NATION

PASSWORD

Many Bothans Died To Bring You THE STAR WARS THREAD

A coffee shop for those who like to discuss art, music, books, movies, TV, each other's own works, and existential angst.

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which is your favorite sentient Star Wars race?

Wookies. Because fur is hot... And murder.
39
8%
Twi'leks. Because slugs are hot.
131
27%
Tusken Raiders. A little rape fantasy never hurt anybody.
33
7%
Jawas. Lots of little hands touching me is hot.
22
4%
Hutts. BIG. NASTY. RUDE. SWEATY. HOT.
13
3%
Ewoks. Because creepy ugly teddy bears are hot.
30
6%
Bothans. I hear they die a lot. And that's hot.
27
5%
Trandoshans. Because lizards are hot.
12
2%
Rodians. Because... I don't know anymore. Reptilian ant-eaters are hot?
13
3%
Other. Because my God there's a lot of alien species in Star Wars. And they're ALL hot.
171
35%
 
Total votes : 491

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Mon Nov 17, 2014 9:48 am

Spoder wrote:
Bearon wrote:
Have you ever seen the original clone wars series?

That series was horrible. So was the art.

Image

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Mon Nov 17, 2014 9:53 am

Transnapastain wrote:It won't happen, no way in hell, but I believe they should have just done Heir to the Empire as the next three Star Wars moves

I think I remember reading that Timothy Zahn was going to be giving some input on the new films, so there might be some Thrawn Trilogy influence. I'll try to dig up a source.

User avatar
Bearon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11448
Founded: Mar 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bearon » Mon Nov 17, 2014 11:11 am

Merizoc wrote:
Transnapastain wrote:It won't happen, no way in hell, but I believe they should have just done Heir to the Empire as the next three Star Wars moves

I think I remember reading that Timothy Zahn was going to be giving some input on the new films, so there might be some Thrawn Trilogy influence. I'll try to dig up a source.


Nah they're using a completely original script for the new trilogy.
Nothing to see here. Move along.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Mon Nov 17, 2014 2:13 pm

Bearon wrote:
Merizoc wrote:I think I remember reading that Timothy Zahn was going to be giving some input on the new films, so there might be some Thrawn Trilogy influence. I'll try to dig up a source.


Nah they're using a completely original script for the new trilogy.


Nothing's set in stone yet.

If we're lucky, the movie will go tits up in development hell and competent storytellers will grab hold of it and make it for a meager budget and the whole movie will take place in a dirty alien city or a Star Destroyer or something.

User avatar
Bearon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11448
Founded: Mar 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bearon » Mon Nov 17, 2014 2:32 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Bearon wrote:
Nah they're using a completely original script for the new trilogy.


Nothing's set in stone yet.

If we're lucky, the movie will go tits up in development hell and competent storytellers will grab hold of it and make it for a meager budget and the whole movie will take place in a dirty alien city or a Star Destroyer or something.


NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nothing to see here. Move along.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Mon Nov 17, 2014 2:34 pm

Bearon wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
Nothing's set in stone yet.

If we're lucky, the movie will go tits up in development hell and competent storytellers will grab hold of it and make it for a meager budget and the whole movie will take place in a dirty alien city or a Star Destroyer or something.


NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! subtitle: do not want


Fix'd. :D

User avatar
Bearon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11448
Founded: Mar 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bearon » Mon Nov 17, 2014 2:38 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Bearon wrote:
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! subtitle: do not want


Fix'd. :D


Honestly I prefer a new trilogy isn't made it just cheapens the series as a whole and shifts Star Wars from iconic to sequel slutt.

Edit: But if they had to make them at least expand the universe like Marvel's doing.
Last edited by Bearon on Mon Nov 17, 2014 2:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Nothing to see here. Move along.

User avatar
Arstotzkas
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7032
Founded: Sep 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Arstotzkas » Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:16 pm

Yesterday was the anniversary of the HOLIDAY SPECIAL
behold, a signature.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:21 pm

Arstotzkas wrote:Yesterday was the anniversary of the HOLIDAY SPECIAL


... :?

There's honestly not much to say about the Holiday Special except "shiagr"

User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10904
Founded: May 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Romulan Republic » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:28 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Bearon wrote:
Nah they're using a completely original script for the new trilogy.


Nothing's set in stone yet.

If we're lucky, the movie will go tits up in development hell and competent storytellers will grab hold of it and make it for a meager budget and the whole movie will take place in a dirty alien city or a Star Destroyer or something.


Given that they're already filming it (unless they've finished filming it by now), I doubt its release will be delayed for long. And its funny that you seem to think having a low budget leads to quality and that being somewhere dirty leads to quality. Let me guess: Hollywood bad, grimdark good. How cliche.
"Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we began by declaring that "all men are created equal." We now practically read it "all men are created equal, except negroes" When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read "all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics." When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty -- to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy." - President Abraham Lincoln.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:29 pm

The Romulan Republic wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
Nothing's set in stone yet.

If we're lucky, the movie will go tits up in development hell and competent storytellers will grab hold of it and make it for a meager budget and the whole movie will take place in a dirty alien city or a Star Destroyer or something.


Given that they're already filming it (unless they've finished filming it by now), I doubt its release will be delayed for long. And its funny that you seem to think having a low budget leads to quality and that being somewhere dirty leads to quality. Let me guess: Hollywood bad, grimdark good. How cliche.


Less can often be more.

Look what happened with goddamn George Lucas.

Give the guy computers and all of a sudden all his actors turn into robots.

User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10904
Founded: May 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Romulan Republic » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:31 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
The Romulan Republic wrote:
Given that they're already filming it (unless they've finished filming it by now), I doubt its release will be delayed for long. And its funny that you seem to think having a low budget leads to quality and that being somewhere dirty leads to quality. Let me guess: Hollywood bad, grimdark good. How cliche.


Less can often be more.

Look what happened with goddamn George Lucas.

Give the guy computers and all of a sudden all his actors turn into robots.


You can make a good film with or without a lot of money. But more money lets you do things you couldn't do otherwise, so I don't think its a bad thing. However, it is not a substitute for a good script and good actors. Neither is a low budget.

That said, I think George Lucas went overboard with the action in Episode III. You need a director who won't let the spectacle get over the top. Christopher Nolan is pretty good at this and Peter Jackson was good at it for the most part in The Lord of the Rings, though he's lost his touch since then. Joss Whedon can do it too.

As for Abrams, he didn't get really absurd with the action in Star Trek. The main problems there were with the script.
Last edited by The Romulan Republic on Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we began by declaring that "all men are created equal." We now practically read it "all men are created equal, except negroes" When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read "all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics." When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty -- to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy." - President Abraham Lincoln.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:38 pm

The Romulan Republic wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
Less can often be more.

Look what happened with goddamn George Lucas.

Give the guy computers and all of a sudden all his actors turn into robots.


You can make a good film with or without a lot of money. But more money lets you do things you couldn't do otherwise, so I don't think its a bad thing. However, it is not a substitute for a good script and good actors. Neither is a low budget.

That said, I think George Lucas went overboard with the action in Episode III. You need a director who won't let the spectacle get over the top. Christopher Nolan is pretty good at this and Peter Jackson was good at it for the most part in The Lord of the Rings, though he's lost his touch since then. Joss Whedon can do it too.

As for Abrams, he didn't get really absurd with the action in Star Trek. The main problems there were with the script.


A big problem with George Lucas is that he's targeting children, and he thinks that means that he has to resort to stereotypes and less grim themes, and that he's forgotten what was fun about Star Wars.

It's the fantasy, the many different alien races, their interactions, the witty banter.

... C'mon, guy. I thought 2 and 3 were FINE. In fact, the action in those movies was my goddamn favorite part because it was fun. It's seeing the characters that we know and love in these situations that make it fun. It's seeing the characters succeed that makes them fun.

User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10904
Founded: May 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Romulan Republic » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:43 pm

Less grim is good. Star Wars has violence and death, but it wasn't terribly bleak/cynical initially. In fact, Luke refusing to follow his supposed destiny and kill Vader, refusing to fight, and redeeming the second biggest villain in the galaxy is one of the most idealistic endings in cinema.
"Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we began by declaring that "all men are created equal." We now practically read it "all men are created equal, except negroes" When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read "all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics." When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty -- to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy." - President Abraham Lincoln.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:48 pm

The Romulan Republic wrote:Less grim is good. Star Wars has violence and death, but it wasn't terribly bleak/cynical initially. In fact, Luke refusing to follow his supposed destiny and kill Vader, refusing to fight, and redeeming the second biggest villain in the galaxy is one of the most idealistic endings in cinema.


Uh huh... So Episode 3, being perhaps the grimmest of all Star Wars, is bad, then?

And Empire Strikes Back, too, even though it's often rightfully considered the greatest Star Wars movie?

Grim is great. Grim is better. Because then the idealistic reward at the end feels better.

User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10904
Founded: May 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Romulan Republic » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:55 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
The Romulan Republic wrote:Less grim is good. Star Wars has violence and death, but it wasn't terribly bleak/cynical initially. In fact, Luke refusing to follow his supposed destiny and kill Vader, refusing to fight, and redeeming the second biggest villain in the galaxy is one of the most idealistic endings in cinema.


Uh huh... So Episode 3, being perhaps the grimmest of all Star Wars, is bad, then?

And Empire Strikes Back, too, even though it's often rightfully considered the greatest Star Wars movie?

Grim is great. Grim is better. Because then the idealistic reward at the end feels better.


Being grim is fine (to a point) as long as the end is idealistic. But I wouldn't say its inherently better.

However, Empire Strikes Back's grimness is more superficial than something in the story. None of the main characters die, no world is destroyed (unlike the first film) and the heroes never really fall to the Dark Side. Episode III is darker but still ends somewhat optimistically (and knowing how things turn out in Return of the Jedi softens it).

Incidentally, I tentatively rate the films as follows:

1. The Empire Strikes Back.
2. The Return of the Jedi with the caveat that it has the best end in the series.
3. A New Hope.
4. A tie between Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith.
5. The Phantom Menace.
6. The Clone Wars movie (though some of the episodes of The Clone Wars were much better).
Last edited by The Romulan Republic on Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we began by declaring that "all men are created equal." We now practically read it "all men are created equal, except negroes" When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read "all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics." When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty -- to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy." - President Abraham Lincoln.

User avatar
Bearon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11448
Founded: Mar 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bearon » Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:50 pm

Am I the only one that liked the Phantom Menace? xD
Nothing to see here. Move along.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:58 pm

Bearon wrote:Am I the only one that liked the Phantom Menace? xD


Believe it or not, I thought it would actually be interesting to see the political machinations of the Star Wars world but... George Lucas sucks.

User avatar
Bearon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11448
Founded: Mar 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bearon » Wed Nov 19, 2014 10:20 am

The Rich Port wrote:
Bearon wrote:Am I the only one that liked the Phantom Menace? xD


Believe it or not, I thought it would actually be interesting to see the political machinations of the Star Wars world but... George Lucas sucks.


I think the hate for that movie was a little too strong. It explored a few different worlds and while the actor for Anakin wasn't great he wasn't terrible ( in my opinion at least ) the only unsalvageable thing was Jar Jar.
Nothing to see here. Move along.

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58271
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Wed Nov 19, 2014 10:23 am

Bearon wrote:Am I the only one that liked the Phantom Menace? xD

There are some parts of it i like, such as the battle between Darth maul and Obi Wan and Qui Gon and the battle between the Droid army and the gungans (The droid deployment and advance on the gungans was fucking awesome looking, as was the mass formations of tanks. Also every gungan that died made it that much better). But there were some parts that annoyed the hell out of me such as Jar Jar and the kid who played Anakin.

So overall eh is alright.
Last edited by The Huskar Social Union on Wed Nov 19, 2014 10:28 am, edited 2 times in total.
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Wed Nov 19, 2014 1:42 pm

Bearon wrote:I think the hate for that movie was a little too strong. It explored a few different worlds and while the actor for Anakin wasn't great he wasn't terrible, the only unsalvageable thing was Jar Jar.


The actors for Anakin in the prequel movies were probably casted correctly, but without a proper director and script; the people still won't do well. I think the bigger problem was that Anakin just wasn't written well and got turned into a "space Jesus."
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Bearon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11448
Founded: Mar 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bearon » Wed Nov 19, 2014 3:41 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Bearon wrote:I think the hate for that movie was a little too strong. It explored a few different worlds and while the actor for Anakin wasn't great he wasn't terrible, the only unsalvageable thing was Jar Jar.


The actors for Anakin in the prequel movies were probably casted correctly, but without a proper director and script; the people still won't do well. I think the bigger problem was that Anakin just wasn't written well and got turned into a "space Jesus."


His dialogue made him emo. ;c;
Nothing to see here. Move along.

User avatar
Havl
Minister
 
Posts: 2641
Founded: Dec 06, 2004
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Havl » Thu Nov 20, 2014 7:10 am

Saiwania wrote:
Bearon wrote:I think the hate for that movie was a little too strong. It explored a few different worlds and while the actor for Anakin wasn't great he wasn't terrible, the only unsalvageable thing was Jar Jar.


The actors for Anakin in the prequel movies were probably casted correctly, but without a proper director and script; the people still won't do well. I think the bigger problem was that Anakin just wasn't written well and got turned into a "space Jesus."

He's not a compelling character (as depicted). In the original trilogy, the little that Kenobi tells Luke about his father is far more interesting and compelling than the whole of what we see in Episodes I-III.
Same flag, same motto, same whatever since 2004.
Champions: World Cup of Hockey 20, 21, 22, 25
Hosts: NationStates Sports Car Series 1, 2, 3, 4

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:22 am

Bearon wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
Believe it or not, I thought it would actually be interesting to see the political machinations of the Star Wars world but... George Lucas sucks.


I think the hate for that movie was a little too strong. It explored a few different worlds and while the actor for Anakin wasn't great he wasn't terrible ( in my opinion at least ) the only unsalvageable thing was Jar Jar.


Not to mention they made Darth Maul into a nothing character.

Darth Maul, a Sith so powerful he took on two Jedi and managed to kill one and almost kill the other.

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Thu Nov 20, 2014 10:44 am

Bearon wrote:Am I the only one that liked the Phantom Menace? xD

I enjoyed it. I don't even hate Jar-Jar that much.

*ducks*

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Arts & Fiction

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GubatSonhe, New haven america

Advertisement

Remove ads