Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2018 3:37 pm
-United Republic of Freedonia wrote:hey we're sharing videos?
So that's what Serenity's been doing this whole time.
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
-United Republic of Freedonia wrote:hey we're sharing videos?
The Biggles Syndicate wrote:-United Republic of Freedonia wrote:hey we're sharing videos?
So that's what Serenity's been doing this whole time.
The Biggles Syndicate wrote:-United Republic of Freedonia wrote:hey we're sharing videos?
So that's what Serenity's been doing this whole time.
The Imperial Reach wrote:So I beat Dark Crusade as every faction (except Eldar, because they suck so bad that I had to ragequit when it was just me and the Necrons left and I couldn't take any of their provinces no matter what strategy I employed) and have no moved on to Soulstorm. Haven't gotten very far yet but here's my impression so far:
1. The Sisters of Battle's commander is fucking annoying.
2. The Sisters of Battle is the tackiest faction in the game.
Baltenstein wrote:The Imperial Reach wrote:So I beat Dark Crusade as every faction (except Eldar, because they suck so bad that I had to ragequit when it was just me and the Necrons left and I couldn't take any of their provinces no matter what strategy I employed) and have no moved on to Soulstorm. Haven't gotten very far yet but here's my impression so far:
1. The Sisters of Battle's commander is fucking annoying.
2. The Sisters of Battle is the tackiest faction in the game.
Soulstorm as a whole is pretty much a mess, but the SoB are easily the most unfinished and half-assed aspect of it.
The Imperial Reach wrote:Seriously though Penitent Engines kick ass.
Isilanka wrote:The Imperial Reach wrote:Seriously though Penitent Engines kick ass.
I've always found their design questionable, but hey, you can't really get more 40K than that.
But I've never truly understood what GW actually wants to do with the SoBs. If they want to scratch them or integrate them in another faction, fine, but it makes little sense to leave them around as a sub-par, broken army relying on gimmicky mechanics. Like, GW, if you don't like the SoBs, just say it and don't cast new models for them, it would be clearer.
(My remark goes for both the Dawn of War games and the tabletop game, even though for the tabletop game things got slightly better in the pas few years and the SoBs are now kinda viable, if still horribly gimmicky).
And yeah, Soulstorm is a bloody mess as a whole, with nothing resembling balance and stupid design decisions (like the proliferation of very long-range weaponry in a game with a very zoomed-in camera...)
The Imperial Reach wrote:Isilanka wrote:
I've always found their design questionable, but hey, you can't really get more 40K than that.
But I've never truly understood what GW actually wants to do with the SoBs. If they want to scratch them or integrate them in another faction, fine, but it makes little sense to leave them around as a sub-par, broken army relying on gimmicky mechanics. Like, GW, if you don't like the SoBs, just say it and don't cast new models for them, it would be clearer.
(My remark goes for both the Dawn of War games and the tabletop game, even though for the tabletop game things got slightly better in the pas few years and the SoBs are now kinda viable, if still horribly gimmicky).
And yeah, Soulstorm is a bloody mess as a whole, with nothing resembling balance and stupid design decisions (like the proliferation of very long-range weaponry in a game with a very zoomed-in camera...)
I find most designs in 40k to be questionable, frankly. They usually look very impractical as 40k follows the "Rule of Cool" - that is if it looks cool, then practicality doesn't matter.
Are giant pyramid-fortress-turtle-tanks with gem-lasers practical? No. Are they cool? Yes.
Are tanks the size of a building with 11 guns practical? No. Are they cool? Yes.
Are city-sized mechs with an armada's worth of firepower practical? No. Are they cool? Yes.