures, or how I learned to stop resisting and love the First Order.
Could also be the new animated series to replace Rebels.

by Hirota » Mon May 15, 2017 10:51 am

by Pilack » Mon May 15, 2017 10:57 am

by Alekseandrea » Mon May 15, 2017 11:25 am
Anywhere Else But Here wrote:Temporarily ruined forever.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement