Advertisement

by Oppressorion » Sun May 26, 2013 4:01 pm

by Northern Dominus » Sun May 26, 2013 4:02 pm
That's like having one wiki for the Mass Effect games and another one entirely for the books. It maksa no sensa whatsoeva!

by Conscentia » Sun May 26, 2013 4:04 pm
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Oppressorion » Sun May 26, 2013 4:04 pm
Northern Dominus wrote:That's like having one wiki for the Mass Effect games and another one entirely for the books. It maksa no sensa whatsoeva!Wisconsin9 wrote:I think one's for the show, the other for... everything else.
... Sisko would punch the idiot who thought that was a good idea and stare rather balefully at them until the two wikis were made into one most likely.

by Northern Dominus » Sun May 26, 2013 4:05 pm
Doesn't matter. You don't f**k with the Sisko. Eddingtion found that out the hard way.Conscentia wrote:Northern Dominus wrote:That's like having one wiki for the Mass Effect games and another one entirely for the books. It maksa no sensa whatsoeva!
... Sisko would punch the idiot who thought that was a good idea and stare rather balefully at them until the two wikis were made into one most likely.
Non-show stuff isn't considered canon, thus not mixed with the canon stuff.

by New haven america » Sun May 26, 2013 4:11 pm
Helicthon wrote:I grew up with TNG, DS9 and VOY, which might be informing the fact that I don't usually pick a favorite captain or series. I think they all have their own merits:
- TOS is good old-school sci-fi, and Kirk is the quintessential old-sci-fi captain, an intermediate step between Buck Rogers and Jean-Luc Picard.
- TNG is good new-school sci-fi; they had to introduce Riker so someone on that ship would still be getting down with the space women, but someone could be making the grand speeches and ballsy diplomatic/tactical maneuvers without the series losing credibility.
- VOY is cinematic as hell, pure and simple. The sci-fi in some episodes is godawful ("Threshold"... /shudder) but face it, Janeway pulled some badass shit out in the Delta Quadrant that Picard would never dream of doing. (Then again, it was frequently in an alternate timeline before the giant reset button was mashed... YMMV.)
- DS9 is straight-up literature. More than just enjoying their exploits, I actually gave a damn about what happened to those people- the only people who fostered that kind of engagement on TNG were Data with his Pinocchio side-quest and (to a more limited extent) Worf (warrior-guy troubles) and Picard (assimilation). I was sadder when DS9 ended than I was for any other series.
- ENT has its value too, I'm sure, be it perhaps only getting a new generation of people interested in Trek. I don't know, I haven't seen all of it yet, but I certainly don't hate it with the foaming intensity some of my fellow Trekkies do.

by Great Empire of Gamilus » Sun May 26, 2013 4:14 pm

by Oppressorion » Sun May 26, 2013 4:15 pm
by Post War America » Sun May 26, 2013 4:25 pm
Gravlen wrote:The famous Bowling Green Massacre is yesterday's news. Today it's all about the Cricket Blue Carnage. Tomorrow it'll be about the Curling Yellow Annihilation.

by Northern Dominus » Mon May 27, 2013 2:04 pm
And yet Janeway was somehow worse...

by Oppressorion » Mon May 27, 2013 2:06 pm

by Northern Dominus » Mon May 27, 2013 2:27 pm
What genocide are you talking about exactly? Because if it's that whole race with a genetic disease arc then there really wasn't a "right" answer in that case. So they cure the genetic mutations up to that point, but what happens when that disease suddenly accelerates again and degenerates further? Plus bear in mind that episode was subject to executive meddling by UPN when they wanted total agreeance rather than confronting the moral quandary. Plus let's be honest here that second race that the first one was kicking around would either inevitably rise up and lead to some sort of extinction or be wiped out by the more advanced one that was dying anyway, so what exactly is "right" in this situation?

by Oppressorion » Mon May 27, 2013 3:34 pm
Northern Dominus wrote:What genocide are you talking about exactly? Because if it's that whole race with a genetic disease arc
then there really wasn't a "right" answer in that case. So they cure the genetic mutations up to that point, but what happens when that disease suddenly accelerates again and degenerates further?
Plus bear in mind that episode was subject to executive meddling by UPN when they wanted total agreeance rather than confronting the moral quandary.
Plus let's be honest here that second race that the first one was kicking around would either inevitably rise up and lead to some sort of extinction or be wiped out by the more advanced one that was dying anyway, so what exactly is "right" in this situation?
Janeway meanwhile harboured a backstabbing asshole of an unknown alien after he screwed up a potential pass for them,
refused to offer replicators to the Kazon for some high ideal then turned right around and gave that tech to the hirogen after the latter tried to hunt Voyager down,
didn't let the borg and 8472 slug it out and take the long way around,
and all after making the mistake of getting a top-of-the-line starship stupidly flung into the delta quadrant,
and she never beat Paris or Torres with the chain of command before they caused any real damage on top of all of that.

by Northern Dominus » Tue May 28, 2013 5:17 am
Right, so if the first race the Val.... race #1 has a genetic disease that couldn't be cured, and they would probably kill themselves with warp technology in a best-case scenario, and race #2 though more primitive has half a chance of survival, the decision is a bit clearer, not easier but clearer. As most people know genetic conditions aren't the same as any other disease. The problem lies in the very building blocks of a species' DNA, and at the time of Enterprise there seems like it's nowhere near as widespread as it is further on in the timeline. So you have a ship with limited medical supplies and crew fighting off a genetic disease on a planet with less advanced medical resources, not exactly a winning proposition.Oppressorion wrote:Okay, before I start on this, I'm not the most obsessed with Trek, so I may misremember things. I don't have a DVD boxset, just a television. SF Debris has a 14 minute review of the episode in question, and dedicated an entire essay to the subject. This is a hobby for me, but it's his job - yes, really.Northern Dominus wrote:What genocide are you talking about exactly? Because if it's that whole race with a genetic disease arc
Yep.then there really wasn't a "right" answer in that case. So they cure the genetic mutations up to that point, but what happens when that disease suddenly accelerates again and degenerates further?
Why would the cure only work to the current point? Further, how does this disease work? It's apparently programmed into their genes (which totally breaks evolution), but Phlox gets the cure by studying the immune Menk (race no. 2)...who are a totally unrelated species. So of course they couldn't be affected if they can't interbreed with the Valakians (race no.1), and so they can't develop any immunity, which requires exposure to build up a resistance.Plus bear in mind that episode was subject to executive meddling by UPN when they wanted total agreeance rather than confronting the moral quandary.
True, that would be less risky than the episode as-is. But risky =/= good. The whole reason a story can be called risky is that there is a chance of failure, which this did. It gambled...and lost.Plus let's be honest here that second race that the first one was kicking around would either inevitably rise up and lead to some sort of extinction or be wiped out by the more advanced one that was dying anyway, so what exactly is "right" in this situation?
You sure about that? The two races were living together peacefully. The Valakians had lived with the Menk for decades without either killing the other, and if they're dying off then the Mank can just wait them out. If the cure is used, then the Menk can either revolt on their own, or Starfleet can negotiate for civil rights in exchange for trade routes and supplies to help rebuild and the like.Janeway meanwhile harboured a backstabbing asshole of an unknown alien after he screwed up a potential pass for them,
Eh? Can you give a title for that?refused to offer replicators to the Kazon for some high ideal then turned right around and gave that tech to the hirogen after the latter tried to hunt Voyager down,
I'm pretty sure that Voyager gave the Hirogen holographic technology, so that they could hunt fake targets without killing anyone. And yeah, this decision comes back to bite her. As for the Kazon - you don't need high ideals to see why giving them more tech would be a bad idea. Not just because they're so stupidly aggressive that they'll immediately go into civil war, but they're so incredibly, deeply stupid (their idea of a prison is a line you're told not to cross), that they may well take their whole damn sector with them.didn't let the borg and 8472 slug it out and take the long way around,
Voyager was already in Borg space by the time they found out about 8472. Leaving would have meant almost certain destruction by one of them. Look, there are some really, really idiotic decisions Janeway made...
and all after making the mistake of getting a top-of-the-line starship stupidly flung into the delta quadrant,
...like that one, but she didn't choose to let an entire species die.and she never beat Paris or Torres with the chain of command before they caused any real damage on top of all of that.
Can you source them too? I remember Torres was fighting in engineering, but she got disciplined for that.

by Alancar » Tue May 28, 2013 9:51 am

by TaQud » Tue May 28, 2013 1:56 pm

by Connahkstan » Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:04 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement