The end justifies the means, and the end is endless lulz.
Advertisement

by The Empire of Pretantia » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:07 pm

by The Armed Republic of Dutch Coolness » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:10 pm
P2TM Mentor

by The Empire of Pretantia » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:13 pm

by Tagmatium » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:16 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

by Pragia » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:23 pm

by The Empire of Pretantia » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:23 pm

by Lunas Legion » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:25 pm
Pragia wrote:Tagmatium wrote:Seems like a really, really dick move.
Indeed it is, but the look on the other players face is priceless, and it does get owned by one lucky Lascannon that rolls high.
Also I generally let the other player know I'm running escalation, but given a S10AP1 10" blast with no cover allowed kinda wrecks most armies.

by The Armed Republic of Dutch Coolness » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:27 pm
P2TM Mentor

by Pragia » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:31 pm

by The Armed Republic of Dutch Coolness » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:32 pm
Pragia wrote:
Idk, having run 750 PT tau against a Stormlord, it's very entertaining, you can really screw with an enemy, especially with 3 pairs of TL fusion blasters
Also, can you run 3 Fusion Blasters on an XV-8? Then could I get 2 FBs with one twin linked
P2TM Mentor

by Slorch » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:33 pm
Pragia wrote:
Idk, having run 750 PT tau against a Stormlord, it's very entertaining, you can really screw with an enemy, especially with 3 pairs of TL fusion blasters
Also, can you run 3 Fusion Blasters on an XV-8? Then could I get 2 FBs with one twin linked
Slorch wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
Nua Corda wrote:click the 'wrote' button.

by Pragia » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:34 pm
The Armed Republic of Dutch coolness wrote:Pragia wrote:Idk, having run 750 PT tau against a Stormlord, it's very entertaining, you can really screw with an enemy, especially with 3 pairs of TL fusion blasters
Also, can you run 3 Fusion Blasters on an XV-8? Then could I get 2 FBs with one twin linked
Competetive Tau lists aren't fun to play against, either.

by Jormengand » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:35 pm
Slorch wrote:Pragia wrote:Idk, having run 750 PT tau against a Stormlord, it's very entertaining, you can really screw with an enemy, especially with 3 pairs of TL fusion blasters
Also, can you run 3 Fusion Blasters on an XV-8? Then could I get 2 FBs with one twin linked
sure but you can only shot 2 weapons a turn
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

by Slorch » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:37 pm
Jormengand wrote:Slorch wrote:
sure but you can only shot 2 weapons a turn
Yep. The FAQ basically says the same, so you can have one and a twin linked, or you can have three but you can't fire one.
Also, someone please tell me that my Tau buff commander either can't join infantry or can't use the CaCN and MSSS on space marines? Otherwise, I may be sorely tempted to run T-L ignores cover devastators.
Slorch wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
Nua Corda wrote:click the 'wrote' button.

by Jormengand » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:47 pm
Slorch wrote:Jormengand wrote:Yep. The FAQ basically says the same, so you can have one and a twin linked, or you can have three but you can't fire one.
Also, someone please tell me that my Tau buff commander either can't join infantry or can't use the CaCN and MSSS on space marines? Otherwise, I may be sorely tempted to run T-L ignores cover devastators.
you can(also with riptides too)
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

by Slorch » Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:52 pm
Jormengand wrote:Slorch wrote:
you can(also with riptides too)
Just noticed the riptides thing as well, as long as you have at least one shielded MD you can stick in a commander and have R72" S8 AP2 heavy 1 large blast twin-linked ignores cover, which will be the ruination of many a space marine. Alternatively, you can go for devastators and have R36" S7 AP2 heavy 4 blast twin-linked ignores cover. Of course, then you have either the fusion blasters and missile pods or moar boltars.
Screw it, he's going with the riptide.
Slorch wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
Nua Corda wrote:click the 'wrote' button.

by Jormengand » Fri Mar 28, 2014 1:05 pm
Slorch wrote:Jormengand wrote:Just noticed the riptides thing as well, as long as you have at least one shielded MD you can stick in a commander and have R72" S8 AP2 heavy 1 large blast twin-linked ignores cover, which will be the ruination of many a space marine. Alternatively, you can go for devastators and have R36" S7 AP2 heavy 4 blast twin-linked ignores cover. Of course, then you have either the fusion blasters and missile pods or moar boltars.
Screw it, he's going with the riptide.
you don't even have to have one on the riptide you just have to be able to take one
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

by Slorch » Fri Mar 28, 2014 1:07 pm
Jormengand wrote:Slorch wrote:
you don't even have to have one on the riptide you just have to be able to take one
Hrrm... the wording of "Units that always consist of a single model" makes me wonder slightly. Does this mean "Units which, for the duration of that game, consist of a single model" or "Units which, in any game, can only ever consist of a single model"? I agree that your explanation sounds a little more likely...
Not that it matters, because I want my T6 4++ and moar missiles, but...
Slorch wrote:click the 'wrote' button.
Nua Corda wrote:click the 'wrote' button.

by Jormengand » Fri Mar 28, 2014 1:33 pm
Slorch wrote:Jormengand wrote:Hrrm... the wording of "Units that always consist of a single model" makes me wonder slightly. Does this mean "Units which, for the duration of that game, consist of a single model" or "Units which, in any game, can only ever consist of a single model"? I agree that your explanation sounds a little more likely...
Not that it matters, because I want my T6 4++ and moar missiles, but...
but with thous point you could shove something even cheesier into the list. I wish that they would have given us a none tau HQ
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

by Vicious Debaters » Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:07 pm

by Tagmatium » Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:40 pm
Vicious Debaters wrote:It's out!
http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catal ... od2430050a
Waaaiit.... 2 units, a full codex, $50? What the fuck- a 72-page book for $50? A whole army with only two new units? I was thinking about trying a full stormtrooper army with proxy Cadians, but this is slightly crazy.
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

by Morrdh » Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:44 pm
Tagmatium wrote:Vicious Debaters wrote:It's out!
http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catal ... od2430050a
Waaaiit.... 2 units, a full codex, $50? What the fuck- a 72-page book for $50? A whole army with only two new units? I was thinking about trying a full stormtrooper army with proxy Cadians, but this is slightly crazy.
That's about what most of the other Army Books/Codices are going for.
It's funny, really. £30 is about what a hardcover army book of the other war game I play costs, but that has got 192 pages and more than twenty army lists. As well as being in full colour and having painting guides and a bit of stuff about each army list.
Shows how much people are willing to pay for GW's stuff.
Albeit, in their defence, unlike Flames of War, GW doesn't have nearly as many schoolboy errors when it comes to spelling, grammar and the apparent inability to proof read or even run their text through MSWord...

by Jormengand » Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:46 pm
Morrdh wrote:Tagmatium wrote:That's about what most of the other Army Books/Codices are going for.
It's funny, really. £30 is about what a hardcover army book of the other war game I play costs, but that has got 192 pages and more than twenty army lists. As well as being in full colour and having painting guides and a bit of stuff about each army list.
Shows how much people are willing to pay for GW's stuff.
Albeit, in their defence, unlike Flames of War, GW doesn't have nearly as many schoolboy errors when it comes to spelling, grammar and the apparent inability to proof read or even run their text through MSWord...
Sorry, just finding it hard to get over the fact that a single IG Heavy Weapons team is now £10 when you used to be able to get an entire squad for £15.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

by Vicious Debaters » Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:52 pm
There's been a lot of ruckus with gaming stores not allowing the online-only codex's and stuff, because it's GW trying to undercut them. Buyer beware!
by Tagmatium » Fri Mar 28, 2014 2:52 pm
Jormengand wrote:Morrdh wrote:
Sorry, just finding it hard to get over the fact that a single IG Heavy Weapons team is now £10 when you used to be able to get an entire squad for £15.
You can get three for £24, and I don't remember ever being able to get three for £15.
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement