Advertisement

by MERIZoC » Mon Nov 17, 2014 9:53 am
Transnapastain wrote:It won't happen, no way in hell, but I believe they should have just done Heir to the Empire as the next three Star Wars moves

by Bearon » Mon Nov 17, 2014 11:11 am
Merizoc wrote:Transnapastain wrote:It won't happen, no way in hell, but I believe they should have just done Heir to the Empire as the next three Star Wars moves
I think I remember reading that Timothy Zahn was going to be giving some input on the new films, so there might be some Thrawn Trilogy influence. I'll try to dig up a source.

by The Rich Port » Mon Nov 17, 2014 2:13 pm

by Bearon » Mon Nov 17, 2014 2:32 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Bearon wrote:
Nah they're using a completely original script for the new trilogy.
Nothing's set in stone yet.
If we're lucky, the movie will go tits up in development hell and competent storytellers will grab hold of it and make it for a meager budget and the whole movie will take place in a dirty alien city or a Star Destroyer or something.

by The Rich Port » Mon Nov 17, 2014 2:34 pm
Bearon wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
Nothing's set in stone yet.
If we're lucky, the movie will go tits up in development hell and competent storytellers will grab hold of it and make it for a meager budget and the whole movie will take place in a dirty alien city or a Star Destroyer or something.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! subtitle: do not want

by Bearon » Mon Nov 17, 2014 2:38 pm

by Arstotzkas » Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:16 pm

by The Rich Port » Tue Nov 18, 2014 6:21 pm
Arstotzkas wrote:Yesterday was the anniversary of the HOLIDAY SPECIAL

by The Romulan Republic » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:28 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Bearon wrote:
Nah they're using a completely original script for the new trilogy.
Nothing's set in stone yet.
If we're lucky, the movie will go tits up in development hell and competent storytellers will grab hold of it and make it for a meager budget and the whole movie will take place in a dirty alien city or a Star Destroyer or something.

by The Rich Port » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:29 pm
The Romulan Republic wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
Nothing's set in stone yet.
If we're lucky, the movie will go tits up in development hell and competent storytellers will grab hold of it and make it for a meager budget and the whole movie will take place in a dirty alien city or a Star Destroyer or something.
Given that they're already filming it (unless they've finished filming it by now), I doubt its release will be delayed for long. And its funny that you seem to think having a low budget leads to quality and that being somewhere dirty leads to quality. Let me guess: Hollywood bad, grimdark good. How cliche.

by The Romulan Republic » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:31 pm
The Rich Port wrote:The Romulan Republic wrote:
Given that they're already filming it (unless they've finished filming it by now), I doubt its release will be delayed for long. And its funny that you seem to think having a low budget leads to quality and that being somewhere dirty leads to quality. Let me guess: Hollywood bad, grimdark good. How cliche.
Less can often be more.
Look what happened with goddamn George Lucas.
Give the guy computers and all of a sudden all his actors turn into robots.

by The Rich Port » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:38 pm
The Romulan Republic wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
Less can often be more.
Look what happened with goddamn George Lucas.
Give the guy computers and all of a sudden all his actors turn into robots.
You can make a good film with or without a lot of money. But more money lets you do things you couldn't do otherwise, so I don't think its a bad thing. However, it is not a substitute for a good script and good actors. Neither is a low budget.
That said, I think George Lucas went overboard with the action in Episode III. You need a director who won't let the spectacle get over the top. Christopher Nolan is pretty good at this and Peter Jackson was good at it for the most part in The Lord of the Rings, though he's lost his touch since then. Joss Whedon can do it too.
As for Abrams, he didn't get really absurd with the action in Star Trek. The main problems there were with the script.

by The Romulan Republic » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:43 pm

by The Rich Port » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:48 pm
The Romulan Republic wrote:Less grim is good. Star Wars has violence and death, but it wasn't terribly bleak/cynical initially. In fact, Luke refusing to follow his supposed destiny and kill Vader, refusing to fight, and redeeming the second biggest villain in the galaxy is one of the most idealistic endings in cinema.

by The Romulan Republic » Tue Nov 18, 2014 7:55 pm
The Rich Port wrote:The Romulan Republic wrote:Less grim is good. Star Wars has violence and death, but it wasn't terribly bleak/cynical initially. In fact, Luke refusing to follow his supposed destiny and kill Vader, refusing to fight, and redeeming the second biggest villain in the galaxy is one of the most idealistic endings in cinema.
Uh huh... So Episode 3, being perhaps the grimmest of all Star Wars, is bad, then?
And Empire Strikes Back, too, even though it's often rightfully considered the greatest Star Wars movie?
Grim is great. Grim is better. Because then the idealistic reward at the end feels better.

by The Rich Port » Tue Nov 18, 2014 9:58 pm
Bearon wrote:Am I the only one that liked the Phantom Menace? xD

by Bearon » Wed Nov 19, 2014 10:20 am

by The Huskar Social Union » Wed Nov 19, 2014 10:23 am
Bearon wrote:Am I the only one that liked the Phantom Menace? xD

by Saiwania » Wed Nov 19, 2014 1:42 pm
Bearon wrote:I think the hate for that movie was a little too strong. It explored a few different worlds and while the actor for Anakin wasn't great he wasn't terrible, the only unsalvageable thing was Jar Jar.

by Bearon » Wed Nov 19, 2014 3:41 pm
Saiwania wrote:Bearon wrote:I think the hate for that movie was a little too strong. It explored a few different worlds and while the actor for Anakin wasn't great he wasn't terrible, the only unsalvageable thing was Jar Jar.
The actors for Anakin in the prequel movies were probably casted correctly, but without a proper director and script; the people still won't do well. I think the bigger problem was that Anakin just wasn't written well and got turned into a "space Jesus."

by Havl » Thu Nov 20, 2014 7:10 am
Saiwania wrote:Bearon wrote:I think the hate for that movie was a little too strong. It explored a few different worlds and while the actor for Anakin wasn't great he wasn't terrible, the only unsalvageable thing was Jar Jar.
The actors for Anakin in the prequel movies were probably casted correctly, but without a proper director and script; the people still won't do well. I think the bigger problem was that Anakin just wasn't written well and got turned into a "space Jesus."

by The Rich Port » Thu Nov 20, 2014 8:22 am
Bearon wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
Believe it or not, I thought it would actually be interesting to see the political machinations of the Star Wars world but... George Lucas sucks.
I think the hate for that movie was a little too strong. It explored a few different worlds and while the actor for Anakin wasn't great he wasn't terrible ( in my opinion at least ) the only unsalvageable thing was Jar Jar.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: GubatSonhe, New haven america
Advertisement